You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@bookkeeper.apache.org by Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com> on 2014/10/03 10:55:42 UTC
[VOTE] BookKeeper 4.3.0 Release Candidate 0
This is the first release candidate for Apache BookKeeper, version 4.3.0.
It fixes the following issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12323267&styleName=Html&projectId=12311293
*** Please download, test and vote by Oct 7th 2014, 00:00 GMT.
Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided
for convenience.
Source and binary files:
http://people.apache.org/~sijie/bookkeeper-4.3.0-candidate-0/
Maven staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-1002/
The tag to be voted upon:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/tags/release-4.3.0/
BookKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/dist/KEYS
Please download the the source package, and follow the README to build
and run a bookkeeper and hedwig service.
Re: [VOTE] BookKeeper 4.3.0 Release Candidate 0
Posted by Flavio Junqueira <fp...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
Just one clarification about licenses. The release management guidelines say that the license file needs to include the licenses for all the files in the package. My understanding is that we don't need to include any because all our dependencies, specifically the non-apache licensed, aren't included in the package but downloaded as part of the maven build process.
Otherwise, it looks good to me.
-Flavio
On 04 Oct 2014, at 14:58, Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 6:35 AM, Rakesh R <ra...@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Sijie!
>>
>> Built from source and ran some tests. It looks OK.
>>
>>
>> I've few observations. Please have a look at the following:
>>
>> 1)
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/tags/release-4.3.0/README
>>
>> "BookKeeper project contains:" section missing the following projects info.
>> - bookkeeper-stats (Stats API for bookkeeper)
>> - hedwig-client-jms (Hedwig client jms)
>>
>
> Good catch.
>
>
>>
>> 2) 4.3.0 Summary page is showing the due date quite old "Due:03/Feb/14",
>> can we update this?
>>
>
> Well, I think the due date is the planned release date. we'd better not
> change it. The CHANGES.txt already reflects the correct release date.
>
>
>> Best Regards,
>> Rakesh
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sijie Guo [mailto:guosijie@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 03 October 2014 14:26
>> To: bookkeeper-dev@zookeeper.apache.org
>> Subject: [VOTE] BookKeeper 4.3.0 Release Candidate 0
>>
>> This is the first release candidate for Apache BookKeeper, version 4.3.0.
>>
>> It fixes the following issues:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12323267&styleName=Html&projectId=12311293
>>
>> *** Please download, test and vote by Oct 7th 2014, 00:00 GMT.
>>
>> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided for
>> convenience.
>>
>> Source and binary files:
>> http://people.apache.org/~sijie/bookkeeper-4.3.0-candidate-0/
>>
>> Maven staging repo:
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-1002/
>>
>> The tag to be voted upon:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/tags/release-4.3.0/
>>
>> BookKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/dist/KEYS
>>
>> Please download the the source package, and follow the README to build and
>> run a bookkeeper and hedwig service.
>>
Re: [VOTE] BookKeeper 4.3.0 Release Candidate 0
Posted by Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com>.
yup. the only license used in the files included in the package is APACHE
license.
All other licenses are include by dependency and mentioned in NOTICE file.
You could check it.
- Sijie
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Flavio Junqueira <
fpjunqueira@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
> About licenses, as per the release management guide, here is what needs to
> happen:
>
> All the licenses on all the files to be included within a package
> should be included in the LICENSE document.
>
>
> The link is this:
>
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-license
>
> -Flavio
>
>
>
> On Monday, October 6, 2014 6:46 PM, Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> >
> >
> >On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Flavio Junqueira <
> >fpjunqueira@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
> >
> >> -1 on invalidating the rc because of the readme file. It is a trivial
> bug
> >> we can fix in 4.3.1 and doesn't seem hurt us in any meaningful way.
> >>
> >
> >Moved https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-789 to 4.3.1.
> >
> >
> >>
> >> I'd like to have a confirmation about licenses that I asked in a
> previous
> >> message for peace of mind.
> >>
> >
> >I think the license is for what license that used for this project, which
> >is apache license. for other dependencies that bookkeeper uses, they would
> >be listed in NOTICE file in the binary package, we just need to ensure
> >their licenses are compatible.
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> >> -Flavio
> >>
> >> On 04 Oct 2014, at 14:58, Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 6:35 AM, Rakesh R <ra...@huawei.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Thanks Sijie!
> >> >>
> >> >> Built from source and ran some tests. It looks OK.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> I've few observations. Please have a look at the following:
> >> >>
> >> >> 1)
> >> >>
> >>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/tags/release-4.3.0/README
> >> >>
> >> >> "BookKeeper project contains:" section missing the following projects
> >> info.
> >> >> - bookkeeper-stats (Stats API for bookkeeper)
> >> >> - hedwig-client-jms (Hedwig client jms)
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Good catch.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> 2) 4.3.0 Summary page is showing the due date quite old
> "Due:03/Feb/14",
> >> >> can we update this?
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Well, I think the due date is the planned release date. we'd better
> not
> >> > change it. The CHANGES.txt already reflects the correct release date.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> Best Regards,
> >> >> Rakesh
> >> >>
> >> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> >> From: Sijie Guo [mailto:guosijie@gmail.com]
> >> >> Sent: 03 October 2014 14:26
> >> >> To: bookkeeper-dev@zookeeper.apache.org
> >> >> Subject: [VOTE] BookKeeper 4.3.0 Release Candidate 0
> >> >>
> >> >> This is the first release candidate for Apache BookKeeper, version
> >> 4.3.0.
> >> >>
> >> >> It fixes the following issues:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12323267&styleName=Html&projectId=12311293
> >> >>
> >> >> *** Please download, test and vote by Oct 7th 2014, 00:00 GMT.
> >> >>
> >> >> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided
> for
> >> >> convenience.
> >> >>
> >> >> Source and binary files:
> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~sijie/bookkeeper-4.3.0-candidate-0/
> >> >>
> >> >> Maven staging repo:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-1002/
> >> >>
> >> >> The tag to be voted upon:
> >> >>
> >>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/tags/release-4.3.0/
> >> >>
> >> >> BookKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
> release:
> >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/dist/KEYS
> >> >>
> >> >> Please download the the source package, and follow the README to
> build
> >> and
> >> >> run a bookkeeper and hedwig service.
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] BookKeeper 4.3.0 Release Candidate 0
Posted by Flavio Junqueira <fp...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
About licenses, as per the release management guide, here is what needs to happen:
All the licenses on all the files to be included within a package
should be included in the LICENSE document.
The link is this:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-license
-Flavio
On Monday, October 6, 2014 6:46 PM, Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Flavio Junqueira <
>fpjunqueira@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
>
>> -1 on invalidating the rc because of the readme file. It is a trivial bug
>> we can fix in 4.3.1 and doesn't seem hurt us in any meaningful way.
>>
>
>Moved https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-789 to 4.3.1.
>
>
>>
>> I'd like to have a confirmation about licenses that I asked in a previous
>> message for peace of mind.
>>
>
>I think the license is for what license that used for this project, which
>is apache license. for other dependencies that bookkeeper uses, they would
>be listed in NOTICE file in the binary package, we just need to ensure
>their licenses are compatible.
>
>
>
>>
>> -Flavio
>>
>> On 04 Oct 2014, at 14:58, Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 6:35 AM, Rakesh R <ra...@huawei.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Thanks Sijie!
>> >>
>> >> Built from source and ran some tests. It looks OK.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I've few observations. Please have a look at the following:
>> >>
>> >> 1)
>> >>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/tags/release-4.3.0/README
>> >>
>> >> "BookKeeper project contains:" section missing the following projects
>> info.
>> >> - bookkeeper-stats (Stats API for bookkeeper)
>> >> - hedwig-client-jms (Hedwig client jms)
>> >>
>> >
>> > Good catch.
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> 2) 4.3.0 Summary page is showing the due date quite old "Due:03/Feb/14",
>> >> can we update this?
>> >>
>> >
>> > Well, I think the due date is the planned release date. we'd better not
>> > change it. The CHANGES.txt already reflects the correct release date.
>> >
>> >
>> >> Best Regards,
>> >> Rakesh
>> >>
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Sijie Guo [mailto:guosijie@gmail.com]
>> >> Sent: 03 October 2014 14:26
>> >> To: bookkeeper-dev@zookeeper.apache.org
>> >> Subject: [VOTE] BookKeeper 4.3.0 Release Candidate 0
>> >>
>> >> This is the first release candidate for Apache BookKeeper, version
>> 4.3.0.
>> >>
>> >> It fixes the following issues:
>> >>
>> >>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12323267&styleName=Html&projectId=12311293
>> >>
>> >> *** Please download, test and vote by Oct 7th 2014, 00:00 GMT.
>> >>
>> >> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided for
>> >> convenience.
>> >>
>> >> Source and binary files:
>> >> http://people.apache.org/~sijie/bookkeeper-4.3.0-candidate-0/
>> >>
>> >> Maven staging repo:
>> >>
>> >>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-1002/
>> >>
>> >> The tag to be voted upon:
>> >>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/tags/release-4.3.0/
>> >>
>> >> BookKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
>> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/dist/KEYS
>> >>
>> >> Please download the the source package, and follow the README to build
>> and
>> >> run a bookkeeper and hedwig service.
>> >>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] BookKeeper 4.3.0 Release Candidate 0
Posted by Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Flavio Junqueira <
fpjunqueira@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
> -1 on invalidating the rc because of the readme file. It is a trivial bug
> we can fix in 4.3.1 and doesn't seem hurt us in any meaningful way.
>
Moved https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-789 to 4.3.1.
>
> I'd like to have a confirmation about licenses that I asked in a previous
> message for peace of mind.
>
I think the license is for what license that used for this project, which
is apache license. for other dependencies that bookkeeper uses, they would
be listed in NOTICE file in the binary package, we just need to ensure
their licenses are compatible.
>
> -Flavio
>
> On 04 Oct 2014, at 14:58, Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 6:35 AM, Rakesh R <ra...@huawei.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks Sijie!
> >>
> >> Built from source and ran some tests. It looks OK.
> >>
> >>
> >> I've few observations. Please have a look at the following:
> >>
> >> 1)
> >>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/tags/release-4.3.0/README
> >>
> >> "BookKeeper project contains:" section missing the following projects
> info.
> >> - bookkeeper-stats (Stats API for bookkeeper)
> >> - hedwig-client-jms (Hedwig client jms)
> >>
> >
> > Good catch.
> >
> >
> >>
> >> 2) 4.3.0 Summary page is showing the due date quite old "Due:03/Feb/14",
> >> can we update this?
> >>
> >
> > Well, I think the due date is the planned release date. we'd better not
> > change it. The CHANGES.txt already reflects the correct release date.
> >
> >
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Rakesh
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Sijie Guo [mailto:guosijie@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: 03 October 2014 14:26
> >> To: bookkeeper-dev@zookeeper.apache.org
> >> Subject: [VOTE] BookKeeper 4.3.0 Release Candidate 0
> >>
> >> This is the first release candidate for Apache BookKeeper, version
> 4.3.0.
> >>
> >> It fixes the following issues:
> >>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12323267&styleName=Html&projectId=12311293
> >>
> >> *** Please download, test and vote by Oct 7th 2014, 00:00 GMT.
> >>
> >> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided for
> >> convenience.
> >>
> >> Source and binary files:
> >> http://people.apache.org/~sijie/bookkeeper-4.3.0-candidate-0/
> >>
> >> Maven staging repo:
> >>
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-1002/
> >>
> >> The tag to be voted upon:
> >>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/tags/release-4.3.0/
> >>
> >> BookKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/dist/KEYS
> >>
> >> Please download the the source package, and follow the README to build
> and
> >> run a bookkeeper and hedwig service.
> >>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] BookKeeper 4.3.0 Release Candidate 0
Posted by Flavio Junqueira <fp...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
-1 on invalidating the rc because of the readme file. It is a trivial bug we can fix in 4.3.1 and doesn't seem hurt us in any meaningful way.
I'd like to have a confirmation about licenses that I asked in a previous message for peace of mind.
-Flavio
On 04 Oct 2014, at 14:58, Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 6:35 AM, Rakesh R <ra...@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Sijie!
>>
>> Built from source and ran some tests. It looks OK.
>>
>>
>> I've few observations. Please have a look at the following:
>>
>> 1)
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/tags/release-4.3.0/README
>>
>> "BookKeeper project contains:" section missing the following projects info.
>> - bookkeeper-stats (Stats API for bookkeeper)
>> - hedwig-client-jms (Hedwig client jms)
>>
>
> Good catch.
>
>
>>
>> 2) 4.3.0 Summary page is showing the due date quite old "Due:03/Feb/14",
>> can we update this?
>>
>
> Well, I think the due date is the planned release date. we'd better not
> change it. The CHANGES.txt already reflects the correct release date.
>
>
>> Best Regards,
>> Rakesh
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sijie Guo [mailto:guosijie@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 03 October 2014 14:26
>> To: bookkeeper-dev@zookeeper.apache.org
>> Subject: [VOTE] BookKeeper 4.3.0 Release Candidate 0
>>
>> This is the first release candidate for Apache BookKeeper, version 4.3.0.
>>
>> It fixes the following issues:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12323267&styleName=Html&projectId=12311293
>>
>> *** Please download, test and vote by Oct 7th 2014, 00:00 GMT.
>>
>> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided for
>> convenience.
>>
>> Source and binary files:
>> http://people.apache.org/~sijie/bookkeeper-4.3.0-candidate-0/
>>
>> Maven staging repo:
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-1002/
>>
>> The tag to be voted upon:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/tags/release-4.3.0/
>>
>> BookKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/dist/KEYS
>>
>> Please download the the source package, and follow the README to build and
>> run a bookkeeper and hedwig service.
>>
Re: [VOTE] BookKeeper 4.3.0 Release Candidate 0
Posted by Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 6:35 AM, Rakesh R <ra...@huawei.com> wrote:
> Thanks Sijie!
>
> Built from source and ran some tests. It looks OK.
>
>
> I've few observations. Please have a look at the following:
>
> 1)
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/tags/release-4.3.0/README
>
> "BookKeeper project contains:" section missing the following projects info.
> - bookkeeper-stats (Stats API for bookkeeper)
> - hedwig-client-jms (Hedwig client jms)
>
Good catch.
>
> 2) 4.3.0 Summary page is showing the due date quite old "Due:03/Feb/14",
> can we update this?
>
Well, I think the due date is the planned release date. we'd better not
change it. The CHANGES.txt already reflects the correct release date.
> Best Regards,
> Rakesh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sijie Guo [mailto:guosijie@gmail.com]
> Sent: 03 October 2014 14:26
> To: bookkeeper-dev@zookeeper.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] BookKeeper 4.3.0 Release Candidate 0
>
> This is the first release candidate for Apache BookKeeper, version 4.3.0.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12323267&styleName=Html&projectId=12311293
>
> *** Please download, test and vote by Oct 7th 2014, 00:00 GMT.
>
> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided for
> convenience.
>
> Source and binary files:
> http://people.apache.org/~sijie/bookkeeper-4.3.0-candidate-0/
>
> Maven staging repo:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-1002/
>
> The tag to be voted upon:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/tags/release-4.3.0/
>
> BookKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/dist/KEYS
>
> Please download the the source package, and follow the README to build and
> run a bookkeeper and hedwig service.
>
RE: [VOTE] BookKeeper 4.3.0 Release Candidate 0
Posted by Rakesh R <ra...@huawei.com>.
Thanks Sijie!
Built from source and ran some tests. It looks OK.
I've few observations. Please have a look at the following:
1) http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/tags/release-4.3.0/README
"BookKeeper project contains:" section missing the following projects info.
- bookkeeper-stats (Stats API for bookkeeper)
- hedwig-client-jms (Hedwig client jms)
2) 4.3.0 Summary page is showing the due date quite old "Due:03/Feb/14", can we update this?
Best Regards,
Rakesh
-----Original Message-----
From: Sijie Guo [mailto:guosijie@gmail.com]
Sent: 03 October 2014 14:26
To: bookkeeper-dev@zookeeper.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] BookKeeper 4.3.0 Release Candidate 0
This is the first release candidate for Apache BookKeeper, version 4.3.0.
It fixes the following issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12323267&styleName=Html&projectId=12311293
*** Please download, test and vote by Oct 7th 2014, 00:00 GMT.
Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided for convenience.
Source and binary files:
http://people.apache.org/~sijie/bookkeeper-4.3.0-candidate-0/
Maven staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-1002/
The tag to be voted upon:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/tags/release-4.3.0/
BookKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/dist/KEYS
Please download the the source package, and follow the README to build and run a bookkeeper and hedwig service.
Re: [VOTE] BookKeeper 4.3.0 Release Candidate 0
Posted by Flavio Junqueira <fp...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
For BOOKKEEPER-589, mark the resolution as done.
-Flavio
On Tuesday, October 7, 2014 11:00 AM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
>The release notes contained a lot of changes which didn't actually have
>any code changes. The contents of svn (since 4.2 branch) and the
>contents of (CHANGES.txt) and the release notes should all be the
>same. I've removed the version info from jiras that didn't go into
>branch but were marked as 4.3.0. BOOKKEEPER-589 and BOOKKEEPER-790 need
>to be resolved before the next RC. For BOOKKEEPER-589, since there'll be
>no change submitted to subversion, just removing the 4.3.0 version
>should be sufficient.
>
>Regards
>Ivan
>
>
>Sijie Guo writes:
>
>> This is the first release candidate for Apache BookKeeper, version 4.3.0.
>>
>> It fixes the following issues:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12323267&styleName=Html&projectId=12311293
>>
>> *** Please download, test and vote by Oct 7th 2014, 00:00 GMT.
>>
>> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided
>> for convenience.
>>
>> Source and binary files:
>> http://people.apache.org/~sijie/bookkeeper-4.3.0-candidate-0/
>>
>> Maven staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-1002/
>>
>> The tag to be voted upon:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/tags/release-4.3.0/
>>
>> BookKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/dist/KEYS
>>
>> Please download the the source package, and follow the README to build
>> and run a bookkeeper and hedwig service.
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] BookKeeper 4.3.0 Release Candidate 0
Posted by Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org>.
The release notes contained a lot of changes which didn't actually have
any code changes. The contents of svn (since 4.2 branch) and the
contents of (CHANGES.txt) and the release notes should all be the
same. I've removed the version info from jiras that didn't go into
branch but were marked as 4.3.0. BOOKKEEPER-589 and BOOKKEEPER-790 need
to be resolved before the next RC. For BOOKKEEPER-589, since there'll be
no change submitted to subversion, just removing the 4.3.0 version
should be sufficient.
Regards
Ivan
Sijie Guo writes:
> This is the first release candidate for Apache BookKeeper, version 4.3.0.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12323267&styleName=Html&projectId=12311293
>
> *** Please download, test and vote by Oct 7th 2014, 00:00 GMT.
>
> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided
> for convenience.
>
> Source and binary files:
> http://people.apache.org/~sijie/bookkeeper-4.3.0-candidate-0/
>
> Maven staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-1002/
>
> The tag to be voted upon:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/tags/release-4.3.0/
>
> BookKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/dist/KEYS
>
> Please download the the source package, and follow the README to build
> and run a bookkeeper and hedwig service.
Re: [VOTE] BookKeeper 4.3.0 Release Candidate 0
Posted by Ivan Kelly <iv...@ivankelly.net>.
Great, thanks for putting this out Sijie. I'll take a look over the
weekend or monday. I wanted to get to it today, but other stuff has
gotten in the way.
-Ivan
Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com> writes:
> This is the first release candidate for Apache BookKeeper, version 4.3.0.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12323267&styleName=Html&projectId=12311293
>
> *** Please download, test and vote by Oct 7th 2014, 00:00 GMT.
>
> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided
> for convenience.
>
> Source and binary files:
> http://people.apache.org/~sijie/bookkeeper-4.3.0-candidate-0/
>
> Maven staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-1002/
>
> The tag to be voted upon:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/tags/release-4.3.0/
>
> BookKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/dist/KEYS
>
> Please download the the source package, and follow the README to build
> and run a bookkeeper and hedwig service.
--
Sent with my mu4e
Re: [VOTE] BookKeeper 4.3.0 Release Candidate 0
Posted by Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@ivankelly.net> wrote:
> I've downloaded, built and tested the src release. It looks fine.
>
> The -bin releases contain jna.jar, which isn't mentioned in the NOTICE
> file, so -1 for releasing the binary tarballs. You can still release the
> source, just leave out the binaries. I think this is ok, since 4.3.0
> isn't GA.
>
Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-790 to address
NOTICE file issue.
>
> I ran a few benchmarks to compare against 4.2.2. The bookie benchmark
> didn't run for 4.3.0. It just hangs on "Benchmarking latency". For a
> single ledger on 3 bookies, performance is acceptable, but latency is
> higher. For 1000 ledgers on 3 bookies, tpt and latency is much better,
> but tpt is very variable. I did see a lot of timeouts in some runs
> also.
>
> single ledger, 3 bookies
> | 4.2.2 | | 4.3.0 |
> | tpt | lat p99 | lat p95 | | tpt | lat p99 | lat p95 |
> | 9995 | 87.98 | 77.26 | | 9988 | 132 | 117 |
> | 9997 | 97.55 | 80.70 | | 9991 | 111 | 107 |
> | 9996 | 105.80 | 86.20 | | 9989 | 103 | 100 |
>
> 1000 ledgers, 3 bookies
> | 4.2.2 | | 4.3.0 |
> | tpt | lat p99 | lat p95 | | tpt | lat p99 | lat p95 |
> | 14588 | 668 | 662 | | 23728 | 229 | 219 |
> | 13571 | 701 | 649 | | 39417 | 230 | 219 |
> | 14062 | 697 | 688 | | 40654 | 231 | 222 |
> | | | | | | | |
>
> Overall, I'm not sure this release is fit to go without having -alpha or
> -beta attached to its version, to make it clear that it shouldn't be
> used as is in production. In particular I'm worried about the bookie
> benchmark not working [1], and the variability of the 1000 ledger
> benchmark. The latency increase for a single ledger can be attributed to
> the added batching in the journal.
>
> -Ivan
>
> [1] bookkeeper-benchmark/bin/benchmark bookie -zookeeper <zk> -host
> <bookie>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] BookKeeper 4.3.0 Release Candidate 0
Posted by Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org>.
Setting:
journalFlushWhenQueueEmpty=true
journalMaxGroupWaitMSec=0
brings things mostly back to normal. The bookie bench did eventually
finish with the default, it just took 20 minutes.
So the only thing outstanding for this release is the JNA license. If
you roll a new release with that (or drop the bin packages), I'll give
my +1 for the release.
-Ivan
Sijie Guo writes:
> On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@ivankelly.net> wrote:
>
>> I've downloaded, built and tested the src release. It looks fine.
>>
>> The -bin releases contain jna.jar, which isn't mentioned in the NOTICE
>> file, so -1 for releasing the binary tarballs. You can still release the
>> source, just leave out the binaries. I think this is ok, since 4.3.0
>> isn't GA.
>>
>> I ran a few benchmarks to compare against 4.2.2. The bookie benchmark
>> didn't run for 4.3.0. It just hangs on "Benchmarking latency". For a
>> single ledger on 3 bookies, performance is acceptable, but latency is
>> higher. For 1000 ledgers on 3 bookies, tpt and latency is much better,
>> but tpt is very variable. I did see a lot of timeouts in some runs
>> also.
>>
>> single ledger, 3 bookies
>> | 4.2.2 | | 4.3.0 |
>> | tpt | lat p99 | lat p95 | | tpt | lat p99 | lat p95 |
>> | 9995 | 87.98 | 77.26 | | 9988 | 132 | 117 |
>> | 9997 | 97.55 | 80.70 | | 9991 | 111 | 107 |
>> | 9996 | 105.80 | 86.20 | | 9989 | 103 | 100 |
>>
>> 1000 ledgers, 3 bookies
>> | 4.2.2 | | 4.3.0 |
>> | tpt | lat p99 | lat p95 | | tpt | lat p99 | lat p95 |
>> | 14588 | 668 | 662 | | 23728 | 229 | 219 |
>> | 13571 | 701 | 649 | | 39417 | 230 | 219 |
>> | 14062 | 697 | 688 | | 40654 | 231 | 222 |
>> | | | | | | | |
>>
>
> You should tune the journal settings before you run the benchmark.
>
> the default value for 'journalMaxGroupWaitMSec' is 200, which is used for
> high throughput traffic rather than latency-sensitive traffic. you could
> reduce it to 6~10 millis, if you are going to gain better latency.
>
> in general, if you want to compare with 4.2.2, please set
> 'journalFlushWhenQueueEmpty' to true, so it would kind of disabling
> time-based group committing.
>
>
>>
>> Overall, I'm not sure this release is fit to go without having -alpha or
>> -beta attached to its version, to make it clear that it shouldn't be
>> used as is in production.
>
>
> I don't think we need to use -alpha or -beta. If we think this release
> isn't stable enough, we don't need to switch the stable to 4.3.0. so 4.3.0
> is still the latest but not the stable one, while 4.2.* is the stable one.
>
>
>> In particular I'm worried about the bookie
>> benchmark not working [1], and the variability of the 1000 ledger
>> benchmark. The latency increase for a single ledger can be attributed to
>> the added batching in the journal.
>>
>
> Please re-run your benchmark with the suggested configuration settings.
>
>
>>
>> -Ivan
>>
>> [1] bookkeeper-benchmark/bin/benchmark bookie -zookeeper <zk> -host
>> <bookie>
>>
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] BookKeeper 4.3.0 Release Candidate 0
Posted by Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@ivankelly.net> wrote:
> I've downloaded, built and tested the src release. It looks fine.
>
> The -bin releases contain jna.jar, which isn't mentioned in the NOTICE
> file, so -1 for releasing the binary tarballs. You can still release the
> source, just leave out the binaries. I think this is ok, since 4.3.0
> isn't GA.
>
> I ran a few benchmarks to compare against 4.2.2. The bookie benchmark
> didn't run for 4.3.0. It just hangs on "Benchmarking latency". For a
> single ledger on 3 bookies, performance is acceptable, but latency is
> higher. For 1000 ledgers on 3 bookies, tpt and latency is much better,
> but tpt is very variable. I did see a lot of timeouts in some runs
> also.
>
> single ledger, 3 bookies
> | 4.2.2 | | 4.3.0 |
> | tpt | lat p99 | lat p95 | | tpt | lat p99 | lat p95 |
> | 9995 | 87.98 | 77.26 | | 9988 | 132 | 117 |
> | 9997 | 97.55 | 80.70 | | 9991 | 111 | 107 |
> | 9996 | 105.80 | 86.20 | | 9989 | 103 | 100 |
>
> 1000 ledgers, 3 bookies
> | 4.2.2 | | 4.3.0 |
> | tpt | lat p99 | lat p95 | | tpt | lat p99 | lat p95 |
> | 14588 | 668 | 662 | | 23728 | 229 | 219 |
> | 13571 | 701 | 649 | | 39417 | 230 | 219 |
> | 14062 | 697 | 688 | | 40654 | 231 | 222 |
> | | | | | | | |
>
You should tune the journal settings before you run the benchmark.
the default value for 'journalMaxGroupWaitMSec' is 200, which is used for
high throughput traffic rather than latency-sensitive traffic. you could
reduce it to 6~10 millis, if you are going to gain better latency.
in general, if you want to compare with 4.2.2, please set
'journalFlushWhenQueueEmpty' to true, so it would kind of disabling
time-based group committing.
>
> Overall, I'm not sure this release is fit to go without having -alpha or
> -beta attached to its version, to make it clear that it shouldn't be
> used as is in production.
I don't think we need to use -alpha or -beta. If we think this release
isn't stable enough, we don't need to switch the stable to 4.3.0. so 4.3.0
is still the latest but not the stable one, while 4.2.* is the stable one.
> In particular I'm worried about the bookie
> benchmark not working [1], and the variability of the 1000 ledger
> benchmark. The latency increase for a single ledger can be attributed to
> the added batching in the journal.
>
Please re-run your benchmark with the suggested configuration settings.
>
> -Ivan
>
> [1] bookkeeper-benchmark/bin/benchmark bookie -zookeeper <zk> -host
> <bookie>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] BookKeeper 4.3.0 Release Candidate 0
Posted by Ivan Kelly <iv...@ivankelly.net>.
I've downloaded, built and tested the src release. It looks fine.
The -bin releases contain jna.jar, which isn't mentioned in the NOTICE
file, so -1 for releasing the binary tarballs. You can still release the
source, just leave out the binaries. I think this is ok, since 4.3.0
isn't GA.
I ran a few benchmarks to compare against 4.2.2. The bookie benchmark
didn't run for 4.3.0. It just hangs on "Benchmarking latency". For a
single ledger on 3 bookies, performance is acceptable, but latency is
higher. For 1000 ledgers on 3 bookies, tpt and latency is much better,
but tpt is very variable. I did see a lot of timeouts in some runs
also.
single ledger, 3 bookies
| 4.2.2 | | 4.3.0 |
| tpt | lat p99 | lat p95 | | tpt | lat p99 | lat p95 |
| 9995 | 87.98 | 77.26 | | 9988 | 132 | 117 |
| 9997 | 97.55 | 80.70 | | 9991 | 111 | 107 |
| 9996 | 105.80 | 86.20 | | 9989 | 103 | 100 |
1000 ledgers, 3 bookies
| 4.2.2 | | 4.3.0 |
| tpt | lat p99 | lat p95 | | tpt | lat p99 | lat p95 |
| 14588 | 668 | 662 | | 23728 | 229 | 219 |
| 13571 | 701 | 649 | | 39417 | 230 | 219 |
| 14062 | 697 | 688 | | 40654 | 231 | 222 |
| | | | | | | |
Overall, I'm not sure this release is fit to go without having -alpha or
-beta attached to its version, to make it clear that it shouldn't be
used as is in production. In particular I'm worried about the bookie
benchmark not working [1], and the variability of the 1000 ledger
benchmark. The latency increase for a single ledger can be attributed to
the added batching in the journal.
-Ivan
[1] bookkeeper-benchmark/bin/benchmark bookie -zookeeper <zk> -host <bookie>
Re: [VOTE] BookKeeper 4.3.0 Release Candidate 0
Posted by Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 2:10 AM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@ivankelly.net> wrote:
>
> Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com> writes:
> > This is a very awesome script to run. I think we could add it to the repo
> > under bin/ directory. Do you mind creating a JIRA to do that? we could
> > include it in 4.3.1 and 4.4.0.
> -1 for splitting development between 4.3.1 and trunk. We should only
> work in trunk for the next few releases, until trunk is superstable
> again.
>
Removed 4.3.1 from BOOKKEEPER-788. Keep it for 4.4.0.
>
>
> >
> > for the git tag question, I am not sure if we could do that, since the
> > bookkeeper repo is actually in svn rather than git.
> gitsvn already creates a tag.
> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/tree/release-4.3.0
>
> But yes, as you commented, after TLP, this will be a proper git repo, so
> it'll be a proper git tag.
>
> -Ivan
>
Re: [VOTE] BookKeeper 4.3.0 Release Candidate 0
Posted by Ivan Kelly <iv...@ivankelly.net>.
Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com> writes:
> This is a very awesome script to run. I think we could add it to the repo
> under bin/ directory. Do you mind creating a JIRA to do that? we could
> include it in 4.3.1 and 4.4.0.
-1 for splitting development between 4.3.1 and trunk. We should only
work in trunk for the next few releases, until trunk is superstable
again.
>
> for the git tag question, I am not sure if we could do that, since the
> bookkeeper repo is actually in svn rather than git.
gitsvn already creates a tag.
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/tree/release-4.3.0
But yes, as you commented, after TLP, this will be a proper git repo, so
it'll be a proper git tag.
-Ivan
Re: [VOTE] BookKeeper 4.3.0 Release Candidate 0
Posted by Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Jiannan Wang <ji...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
> > Your release script is actually attached in that email :)
> > But the link that you provided is yahoo internal link :) you might take
> care of this next time, if it is yahoo confidential :)
>
> Wow, I didn't notice that, thanks for pointing it out. I need to be more
> careful to avoid being fired :)
>
> > This is a very awesome script to run. I think we could add it to the
> repo under bin/ directory. Do you mind creating a JIRA to do that? we could
> include it in 4.3.1 and 4.4.0.
>
> Done, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-788. I'll create
> a patch tomorrow.
>
> > for the git tag question, I am not sure if we could do that, since the
> bookkeeper repo is actually in svn rather than git.
>
> Maybe we could manage it manually in GitHub?
>
I think after BOOKKEEPER goes TLP, we will have a separated repo, which we
might have a real git repo.
> Thanks,
> Jiannan
>
> From: Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com>
> Date: Saturday, October 4, 2014 at 4:42 PM
> To: "Y.CORP.YAHOO.COM\\jiannan" <ji...@yahoo-inc.com>
> Cc: "bookkeeper-dev@zookeeper.apache.org" <
> bookkeeper-dev@zookeeper.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] BookKeeper 4.3.0 Release Candidate 0
>
> Thanks Jiannan!
>
> This is a very awesome script to run. I think we could add it to the
> repo under bin/ directory. Do you mind creating a JIRA to do that? we could
> include it in 4.3.1 and 4.4.0.
>
> for the git tag question, I am not sure if we could do that, since the
> bookkeeper repo is actually in svn rather than git.
>
> - Sijie
>
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Jiannan Wang <ji...@yahoo-inc.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Sijie.
>>
>> +1 for the tag, verified successfully in following platforms:
>> * Mac OS X 10.9.4, JDK 1.7.0_45, Maven 3.0.5
>> * Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.4, JDK 1.6.0_13, Maven 3.0.4
>> * Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.5, JDK 1.7.0_60, Maven 3.2.1
>>
>>
>> By the way, it would be convenient if git tag could also be provided.
>>
>> During verification, I find we need to type several commands to validate
>> each release, which would be boring. So I create a script to wrap up all
>> steps, see attachment.
>>
>> Usage: place the script outside source code (to avoid rat check failure)
>> and run it under the top-level directory.
>>
>> Here is process of the script:
>> 1. Collecting build environment info (Operation System, JDK, Maven)
>> 2. Run 'mvn install -DskipTests'
>> 3. Checking code (findbugs, rat now). Should I add mvn
>> javadoc:aggregate?
>> 4. Running unit test
>> 5. Start standalone Bookie and Hedwig service
>> 6. Run simple Bookie test: bookkeeper-server/bin/bookkeeper simpletest
>> -ensemble 3 -writeQuorum 3
>> 7. Run simple Hedwig test: hedwig-server/bin/hedwig console; pubsub
>> topic subscriber 10 message
>> 8. Tar all above logs when error/exit
>>
>>
>> Furthermore, with the tar logs we could diagnose user's compile/UT
>> failure.
>>
>> Best,
>> Jiannan
>>
>> On 10/3/14, 4:55 PM, "Sijie Guo" <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >This is the first release candidate for Apache BookKeeper, version 4.3.0.
>> >
>> >It fixes the following issues:
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12323267&st
>> >yleName=Html&projectId=12311293
>> >
>> >*** Please download, test and vote by Oct 7th 2014, 00:00 GMT.
>> >
>> >Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided
>> >for convenience.
>> >
>> >Source and binary files:
>> >http://people.apache.org/~sijie/bookkeeper-4.3.0-candidate-0/
>> >
>> >Maven staging repo:
>> >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-100
>> >2/
>> >
>> >The tag to be voted upon:
>> >http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/tags/release-4.3.0/
>> >
>> >BookKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
>> >http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/dist/KEYS
>> >
>> >Please download the the source package, and follow the README to build
>> >and run a bookkeeper and hedwig service.
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] BookKeeper 4.3.0 Release Candidate 0
Posted by Jiannan Wang <ji...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID>.
> Your release script is actually attached in that email :)
> But the link that you provided is yahoo internal link :) you might take care of this next time, if it is yahoo confidential :)
Wow, I didn't notice that, thanks for pointing it out. I need to be more careful to avoid being fired :)
> This is a very awesome script to run. I think we could add it to the repo under bin/ directory. Do you mind creating a JIRA to do that? we could include it in 4.3.1 and 4.4.0.
Done, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-788. I'll create a patch tomorrow.
> for the git tag question, I am not sure if we could do that, since the bookkeeper repo is actually in svn rather than git.
Maybe we could manage it manually in GitHub?
Thanks,
Jiannan
From: Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com>>
Date: Saturday, October 4, 2014 at 4:42 PM
To: "Y.CORP.YAHOO.COM\\jiannan" <ji...@yahoo-inc.com>>
Cc: "bookkeeper-dev@zookeeper.apache.org<ma...@zookeeper.apache.org>" <bo...@zookeeper.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] BookKeeper 4.3.0 Release Candidate 0
Thanks Jiannan!
This is a very awesome script to run. I think we could add it to the repo under bin/ directory. Do you mind creating a JIRA to do that? we could include it in 4.3.1 and 4.4.0.
for the git tag question, I am not sure if we could do that, since the bookkeeper repo is actually in svn rather than git.
- Sijie
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Jiannan Wang <ji...@yahoo-inc.com>> wrote:
Thanks Sijie.
+1 for the tag, verified successfully in following platforms:
* Mac OS X 10.9.4, JDK 1.7.0_45, Maven 3.0.5
* Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.4, JDK 1.6.0_13, Maven 3.0.4
* Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.5, JDK 1.7.0_60, Maven 3.2.1
By the way, it would be convenient if git tag could also be provided.
During verification, I find we need to type several commands to validate
each release, which would be boring. So I create a script to wrap up all
steps, see attachment.
Usage: place the script outside source code (to avoid rat check failure)
and run it under the top-level directory.
Here is process of the script:
1. Collecting build environment info (Operation System, JDK, Maven)
2. Run 'mvn install -DskipTests'
3. Checking code (findbugs, rat now). Should I add mvn
javadoc:aggregate?
4. Running unit test
5. Start standalone Bookie and Hedwig service
6. Run simple Bookie test: bookkeeper-server/bin/bookkeeper simpletest
-ensemble 3 -writeQuorum 3
7. Run simple Hedwig test: hedwig-server/bin/hedwig console; pubsub
topic subscriber 10 message
8. Tar all above logs when error/exit
Furthermore, with the tar logs we could diagnose user's compile/UT failure.
Best,
Jiannan
On 10/3/14, 4:55 PM, "Sijie Guo" <gu...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>This is the first release candidate for Apache BookKeeper, version 4.3.0.
>
>It fixes the following issues:
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12323267&st
>yleName=Html&projectId=12311293
>
>*** Please download, test and vote by Oct 7th 2014, 00:00 GMT.
>
>Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided
>for convenience.
>
>Source and binary files:
>http://people.apache.org/~sijie/bookkeeper-4.3.0-candidate-0/
>
>Maven staging repo:
>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-100
>2/
>
>The tag to be voted upon:
>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/tags/release-4.3.0/
>
>BookKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/dist/KEYS
>
>Please download the the source package, and follow the README to build
>and run a bookkeeper and hedwig service.
Re: [VOTE] BookKeeper 4.3.0 Release Candidate 0
Posted by Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Jiannan!
This is a very awesome script to run. I think we could add it to the repo
under bin/ directory. Do you mind creating a JIRA to do that? we could
include it in 4.3.1 and 4.4.0.
for the git tag question, I am not sure if we could do that, since the
bookkeeper repo is actually in svn rather than git.
- Sijie
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Jiannan Wang <ji...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
> Thanks Sijie.
>
> +1 for the tag, verified successfully in following platforms:
> * Mac OS X 10.9.4, JDK 1.7.0_45, Maven 3.0.5
> * Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.4, JDK 1.6.0_13, Maven 3.0.4
> * Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.5, JDK 1.7.0_60, Maven 3.2.1
>
>
> By the way, it would be convenient if git tag could also be provided.
>
> During verification, I find we need to type several commands to validate
> each release, which would be boring. So I create a script to wrap up all
> steps, see attachment.
>
> Usage: place the script outside source code (to avoid rat check failure)
> and run it under the top-level directory.
>
> Here is process of the script:
> 1. Collecting build environment info (Operation System, JDK, Maven)
> 2. Run 'mvn install -DskipTests'
> 3. Checking code (findbugs, rat now). Should I add mvn
> javadoc:aggregate?
> 4. Running unit test
> 5. Start standalone Bookie and Hedwig service
> 6. Run simple Bookie test: bookkeeper-server/bin/bookkeeper simpletest
> -ensemble 3 -writeQuorum 3
> 7. Run simple Hedwig test: hedwig-server/bin/hedwig console; pubsub
> topic subscriber 10 message
> 8. Tar all above logs when error/exit
>
>
> Furthermore, with the tar logs we could diagnose user's compile/UT failure.
>
> Best,
> Jiannan
>
> On 10/3/14, 4:55 PM, "Sijie Guo" <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >This is the first release candidate for Apache BookKeeper, version 4.3.0.
> >
> >It fixes the following issues:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12323267&st
> >yleName=Html&projectId=12311293
> >
> >*** Please download, test and vote by Oct 7th 2014, 00:00 GMT.
> >
> >Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided
> >for convenience.
> >
> >Source and binary files:
> >http://people.apache.org/~sijie/bookkeeper-4.3.0-candidate-0/
> >
> >Maven staging repo:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-100
> >2/
> >
> >The tag to be voted upon:
> >http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/tags/release-4.3.0/
> >
> >BookKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> >http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/dist/KEYS
> >
> >Please download the the source package, and follow the README to build
> >and run a bookkeeper and hedwig service.
>
>
Re: [VOTE] BookKeeper 4.3.0 Release Candidate 0
Posted by Jiannan Wang <ji...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID>.
It seems attachment is not supported, put the script in gist:
https://git.corp.yahoo.com/gist/jiannan/d6412e5456672b3ccffb
Best,
Jiannan
On 10/4/14, 12:26 PM, "Jiannan Wang" <ji...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> wrote:
>Thanks Sijie.
>
>+1 for the tag, verified successfully in following platforms:
> * Mac OS X 10.9.4, JDK 1.7.0_45, Maven 3.0.5
> * Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.4, JDK 1.6.0_13, Maven 3.0.4
> * Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.5, JDK 1.7.0_60, Maven 3.2.1
>
>
>By the way, it would be convenient if git tag could also be provided.
>
>During verification, I find we need to type several commands to validate
>each release, which would be boring. So I create a script to wrap up all
>steps, see attachment.
>
>Usage: place the script outside source code (to avoid rat check failure)
>and run it under the top-level directory.
>
>Here is process of the script:
> 1. Collecting build environment info (Operation System, JDK, Maven)
> 2. Run 'mvn install -DskipTests'
> 3. Checking code (findbugs, rat now). Should I add mvn
>javadoc:aggregate?
> 4. Running unit test
> 5. Start standalone Bookie and Hedwig service
> 6. Run simple Bookie test: bookkeeper-server/bin/bookkeeper simpletest
>-ensemble 3 -writeQuorum 3
> 7. Run simple Hedwig test: hedwig-server/bin/hedwig console; pubsub
>topic subscriber 10 message
> 8. Tar all above logs when error/exit
>
>
>Furthermore, with the tar logs we could diagnose user's compile/UT
>failure.
>
>Best,
>Jiannan
>
>On 10/3/14, 4:55 PM, "Sijie Guo" <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>This is the first release candidate for Apache BookKeeper, version 4.3.0.
>>
>>It fixes the following issues:
>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12323267&s
>>t
>>yleName=Html&projectId=12311293
>>
>>*** Please download, test and vote by Oct 7th 2014, 00:00 GMT.
>>
>>Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided
>>for convenience.
>>
>>Source and binary files:
>>http://people.apache.org/~sijie/bookkeeper-4.3.0-candidate-0/
>>
>>Maven staging repo:
>>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-10
>>0
>>2/
>>
>>The tag to be voted upon:
>>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/tags/release-4.3.0/
>>
>>BookKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
>>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/dist/KEYS
>>
>>Please download the the source package, and follow the README to build
>>and run a bookkeeper and hedwig service.
>
Re: [VOTE] BookKeeper 4.3.0 Release Candidate 0
Posted by Jiannan Wang <ji...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID>.
Thanks Sijie.
+1 for the tag, verified successfully in following platforms:
* Mac OS X 10.9.4, JDK 1.7.0_45, Maven 3.0.5
* Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.4, JDK 1.6.0_13, Maven 3.0.4
* Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.5, JDK 1.7.0_60, Maven 3.2.1
By the way, it would be convenient if git tag could also be provided.
During verification, I find we need to type several commands to validate
each release, which would be boring. So I create a script to wrap up all
steps, see attachment.
Usage: place the script outside source code (to avoid rat check failure)
and run it under the top-level directory.
Here is process of the script:
1. Collecting build environment info (Operation System, JDK, Maven)
2. Run 'mvn install -DskipTests'
3. Checking code (findbugs, rat now). Should I add mvn
javadoc:aggregate?
4. Running unit test
5. Start standalone Bookie and Hedwig service
6. Run simple Bookie test: bookkeeper-server/bin/bookkeeper simpletest
-ensemble 3 -writeQuorum 3
7. Run simple Hedwig test: hedwig-server/bin/hedwig console; pubsub
topic subscriber 10 message
8. Tar all above logs when error/exit
Furthermore, with the tar logs we could diagnose user's compile/UT failure.
Best,
Jiannan
On 10/3/14, 4:55 PM, "Sijie Guo" <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>This is the first release candidate for Apache BookKeeper, version 4.3.0.
>
>It fixes the following issues:
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12323267&st
>yleName=Html&projectId=12311293
>
>*** Please download, test and vote by Oct 7th 2014, 00:00 GMT.
>
>Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided
>for convenience.
>
>Source and binary files:
>http://people.apache.org/~sijie/bookkeeper-4.3.0-candidate-0/
>
>Maven staging repo:
>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-100
>2/
>
>The tag to be voted upon:
>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/tags/release-4.3.0/
>
>BookKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/dist/KEYS
>
>Please download the the source package, and follow the README to build
>and run a bookkeeper and hedwig service.