You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@rave.apache.org by "Franklin, Matthew B." <mf...@mitre.org> on 2011/06/29 19:37:12 UTC
[DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.1-incubating Release Candidate
Discussion thread for vote on 0.1-incubating release candidate.
For more information on the release process, checkout -
http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
Some of the things to check before voting are:
- can you run the demo binaries
- can you build the contents of source-release.zip and svn tag
- do all of the staged jars/zips contain the required LICENSE, NOTICE and
DISCLAIMER files
- are all of the staged jars signed and the signature verifiable
- is the signing key in the project's KEYS file and on a public server
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.1-incubating Release Candidate
Posted by Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org>.
On Jun 29, 2011, at 1:37 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
> Discussion thread for vote on 0.1-incubating release candidate.
>
> For more information on the release process, checkout -
> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
All the instructions seem to be well followed.
>
> Some of the things to check before voting are:
> - can you run the demo binaries
Yes I was able to run the binaries just fine. One cosmetic suggestion is to add trouble shooting information to REAME like conflicting ports for future releases.
> - can you build the contents of source-release.zip and svn tag
Yes. on Mac 10.6.7.
> - do all of the staged jars/zips contain the required LICENSE, NOTICE and
> DISCLAIMER files
Yes.
> - are all of the staged jars signed and the signature verifiable
> - is the signing key in the project's KEYS file and on a public server
Yes.
>
Excellent job in pulling this together Matt.
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.1-incubating Release Candidate
Posted by Marlon Pierce <mp...@cs.indiana.edu>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
The permission issues are an artifact of using jar to uncompres the zip
file. Using unzip, I see the correct permissions.
Marlon
On 6/29/11 3:56 PM, Marlon Pierce wrote:
> Mac OSX. I unpacked the zip with jar.
>
>
>
>> * I had to chmod +x the ./bin/*.sh files in from the .zipped Demo
>> Artifact
>> (https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherave-004/org/
>> apache/rave/rave-project/0.1-incubating/raveproject-0.1-incubating-source-
>> release.zip)--permissions
>> weren't correct.
>
>>> What system? I was able to run them just fine from my mac...
>
>
>
>> Marlon
>
>
>
>
>> On 6/29/11 3:29 PM, Scott Wilson wrote:
>>>>> On 29 Jun 2011, at 18:37, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Discussion thread for vote on 0.1-incubating release candidate.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For more information on the release process, checkout -
>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
>>>>>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Some of the things to check before voting are:
>>>>>> - can you run the demo binaries
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, just did this, and it works really nicely following the README
>>>>>
>>>>>> - can you build the contents of source-release.zip and svn tag
>>>>>> - do all of the staged jars/zips contain the required LICENSE, NOTICE
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> DISCLAIMER files
>>>>>> - are all of the staged jars signed and the signature verifiable
>>>>>> - is the signing key in the project's KEYS file and on a public server
>>>>>>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOC4UgAAoJEEfVXEODPFID5pYIAJcBqDXIYZ0rp2F1aGABbMct
0BbJks9bblFpNmUxGdMMv5vfWQK0RZdCWJzNwdGoE8ma9uBZDFbCbfgTD6NdR9V+
Z2mB5vvY6y1NmVtJP/d7MepXPhl+iLxSm5WajPJgVOEsxjjtlrJ0O78rCBbNXlOU
dMxJRTBSLCJ2vFfLMZwVo01jLnHWFFJ/MlVySVLXMMp8aYEO8Fvg+hrchCVIxAkG
wrmLPkyTw3L6eHgAGdUb2yzauvK77dLDd2BppWqlm8xAw7XNeFq77lAYyDDzDUlX
6ibsStL5oOcxckkBI/HOa0WPbuOqjWDNQsB0k6yfQa3bDEJnJlJCnY73yXZsyJ8=
=/oP9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.1-incubating Release Candidate
Posted by Marlon Pierce <mp...@cs.indiana.edu>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Mac OSX. I unpacked the zip with jar.
>
> * I had to chmod +x the ./bin/*.sh files in from the .zipped Demo
> Artifact
> (https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherave-004/org/
> apache/rave/rave-project/0.1-incubating/raveproject-0.1-incubating-source-
> release.zip)--permissions
> weren't correct.
>
>> What system? I was able to run them just fine from my mac...
>
>
>
> Marlon
>
>
>
>
> On 6/29/11 3:29 PM, Scott Wilson wrote:
>>>> On 29 Jun 2011, at 18:37, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Discussion thread for vote on 0.1-incubating release candidate.
>>>>>
>>>>> For more information on the release process, checkout -
>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
>>>>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Some of the things to check before voting are:
>>>>> - can you run the demo binaries
>>>>
>>>> Yes, just did this, and it works really nicely following the README
>>>>
>>>>> - can you build the contents of source-release.zip and svn tag
>>>>> - do all of the staged jars/zips contain the required LICENSE, NOTICE
>>>>> and
>>>>> DISCLAIMER files
>>>>> - are all of the staged jars signed and the signature verifiable
>>>>> - is the signing key in the project's KEYS file and on a public server
>>>>>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOC4NqAAoJEEfVXEODPFIDqOsIAIK5+4r8iljjBi/ptvN0n7WG
7JY5/auXBZn7X/yHtao4rcGnGXuPV4omqJUhC0SRe3MIPuUJPwH+2D/UygdgOaB/
wKQuykdmUCBgErESPysx3DpEuv30+Tn5O33J65UTYXmo2Iu2wyynol4XDYlaxOSq
1d1O/Ro+XO4fPdIDlK81M4/paON/h427N4nW311wY/c/RaEbuZFe+C4G2huu3H8G
c8HSpMGI5WpxdIvophkolbppL7tGOIHYUHllQvsS6jzidSRhSD+BytQfKaSiQWqD
2Hqr2zthhBjFb8NlqJEuTyl1nXyS23m61uBH60pvDSy38N1hPK+ygHtoNOp9ReQ=
=WAof
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.1-incubating Release Candidate
Posted by "Franklin, Matthew B." <mf...@mitre.org>.
On 6/29/11 3:31 PM, "Marlon Pierce" <mp...@cs.indiana.edu> wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>(Reposting from the [VOTE] thread)
>
>I ran through these. I was able to build from the tagged SVN and to run
>both the .tar.gz and .zip. I started, logged in and did a few manual
>tests (moving, deleting, adding gadgets, for example). No problems. I
>was also able to import the KEYS with gpg, so it is well formed.
>
>Two issues:
>
>* This link is broken:
>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherave-037/org/a
>pache/rave/rave-master/0.1-incubating/rave-master-0.1-incubating-source-re
>lease.zip
I will make sure to fix this when we go for the IPMC vote, it is supposed
to be
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherave-004/org/ap
ache/rave/rave-master/0.1-incubating/rave-master-0.1-incubating-source-rele
ase.zip
>
>* I had to chmod +x the ./bin/*.sh files in from the .zipped Demo
>Artifact
>(https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherave-004/org/
>apache/rave/rave-project/0.1-incubating/raveproject-0.1-incubating-source-
>release.zip)--permissions
>weren't correct.
What system? I was able to run them just fine from my mac...
>
>
>Marlon
>
>
>
>
>On 6/29/11 3:29 PM, Scott Wilson wrote:
>> On 29 Jun 2011, at 18:37, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>
>>> Discussion thread for vote on 0.1-incubating release candidate.
>>>
>>> For more information on the release process, checkout -
>>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
>>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
>>>
>>> Some of the things to check before voting are:
>>> - can you run the demo binaries
>>
>> Yes, just did this, and it works really nicely following the README
>>
>>> - can you build the contents of source-release.zip and svn tag
>>> - do all of the staged jars/zips contain the required LICENSE, NOTICE
>>>and
>>> DISCLAIMER files
>>> - are all of the staged jars signed and the signature verifiable
>>> - is the signing key in the project's KEYS file and on a public server
>>>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
>Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
>Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
>iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOC32qAAoJEEfVXEODPFIDpXkIAJup0klr3IVs3BFSXQHW1FLN
>mZfchWUg5X5rSpdxmMkhMfy/WFYm/4bU1SIA0Xxs6iURBRFOb2TN6zao9/NBcZAH
>NkM49yx/mCGV4cWEVLYn5kY9oNXBe216ZWApW7GwQ98u61TVgD3lLOOn4ur/L0SQ
>JhzrsHc65hJeHVY09+01H4cnn+01vmTuLDf09KIS7zwDauCGsasYsafMdYgZEcBf
>4p5N6VESjql895BFojvrVUApVw+m8HgDmaZ+0//3cByHnlTqMomroaOP5Sm9UEG/
>UZc2/yHZZa5dfRkDYMmPHlQnHb5hU+Bv/pcoPshHla/I4gWtrZ75bwGTIDUvJRg=
>=5N4d
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.1-incubating Release Candidate
Posted by Marlon Pierce <mp...@cs.indiana.edu>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
(Reposting from the [VOTE] thread)
I ran through these. I was able to build from the tagged SVN and to run
both the .tar.gz and .zip. I started, logged in and did a few manual
tests (moving, deleting, adding gadgets, for example). No problems. I
was also able to import the KEYS with gpg, so it is well formed.
Two issues:
* This link is broken:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherave-037/org/apache/rave/rave-master/0.1-incubating/rave-master-0.1-incubating-source-release.zip
* I had to chmod +x the ./bin/*.sh files in from the .zipped Demo
Artifact
(https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherave-004/org/apache/rave/rave-project/0.1-incubating/raveproject-0.1-incubating-source-release.zip)--permissions
weren't correct.
Marlon
On 6/29/11 3:29 PM, Scott Wilson wrote:
> On 29 Jun 2011, at 18:37, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>
>> Discussion thread for vote on 0.1-incubating release candidate.
>>
>> For more information on the release process, checkout -
>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
>>
>> Some of the things to check before voting are:
>> - can you run the demo binaries
>
> Yes, just did this, and it works really nicely following the README
>
>> - can you build the contents of source-release.zip and svn tag
>> - do all of the staged jars/zips contain the required LICENSE, NOTICE and
>> DISCLAIMER files
>> - are all of the staged jars signed and the signature verifiable
>> - is the signing key in the project's KEYS file and on a public server
>>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOC32qAAoJEEfVXEODPFIDpXkIAJup0klr3IVs3BFSXQHW1FLN
mZfchWUg5X5rSpdxmMkhMfy/WFYm/4bU1SIA0Xxs6iURBRFOb2TN6zao9/NBcZAH
NkM49yx/mCGV4cWEVLYn5kY9oNXBe216ZWApW7GwQ98u61TVgD3lLOOn4ur/L0SQ
JhzrsHc65hJeHVY09+01H4cnn+01vmTuLDf09KIS7zwDauCGsasYsafMdYgZEcBf
4p5N6VESjql895BFojvrVUApVw+m8HgDmaZ+0//3cByHnlTqMomroaOP5Sm9UEG/
UZc2/yHZZa5dfRkDYMmPHlQnHb5hU+Bv/pcoPshHla/I4gWtrZ75bwGTIDUvJRg=
=5N4d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.1-incubating Release Candidate
Posted by Scott Wilson <sc...@gmail.com>.
On 29 Jun 2011, at 18:37, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
> Discussion thread for vote on 0.1-incubating release candidate.
>
> For more information on the release process, checkout -
> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
>
> Some of the things to check before voting are:
> - can you run the demo binaries
Yes, just did this, and it works really nicely following the README
> - can you build the contents of source-release.zip and svn tag
> - do all of the staged jars/zips contain the required LICENSE, NOTICE and
> DISCLAIMER files
> - are all of the staged jars signed and the signature verifiable
> - is the signing key in the project's KEYS file and on a public server
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.1-incubating Release Candidate
Posted by Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu>.
Great work Matt and looking good so far!
One minor detail concerning the [VOTE] email itself:
Only the *-source-release.zip distributions for the rave-master-pom and the
rave-project projects represent true and valid (complete!) source distributions.
The other two *-sources.jar for rave-portal and rave-shindig are supportive
artifacts intended to be used by IDEs, but do are not valid source distributions
from ASF requirements POV.
An ASF source release must be completely self-contained from which the
project(s) can be build by itself. For one, this requires build scripts etc.
(our maven pom.xml) to be embedded.
So only the primary *-source-release.zip files qualify for this (and the one for
rave-project also covers/contains everything for rave-shindig and rave-portal as
well).
For future release [VOTE] messages only these *-source-release.zip archives
needs to be indicated as such. Furthermore, after the VOTE (if accepted) the
only these two zip archives and the binary distributions need/should be provided
from the official dist download area.
Regards,
Ate
On 06/29/2011 07:37 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
> Discussion thread for vote on 0.1-incubating release candidate.
>
> For more information on the release process, checkout -
> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
>
> Some of the things to check before voting are:
> - can you run the demo binaries
> - can you build the contents of source-release.zip and svn tag
> - do all of the staged jars/zips contain the required LICENSE, NOTICE and
> DISCLAIMER files
> - are all of the staged jars signed and the signature verifiable
> - is the signing key in the project's KEYS file and on a public server
>