Re: Preparing for continuum-1.1-alpha-1

[Jesse McConnell <je...@gmail.com>]

might as well just use this thread...

I have continuum 1.1 alpha 1 staged now...but I have one concern about
calling a vote on this and making it official...

Its kinda big (16M war, 25M plexus app) and I still don't really feel
comfortable releasing something like continuum as an alpha into the
main repositories.

its currently staged at:

http://people.apache.org/~jmcconnell/continuum

What do you guys think? just call a vote on it and get it pushed into
the wild or can we just do the alpha's like this through the staging
setup?

jesse

On 3/30/07, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On 31/03/2007, at 6:50 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>
> > I'm ok for a timestamped version, but we can release the release
> > manager too, without the plugin because it isn't ready and I want
> > the new Maven-SCM in it.
>
> We're not set up to have snapshots in place permanently, so I don't
> think we should use a timestamped one.
>
> I'd agree with releasing just the shared release component.
>
> >
> > The pb is that release-manager use maven-scm 1.0-SNAPSHOT, we can
> > use 1.0-beta-4 because the release manager doesn't use new code of
> > maven-scm but we won't have maven-scm fixes. Or we can use a
> > timestamped version of Maven-SCM too. If we choose the timestamped
> > version of Maven-SCM, Continuum need to use it.
>
> I think we could cut another beta of Maven SCM now with the recent
> fixes before you push towards 1.0 as discussed on that list.
>
> Cheers,
> Brett
>


-- 
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com

Re: Preparing for continuum-1.1-alpha-1

[Jesse McConnell <je...@gmail.com>]

hm, thats a great way to do it, thanks wendy..

I'll just call the vote then :)

jesse

On 4/20/07, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/20/07, Jesse McConnell <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > What do you guys think? just call a vote on it and get it pushed into
> > the wild or can we just do the alpha's like this through the staging
> > setup?
>
> The vote makes it an official release tha can be annouced on the user
> list.  Whether to put it on the mirrors is a separate issue.
>
> Many projects use people.apache.org/builds for both snapshots and
> releases that aren't mirrored for whatever reason.  I created
> people.a.o/maven/archiva for archiva-0.9-alpha-1 (which remains a
> development build.)
>
> How about putting it under
> http://people.apache.org/builds/maven/continuum/1.1-alpha-1 ?
>
> BTW, please make sure it contains LICENSE and NOTICE.  I don't see
> them in my last Continuum build.
>
> --
> Wendy
>


-- 
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com

Re: Preparing for continuum-1.1-alpha-1

[Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>]

Even if it's a minor releases, we need to put them in the repo, because we're under the Maven umbrella so it's better if we respect the Maven philosophy.

My 2 cents.

Emmanuel

Jesse McConnell a écrit :
> well, my thought is that its not like anyone would be coding against
> the modules in continuum as a dependency, so why bother putting these
> minor releases into the main repositories?  We don't even deploy
> updated snapshots of continuum modules much if at all..
> 
> jesse
> 
> On 4/20/07, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net> wrote:
>> I don't think it's a pb to release alpha in 2 weeks and put them in 
>> the main repo.
>>
>> Emmanuel
>>
>> Jesse McConnell a écrit :
>> > well, I think it will bridge the gap really...its an official release
>> > in that it has tags and was generated through the release process, but
>> > I hesitate to shove it out into the main repositories only to follow
>> > up with an alpha 2 in a few weeks..
>> >
>> > jesse
>> >
>> > On 4/20/07, Rahul Thakur <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Since this would be a proper release (not a build), I'd imagine this
>> >> going on to the main repository (and subsequently mirrored).
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Rahul
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ----- Original Message -----
>> >> From: "Wendy Smoak" <ws...@gmail.com>
>> >> To: <co...@maven.apache.org>
>> >> Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 7:14 AM
>> >> Subject: Re: Preparing for continuum-1.1-alpha-1
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > On 4/20/07, Jesse McConnell <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> What do you guys think? just call a vote on it and get it pushed 
>> into
>> >> >> the wild or can we just do the alpha's like this through the 
>> staging
>> >> >> setup?
>> >> >
>> >> > The vote makes it an official release tha can be annouced on the 
>> user
>> >> > list.  Whether to put it on the mirrors is a separate issue.
>> >> >
>> >> > Many projects use people.apache.org/builds for both snapshots and
>> >> > releases that aren't mirrored for whatever reason.  I created
>> >> > people.a.o/maven/archiva for archiva-0.9-alpha-1 (which remains a
>> >> > development build.)
>> >> >
>> >> > How about putting it under
>> >> > http://people.apache.org/builds/maven/continuum/1.1-alpha-1 ?
>> >> >
>> >> > BTW, please make sure it contains LICENSE and NOTICE.  I don't see
>> >> > them in my last Continuum build.
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Wendy
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
> 
> 

Re: Preparing for continuum-1.1-alpha-1

[Jesse McConnell <je...@gmail.com>]

well, my thought is that its not like anyone would be coding against
the modules in continuum as a dependency, so why bother putting these
minor releases into the main repositories?  We don't even deploy
updated snapshots of continuum modules much if at all..

jesse

On 4/20/07, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net> wrote:
> I don't think it's a pb to release alpha in 2 weeks and put them in the main repo.
>
> Emmanuel
>
> Jesse McConnell a écrit :
> > well, I think it will bridge the gap really...its an official release
> > in that it has tags and was generated through the release process, but
> > I hesitate to shove it out into the main repositories only to follow
> > up with an alpha 2 in a few weeks..
> >
> > jesse
> >
> > On 4/20/07, Rahul Thakur <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Since this would be a proper release (not a build), I'd imagine this
> >> going on to the main repository (and subsequently mirrored).
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Rahul
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Wendy Smoak" <ws...@gmail.com>
> >> To: <co...@maven.apache.org>
> >> Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 7:14 AM
> >> Subject: Re: Preparing for continuum-1.1-alpha-1
> >>
> >>
> >> > On 4/20/07, Jesse McConnell <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> What do you guys think? just call a vote on it and get it pushed into
> >> >> the wild or can we just do the alpha's like this through the staging
> >> >> setup?
> >> >
> >> > The vote makes it an official release tha can be annouced on the user
> >> > list.  Whether to put it on the mirrors is a separate issue.
> >> >
> >> > Many projects use people.apache.org/builds for both snapshots and
> >> > releases that aren't mirrored for whatever reason.  I created
> >> > people.a.o/maven/archiva for archiva-0.9-alpha-1 (which remains a
> >> > development build.)
> >> >
> >> > How about putting it under
> >> > http://people.apache.org/builds/maven/continuum/1.1-alpha-1 ?
> >> >
> >> > BTW, please make sure it contains LICENSE and NOTICE.  I don't see
> >> > them in my last Continuum build.
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Wendy
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>


-- 
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com

Re: Preparing for continuum-1.1-alpha-1

[Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>]

I don't think it's a pb to release alpha in 2 weeks and put them in the main repo.

Emmanuel

Jesse McConnell a écrit :
> well, I think it will bridge the gap really...its an official release
> in that it has tags and was generated through the release process, but
> I hesitate to shove it out into the main repositories only to follow
> up with an alpha 2 in a few weeks..
> 
> jesse
> 
> On 4/20/07, Rahul Thakur <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Since this would be a proper release (not a build), I'd imagine this
>> going on to the main repository (and subsequently mirrored).
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Rahul
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Wendy Smoak" <ws...@gmail.com>
>> To: <co...@maven.apache.org>
>> Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 7:14 AM
>> Subject: Re: Preparing for continuum-1.1-alpha-1
>>
>>
>> > On 4/20/07, Jesse McConnell <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> What do you guys think? just call a vote on it and get it pushed into
>> >> the wild or can we just do the alpha's like this through the staging
>> >> setup?
>> >
>> > The vote makes it an official release tha can be annouced on the user
>> > list.  Whether to put it on the mirrors is a separate issue.
>> >
>> > Many projects use people.apache.org/builds for both snapshots and
>> > releases that aren't mirrored for whatever reason.  I created
>> > people.a.o/maven/archiva for archiva-0.9-alpha-1 (which remains a
>> > development build.)
>> >
>> > How about putting it under
>> > http://people.apache.org/builds/maven/continuum/1.1-alpha-1 ?
>> >
>> > BTW, please make sure it contains LICENSE and NOTICE.  I don't see
>> > them in my last Continuum build.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Wendy
>>
>>
> 
> 

Re: Preparing for continuum-1.1-alpha-1

[Jesse McConnell <je...@gmail.com>]

well, I think it will bridge the gap really...its an official release
in that it has tags and was generated through the release process, but
I hesitate to shove it out into the main repositories only to follow
up with an alpha 2 in a few weeks..

jesse

On 4/20/07, Rahul Thakur <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Since this would be a proper release (not a build), I'd imagine this
> going on to the main repository (and subsequently mirrored).
>
> Cheers,
> Rahul
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Wendy Smoak" <ws...@gmail.com>
> To: <co...@maven.apache.org>
> Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 7:14 AM
> Subject: Re: Preparing for continuum-1.1-alpha-1
>
>
> > On 4/20/07, Jesse McConnell <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> What do you guys think? just call a vote on it and get it pushed into
> >> the wild or can we just do the alpha's like this through the staging
> >> setup?
> >
> > The vote makes it an official release tha can be annouced on the user
> > list.  Whether to put it on the mirrors is a separate issue.
> >
> > Many projects use people.apache.org/builds for both snapshots and
> > releases that aren't mirrored for whatever reason.  I created
> > people.a.o/maven/archiva for archiva-0.9-alpha-1 (which remains a
> > development build.)
> >
> > How about putting it under
> > http://people.apache.org/builds/maven/continuum/1.1-alpha-1 ?
> >
> > BTW, please make sure it contains LICENSE and NOTICE.  I don't see
> > them in my last Continuum build.
> >
> > --
> > Wendy
>
>


-- 
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com

Re: Preparing for continuum-1.1-alpha-1

[Rahul Thakur <ra...@gmail.com>]

Since this would be a proper release (not a build), I'd imagine this 
going on to the main repository (and subsequently mirrored).

Cheers,
Rahul


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Wendy Smoak" <ws...@gmail.com>
To: <co...@maven.apache.org>
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 7:14 AM
Subject: Re: Preparing for continuum-1.1-alpha-1


> On 4/20/07, Jesse McConnell <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> What do you guys think? just call a vote on it and get it pushed into
>> the wild or can we just do the alpha's like this through the staging
>> setup?
>
> The vote makes it an official release tha can be annouced on the user
> list.  Whether to put it on the mirrors is a separate issue.
>
> Many projects use people.apache.org/builds for both snapshots and
> releases that aren't mirrored for whatever reason.  I created
> people.a.o/maven/archiva for archiva-0.9-alpha-1 (which remains a
> development build.)
>
> How about putting it under
> http://people.apache.org/builds/maven/continuum/1.1-alpha-1 ?
>
> BTW, please make sure it contains LICENSE and NOTICE.  I don't see
> them in my last Continuum build.
>
> -- 
> Wendy 

Re: Preparing for continuum-1.1-alpha-1

[Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>]

On 4/20/07, Jesse McConnell <je...@gmail.com> wrote:

> What do you guys think? just call a vote on it and get it pushed into
> the wild or can we just do the alpha's like this through the staging
> setup?

The vote makes it an official release tha can be annouced on the user
list.  Whether to put it on the mirrors is a separate issue.

Many projects use people.apache.org/builds for both snapshots and
releases that aren't mirrored for whatever reason.  I created
people.a.o/maven/archiva for archiva-0.9-alpha-1 (which remains a
development build.)

How about putting it under
http://people.apache.org/builds/maven/continuum/1.1-alpha-1 ?

BTW, please make sure it contains LICENSE and NOTICE.  I don't see
them in my last Continuum build.

-- 
Wendy