[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-2136) Inside lower bound inclusion (documentation)

["Daniel Kuppitz (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16748807#comment-16748807 ] 

Daniel Kuppitz commented on TINKERPOP-2136:
-------------------------------------------

I just go ahead and merge the changes into {{tp33}} and {{master}}. Not worth a PR as it's just a minor fix in the user docs.

> Inside lower bound inclusion (documentation)
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TINKERPOP-2136
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2136
>             Project: TinkerPop
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: process
>    Affects Versions: 3.3.5
>            Reporter: Martijn Dwars
>            Assignee: Daniel Kuppitz
>            Priority: Minor
>
> On [http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/current/reference/#has-step] there is an example:
> {code:java}
> g.V().has('age',inside(20,30)).values('age') // 1
> {code}
> with the comment:
> {code:java}
> Find all vertices whose ages are between 20 (inclusive) and 30 (exclusive).
> {code}
> But if I run this in the Gremlin Groovy shell I see:
> {code:java}
> gremlin> g.V().has('age', inside(10, 30)).toString()
> ==>[GraphStep(vertex,[]), HasStep([age.and(gt(10), lt(30))])]
> {code}
> which means the lower bound and upper bound are both exclusive. In particular, the lower bound is exclusive, _not_ inclusive. Right?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)