[GitHub] [bookkeeper] Ghatage commented on issue #2466: BookKeeper code coverage is broken because of Jenkins migration

[GitBox <gi...@apache.org>]

Ghatage commented on issue #2466:
URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/2466#issuecomment-718403208


   Yes my thoughts exactly.
   Code coverage driven testing has proven to reduce bugs. I've been
   championing this at work and want to bring the same aspect to the community.
   
   Code coverage per pull request commit.
   Optional merge barrier based on % coverage of the commit vs a preset
   threshold.
   
   On Wed, Oct 28, 2020, 11:03 PM Enrico Olivelli <no...@github.com>
   wrote:
   
   > I am not sure anyone ever taken those reports into consideration, apart
   > from the days when we set them up.
   >
   > Btw it would be cool to resume that work.
   >
   > I would find it more useful during pull requests validation, because you
   > can easily check if the new code is covered by tests
   >
   > —
   > You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
   > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
   > <https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/2466#issuecomment-718380524>,
   > or unsubscribe
   > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAX6QQIAQURA6X3H4Y46B7TSNEARJANCNFSM4TDD2Q4Q>
   > .
   >
   


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org