You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "Yu Li (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/09/21 07:45:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-19303) Disable WAL in RocksDB recovery
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17199227#comment-17199227 ]
Yu Li commented on FLINK-19303:
-------------------------------
Mind if I assign this JIRA to you [~juha.mynttinen]? Thanks.
> Disable WAL in RocksDB recovery
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-19303
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19303
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Juha Mynttinen
> Priority: Major
>
> During recovery of {{RocksDBStateBackend}} the recovery mechanism puts the key value pairs to local RocksDB instance(s). To speed up the process, the recovery process uses RocskDB write batch mechanism. [RocksDB WAL|https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Write-Ahead-Log] is enabled during this process.
> During normal operations, i.e. when the state backend has been recovered and the Flink application is running (on RocksDB state backend) WAL is disabled.
> The recovery process doesn't need WAL. In fact the recovery should be much faster without WAL. Thus, WAL should be disabled in the recovery process.
> AFAIK the last thing that was done with WAL during recovery was an attempt to remove it. Later that removal was removed because it causes stability issues (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8922).
> Unfortunately the root cause why disabling WAL causes segfault during recovery is unknown. After all, WAL is not used during normal operations.
> Potential explanation is some kind of bug in RocksDB write batch when using WAL. It is possible later RocksDB versions have fixes / workarounds for the issue.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)