You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tez.apache.org by Kuhu Shukla <ks...@oath.com.INVALID> on 2018/07/13 18:06:55 UTC

Re: [DISCUSS] Tez 0.9.2 Release

Hello again!

I think we are in a position to start the release process and the above
mentioned JIRAs are not quite in the blocker category. They are more of
good bug fixes to have which we can include in the next line. Any thoughts
are appreciated and I hope to do a RC next week unless we decide otherwise
post this discussion.

Appreciate any and all inputs.

Regards,
Kuhu

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:49 AM, Kuhu Shukla <ks...@oath.com> wrote:

> Hello folks,
>
> I would like to start the discussion around the release plan for Tez 0.9.2.
>
> Currently there are a  7 patch available
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-3939?filter=-1&jql=project%20%3D%20%22Apache%20Tez%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20%22Patch%20Available%22%20%20%20%20AND%20(%22Target%20Version%2Fs%22%20%20%3D%200.9.next%20OR%20%22Target%20Version%2Fs%22%20%20%3D%200.9.2%20OR%20%22Target%20Version%2Fs%22%20%20%3D%200.9)%20>
> and 8 Open JIRAs
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-3800?filter=-1&jql=project%20%3D%20%22Apache%20Tez%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20%20%20AND%20(%22Target%20Version%2Fs%22%20%20%3D%200.9.next%20OR%20%22Target%20Version%2Fs%22%20%20%3D%200.9.2%20OR%20%22Target%20Version%2Fs%22%20%20%3D%200.9)%20>
> that are targeted to 0.9.2/0.9.next. Please add any JIRA(s) that you think
> is a good addition to 0.9.2 or move them out to the next version if it is
> not a required fix/feature for the current release plan. If you are working
> on one of the JIRAs targeted for 0.9.2, feel free to share the status on
> the JIRAs on this thread. I will reach out independently to the
> assignees/reviewers/reporters of these JIRAs in the next couple days if we
> don't see an update on them.
>
> I would appreciate any and all comments/thoughts on setting the
> requirements and expectations for this release!
>
> To start of this discussion, from my side TEZ-3910 and TEZ-3918 are good
> fixes that should make this release, the former one is a higher priority.
> They are in PA state and need reviews at the moment.
>
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Kuhu
>
>
>
>