Re: Why'd VBounce not hit?

[Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org>]

hi Dan --

b) if you open a bug on the bugzilla, and attach the change as a patch
(ie. "diff -u" output) to that, we can put it into the 3.2.x ruleset.

a) we'll test it as part of that ;)

--j.

Dan Barker writes:
> OK, I added the subject "Delivery Status Notification" as __BOUNCE_STAT_FAIL
> in 20.vbounce.cf and OR'd it in the huge meta rule (BOUNCE_MESSAGE) next to
> __BOUNCE_DEL_FAIL (on or about line 105).
> 
> I tested it and it works.
> 
> What I don't know how to do is:
> 
>  a) Investigate the possibility of FP's due to this change. It "looks" OK to
> me, but I don't have a large corpus of non-bounce delivery status
> notifications against which to test (er, ah, I have none<g>)
> 
>  b) I don't know how to report this as an enhancement. I do have sample
> emails (http://www.visioncomm.net/VBounce.txt,
> http://www.visioncomm.net/VBounce2.txt,
> http://www.visioncomm.net/VBounce3.txt). Would it go in bugzilla or
> somewhere else? It's an add-on rule for me (3.1.7) but I think it's built in
> to 3.2.x.
> 
> Dan
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kai Schaetzl [mailto:maillists@conactive.com] 
> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 6:17 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Why'd VBounce not hit?
> 
> Dan Barker wrote on Sun, 19 Aug 2007 20:07:30 -0400:
> 
> > I'll dig through this some tomorrow, and maybe open up a bug report, 
> > if it needs a more flexible subject.
> 
> I think this is a good idea.
> 
> Kai
> 
> --
> Kai Sch�tzl, Berlin, Germany
> Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com