You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@kudu.apache.org by "Mike Percy (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/02/26 12:55:18 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (KUDU-568) Exactly-once semantics on writes

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Mike Percy updated KUDU-568:
----------------------------
    Parent: KUDU-560

> Exactly-once semantics on writes
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KUDU-568
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-568
>             Project: Kudu
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: consensus
>    Affects Versions: M4.5
>            Reporter: David Alves
>            Priority: Critical
>
> When failing over from a leader to the next one, the new leader might elect to 1) commit or 2) overwrite incomplete operations that were sent to the first leader.
> If the client, gets a timeout, or tries the new leader before getting a response from the old leader, it retries the writes, and if the leader chose option 1), commit, then it will get back an Status::AlreadyPresent().
> We should implement exactly-once semantics to mask this behavior, i.e. when the client tries the new leader it should just get back that the writes were successful, independently of when they were applied.
> A common strategy to do this is to have a a replay cache. Each write has a client id and a write sequence number, which we store along with the WriteRequestPB. When a new leader is promoted it keeps in memory, for a period, the ids and sequence numbers of client writes. When a client is then submitting a duplicated write it just replies immediately.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)