You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by Thomas Koch <th...@koch.ro> on 2010/04/17 09:20:38 UTC
official GIT repository / switch to GIT?
Hi,
at least since august 2009 nobody has dared to ask this question, so let's
start a flamewar:
Don't you think, it's time for lucene and solr to switch to GIT?
And now seriously:
I did the last packaging of SOLR 1.4 for Debian and I intend to continue doing
so. Since I'm doing the packaging in GIT, I'm asking myself, whether I should
base the packaging GIT repository on the SOLR repo found at git.apache.org?
However if the one from git.a.o is not stable and may crash at any given time,
this would not be a good idea.
And the best thing for those packagers like me would be of course, if the GIT
repo would be the official one.
And I wonder, if there are really people using SVN and downloading douzens of
patch files from jira? Isn't it, that everybody already uses git-svn?
Best regards,
Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: official GIT repository / switch to GIT?
Posted by Andrzej Bialecki <ab...@getopt.org>.
On 2010-04-17 12:57, Earwin Burrfoot wrote:
> Why can't people just use svn or mercurial as a client for subversion
> repository?
> What is the benefit of migrating repository itself?
I think CVS and SVN mentality is too deeply ingrained in the ASF culture
... To Thomas - use git-svn and the problem is solved (for you).
--
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki <><
___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________
[__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration
http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: official GIT repository / switch to GIT?
Posted by Earwin Burrfoot <ea...@gmail.com>.
Why can't people just use svn or mercurial as a client for subversion
repository?
What is the benefit of migrating repository itself?
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 11:20, Thomas Koch <th...@koch.ro> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> at least since august 2009 nobody has dared to ask this question, so let's
> start a flamewar:
> Don't you think, it's time for lucene and solr to switch to GIT?
>
> And now seriously:
> I did the last packaging of SOLR 1.4 for Debian and I intend to continue doing
> so. Since I'm doing the packaging in GIT, I'm asking myself, whether I should
> base the packaging GIT repository on the SOLR repo found at git.apache.org?
> However if the one from git.a.o is not stable and may crash at any given time,
> this would not be a good idea.
> And the best thing for those packagers like me would be of course, if the GIT
> repo would be the official one.
>
> And I wonder, if there are really people using SVN and downloading douzens of
> patch files from jira? Isn't it, that everybody already uses git-svn?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
--
Kirill Zakharenko/Кирилл Захаренко (earwin@gmail.com)
Home / Mobile: +7 (495) 683-567-4 / +7 (903) 5-888-423
ICQ: 104465785
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: official GIT repository / switch to GIT?
Posted by Lance Norskog <go...@gmail.com>.
"What I remember from my last SVN job and see from still not illuminated
collegues: With SVN you tend to have uncommitted code lying around on your
machine for days or even weeks until it's ready to get committed to the
central repository. - I don't need to tell you the problems with this."
Yes. Also, I tend to build up extra files for this and that projects.
Switching branches in place using git forces me to take care of these.
Git is, in general, good stuff. The Eclipse eGIT project is in beta
but I'm finding it easy to use.
On 4/19/10, Thomas Koch <th...@koch.ro> wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Mark Bennett:
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> An interesting thread, thanks for starting it. Since you anticipated my
>> knee-jerk reaction (though I wouldn't have flamed you), I was inspired to
>> go find out a bit more about it.
> Very sympatic. :-)
>
>> The focus on merging is quite interesting.
> It's awesome. wonderful. life changing!
>
>> Not that this is a concern for ASF, but for me I think other aspects of
>> git
>> might cause concern for my commercial clients.
>>
>> 1: Many companies have taken the time to move from CVS to SVN, which was
>> an
>> improvement. And I think most are happy with it. It fixed most of the
>> file locking issues of it's predecessor, though I do hear a fair amount
>> of
>> branch and merge conversations. So I think they think "problem solved",
>> but maybe git could make even more things run smoothly.
> What I remember from my last SVN job and see from still not illuminated
> collegues: With SVN you tend to have uncommitted code lying around on your
> machine for days or even weeks until it's ready to get committed to the
> central repository. - I don't need to tell you the problems with this.
>
>> 2: Actually I think the "distributed" aspect of git might actually make
>> companies nervous. I'm not saying this is justified, I'm talking
>> perception here.
>>
>> This is a true story: A large client sternly reminded everybody about the
>> absolute ban on peer-to-peer and distributed file sharing, and conveying
>> that this could qualify as a first time termination offense. I never got
>> full details, but there had been an incident of an employee intentionally
>> covering their tracks, and for clearly for illegal activities.
>>
>> But I politely pointed out that Bit Torrent, for example, is often used
>> for
>> legitimate like Linux distributions. Given the recent happenings my
>> manager suggested that the company simply didn't want to discuss it. So
>> I
>> dropped it.
>>
>> There's also some mention in the git wiki about where files live and that
>> perhaps companies that are used to backing up centralized repositories
>> might find the git model different (my words)
> I've read several times the misunderstanding, that with GIT you couldn't
> have
> a centraliced repository, since it's decentraliced. But I think most people
> understand when one explains them, that a central GIT repository gets
> central
> just by convention. And of course this can then also be backed up and
> integrated in all kinds of QA tools.
>
>> If the merge-friendly nature of git were seen as valuable enough, I'm sure
>> some companies would revisit their policies.
> I've read stories of entire teams using git-svn against the companies
> official
> SVN repos because they just can't stand it anymore once they got hooked.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
--
Lance Norskog
goksron@gmail.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: official GIT repository / switch to GIT?
Posted by Thomas Koch <th...@koch.ro>.
Hi Mark,
Mark Bennett:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> An interesting thread, thanks for starting it. Since you anticipated my
> knee-jerk reaction (though I wouldn't have flamed you), I was inspired to
> go find out a bit more about it.
Very sympatic. :-)
> The focus on merging is quite interesting.
It's awesome. wonderful. life changing!
> Not that this is a concern for ASF, but for me I think other aspects of git
> might cause concern for my commercial clients.
>
> 1: Many companies have taken the time to move from CVS to SVN, which was an
> improvement. And I think most are happy with it. It fixed most of the
> file locking issues of it's predecessor, though I do hear a fair amount of
> branch and merge conversations. So I think they think "problem solved",
> but maybe git could make even more things run smoothly.
What I remember from my last SVN job and see from still not illuminated
collegues: With SVN you tend to have uncommitted code lying around on your
machine for days or even weeks until it's ready to get committed to the
central repository. - I don't need to tell you the problems with this.
> 2: Actually I think the "distributed" aspect of git might actually make
> companies nervous. I'm not saying this is justified, I'm talking
> perception here.
>
> This is a true story: A large client sternly reminded everybody about the
> absolute ban on peer-to-peer and distributed file sharing, and conveying
> that this could qualify as a first time termination offense. I never got
> full details, but there had been an incident of an employee intentionally
> covering their tracks, and for clearly for illegal activities.
>
> But I politely pointed out that Bit Torrent, for example, is often used for
> legitimate like Linux distributions. Given the recent happenings my
> manager suggested that the company simply didn't want to discuss it. So I
> dropped it.
>
> There's also some mention in the git wiki about where files live and that
> perhaps companies that are used to backing up centralized repositories
> might find the git model different (my words)
I've read several times the misunderstanding, that with GIT you couldn't have
a centraliced repository, since it's decentraliced. But I think most people
understand when one explains them, that a central GIT repository gets central
just by convention. And of course this can then also be backed up and
integrated in all kinds of QA tools.
> If the merge-friendly nature of git were seen as valuable enough, I'm sure
> some companies would revisit their policies.
I've read stories of entire teams using git-svn against the companies official
SVN repos because they just can't stand it anymore once they got hooked.
Best regards,
Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: official GIT repository / switch to GIT?
Posted by Mark Bennett <mb...@ideaeng.com>.
Hi Thomas,
An interesting thread, thanks for starting it. Since you anticipated my
knee-jerk reaction (though I wouldn't have flamed you), I was inspired to go
find out a bit more about it.
The focus on merging is quite interesting.
Not that this is a concern for ASF, but for me I think other aspects of git
might cause concern for my commercial clients.
1: Many companies have taken the time to move from CVS to SVN, which was an
improvement. And I think most are happy with it. It fixed most of the file
locking issues of it's predecessor, though I do hear a fair amount of branch
and merge conversations. So I think they think "problem solved", but maybe
git could make even more things run smoothly.
2: Actually I think the "distributed" aspect of git might actually make
companies nervous. I'm not saying this is justified, I'm talking perception
here.
This is a true story: A large client sternly reminded everybody about the
absolute ban on peer-to-peer and distributed file sharing, and conveying
that this could qualify as a first time termination offense. I never got
full details, but there had been an incident of an employee intentionally
covering their tracks, and for clearly for illegal activities.
But I politely pointed out that Bit Torrent, for example, is often used for
legitimate like Linux distributions. Given the recent happenings my manager
suggested that the company simply didn't want to discuss it. So I dropped
it.
There's also some mention in the git wiki about where files live and that
perhaps companies that are used to backing up centralized repositories might
find the git model different (my words)
If the merge-friendly nature of git were seen as valuable enough, I'm sure
some companies would revisit their policies.
--
Mark Bennett / New Idea Engineering, Inc. / mbennett@ideaeng.com
Direct: 408-733-0387 / Main: 866-IDEA-ENG / Cell: 408-829-6513
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 12:20 AM, Thomas Koch <th...@koch.ro> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> at least since august 2009 nobody has dared to ask this question, so let's
> start a flamewar:
> Don't you think, it's time for lucene and solr to switch to GIT?
>
> And now seriously:
> I did the last packaging of SOLR 1.4 for Debian and I intend to continue
> doing
> so. Since I'm doing the packaging in GIT, I'm asking myself, whether I
> should
> base the packaging GIT repository on the SOLR repo found at git.apache.org
> ?
> However if the one from git.a.o is not stable and may crash at any given
> time,
> this would not be a good idea.
> And the best thing for those packagers like me would be of course, if the
> GIT
> repo would be the official one.
>
> And I wonder, if there are really people using SVN and downloading douzens
> of
> patch files from jira? Isn't it, that everybody already uses git-svn?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
Re: official GIT repository / switch to GIT?
Posted by Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>.
It's not up to Lucene and Solr, as it is an Apache Infrastructure thing. It is also unclear as to provenance w/ GIT. So, even for all of GITs benefits, it's a non-starter at this point Foundation wise, so no need for a flamewar at all.
For the record, yes, I deal with dozens of patches at a time through SVN, and I suspect most other committers do too.
On Apr 17, 2010, at 3:20 AM, Thomas Koch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> at least since august 2009 nobody has dared to ask this question, so let's
> start a flamewar:
> Don't you think, it's time for lucene and solr to switch to GIT?
>
> And now seriously:
> I did the last packaging of SOLR 1.4 for Debian and I intend to continue doing
> so. Since I'm doing the packaging in GIT, I'm asking myself, whether I should
> base the packaging GIT repository on the SOLR repo found at git.apache.org?
> However if the one from git.a.o is not stable and may crash at any given time,
> this would not be a good idea.
> And the best thing for those packagers like me would be of course, if the GIT
> repo would be the official one.
>
> And I wonder, if there are really people using SVN and downloading douzens of
> patch files from jira? Isn't it, that everybody already uses git-svn?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: official GIT repository / switch to GIT?
Posted by Jake Mannix <ja...@gmail.com>.
Thomas,
As you could have found out by reading the exact same thread which
comes up every time someone asks this question, no ASF project will
be on git at any point in the forseeable future.
And no, most people I know of use git-svn. They do it "the old
fashioned way", with multiple checkouts and downloaded patches.
But Grant - I don't think the provenance of the code is much of
a problem, you could certainly still have only "committers" have
write access to the "master" git repo, right? It's not like the
Linux source tree has any trouble keeping track of where stuff
comes from, and they've got even more reason to make sure that
their code is of reliable provenance than ours.
It would just take a huge change of culture to get that kind of
thinking in the Apache world, and so it's not going to happen until
the majority of the committers have been primarily using git (or
something like it - on other projects, for other reasons) for many
years.
-jake
-jake
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 12:20 AM, Thomas Koch <th...@koch.ro> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> at least since august 2009 nobody has dared to ask this question, so let's
> start a flamewar:
> Don't you think, it's time for lucene and solr to switch to GIT?
>
> And now seriously:
> I did the last packaging of SOLR 1.4 for Debian and I intend to continue
> doing
> so. Since I'm doing the packaging in GIT, I'm asking myself, whether I
> should
> base the packaging GIT repository on the SOLR repo found at git.apache.org
> ?
> However if the one from git.a.o is not stable and may crash at any given
> time,
> this would not be a good idea.
> And the best thing for those packagers like me would be of course, if the
> GIT
> repo would be the official one.
>
> And I wonder, if there are really people using SVN and downloading douzens
> of
> patch files from jira? Isn't it, that everybody already uses git-svn?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
Re: official GIT repository / switch to GIT?
Posted by Lance Norskog <go...@gmail.com>.
Yeah I forgot about that. But yes, I'm running from the apache
lucene-solr GIT with Eclipse & 'egit'. Egit is in beta but I'm a git
rookie & haven't tripped over anything major.
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Earwin Burrfoot <ea...@gmail.com> wrote:
> O, I don't really care myself (= won't notice it not showing up), I'm
> on mercurial :)
> Just pointed out the dead link.
>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 03:27, Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 1:18 AM, Earwin Burrfoot <ea...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Aha, missed that. Github's not yet synced though, says - that page
>>> doesn't exist!
>>
>> Github pulls new mirrors from us only every now and then. If it
>> doesn't show up within the next few days, you may want to contact
>> their support for the status.
>>
>> BR,
>>
>> Jukka Zitting
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Kirill Zakharenko/Кирилл Захаренко (earwin@gmail.com)
> Home / Mobile: +7 (495) 683-567-4 / +7 (903) 5-888-423
> ICQ: 104465785
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
--
Lance Norskog
goksron@gmail.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: official GIT repository / switch to GIT?
Posted by Earwin Burrfoot <ea...@gmail.com>.
O, I don't really care myself (= won't notice it not showing up), I'm
on mercurial :)
Just pointed out the dead link.
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 03:27, Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 1:18 AM, Earwin Burrfoot <ea...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Aha, missed that. Github's not yet synced though, says - that page
>> doesn't exist!
>
> Github pulls new mirrors from us only every now and then. If it
> doesn't show up within the next few days, you may want to contact
> their support for the status.
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
--
Kirill Zakharenko/Кирилл Захаренко (earwin@gmail.com)
Home / Mobile: +7 (495) 683-567-4 / +7 (903) 5-888-423
ICQ: 104465785
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: official GIT repository / switch to GIT?
Posted by Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 1:18 AM, Earwin Burrfoot <ea...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Aha, missed that. Github's not yet synced though, says - that page
> doesn't exist!
Github pulls new mirrors from us only every now and then. If it
doesn't show up within the next few days, you may want to contact
their support for the status.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: official GIT repository / switch to GIT?
Posted by Earwin Burrfoot <ea...@gmail.com>.
Aha, missed that. Github's not yet synced though, says - that page
doesn't exist!
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 02:58, Lance Norskog <go...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Already done.
>
> http://github.com/apache/lucene-solr
>
> Search for git.apache.org for 'lucene' and you'll see.
>
> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Earwin Burrfoot <ea...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> These are broken, by the way.
>> We need to kick someone to merge entries for lucene&solr and point
>> them to a new svn url.
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 04:10, John Wang <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Thomas:
>>> There is a git mirror already: http://github.com/apache/lucene
>>> All of apache projects are: http://git.apache.org/
>>> You are free to use git. Apache is running a git-svn server somewhere,
>>> although the repository itself is not git, but you can use it as one.
>>> Hope this helps.
>>> -John
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> In my opinion: Definitely NOT!
>>>>
>>>> -----
>>>> Uwe Schindler
>>>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>>>> http://www.thetaphi.de
>>>> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>>> > From: Thomas Koch [mailto:thomas@koch.ro]
>>>> > Sent: Saturday, April 17, 2010 9:21 AM
>>>> > To: solr-dev; java-dev@lucene.apache.org
>>>> > Subject: official GIT repository / switch to GIT?
>>>> >
>>>> > Hi,
>>>> >
>>>> > at least since august 2009 nobody has dared to ask this question, so
>>>> > let's
>>>> > start a flamewar:
>>>> > Don't you think, it's time for lucene and solr to switch to GIT?
>>>> >
>>>> > And now seriously:
>>>> > I did the last packaging of SOLR 1.4 for Debian and I intend to
>>>> > continue doing
>>>> > so. Since I'm doing the packaging in GIT, I'm asking myself, whether I
>>>> > should
>>>> > base the packaging GIT repository on the SOLR repo found at
>>>> > git.apache.org?
>>>> > However if the one from git.a.o is not stable and may crash at any
>>>> > given time,
>>>> > this would not be a good idea.
>>>> > And the best thing for those packagers like me would be of course, if
>>>> > the GIT
>>>> > repo would be the official one.
>>>> >
>>>> > And I wonder, if there are really people using SVN and downloading
>>>> > douzens of
>>>> > patch files from jira? Isn't it, that everybody already uses git-svn?
>>>> >
>>>> > Best regards,
>>>> >
>>>> > Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro
>>>> >
>>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Kirill Zakharenko/Кирилл Захаренко (earwin@gmail.com)
>> Home / Mobile: +7 (495) 683-567-4 / +7 (903) 5-888-423
>> ICQ: 104465785
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Lance Norskog
> goksron@gmail.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
--
Kirill Zakharenko/Кирилл Захаренко (earwin@gmail.com)
Home / Mobile: +7 (495) 683-567-4 / +7 (903) 5-888-423
ICQ: 104465785
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: official GIT repository / switch to GIT?
Posted by Lance Norskog <go...@gmail.com>.
Already done.
http://github.com/apache/lucene-solr
Search for git.apache.org for 'lucene' and you'll see.
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Earwin Burrfoot <ea...@gmail.com> wrote:
> These are broken, by the way.
> We need to kick someone to merge entries for lucene&solr and point
> them to a new svn url.
>
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 04:10, John Wang <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Thomas:
>> There is a git mirror already: http://github.com/apache/lucene
>> All of apache projects are: http://git.apache.org/
>> You are free to use git. Apache is running a git-svn server somewhere,
>> although the repository itself is not git, but you can use it as one.
>> Hope this helps.
>> -John
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> In my opinion: Definitely NOT!
>>>
>>> -----
>>> Uwe Schindler
>>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>>> http://www.thetaphi.de
>>> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>>>
>>>
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> > From: Thomas Koch [mailto:thomas@koch.ro]
>>> > Sent: Saturday, April 17, 2010 9:21 AM
>>> > To: solr-dev; java-dev@lucene.apache.org
>>> > Subject: official GIT repository / switch to GIT?
>>> >
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > at least since august 2009 nobody has dared to ask this question, so
>>> > let's
>>> > start a flamewar:
>>> > Don't you think, it's time for lucene and solr to switch to GIT?
>>> >
>>> > And now seriously:
>>> > I did the last packaging of SOLR 1.4 for Debian and I intend to
>>> > continue doing
>>> > so. Since I'm doing the packaging in GIT, I'm asking myself, whether I
>>> > should
>>> > base the packaging GIT repository on the SOLR repo found at
>>> > git.apache.org?
>>> > However if the one from git.a.o is not stable and may crash at any
>>> > given time,
>>> > this would not be a good idea.
>>> > And the best thing for those packagers like me would be of course, if
>>> > the GIT
>>> > repo would be the official one.
>>> >
>>> > And I wonder, if there are really people using SVN and downloading
>>> > douzens of
>>> > patch files from jira? Isn't it, that everybody already uses git-svn?
>>> >
>>> > Best regards,
>>> >
>>> > Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro
>>> >
>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Kirill Zakharenko/Кирилл Захаренко (earwin@gmail.com)
> Home / Mobile: +7 (495) 683-567-4 / +7 (903) 5-888-423
> ICQ: 104465785
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
--
Lance Norskog
goksron@gmail.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: official GIT repository / switch to GIT?
Posted by Earwin Burrfoot <ea...@gmail.com>.
These are broken, by the way.
We need to kick someone to merge entries for lucene&solr and point
them to a new svn url.
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 04:10, John Wang <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Thomas:
> There is a git mirror already: http://github.com/apache/lucene
> All of apache projects are: http://git.apache.org/
> You are free to use git. Apache is running a git-svn server somewhere,
> although the repository itself is not git, but you can use it as one.
> Hope this helps.
> -John
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> In my opinion: Definitely NOT!
>>
>> -----
>> Uwe Schindler
>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>> http://www.thetaphi.de
>> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>>
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Thomas Koch [mailto:thomas@koch.ro]
>> > Sent: Saturday, April 17, 2010 9:21 AM
>> > To: solr-dev; java-dev@lucene.apache.org
>> > Subject: official GIT repository / switch to GIT?
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > at least since august 2009 nobody has dared to ask this question, so
>> > let's
>> > start a flamewar:
>> > Don't you think, it's time for lucene and solr to switch to GIT?
>> >
>> > And now seriously:
>> > I did the last packaging of SOLR 1.4 for Debian and I intend to
>> > continue doing
>> > so. Since I'm doing the packaging in GIT, I'm asking myself, whether I
>> > should
>> > base the packaging GIT repository on the SOLR repo found at
>> > git.apache.org?
>> > However if the one from git.a.o is not stable and may crash at any
>> > given time,
>> > this would not be a good idea.
>> > And the best thing for those packagers like me would be of course, if
>> > the GIT
>> > repo would be the official one.
>> >
>> > And I wonder, if there are really people using SVN and downloading
>> > douzens of
>> > patch files from jira? Isn't it, that everybody already uses git-svn?
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> >
>> > Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>
>
--
Kirill Zakharenko/Кирилл Захаренко (earwin@gmail.com)
Home / Mobile: +7 (495) 683-567-4 / +7 (903) 5-888-423
ICQ: 104465785
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: official GIT repository / switch to GIT?
Posted by John Wang <jo...@gmail.com>.
Hi Thomas:
There is a git mirror already: http://github.com/apache/lucene
All of apache projects are: http://git.apache.org/
You are free to use git. Apache is running a git-svn server somewhere,
although the repository itself is not git, but you can use it as one.
Hope this helps.
-John
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In my opinion: Definitely NOT!
>
> -----
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Thomas Koch [mailto:thomas@koch.ro]
> > Sent: Saturday, April 17, 2010 9:21 AM
> > To: solr-dev; java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: official GIT repository / switch to GIT?
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > at least since august 2009 nobody has dared to ask this question, so
> > let's
> > start a flamewar:
> > Don't you think, it's time for lucene and solr to switch to GIT?
> >
> > And now seriously:
> > I did the last packaging of SOLR 1.4 for Debian and I intend to
> > continue doing
> > so. Since I'm doing the packaging in GIT, I'm asking myself, whether I
> > should
> > base the packaging GIT repository on the SOLR repo found at
> > git.apache.org?
> > However if the one from git.a.o is not stable and may crash at any
> > given time,
> > this would not be a good idea.
> > And the best thing for those packagers like me would be of course, if
> > the GIT
> > repo would be the official one.
> >
> > And I wonder, if there are really people using SVN and downloading
> > douzens of
> > patch files from jira? Isn't it, that everybody already uses git-svn?
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
RE: official GIT repository / switch to GIT?
Posted by Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de>.
Hi,
In my opinion: Definitely NOT!
-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Koch [mailto:thomas@koch.ro]
> Sent: Saturday, April 17, 2010 9:21 AM
> To: solr-dev; java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: official GIT repository / switch to GIT?
>
> Hi,
>
> at least since august 2009 nobody has dared to ask this question, so
> let's
> start a flamewar:
> Don't you think, it's time for lucene and solr to switch to GIT?
>
> And now seriously:
> I did the last packaging of SOLR 1.4 for Debian and I intend to
> continue doing
> so. Since I'm doing the packaging in GIT, I'm asking myself, whether I
> should
> base the packaging GIT repository on the SOLR repo found at
> git.apache.org?
> However if the one from git.a.o is not stable and may crash at any
> given time,
> this would not be a good idea.
> And the best thing for those packagers like me would be of course, if
> the GIT
> repo would be the official one.
>
> And I wonder, if there are really people using SVN and downloading
> douzens of
> patch files from jira? Isn't it, that everybody already uses git-svn?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: official GIT repository / switch to GIT?
Posted by Robert Muir <rc...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Thomas Koch <th...@koch.ro> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> at least since august 2009 nobody has dared to ask this question, so let's
> start a flamewar:
> Don't you think, it's time for lucene and solr to switch to GIT?
>
Since, you asked: No.
> And I wonder, if there are really people using SVN and downloading douzens
> of
> patch files from jira? Isn't it, that everybody already uses git-svn?
>
>
No.
--
Robert Muir
rcmuir@gmail.com