You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@brooklyn.apache.org by Adrián Nieto Pérez <ad...@lcc.uma.es> on 2015/07/01 11:42:59 UTC
A proposal of a new Apache Brooklyn GUI
Hello to all:
I’m Adrian, currently a dev of SeaClouds Project in University of Málaga. As some kind of Apache Brooklyn Summer of Code me and maybe some of my colleges have planned to develop a new GUI for Brooklyn. The intention is to use AngularJS and Material Design Guidelines (https://github.com/angular/material <https://github.com/angular/material>) to improve Brooklyn UX.
I have two concerns before starting this project during August. One of them is if you are currently planning to develop a Dashboard (I found some commits on GH about a mobile version of the Brooklyn GUI). The other one is I would like to use a library to interact with Brooklyn API (for example https://github.com/signalfx/swagger-angular-client <https://github.com/signalfx/swagger-angular-client>), but I wasn’t able to find one compatible with swagger 1.0 (which is already deprecated). Do you have plans to upgrade swagger to V2?
Also I’m aware that you plan to develop a drag and drop editor, I will try to follow the conversation about this designer which should be part of the new dashboard. I think that if it’s developed as an standalone library which outputs YAML from a visual topology it will be enough to let me develop an Angular Directive over your code (we currently do this on SeaClouds Project with https://youtu.be/tyg-vkG2oho <https://youtu.be/tyg-vkG2oho> minute 1.30).
Anyway before starting to code a new dashboard the swagger thing is mandatory IMO. But i'm afraid that my knowledge about Brooklyn & Swagger will not be enough to try to upgrade it by my own. Also upgrading Swagger probably will break the current JSGUI so maybe the best way to work is update Brooklyn in a branch which will let me to work on the new GUI.
What do you think guys?
Thank you very much.
Re: A proposal of a new Apache Brooklyn GUI
Posted by Thomas Bouron <th...@cloudsoftcorp.com>.
Hi Adrian.
As I said on IRC, +1 for Angular and Material Design. I'll post updates on
the drag & drop editor as soon as I have some.
Cheers.
On Wed, 1 Jul 2015 at 10:51 Alex Heneveld <al...@cloudsoftcorp.com>
wrote:
>
> Hi Adrian-
>
> Excellent!
>
> +1 to Angular and Material Design
>
> Re the Swagger point, this is probably a few days' work to swap out the
> 1.0 + custom with 2.0. And it's something I'd love to see happen.
> "ron" in the IRC works on Swagger and has offered to help.
>
> Best
> Alex
>
>
> On 01/07/2015 10:42, Adrián Nieto Pérez wrote:
> > Hello to all:
> >
> > I’m Adrian, currently a dev of SeaClouds Project in University of
> > Málaga. As some kind of Apache Brooklyn Summer of Code me and maybe
> > some of my colleges have planned to develop a new GUI for Brooklyn.
> > The intention is to use AngularJS and Material Design Guidelines
> > (https://github.com/angular/material) to improve Brooklyn UX.
> >
> > I have two concerns before starting this project during August. One of
> > them is if you are currently planning to develop a Dashboard (I found
> > some commits on GH about a mobile version of the Brooklyn GUI). The
> > other one is I would like to use a library to interact with Brooklyn
> > API (for example https://github.com/signalfx/swagger-angular-client),
> > but I wasn’t able to find one compatible with swagger 1.0 (which is
> > already deprecated). Do you have plans to upgrade swagger to V2?
> >
> > Also I’m aware that you plan to develop a drag and drop editor, I will
> > try to follow the conversation about this designer which should be
> > part of the new dashboard. I think that if it’s developed as an
> > standalone library which outputs YAML from a visual topology it will
> > be enough to let me develop an Angular Directive over your code (we
> > currently do this on SeaClouds Project with
> > https://youtu.be/tyg-vkG2oho minute 1.30).
> >
> > Anyway before starting to code a new dashboard the swagger thing is
> > mandatory IMO. But i'm afraid that my knowledge about Brooklyn &
> > Swagger will not be enough to try to upgrade it by my own. Also
> > upgrading Swagger probably will break the current JSGUI so maybe the
> > best way to work is update Brooklyn in a branch which will let me to
> > work on the new GUI.
> >
> > What do you think guys?
> >
> > Thank you very much.
>
>
> --
> Cloudsoft Corporation Limited, Registered in Scotland No: SC349230.
> Registered Office: 13 Dryden Place, Edinburgh, EH9 1RP
>
> This e-mail message is confidential and for use by the addressee only. If
> the message is received by anyone other than the addressee, please return
> the message to the sender by replying to it and then delete the message
> from your computer. Internet e-mails are not necessarily secure. Cloudsoft
> Corporation Limited does not accept responsibility for changes made to this
> message after it was sent.
>
> Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of
> viruses, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that the
> onward transmission, opening or use of this message and any attachments
> will not adversely affect its systems or data. No responsibility is
> accepted by Cloudsoft Corporation Limited in this regard and the recipient
> should carry out such virus and other checks as it considers appropriate.
>
--
Thomas
--
Cloudsoft Corporation Limited, Registered in Scotland No: SC349230.
Registered Office: 13 Dryden Place, Edinburgh, EH9 1RP
This e-mail message is confidential and for use by the addressee only. If
the message is received by anyone other than the addressee, please return
the message to the sender by replying to it and then delete the message
from your computer. Internet e-mails are not necessarily secure. Cloudsoft
Corporation Limited does not accept responsibility for changes made to this
message after it was sent.
Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of
viruses, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that the
onward transmission, opening or use of this message and any attachments
will not adversely affect its systems or data. No responsibility is
accepted by Cloudsoft Corporation Limited in this regard and the recipient
should carry out such virus and other checks as it considers appropriate.
Re: A proposal of a new Apache Brooklyn GUI
Posted by Alex Heneveld <al...@cloudsoftcorp.com>.
Hi Adrian-
Excellent!
+1 to Angular and Material Design
Re the Swagger point, this is probably a few days' work to swap out the
1.0 + custom with 2.0. And it's something I'd love to see happen.
"ron" in the IRC works on Swagger and has offered to help.
Best
Alex
On 01/07/2015 10:42, Adrián Nieto Pérez wrote:
> Hello to all:
>
> I’m Adrian, currently a dev of SeaClouds Project in University of
> Málaga. As some kind of Apache Brooklyn Summer of Code me and maybe
> some of my colleges have planned to develop a new GUI for Brooklyn.
> The intention is to use AngularJS and Material Design Guidelines
> (https://github.com/angular/material) to improve Brooklyn UX.
>
> I have two concerns before starting this project during August. One of
> them is if you are currently planning to develop a Dashboard (I found
> some commits on GH about a mobile version of the Brooklyn GUI). The
> other one is I would like to use a library to interact with Brooklyn
> API (for example https://github.com/signalfx/swagger-angular-client),
> but I wasn’t able to find one compatible with swagger 1.0 (which is
> already deprecated). Do you have plans to upgrade swagger to V2?
>
> Also I’m aware that you plan to develop a drag and drop editor, I will
> try to follow the conversation about this designer which should be
> part of the new dashboard. I think that if it’s developed as an
> standalone library which outputs YAML from a visual topology it will
> be enough to let me develop an Angular Directive over your code (we
> currently do this on SeaClouds Project with
> https://youtu.be/tyg-vkG2oho minute 1.30).
>
> Anyway before starting to code a new dashboard the swagger thing is
> mandatory IMO. But i'm afraid that my knowledge about Brooklyn &
> Swagger will not be enough to try to upgrade it by my own. Also
> upgrading Swagger probably will break the current JSGUI so maybe the
> best way to work is update Brooklyn in a branch which will let me to
> work on the new GUI.
>
> What do you think guys?
>
> Thank you very much.
--
Cloudsoft Corporation Limited, Registered in Scotland No: SC349230.
Registered Office: 13 Dryden Place, Edinburgh, EH9 1RP
This e-mail message is confidential and for use by the addressee only. If
the message is received by anyone other than the addressee, please return
the message to the sender by replying to it and then delete the message
from your computer. Internet e-mails are not necessarily secure. Cloudsoft
Corporation Limited does not accept responsibility for changes made to this
message after it was sent.
Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of
viruses, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that the
onward transmission, opening or use of this message and any attachments
will not adversely affect its systems or data. No responsibility is
accepted by Cloudsoft Corporation Limited in this regard and the recipient
should carry out such virus and other checks as it considers appropriate.
Re: A proposal of a new Apache Brooklyn GUI
Posted by Andrea Turli <an...@cloudsoftcorp.com>.
Adrian,
it makes sense. Not really a js expert but I think with swagger we could
even consider the recommended approach [1]
HTH,
Andrea
[1]: https://github.com/swagger-api/swagger-codegen#where-is-javascript
On Wed, 1 Jul 2015 at 12:57 Adrián Nieto <ad...@lcc.uma.es> wrote:
> Hello Svet,
>
> $resource it is in fact enough to develop a functional GUI. The thing is
> if I don't rely on a external library (even a non angular specific one
> like the one which swagger provides and you are currently using), I will
> have to translate the entire Brooklyn API into Angular $resource objects
> and I would like to avoid this because Brooklyn API it's a kinda big.
>
> Anyway if there is no other way to automatically generate a client I
> will do my own one of course.
>
>
> I just want to find a way to wrap around the handma
>
> El 01/07/2015 a las 12:47, Svetoslav Neykov escribió:
> > Hi Adrian,
> >
> > As is evident from previous mails AngularJS implementation of the web
> console is very well received.
> > What I'd like to understand is why are you looking for an additional
> library to interact with the Brooklyn API. Is Angular's $resource missing
> some required functionality?
> >
> > Svet.
> >
> >
> >> On 1.07.2015 г., at 12:42, Adrián Nieto Pérez <ad...@lcc.uma.es>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello to all:
> >>
> >> I’m Adrian, currently a dev of SeaClouds Project in University of
> Málaga. As some kind of Apache Brooklyn Summer of Code me and maybe some of
> my colleges have planned to develop a new GUI for Brooklyn. The intention
> is to use AngularJS and Material Design Guidelines (
> https://github.com/angular/material <https://github.com/angular/material>)
> to improve Brooklyn UX.
> >>
> >> I have two concerns before starting this project during August. One of
> them is if you are currently planning to develop a Dashboard (I found some
> commits on GH about a mobile version of the Brooklyn GUI). The other one is
> I would like to use a library to interact with Brooklyn API (for example
> https://github.com/signalfx/swagger-angular-client <
> https://github.com/signalfx/swagger-angular-client>), but I wasn’t able
> to find one compatible with swagger 1.0 (which is already deprecated). Do
> you have plans to upgrade swagger to V2?
> >>
> >> Also I’m aware that you plan to develop a drag and drop editor, I will
> try to follow the conversation about this designer which should be part of
> the new dashboard. I think that if it’s developed as an standalone library
> which outputs YAML from a visual topology it will be enough to let me
> develop an Angular Directive over your code (we currently do this on
> SeaClouds Project with https://youtu.be/tyg-vkG2oho <
> https://youtu.be/tyg-vkG2oho> minute 1.30).
> >>
> >> Anyway before starting to code a new dashboard the swagger thing is
> mandatory IMO. But i'm afraid that my knowledge about Brooklyn & Swagger
> will not be enough to try to upgrade it by my own. Also upgrading Swagger
> probably will break the current JSGUI so maybe the best way to work is
> update Brooklyn in a branch which will let me to work on the new GUI.
> >>
> >> What do you think guys?
> >>
> >> Thank you very much.
> >
> >
>
>
--
Cloudsoft Corporation Limited, Registered in Scotland No: SC349230.
Registered Office: 13 Dryden Place, Edinburgh, EH9 1RP
This e-mail message is confidential and for use by the addressee only. If
the message is received by anyone other than the addressee, please return
the message to the sender by replying to it and then delete the message
from your computer. Internet e-mails are not necessarily secure. Cloudsoft
Corporation Limited does not accept responsibility for changes made to this
message after it was sent.
Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of
viruses, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that the
onward transmission, opening or use of this message and any attachments
will not adversely affect its systems or data. No responsibility is
accepted by Cloudsoft Corporation Limited in this regard and the recipient
should carry out such virus and other checks as it considers appropriate.
Re: A proposal of a new Apache Brooklyn GUI
Posted by Adrián Nieto <ad...@lcc.uma.es>.
Hello Svet,
$resource it is in fact enough to develop a functional GUI. The thing is
if I don't rely on a external library (even a non angular specific one
like the one which swagger provides and you are currently using), I will
have to translate the entire Brooklyn API into Angular $resource objects
and I would like to avoid this because Brooklyn API it's a kinda big.
Anyway if there is no other way to automatically generate a client I
will do my own one of course.
I just want to find a way to wrap around the handma
El 01/07/2015 a las 12:47, Svetoslav Neykov escribió:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> As is evident from previous mails AngularJS implementation of the web console is very well received.
> What I'd like to understand is why are you looking for an additional library to interact with the Brooklyn API. Is Angular's $resource missing some required functionality?
>
> Svet.
>
>
>> On 1.07.2015 г., at 12:42, Adrián Nieto Pérez <ad...@lcc.uma.es> wrote:
>>
>> Hello to all:
>>
>> I’m Adrian, currently a dev of SeaClouds Project in University of Málaga. As some kind of Apache Brooklyn Summer of Code me and maybe some of my colleges have planned to develop a new GUI for Brooklyn. The intention is to use AngularJS and Material Design Guidelines (https://github.com/angular/material <https://github.com/angular/material>) to improve Brooklyn UX.
>>
>> I have two concerns before starting this project during August. One of them is if you are currently planning to develop a Dashboard (I found some commits on GH about a mobile version of the Brooklyn GUI). The other one is I would like to use a library to interact with Brooklyn API (for example https://github.com/signalfx/swagger-angular-client <https://github.com/signalfx/swagger-angular-client>), but I wasn’t able to find one compatible with swagger 1.0 (which is already deprecated). Do you have plans to upgrade swagger to V2?
>>
>> Also I’m aware that you plan to develop a drag and drop editor, I will try to follow the conversation about this designer which should be part of the new dashboard. I think that if it’s developed as an standalone library which outputs YAML from a visual topology it will be enough to let me develop an Angular Directive over your code (we currently do this on SeaClouds Project with https://youtu.be/tyg-vkG2oho <https://youtu.be/tyg-vkG2oho> minute 1.30).
>>
>> Anyway before starting to code a new dashboard the swagger thing is mandatory IMO. But i'm afraid that my knowledge about Brooklyn & Swagger will not be enough to try to upgrade it by my own. Also upgrading Swagger probably will break the current JSGUI so maybe the best way to work is update Brooklyn in a branch which will let me to work on the new GUI.
>>
>> What do you think guys?
>>
>> Thank you very much.
>
>
Re: A proposal of a new Apache Brooklyn GUI
Posted by Svetoslav Neykov <sv...@cloudsoftcorp.com>.
Hi Adrian,
As is evident from previous mails AngularJS implementation of the web console is very well received.
What I'd like to understand is why are you looking for an additional library to interact with the Brooklyn API. Is Angular's $resource missing some required functionality?
Svet.
> On 1.07.2015 г., at 12:42, Adrián Nieto Pérez <ad...@lcc.uma.es> wrote:
>
> Hello to all:
>
> I’m Adrian, currently a dev of SeaClouds Project in University of Málaga. As some kind of Apache Brooklyn Summer of Code me and maybe some of my colleges have planned to develop a new GUI for Brooklyn. The intention is to use AngularJS and Material Design Guidelines (https://github.com/angular/material <https://github.com/angular/material>) to improve Brooklyn UX.
>
> I have two concerns before starting this project during August. One of them is if you are currently planning to develop a Dashboard (I found some commits on GH about a mobile version of the Brooklyn GUI). The other one is I would like to use a library to interact with Brooklyn API (for example https://github.com/signalfx/swagger-angular-client <https://github.com/signalfx/swagger-angular-client>), but I wasn’t able to find one compatible with swagger 1.0 (which is already deprecated). Do you have plans to upgrade swagger to V2?
>
> Also I’m aware that you plan to develop a drag and drop editor, I will try to follow the conversation about this designer which should be part of the new dashboard. I think that if it’s developed as an standalone library which outputs YAML from a visual topology it will be enough to let me develop an Angular Directive over your code (we currently do this on SeaClouds Project with https://youtu.be/tyg-vkG2oho <https://youtu.be/tyg-vkG2oho> minute 1.30).
>
> Anyway before starting to code a new dashboard the swagger thing is mandatory IMO. But i'm afraid that my knowledge about Brooklyn & Swagger will not be enough to try to upgrade it by my own. Also upgrading Swagger probably will break the current JSGUI so maybe the best way to work is update Brooklyn in a branch which will let me to work on the new GUI.
>
> What do you think guys?
>
> Thank you very much.
--
Cloudsoft Corporation Limited, Registered in Scotland No: SC349230.
Registered Office: 13 Dryden Place, Edinburgh, EH9 1RP
This e-mail message is confidential and for use by the addressee only. If
the message is received by anyone other than the addressee, please return
the message to the sender by replying to it and then delete the message
from your computer. Internet e-mails are not necessarily secure. Cloudsoft
Corporation Limited does not accept responsibility for changes made to this
message after it was sent.
Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of
viruses, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that the
onward transmission, opening or use of this message and any attachments
will not adversely affect its systems or data. No responsibility is
accepted by Cloudsoft Corporation Limited in this regard and the recipient
should carry out such virus and other checks as it considers appropriate.