You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by David Jiménez Domínguez <dj...@correo.seguridad.unam.mx> on 2004/07/12 22:23:03 UTC
autolearn problem
Hi lists!!
I'm using Amavis-New with SA and Postfix. When I check the Spam in the
quarantine directory, all the messages doesn't have the autolearn label in the
headers (Neither autolearn=no, nor autolearn=SPAM / HAM). This is my local.cf:
require_version 2.63
required_hits 5.0
rewrite_subject 0
subject_tag *****SPAM*****
report_safe 1
use_terse_report 0
use_bayes 1
bayes_auto_learn 1
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam 0.1
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam 10.0
bayes_min_ham_num 200
bayes_min_spam_num 200
bayes_path /var/amavis/.spamassassin/bayes
bayes_file_mode 0770
auto_learn 1
rbl_timeout 8
use_razor2 0
use_dcc 0
use_pyzor 0
ok_languages en es
ok_locales en
and this is an Spam header...
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=11.8 tag1=-999.0 tag2=3.0 kill=5.0 tests=ALL_NATURAL,
BANG_GUARANTEE, BAYES_99, HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,
HTML_FONT_BIG, HTML_MESSAGE, MIME_HTML_ONLY, MONEY_BACK
X-Spam-Level: ***********
What is wrong??? Please help me
David Jimenez.
Re: autolearn problem
Posted by Tom Meunier <to...@mvps.org>.
David Jiménez Domínguez wrote:
>Hi lists!!
>
>I'm using Amavis-New with SA and Postfix. When I check the Spam in the
>quarantine directory, all the messages doesn't have the autolearn label in the
>headers (Neither autolearn=no, nor autolearn=SPAM / HAM). This is my local.cf:
>
>bayes_auto_learn 1
>bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam 0.1
>bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam 10.0
>
>
>
>and this is an Spam header...
>
>X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=11.8 tag1=-999.0 tag2=3.0 kill=5.0 tests=ALL_NATURAL,
> BANG_GUARANTEE, BAYES_99, HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,
> HTML_FONT_BIG, HTML_MESSAGE, MIME_HTML_ONLY, MONEY_BACK
>X-Spam-Level: ***********
>
>What is wrong??? Please help me
>
>
The pre-Bayes score is not over 10.0, which is your threshold for
autolearning. Without parsing the individual scores, keep in mind you
have to have a certain number of points from header and body tests also
- it looks like you have 0.0 from headers.
--
-tom
Re: autolearn problem
Posted by Matt Kettler <mk...@comcast.net>.
At 03:23 PM 7/12/04 -0500, David Jiménez Domínguez wrote:
>Hi lists!!
>
>I'm using Amavis-New with SA and Postfix. When I check the Spam in the
>quarantine directory, all the messages doesn't have the autolearn label in the
>headers (Neither autolearn=no, nor autolearn=SPAM / HAM). This is my local.cf:
Under amavis spamassassin does NOT generate the message headers or tagging,
this is ENTIRELY done by amavis itself, which only uses information that SA
provides.
Thus, the inclusion or not of an autolearn header is an amavis feature.
Also, for reference the example message in question would not have been
autolearned. The autolearn threshold is 10, the TOTAL message score was
11.8, but the pre-bayes score was substantially lower. Autolearning is done
based on calculating the message score as if bayes was entirely disabled
(no BAYES_* rules, and the appropriate change to using scoreset 0 or 1 is
made). This score can be vastly different from the total score.
Autolearning as spam also requires at least 3 points from header tests, and
this message had 0, so it wouldn't have learned for that reason as well.
>and this is an Spam header...
>
>X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=11.8 tag1=-999.0 tag2=3.0 kill=5.0 tests=ALL_NATURAL,
> BANG_GUARANTEE, BAYES_99, HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,
> HTML_FONT_BIG, HTML_MESSAGE, MIME_HTML_ONLY, MONEY_BACK
>X-Spam-Level: ***********
>
>What is wrong??? Please help me
>
>
>David Jimenez.