[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2694) MTQ rewrite + weight/scorer init should be single pass

["Robert Muir (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12979562#action_12979562 ] 

Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2694:
-------------------------------------

One question, I'm look at the definition of TermState:
{noformat}
Holds all state required for {@link TermsEnum} to produce a {@link DocsEnum} without re-seeking the terms dict.
{noformat}

So why do we have seek(BytesRef, TermState)
shouldnt it just be seek(Termstate) ?
I think its confusing it takes an unnecessary bytes parameter.

> MTQ rewrite + weight/scorer init should be single pass
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2694
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2694
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Search
>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>            Assignee: Simon Willnauer
>             Fix For: 4.0
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2694-FTE.patch, LUCENE-2694.patch, LUCENE-2694.patch, LUCENE-2694.patch, LUCENE-2694.patch, LUCENE-2694.patch, LUCENE-2694.patch, LUCENE-2694.patch
>
>
> Spinoff of LUCENE-2690 (see the hacked patch on that issue)...
> Once we fix MTQ rewrite to be per-segment, we should take it further and make weight/scorer init also run in the same single pass as rewrite.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org