You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@plc4x.apache.org by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de> on 2021/09/18 16:15:37 UTC
AW: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 0.9.0 RC2
This is the discussion thread for the corresponding VOTE thread.
Please keep discussions in this thread to simplify the counting of votes.
If you have to vote -1 please mention a brief description on why and then take the details to this thread.
AW: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 0.9.0 RC2
Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
And by downgrading the dependency version of the jetty-util artifact to the lower version: 9.4.43.v20210629 resolved the last issues with Java 1.8 ... turns out it was only the util for obfuscating the password which was used from the jetty-utils which was causing the problems.
With the OPC-UA tests that were failling because of a keysore generated by a newer java version ... I made the test delete that directory before running the testcases. This should not be a problem in the future. However it might increase the execution time of the tests a bit.
So right now the 0.10.0-SNAPSHOT codebase on develop is compatible with Java 1.8 ... and the README should be updated accordingly.
Chris
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. September 2021 10:58
An: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Betreff: AW: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 0.9.0 RC2
Ok ... I did some investigation into this issue ...
So it turns out that the OPC-UA driver does build nicely with Java 1.8 if you never ran it with a newer version of Java before. The reason is that the test-server initializes a keystore in a fixed temp directory. So if you have run it with a newer version of Java this keystore has a different format than if you run it with Java 8. So if you ran the tests with Java 11 and then run them with Java 1.8, they will fail.
However a bit down the path, it seems that the OPC-UA Server requires Java 11 as the Milo OPC-UA Server is built for that ;-/
Chris
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. September 2021 10:23
An: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Betreff: AW: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 0.9.0 RC2
Ok ... taking reference to Otto's -1 vote.
I have checked ... it seems that the new testsuite for OPC-UA introduced something that makes the build currently incompatible with Java 1.8 ... what do you all think? Should I simply update the README and we still release the version, or should I prepare a RC3 (Which will make us release PLC4X AFTER ApacheCon)?
I don't want to decide this on my own ... right now I would be leaning more towards releasing it with this minor documentation issue.
Chris
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>
Gesendet: Montag, 20. September 2021 16:41
An: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Betreff: AW: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 0.9.0 RC2
Hi Cesar,
I bet this should have gone to the VOTE thread instead ;)
And it was an effort of the entire team ... I just ran the release scripts.
Chris
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Cesar Garcia <ce...@ceos.com.ve>
Gesendet: Montag, 20. September 2021 15:53
An: Apache PLC4X <de...@plc4x.apache.org>
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 0.9.0 RC2
Hi,
+1
. Download all staged artifacts under the url specified in the release vote email into a directory we’ll now call OK . Verify the SHA512 hashes, OK . Unzip the archive, OK . Verify the existence of LICENSE, NOTICE, README, RELEASE_NOTES files in the extracted source bundle. OK . Run RAT externally to ensure there are no surprises. OK . Search for SNAPSHOT references. OK (Only in Jenkins) . Build the project according to the information in the README.md file. OK
Excellent work Chris,
El sáb, 18 sept 2021 a las 12:15, Christofer Dutz (<
christofer.dutz@c-ware.de>) escribió:
> This is the discussion thread for the corresponding VOTE thread.
>
>
>
> Please keep discussions in this thread to simplify the counting of votes.
>
>
>
> If you have to vote -1 please mention a brief description on why and
> then take the details to this thread.
>
>
--
*CEOS Automatización, C.A.*
*GALPON SERVICIO INDUSTRIALES Y NAVALES FA, C.A.,* *PISO 1, OFICINA 2, AV. RAUL LEONI, SECTOR GUAMACHITO,*
*FRENTE A LA ASOCIACION DE GANADEROS,BARCELONA,EDO. ANZOATEGUI* *Ing. César García*
*Cel: +58 414-760.98.95*
*Hotline Técnica SIEMENS: 0800 1005080*
*Email: support.aan.automation@siemens.com
<su...@siemens.com>*
AW: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 0.9.0 RC2
Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
Ok ... I did some investigation into this issue ...
So it turns out that the OPC-UA driver does build nicely with Java 1.8 if you never ran it with a newer version of Java before. The reason is that the test-server initializes a keystore in a fixed temp directory. So if you have run it with a newer version of Java this keystore has a different format than if you run it with Java 8. So if you ran the tests with Java 11 and then run them with Java 1.8, they will fail.
However a bit down the path, it seems that the OPC-UA Server requires Java 11 as the Milo OPC-UA Server is built for that ;-/
Chris
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. September 2021 10:23
An: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Betreff: AW: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 0.9.0 RC2
Ok ... taking reference to Otto's -1 vote.
I have checked ... it seems that the new testsuite for OPC-UA introduced something that makes the build currently incompatible with Java 1.8 ... what do you all think? Should I simply update the README and we still release the version, or should I prepare a RC3 (Which will make us release PLC4X AFTER ApacheCon)?
I don't want to decide this on my own ... right now I would be leaning more towards releasing it with this minor documentation issue.
Chris
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>
Gesendet: Montag, 20. September 2021 16:41
An: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Betreff: AW: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 0.9.0 RC2
Hi Cesar,
I bet this should have gone to the VOTE thread instead ;)
And it was an effort of the entire team ... I just ran the release scripts.
Chris
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Cesar Garcia <ce...@ceos.com.ve>
Gesendet: Montag, 20. September 2021 15:53
An: Apache PLC4X <de...@plc4x.apache.org>
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 0.9.0 RC2
Hi,
+1
. Download all staged artifacts under the url specified in the release vote email into a directory we’ll now call OK . Verify the SHA512 hashes, OK . Unzip the archive, OK . Verify the existence of LICENSE, NOTICE, README, RELEASE_NOTES files in the extracted source bundle. OK . Run RAT externally to ensure there are no surprises. OK . Search for SNAPSHOT references. OK (Only in Jenkins) . Build the project according to the information in the README.md file. OK
Excellent work Chris,
El sáb, 18 sept 2021 a las 12:15, Christofer Dutz (<
christofer.dutz@c-ware.de>) escribió:
> This is the discussion thread for the corresponding VOTE thread.
>
>
>
> Please keep discussions in this thread to simplify the counting of votes.
>
>
>
> If you have to vote -1 please mention a brief description on why and
> then take the details to this thread.
>
>
--
*CEOS Automatización, C.A.*
*GALPON SERVICIO INDUSTRIALES Y NAVALES FA, C.A.,* *PISO 1, OFICINA 2, AV. RAUL LEONI, SECTOR GUAMACHITO,*
*FRENTE A LA ASOCIACION DE GANADEROS,BARCELONA,EDO. ANZOATEGUI* *Ing. César García*
*Cel: +58 414-760.98.95*
*Hotline Técnica SIEMENS: 0800 1005080*
*Email: support.aan.automation@siemens.com
<su...@siemens.com>*
AW: AW: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 0.9.0 RC2
Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
We can even mention the "Documentation Issue" in the Announce email ...
Chris
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Niklas Merz <ni...@apache.org>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. September 2021 13:26
An: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 0.9.0 RC2
I would't stop the release for this small imperfection in the README.
For documentation I always check the online versions like the website first.
On September 21, 2021, "Sebastian Rühl" <sr...@apache.org> wrote:
> I would be fine with that minor imperfection. In case of trouble we
> can always release a new hotfix.
>
> - Sebastian
>
> On 2021/09/21 08:22:58, Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>
> wrote:
> > Ok ... taking reference to Otto's -1 vote.
> >
> > I have checked ... it seems that the new testsuite for OPC-UA
> introduced something that makes the build currently incompatible with
> Java 1.8 ... what do you all think? Should I simply update the README
> and we still release the version, or should I prepare a RC3 (Which
> will make us release PLC4X AFTER ApacheCon)?
> >
> > I don't want to decide this on my own ... right now I would be
> leaning more towards releasing it with this minor documentation issue.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>
> > Gesendet: Montag, 20. September 2021 16:41
> > An: dev@plc4x.apache.org
> > Betreff: AW: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 0.9.0 RC2
> >
> > Hi Cesar,
> >
> > I bet this should have gone to the VOTE thread instead ;)
> >
> > And it was an effort of the entire team ... I just ran the release
> scripts.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Cesar Garcia <ce...@ceos.com.ve>
> > Gesendet: Montag, 20. September 2021 15:53
> > An: Apache PLC4X <de...@plc4x.apache.org>
> > Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 0.9.0 RC2
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > +1
> >
> > . Download all staged artifacts under the url specified in the
> release vote email into a directory we’ll now call OK . Verify the
> SHA512 hashes, OK . Unzip the archive, OK . Verify the existence of
> LICENSE, NOTICE, README, RELEASE_NOTES files in the extracted source
> bundle. OK . Run RAT externally to ensure there are no surprises. OK .
> Search for SNAPSHOT references. OK (Only in Jenkins) . Build the
> project according to the information in the README.md file. OK
> >
> >
> > Excellent work Chris,
> >
> >
> >
> > El sáb, 18 sept 2021 a las 12:15, Christofer Dutz (<
> > christofer.dutz@c-ware.de>) escribió:
> >
> > > This is the discussion thread for the corresponding VOTE thread.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Please keep discussions in this thread to simplify the counting of
> votes.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > If you have to vote -1 please mention a brief description on why
> and
> > > then take the details to this thread.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > *CEOS Automatización, C.A.*
> > *GALPON SERVICIO INDUSTRIALES Y NAVALES FA, C.A.,* *PISO 1, OFICINA
> 2, AV. RAUL LEONI, SECTOR GUAMACHITO,*
> >
> > *FRENTE A LA ASOCIACION DE GANADEROS,BARCELONA,EDO. ANZOATEGUI*
> *Ing. César García*
> >
> > *Cel: +58 414-760.98.95*
> >
> > *Hotline Técnica SIEMENS: 0800 1005080*
> >
> > *Email: support.aan.automation@siemens.com
> > <su...@siemens.com>*
> >
Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 0.9.0 RC2
Posted by Niklas Merz <ni...@apache.org>.
I would't stop the release for this small imperfection in the README.
For documentation I always check the online versions like the website
first.
On September 21, 2021, "Sebastian Rühl" <sr...@apache.org> wrote:
> I would be fine with that minor imperfection. In case of trouble we
> can always release a new hotfix.
>
> - Sebastian
>
> On 2021/09/21 08:22:58, Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>
> wrote:
> > Ok ... taking reference to Otto's -1 vote.
> >
> > I have checked ... it seems that the new testsuite for OPC-UA
> introduced something that makes the build currently incompatible with
> Java 1.8 ... what do you all think? Should I simply update the README
> and we still release the version, or should I prepare a RC3 (Which
> will make us release PLC4X AFTER ApacheCon)?
> >
> > I don't want to decide this on my own ... right now I would be
> leaning more towards releasing it with this minor documentation issue.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>
> > Gesendet: Montag, 20. September 2021 16:41
> > An: dev@plc4x.apache.org
> > Betreff: AW: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 0.9.0 RC2
> >
> > Hi Cesar,
> >
> > I bet this should have gone to the VOTE thread instead ;)
> >
> > And it was an effort of the entire team ... I just ran the release
> scripts.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Cesar Garcia <ce...@ceos.com.ve>
> > Gesendet: Montag, 20. September 2021 15:53
> > An: Apache PLC4X <de...@plc4x.apache.org>
> > Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 0.9.0 RC2
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > +1
> >
> > . Download all staged artifacts under the url specified in the
> release vote email into a directory we’ll now call OK . Verify the
> SHA512 hashes, OK . Unzip the archive, OK . Verify the existence of
> LICENSE, NOTICE, README, RELEASE_NOTES files in the extracted source
> bundle. OK . Run RAT externally to ensure there are no surprises. OK .
> Search for SNAPSHOT references. OK (Only in Jenkins) . Build the
> project according to the information in the README.md file. OK
> >
> >
> > Excellent work Chris,
> >
> >
> >
> > El sáb, 18 sept 2021 a las 12:15, Christofer Dutz (<
> > christofer.dutz@c-ware.de>) escribió:
> >
> > > This is the discussion thread for the corresponding VOTE thread.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Please keep discussions in this thread to simplify the counting of
> votes.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > If you have to vote -1 please mention a brief description on why
> and
> > > then take the details to this thread.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > *CEOS Automatización, C.A.*
> > *GALPON SERVICIO INDUSTRIALES Y NAVALES FA, C.A.,* *PISO 1, OFICINA
> 2, AV. RAUL LEONI, SECTOR GUAMACHITO,*
> >
> > *FRENTE A LA ASOCIACION DE GANADEROS,BARCELONA,EDO. ANZOATEGUI*
> *Ing. César García*
> >
> > *Cel: +58 414-760.98.95*
> >
> > *Hotline Técnica SIEMENS: 0800 1005080*
> >
> > *Email: support.aan.automation@siemens.com
> > <su...@siemens.com>*
> >
Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 0.9.0 RC2
Posted by Sebastian R��hl <sr...@apache.org>.
I would be fine with that minor imperfection. In case of trouble we can always release a new hotfix.
- Sebastian
On 2021/09/21 08:22:58, Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de> wrote:
> Ok ... taking reference to Otto's -1 vote.
>
> I have checked ... it seems that the new testsuite for OPC-UA introduced something that makes the build currently incompatible with Java 1.8 ... what do you all think? Should I simply update the README and we still release the version, or should I prepare a RC3 (Which will make us release PLC4X AFTER ApacheCon)?
>
> I don't want to decide this on my own ... right now I would be leaning more towards releasing it with this minor documentation issue.
>
> Chris
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>
> Gesendet: Montag, 20. September 2021 16:41
> An: dev@plc4x.apache.org
> Betreff: AW: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 0.9.0 RC2
>
> Hi Cesar,
>
> I bet this should have gone to the VOTE thread instead ;)
>
> And it was an effort of the entire team ... I just ran the release scripts.
>
> Chris
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Cesar Garcia <ce...@ceos.com.ve>
> Gesendet: Montag, 20. September 2021 15:53
> An: Apache PLC4X <de...@plc4x.apache.org>
> Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 0.9.0 RC2
>
> Hi,
>
> +1
>
> . Download all staged artifacts under the url specified in the release vote email into a directory we’ll now call OK . Verify the SHA512 hashes, OK . Unzip the archive, OK . Verify the existence of LICENSE, NOTICE, README, RELEASE_NOTES files in the extracted source bundle. OK . Run RAT externally to ensure there are no surprises. OK . Search for SNAPSHOT references. OK (Only in Jenkins) . Build the project according to the information in the README.md file. OK
>
>
> Excellent work Chris,
>
>
>
> El sáb, 18 sept 2021 a las 12:15, Christofer Dutz (<
> christofer.dutz@c-ware.de>) escribió:
>
> > This is the discussion thread for the corresponding VOTE thread.
> >
> >
> >
> > Please keep discussions in this thread to simplify the counting of votes.
> >
> >
> >
> > If you have to vote -1 please mention a brief description on why and
> > then take the details to this thread.
> >
> >
>
> --
> *CEOS Automatización, C.A.*
> *GALPON SERVICIO INDUSTRIALES Y NAVALES FA, C.A.,* *PISO 1, OFICINA 2, AV. RAUL LEONI, SECTOR GUAMACHITO,*
>
> *FRENTE A LA ASOCIACION DE GANADEROS,BARCELONA,EDO. ANZOATEGUI* *Ing. César García*
>
> *Cel: +58 414-760.98.95*
>
> *Hotline Técnica SIEMENS: 0800 1005080*
>
> *Email: support.aan.automation@siemens.com
> <su...@siemens.com>*
>
AW: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 0.9.0 RC2
Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
Ok ... taking reference to Otto's -1 vote.
I have checked ... it seems that the new testsuite for OPC-UA introduced something that makes the build currently incompatible with Java 1.8 ... what do you all think? Should I simply update the README and we still release the version, or should I prepare a RC3 (Which will make us release PLC4X AFTER ApacheCon)?
I don't want to decide this on my own ... right now I would be leaning more towards releasing it with this minor documentation issue.
Chris
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>
Gesendet: Montag, 20. September 2021 16:41
An: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Betreff: AW: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 0.9.0 RC2
Hi Cesar,
I bet this should have gone to the VOTE thread instead ;)
And it was an effort of the entire team ... I just ran the release scripts.
Chris
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Cesar Garcia <ce...@ceos.com.ve>
Gesendet: Montag, 20. September 2021 15:53
An: Apache PLC4X <de...@plc4x.apache.org>
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 0.9.0 RC2
Hi,
+1
. Download all staged artifacts under the url specified in the release vote email into a directory we’ll now call OK . Verify the SHA512 hashes, OK . Unzip the archive, OK . Verify the existence of LICENSE, NOTICE, README, RELEASE_NOTES files in the extracted source bundle. OK . Run RAT externally to ensure there are no surprises. OK . Search for SNAPSHOT references. OK (Only in Jenkins) . Build the project according to the information in the README.md file. OK
Excellent work Chris,
El sáb, 18 sept 2021 a las 12:15, Christofer Dutz (<
christofer.dutz@c-ware.de>) escribió:
> This is the discussion thread for the corresponding VOTE thread.
>
>
>
> Please keep discussions in this thread to simplify the counting of votes.
>
>
>
> If you have to vote -1 please mention a brief description on why and
> then take the details to this thread.
>
>
--
*CEOS Automatización, C.A.*
*GALPON SERVICIO INDUSTRIALES Y NAVALES FA, C.A.,* *PISO 1, OFICINA 2, AV. RAUL LEONI, SECTOR GUAMACHITO,*
*FRENTE A LA ASOCIACION DE GANADEROS,BARCELONA,EDO. ANZOATEGUI* *Ing. César García*
*Cel: +58 414-760.98.95*
*Hotline Técnica SIEMENS: 0800 1005080*
*Email: support.aan.automation@siemens.com
<su...@siemens.com>*
AW: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 0.9.0 RC2
Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
Hi Cesar,
I bet this should have gone to the VOTE thread instead ;)
And it was an effort of the entire team ... I just ran the release scripts.
Chris
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Cesar Garcia <ce...@ceos.com.ve>
Gesendet: Montag, 20. September 2021 15:53
An: Apache PLC4X <de...@plc4x.apache.org>
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 0.9.0 RC2
Hi,
+1
. Download all staged artifacts under the url specified in the release vote email into a directory we’ll now call OK . Verify the SHA512 hashes, OK . Unzip the archive, OK . Verify the existence of LICENSE, NOTICE, README, RELEASE_NOTES files in the extracted source bundle. OK . Run RAT externally to ensure there are no surprises. OK . Search for SNAPSHOT references. OK (Only in Jenkins) . Build the project according to the information in the README.md file. OK
Excellent work Chris,
El sáb, 18 sept 2021 a las 12:15, Christofer Dutz (<
christofer.dutz@c-ware.de>) escribió:
> This is the discussion thread for the corresponding VOTE thread.
>
>
>
> Please keep discussions in this thread to simplify the counting of votes.
>
>
>
> If you have to vote -1 please mention a brief description on why and
> then take the details to this thread.
>
>
--
*CEOS Automatización, C.A.*
*GALPON SERVICIO INDUSTRIALES Y NAVALES FA, C.A.,* *PISO 1, OFICINA 2, AV. RAUL LEONI, SECTOR GUAMACHITO,*
*FRENTE A LA ASOCIACION DE GANADEROS,BARCELONA,EDO. ANZOATEGUI* *Ing. César García*
*Cel: +58 414-760.98.95*
*Hotline Técnica SIEMENS: 0800 1005080*
*Email: support.aan.automation@siemens.com
<su...@siemens.com>*
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 0.9.0 RC2
Posted by Cesar Garcia <ce...@ceos.com.ve>.
Hi,
+1
. Download all staged artifacts under the url specified in the release vote
email into a directory we’ll now call OK
. Verify the SHA512 hashes, OK
. Unzip the archive, OK
. Verify the existence of LICENSE, NOTICE, README, RELEASE_NOTES files in
the extracted source bundle. OK
. Run RAT externally to ensure there are no surprises. OK
. Search for SNAPSHOT references. OK (Only in Jenkins)
. Build the project according to the information in the README.md file. OK
Excellent work Chris,
El sáb, 18 sept 2021 a las 12:15, Christofer Dutz (<
christofer.dutz@c-ware.de>) escribió:
> This is the discussion thread for the corresponding VOTE thread.
>
>
>
> Please keep discussions in this thread to simplify the counting of votes.
>
>
>
> If you have to vote -1 please mention a brief description on why and then
> take the details to this thread.
>
>
--
*CEOS Automatización, C.A.*
*GALPON SERVICIO INDUSTRIALES Y NAVALES FA, C.A.,*
*PISO 1, OFICINA 2, AV. RAUL LEONI, SECTOR GUAMACHITO,*
*FRENTE A LA ASOCIACION DE GANADEROS,BARCELONA,EDO. ANZOATEGUI*
*Ing. César García*
*Cel: +58 414-760.98.95*
*Hotline Técnica SIEMENS: 0800 1005080*
*Email: support.aan.automation@siemens.com
<su...@siemens.com>*
AW: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 0.9.0 RC2
Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
Hi all,
even if I'm happy with our release, I did notice that when unpacking the source zip with 7zip that I'm getting some strange header error, even if it unpacks fine. I haven't seen this with the Windows unpacking or on any Linux system.
Does anyone have an idea, what might be causing this?
Chris
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>
Gesendet: Samstag, 18. September 2021 18:16
An: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Betreff: AW: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 0.9.0 RC2
This is the discussion thread for the corresponding VOTE thread.
Please keep discussions in this thread to simplify the counting of votes.
If you have to vote -1 please mention a brief description on why and then take the details to this thread.