You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com> on 2013/07/01 04:32:45 UTC

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.0.65 [the final frontier]

On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 5:28 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. <wr...@rowe-clan.net>wrote:

> Candidates are in http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
>   +/-1
>   [  ]  Release 2.0.65 as the final 2.0 series package
>
> TIA!
>

[+1]  Release 2.0.65 as the final 2.0 series package

Tested 64-bit builds on FreeBSD 9
Compares favorably with 2.0.64.

2.0.64 vs. 2.0.65:

 Test Summary Report
 -------------------
-t/apache/byterange7.t             (Wstat: 0 Tests: 24 Failed: 8)
-  Failed tests:  13-19, 23
 t/apache/pr17629.t                (Wstat: 0 Tests: 4 Failed: 1)
   Failed test:  4
 t/apache/pr43939.t                (Wstat: 0 Tests: 4 Failed: 1)
@@ -570,15 +553,9 @@
   Parse errors: Bad plan.  You planned 58 tests but ran 50.
 t/modules/dav.t                   (Wstat: 0 Tests: 16 Failed: 1)
   Failed test:  16
-t/modules/include.t               (Wstat: 0 Tests: 87 Failed: 1)
-  Failed test:  66
-t/modules/rewrite.t               (Wstat: 0 Tests: 29 Failed: 1)
-  Failed test:  24
-t/security/CVE-2011-3368-rewrite.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 3 Failed: 1)
-  Failed test:  3
-Files=108, Tests=3246, 91 wallclock secs ( 2.00 usr  0.33 sys + 36.73 cusr
 9.00 csys = 48.05 CPU)
+Files=108, Tests=3246, 92 wallclock secs ( 1.91 usr  0.33 sys + 36.18 cusr
 8.55 csys = 46.97 CPU)
 Result: FAIL
-Failed 8/108 test programs. 27/3246 subtests failed.
+Failed 4/108 test programs. 16/3246 subtests failed.

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.0.65 [the final frontier]

Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 5:28 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. <wr...@rowe-clan.net>wrote:
>
>> Candidates are in http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>>
>>   +/-1
>>   [  ]  Release 2.0.65 as the final 2.0 series package
>>
>> TIA!
>>
>
> [+1]  Release 2.0.65 as the final 2.0 series package
>
> Tested 64-bit builds on FreeBSD 9
> Compares favorably with 2.0.64.
>
> 2.0.64 vs. 2.0.65:
>
>  Test Summary Report
>  -------------------
> -t/apache/byterange7.t             (Wstat: 0 Tests: 24 Failed: 8)
> -  Failed tests:  13-19, 23
>  t/apache/pr17629.t                (Wstat: 0 Tests: 4 Failed: 1)
>    Failed test:  4
>  t/apache/pr43939.t                (Wstat: 0 Tests: 4 Failed: 1)
> @@ -570,15 +553,9 @@
>    Parse errors: Bad plan.  You planned 58 tests but ran 50.
>  t/modules/dav.t                   (Wstat: 0 Tests: 16 Failed: 1)
>    Failed test:  16
> -t/modules/include.t               (Wstat: 0 Tests: 87 Failed: 1)
> -  Failed test:  66
> -t/modules/rewrite.t               (Wstat: 0 Tests: 29 Failed: 1)
> -  Failed test:  24
> -t/security/CVE-2011-3368-rewrite.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 3 Failed: 1)
> -  Failed test:  3
> -Files=108, Tests=3246, 91 wallclock secs ( 2.00 usr  0.33 sys + 36.73
> cusr  9.00 csys = 48.05 CPU)
> +Files=108, Tests=3246, 92 wallclock secs ( 1.91 usr  0.33 sys + 36.18
> cusr  8.55 csys = 46.97 CPU)
>  Result: FAIL
> -Failed 8/108 test programs. 27/3246 subtests failed.
> +Failed 4/108 test programs. 16/3246 subtests failed.
>


Another note: Some tests I had for the vulnerabilities passed.

-- 
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
http://emptyhammock.com/