You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@netbeans.apache.org by Christian Lenz <ch...@gmx.net> on 2017/09/24 15:17:36 UTC
Maybe spam?
There is no reason to have a second darkula LAF: http://plugins.netbeans.org/plugin/73032, which I think does nothing special, with no extended stuff from the original one. I will wait, what the author says but I think it is spam or what ever. We should be aware of it, only to let you know that.
Greets
Chris
AW: Maybe spam?
Posted by Christian Lenz <ch...@gmx.net>.
Great, thx.
Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10
Von: Geertjan Wielenga
Gesendet: Sonntag, 24. September 2017 21:27
An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Maybe spam?
Will do, right now.
Gj
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 9:25 PM, Emilian Bold <em...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> The binaries are absolutely identical. So it looks like somebody is
> just playing.
>
> The copycat should be removed from the Plugin Portal. Really no reason
> to have it there.
>
> --emi
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 7:11 PM, Geertjan Wielenga
> <ge...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > I'm the one who approved it for display in the Plugin Portal today. We
> > could simply unapprove it -- anything so that we can focus on the only
> > thing that is relevant right now: the Module Review.
> >
> > Gj
> >
> > On Sun, 24 Sep 2017 at 18:08, Emilian Bold <em...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> My first thought is virus.
> >>
> >> I have downloaded the binaries and will compare with the original.
> >>
> >> --emi
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Christian Lenz <christian.lenz@gmx.net
> >
> >> wrote:
> >> > There is no reason to have a second darkula LAF:
> >> http://plugins.netbeans.org/plugin/73032, which I think does nothing
> >> special, with no extended stuff from the original one. I will wait, what
> >> the author says but I think it is spam or what ever. We should be aware
> of
> >> it, only to let you know that.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Greets
> >> >
> >> > Chris
> >>
>
Re: Maybe spam?
Posted by Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com>.
Will do, right now.
Gj
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 9:25 PM, Emilian Bold <em...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> The binaries are absolutely identical. So it looks like somebody is
> just playing.
>
> The copycat should be removed from the Plugin Portal. Really no reason
> to have it there.
>
> --emi
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 7:11 PM, Geertjan Wielenga
> <ge...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > I'm the one who approved it for display in the Plugin Portal today. We
> > could simply unapprove it -- anything so that we can focus on the only
> > thing that is relevant right now: the Module Review.
> >
> > Gj
> >
> > On Sun, 24 Sep 2017 at 18:08, Emilian Bold <em...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> My first thought is virus.
> >>
> >> I have downloaded the binaries and will compare with the original.
> >>
> >> --emi
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Christian Lenz <christian.lenz@gmx.net
> >
> >> wrote:
> >> > There is no reason to have a second darkula LAF:
> >> http://plugins.netbeans.org/plugin/73032, which I think does nothing
> >> special, with no extended stuff from the original one. I will wait, what
> >> the author says but I think it is spam or what ever. We should be aware
> of
> >> it, only to let you know that.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Greets
> >> >
> >> > Chris
> >>
>
Re: Maybe spam?
Posted by Emilian Bold <em...@gmail.com>.
The binaries are absolutely identical. So it looks like somebody is
just playing.
The copycat should be removed from the Plugin Portal. Really no reason
to have it there.
--emi
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 7:11 PM, Geertjan Wielenga
<ge...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I'm the one who approved it for display in the Plugin Portal today. We
> could simply unapprove it -- anything so that we can focus on the only
> thing that is relevant right now: the Module Review.
>
> Gj
>
> On Sun, 24 Sep 2017 at 18:08, Emilian Bold <em...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> My first thought is virus.
>>
>> I have downloaded the binaries and will compare with the original.
>>
>> --emi
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Christian Lenz <ch...@gmx.net>
>> wrote:
>> > There is no reason to have a second darkula LAF:
>> http://plugins.netbeans.org/plugin/73032, which I think does nothing
>> special, with no extended stuff from the original one. I will wait, what
>> the author says but I think it is spam or what ever. We should be aware of
>> it, only to let you know that.
>> >
>> >
>> > Greets
>> >
>> > Chris
>>
Re: Maybe spam?
Posted by Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com>.
I'm the one who approved it for display in the Plugin Portal today. We
could simply unapprove it -- anything so that we can focus on the only
thing that is relevant right now: the Module Review.
Gj
On Sun, 24 Sep 2017 at 18:08, Emilian Bold <em...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My first thought is virus.
>
> I have downloaded the binaries and will compare with the original.
>
> --emi
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Christian Lenz <ch...@gmx.net>
> wrote:
> > There is no reason to have a second darkula LAF:
> http://plugins.netbeans.org/plugin/73032, which I think does nothing
> special, with no extended stuff from the original one. I will wait, what
> the author says but I think it is spam or what ever. We should be aware of
> it, only to let you know that.
> >
> >
> > Greets
> >
> > Chris
>
Re: Maybe spam?
Posted by Emilian Bold <em...@gmail.com>.
My first thought is virus.
I have downloaded the binaries and will compare with the original.
--emi
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Christian Lenz <ch...@gmx.net> wrote:
> There is no reason to have a second darkula LAF: http://plugins.netbeans.org/plugin/73032, which I think does nothing special, with no extended stuff from the original one. I will wait, what the author says but I think it is spam or what ever. We should be aware of it, only to let you know that.
>
>
> Greets
>
> Chris