You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@arrow.apache.org by "Uwe L. Korn" <uw...@xhochy.com> on 2017/08/01 13:44:15 UTC
Re: Arrow 0.6.0 release planning and timeline
Hello,
from my side we're mostly fine for a 0.6.0 release. Currently I'm facing
a problem with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1302 in the
0.5.0 OSX wheels. We need to fix this before 0.6.0. Also I would like to
look a bit more into the jemalloc issues that came up with 0.5.0 to get
some of them solved in the next release.
Uwe
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017, at 04:55 PM, Wes McKinney wrote:
> hi all,
>
> We're already 40 patches into the next Arrow version. I just created
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1297 as a tracking issue
> so that any blocking issues can be tracked as we push forward to 0.6.0
>
> You can track the status of the release here (accessible from the
> "Projects" tab --> Releases in JIRA):
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARROW/versions/12341088
>
> We don't have any more data types slated for integration testing for
> this release, but it might be nice to try to finish one or more of
> them in the next week or two:
>
> - Fixed size binary
> - Fixed size lists
> - Decimal
> - Union
>
> As far as timeline for 0.6.0, I would like to push for an RC the week
> of 8/14 at latest (assuming we are ready to ship the Plasma C++ code),
> reducing scope if needed. Any contributions of code, documentation, or
> JIRA prioritization would be much appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Wes
Re: Arrow 0.6.0 release planning and timeline
Posted by Wes McKinney <we...@gmail.com>.
OK, I believe we are all set with the alignment patch in
https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/954 if anyone wants to take a
last look.
I have one last Python issue that needs to be closed out, but barring
new developments, we should be able to start a 0.6.0 vote tomorrow
morning.
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Wes McKinney <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In light of the mailing list discussion about buffer alignment in
> distributed stream construction (see ARROW-1343 and the mailing list
> discussion), I am going to hold off on cutting an RC until we can
> reach a resolution there. Otherwise things seem to be in good shape.
>
> Thanks
> Wes
>
> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Wes McKinney <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> hi all,
>>
>> It looks like we should be able to close out 0.6.0 issues today and
>> cut a release candidate tomorrow if there are no objections. Please
>> take a moment to complete any code reviews for patches that should go
>> in. We have a number of Java library dependency upgrades pending, do
>> these need to go in?
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/929
>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/873
>>
>> There is another Java patch that needs to be merged if someone could review:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/898
>>
>> There are a handful of C++ or Python patches pending, and I'll be
>> opening a few more PRs today; any code reviews would be appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Wes
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Siddharth Teotia <si...@dremio.com> wrote:
>>> Reviewed https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/915 for ARROW-1296
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Siddharth Teotia <si...@dremio.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I will review it by EOD.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Li Jin <ic...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On the Java side I have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1296,
>>>>> which is small bug fix.
>>>>>
>>>>> If someone help review it would be great. Else if it doesn't get reviewed
>>>>> by 0.6 rc cut, we can take it off 0.6 release.
>>>>>
>>>>> Li
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Wes McKinney <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > hi all,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > If there are no problems with the Plasma IP Clearance, I would like to
>>>>> > cut a release candidate for 0.6.0 at the beginning of next week. There
>>>>> > are a handful of issues pending on the Java and C++ side that I'll be
>>>>> > working to complete over the next several days. Please keep an eye on
>>>>> > the release page on JIRA:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARROW/versions/12341088
>>>>> >
>>>>> > There are a number of outstanding Java patches; if you would like to
>>>>> > include any of these in the 0.6.0 release, could someone review?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Thanks,
>>>>> > Wes
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 10:59 PM, Wes McKinney <we...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > > It seems that ARROW-1282 is causing some users problems. We have the
>>>>> > > option of making a 0.5.1 release, but given how much work has reached
>>>>> > > master (or is about to reach master) I would be in favor of
>>>>> > > accelerating 0.6.0, cutting a release candidate within the next couple
>>>>> > > of days. We could aim for another release within 2-3 weeks after
>>>>> > > completing the Plasma IP clearance.
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > Thoughts?
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Uwe L. Korn <uw...@xhochy.com> wrote:
>>>>> > >> Hello,
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >> from my side we're mostly fine for a 0.6.0 release. Currently I'm
>>>>> facing
>>>>> > >> a problem with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1302 in
>>>>> the
>>>>> > >> 0.5.0 OSX wheels. We need to fix this before 0.6.0. Also I would
>>>>> like to
>>>>> > >> look a bit more into the jemalloc issues that came up with 0.5.0 to
>>>>> get
>>>>> > >> some of them solved in the next release.
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >> Uwe
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017, at 04:55 PM, Wes McKinney wrote:
>>>>> > >>> hi all,
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>> We're already 40 patches into the next Arrow version. I just created
>>>>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1297 as a tracking
>>>>> issue
>>>>> > >>> so that any blocking issues can be tracked as we push forward to
>>>>> 0.6.0
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>> You can track the status of the release here (accessible from the
>>>>> > >>> "Projects" tab --> Releases in JIRA):
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARROW/versions/12341088
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>> We don't have any more data types slated for integration testing for
>>>>> > >>> this release, but it might be nice to try to finish one or more of
>>>>> > >>> them in the next week or two:
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>> - Fixed size binary
>>>>> > >>> - Fixed size lists
>>>>> > >>> - Decimal
>>>>> > >>> - Union
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>> As far as timeline for 0.6.0, I would like to push for an RC the
>>>>> week
>>>>> > >>> of 8/14 at latest (assuming we are ready to ship the Plasma C++
>>>>> code),
>>>>> > >>> reducing scope if needed. Any contributions of code, documentation,
>>>>> or
>>>>> > >>> JIRA prioritization would be much appreciated.
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>> Thanks,
>>>>> > >>> Wes
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
Re: Arrow 0.6.0 release planning and timeline
Posted by Wes McKinney <we...@gmail.com>.
In light of the mailing list discussion about buffer alignment in
distributed stream construction (see ARROW-1343 and the mailing list
discussion), I am going to hold off on cutting an RC until we can
reach a resolution there. Otherwise things seem to be in good shape.
Thanks
Wes
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Wes McKinney <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> hi all,
>
> It looks like we should be able to close out 0.6.0 issues today and
> cut a release candidate tomorrow if there are no objections. Please
> take a moment to complete any code reviews for patches that should go
> in. We have a number of Java library dependency upgrades pending, do
> these need to go in?
>
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/929
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/873
>
> There is another Java patch that needs to be merged if someone could review:
>
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/898
>
> There are a handful of C++ or Python patches pending, and I'll be
> opening a few more PRs today; any code reviews would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks
> Wes
>
> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Siddharth Teotia <si...@dremio.com> wrote:
>> Reviewed https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/915 for ARROW-1296
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Siddharth Teotia <si...@dremio.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I will review it by EOD.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Li Jin <ic...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On the Java side I have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1296,
>>>> which is small bug fix.
>>>>
>>>> If someone help review it would be great. Else if it doesn't get reviewed
>>>> by 0.6 rc cut, we can take it off 0.6 release.
>>>>
>>>> Li
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Wes McKinney <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > hi all,
>>>> >
>>>> > If there are no problems with the Plasma IP Clearance, I would like to
>>>> > cut a release candidate for 0.6.0 at the beginning of next week. There
>>>> > are a handful of issues pending on the Java and C++ side that I'll be
>>>> > working to complete over the next several days. Please keep an eye on
>>>> > the release page on JIRA:
>>>> >
>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARROW/versions/12341088
>>>> >
>>>> > There are a number of outstanding Java patches; if you would like to
>>>> > include any of these in the 0.6.0 release, could someone review?
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks,
>>>> > Wes
>>>> >
>>>> > On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 10:59 PM, Wes McKinney <we...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > > It seems that ARROW-1282 is causing some users problems. We have the
>>>> > > option of making a 0.5.1 release, but given how much work has reached
>>>> > > master (or is about to reach master) I would be in favor of
>>>> > > accelerating 0.6.0, cutting a release candidate within the next couple
>>>> > > of days. We could aim for another release within 2-3 weeks after
>>>> > > completing the Plasma IP clearance.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Thoughts?
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Uwe L. Korn <uw...@xhochy.com> wrote:
>>>> > >> Hello,
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> from my side we're mostly fine for a 0.6.0 release. Currently I'm
>>>> facing
>>>> > >> a problem with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1302 in
>>>> the
>>>> > >> 0.5.0 OSX wheels. We need to fix this before 0.6.0. Also I would
>>>> like to
>>>> > >> look a bit more into the jemalloc issues that came up with 0.5.0 to
>>>> get
>>>> > >> some of them solved in the next release.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Uwe
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017, at 04:55 PM, Wes McKinney wrote:
>>>> > >>> hi all,
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> We're already 40 patches into the next Arrow version. I just created
>>>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1297 as a tracking
>>>> issue
>>>> > >>> so that any blocking issues can be tracked as we push forward to
>>>> 0.6.0
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> You can track the status of the release here (accessible from the
>>>> > >>> "Projects" tab --> Releases in JIRA):
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARROW/versions/12341088
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> We don't have any more data types slated for integration testing for
>>>> > >>> this release, but it might be nice to try to finish one or more of
>>>> > >>> them in the next week or two:
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> - Fixed size binary
>>>> > >>> - Fixed size lists
>>>> > >>> - Decimal
>>>> > >>> - Union
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> As far as timeline for 0.6.0, I would like to push for an RC the
>>>> week
>>>> > >>> of 8/14 at latest (assuming we are ready to ship the Plasma C++
>>>> code),
>>>> > >>> reducing scope if needed. Any contributions of code, documentation,
>>>> or
>>>> > >>> JIRA prioritization would be much appreciated.
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> Thanks,
>>>> > >>> Wes
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>>
Re: Arrow 0.6.0 release planning and timeline
Posted by Wes McKinney <we...@gmail.com>.
hi all,
It looks like we should be able to close out 0.6.0 issues today and
cut a release candidate tomorrow if there are no objections. Please
take a moment to complete any code reviews for patches that should go
in. We have a number of Java library dependency upgrades pending, do
these need to go in?
https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/929
https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/873
There is another Java patch that needs to be merged if someone could review:
https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/898
There are a handful of C++ or Python patches pending, and I'll be
opening a few more PRs today; any code reviews would be appreciated.
Thanks
Wes
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Siddharth Teotia <si...@dremio.com> wrote:
> Reviewed https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/915 for ARROW-1296
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Siddharth Teotia <si...@dremio.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I will review it by EOD.
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Li Jin <ic...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On the Java side I have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1296,
>>> which is small bug fix.
>>>
>>> If someone help review it would be great. Else if it doesn't get reviewed
>>> by 0.6 rc cut, we can take it off 0.6 release.
>>>
>>> Li
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Wes McKinney <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > hi all,
>>> >
>>> > If there are no problems with the Plasma IP Clearance, I would like to
>>> > cut a release candidate for 0.6.0 at the beginning of next week. There
>>> > are a handful of issues pending on the Java and C++ side that I'll be
>>> > working to complete over the next several days. Please keep an eye on
>>> > the release page on JIRA:
>>> >
>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARROW/versions/12341088
>>> >
>>> > There are a number of outstanding Java patches; if you would like to
>>> > include any of these in the 0.6.0 release, could someone review?
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Wes
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 10:59 PM, Wes McKinney <we...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > It seems that ARROW-1282 is causing some users problems. We have the
>>> > > option of making a 0.5.1 release, but given how much work has reached
>>> > > master (or is about to reach master) I would be in favor of
>>> > > accelerating 0.6.0, cutting a release candidate within the next couple
>>> > > of days. We could aim for another release within 2-3 weeks after
>>> > > completing the Plasma IP clearance.
>>> > >
>>> > > Thoughts?
>>> > >
>>> > > On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Uwe L. Korn <uw...@xhochy.com> wrote:
>>> > >> Hello,
>>> > >>
>>> > >> from my side we're mostly fine for a 0.6.0 release. Currently I'm
>>> facing
>>> > >> a problem with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1302 in
>>> the
>>> > >> 0.5.0 OSX wheels. We need to fix this before 0.6.0. Also I would
>>> like to
>>> > >> look a bit more into the jemalloc issues that came up with 0.5.0 to
>>> get
>>> > >> some of them solved in the next release.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Uwe
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017, at 04:55 PM, Wes McKinney wrote:
>>> > >>> hi all,
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> We're already 40 patches into the next Arrow version. I just created
>>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1297 as a tracking
>>> issue
>>> > >>> so that any blocking issues can be tracked as we push forward to
>>> 0.6.0
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> You can track the status of the release here (accessible from the
>>> > >>> "Projects" tab --> Releases in JIRA):
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARROW/versions/12341088
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> We don't have any more data types slated for integration testing for
>>> > >>> this release, but it might be nice to try to finish one or more of
>>> > >>> them in the next week or two:
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> - Fixed size binary
>>> > >>> - Fixed size lists
>>> > >>> - Decimal
>>> > >>> - Union
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> As far as timeline for 0.6.0, I would like to push for an RC the
>>> week
>>> > >>> of 8/14 at latest (assuming we are ready to ship the Plasma C++
>>> code),
>>> > >>> reducing scope if needed. Any contributions of code, documentation,
>>> or
>>> > >>> JIRA prioritization would be much appreciated.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Thanks,
>>> > >>> Wes
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
Re: Arrow 0.6.0 release planning and timeline
Posted by Siddharth Teotia <si...@dremio.com>.
Reviewed https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/915 for ARROW-1296
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Siddharth Teotia <si...@dremio.com>
wrote:
> I will review it by EOD.
>
> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Li Jin <ic...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On the Java side I have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1296,
>> which is small bug fix.
>>
>> If someone help review it would be great. Else if it doesn't get reviewed
>> by 0.6 rc cut, we can take it off 0.6 release.
>>
>> Li
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Wes McKinney <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > hi all,
>> >
>> > If there are no problems with the Plasma IP Clearance, I would like to
>> > cut a release candidate for 0.6.0 at the beginning of next week. There
>> > are a handful of issues pending on the Java and C++ side that I'll be
>> > working to complete over the next several days. Please keep an eye on
>> > the release page on JIRA:
>> >
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARROW/versions/12341088
>> >
>> > There are a number of outstanding Java patches; if you would like to
>> > include any of these in the 0.6.0 release, could someone review?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Wes
>> >
>> > On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 10:59 PM, Wes McKinney <we...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > It seems that ARROW-1282 is causing some users problems. We have the
>> > > option of making a 0.5.1 release, but given how much work has reached
>> > > master (or is about to reach master) I would be in favor of
>> > > accelerating 0.6.0, cutting a release candidate within the next couple
>> > > of days. We could aim for another release within 2-3 weeks after
>> > > completing the Plasma IP clearance.
>> > >
>> > > Thoughts?
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Uwe L. Korn <uw...@xhochy.com> wrote:
>> > >> Hello,
>> > >>
>> > >> from my side we're mostly fine for a 0.6.0 release. Currently I'm
>> facing
>> > >> a problem with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1302 in
>> the
>> > >> 0.5.0 OSX wheels. We need to fix this before 0.6.0. Also I would
>> like to
>> > >> look a bit more into the jemalloc issues that came up with 0.5.0 to
>> get
>> > >> some of them solved in the next release.
>> > >>
>> > >> Uwe
>> > >>
>> > >> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017, at 04:55 PM, Wes McKinney wrote:
>> > >>> hi all,
>> > >>>
>> > >>> We're already 40 patches into the next Arrow version. I just created
>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1297 as a tracking
>> issue
>> > >>> so that any blocking issues can be tracked as we push forward to
>> 0.6.0
>> > >>>
>> > >>> You can track the status of the release here (accessible from the
>> > >>> "Projects" tab --> Releases in JIRA):
>> > >>>
>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARROW/versions/12341088
>> > >>>
>> > >>> We don't have any more data types slated for integration testing for
>> > >>> this release, but it might be nice to try to finish one or more of
>> > >>> them in the next week or two:
>> > >>>
>> > >>> - Fixed size binary
>> > >>> - Fixed size lists
>> > >>> - Decimal
>> > >>> - Union
>> > >>>
>> > >>> As far as timeline for 0.6.0, I would like to push for an RC the
>> week
>> > >>> of 8/14 at latest (assuming we are ready to ship the Plasma C++
>> code),
>> > >>> reducing scope if needed. Any contributions of code, documentation,
>> or
>> > >>> JIRA prioritization would be much appreciated.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Thanks,
>> > >>> Wes
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: Arrow 0.6.0 release planning and timeline
Posted by Siddharth Teotia <si...@dremio.com>.
I will review it by EOD.
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Li Jin <ic...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On the Java side I have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1296,
> which is small bug fix.
>
> If someone help review it would be great. Else if it doesn't get reviewed
> by 0.6 rc cut, we can take it off 0.6 release.
>
> Li
>
> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Wes McKinney <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > hi all,
> >
> > If there are no problems with the Plasma IP Clearance, I would like to
> > cut a release candidate for 0.6.0 at the beginning of next week. There
> > are a handful of issues pending on the Java and C++ side that I'll be
> > working to complete over the next several days. Please keep an eye on
> > the release page on JIRA:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARROW/versions/12341088
> >
> > There are a number of outstanding Java patches; if you would like to
> > include any of these in the 0.6.0 release, could someone review?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Wes
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 10:59 PM, Wes McKinney <we...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > It seems that ARROW-1282 is causing some users problems. We have the
> > > option of making a 0.5.1 release, but given how much work has reached
> > > master (or is about to reach master) I would be in favor of
> > > accelerating 0.6.0, cutting a release candidate within the next couple
> > > of days. We could aim for another release within 2-3 weeks after
> > > completing the Plasma IP clearance.
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Uwe L. Korn <uw...@xhochy.com> wrote:
> > >> Hello,
> > >>
> > >> from my side we're mostly fine for a 0.6.0 release. Currently I'm
> facing
> > >> a problem with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1302 in
> the
> > >> 0.5.0 OSX wheels. We need to fix this before 0.6.0. Also I would like
> to
> > >> look a bit more into the jemalloc issues that came up with 0.5.0 to
> get
> > >> some of them solved in the next release.
> > >>
> > >> Uwe
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017, at 04:55 PM, Wes McKinney wrote:
> > >>> hi all,
> > >>>
> > >>> We're already 40 patches into the next Arrow version. I just created
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1297 as a tracking issue
> > >>> so that any blocking issues can be tracked as we push forward to
> 0.6.0
> > >>>
> > >>> You can track the status of the release here (accessible from the
> > >>> "Projects" tab --> Releases in JIRA):
> > >>>
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARROW/versions/12341088
> > >>>
> > >>> We don't have any more data types slated for integration testing for
> > >>> this release, but it might be nice to try to finish one or more of
> > >>> them in the next week or two:
> > >>>
> > >>> - Fixed size binary
> > >>> - Fixed size lists
> > >>> - Decimal
> > >>> - Union
> > >>>
> > >>> As far as timeline for 0.6.0, I would like to push for an RC the week
> > >>> of 8/14 at latest (assuming we are ready to ship the Plasma C++
> code),
> > >>> reducing scope if needed. Any contributions of code, documentation,
> or
> > >>> JIRA prioritization would be much appreciated.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> Wes
> >
>
Re: Arrow 0.6.0 release planning and timeline
Posted by Li Jin <ic...@gmail.com>.
On the Java side I have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1296,
which is small bug fix.
If someone help review it would be great. Else if it doesn't get reviewed
by 0.6 rc cut, we can take it off 0.6 release.
Li
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Wes McKinney <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> hi all,
>
> If there are no problems with the Plasma IP Clearance, I would like to
> cut a release candidate for 0.6.0 at the beginning of next week. There
> are a handful of issues pending on the Java and C++ side that I'll be
> working to complete over the next several days. Please keep an eye on
> the release page on JIRA:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARROW/versions/12341088
>
> There are a number of outstanding Java patches; if you would like to
> include any of these in the 0.6.0 release, could someone review?
>
> Thanks,
> Wes
>
> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 10:59 PM, Wes McKinney <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > It seems that ARROW-1282 is causing some users problems. We have the
> > option of making a 0.5.1 release, but given how much work has reached
> > master (or is about to reach master) I would be in favor of
> > accelerating 0.6.0, cutting a release candidate within the next couple
> > of days. We could aim for another release within 2-3 weeks after
> > completing the Plasma IP clearance.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Uwe L. Korn <uw...@xhochy.com> wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> from my side we're mostly fine for a 0.6.0 release. Currently I'm facing
> >> a problem with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1302 in the
> >> 0.5.0 OSX wheels. We need to fix this before 0.6.0. Also I would like to
> >> look a bit more into the jemalloc issues that came up with 0.5.0 to get
> >> some of them solved in the next release.
> >>
> >> Uwe
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017, at 04:55 PM, Wes McKinney wrote:
> >>> hi all,
> >>>
> >>> We're already 40 patches into the next Arrow version. I just created
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1297 as a tracking issue
> >>> so that any blocking issues can be tracked as we push forward to 0.6.0
> >>>
> >>> You can track the status of the release here (accessible from the
> >>> "Projects" tab --> Releases in JIRA):
> >>>
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARROW/versions/12341088
> >>>
> >>> We don't have any more data types slated for integration testing for
> >>> this release, but it might be nice to try to finish one or more of
> >>> them in the next week or two:
> >>>
> >>> - Fixed size binary
> >>> - Fixed size lists
> >>> - Decimal
> >>> - Union
> >>>
> >>> As far as timeline for 0.6.0, I would like to push for an RC the week
> >>> of 8/14 at latest (assuming we are ready to ship the Plasma C++ code),
> >>> reducing scope if needed. Any contributions of code, documentation, or
> >>> JIRA prioritization would be much appreciated.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Wes
>
Re: Arrow 0.6.0 release planning and timeline
Posted by Wes McKinney <we...@gmail.com>.
hi all,
If there are no problems with the Plasma IP Clearance, I would like to
cut a release candidate for 0.6.0 at the beginning of next week. There
are a handful of issues pending on the Java and C++ side that I'll be
working to complete over the next several days. Please keep an eye on
the release page on JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARROW/versions/12341088
There are a number of outstanding Java patches; if you would like to
include any of these in the 0.6.0 release, could someone review?
Thanks,
Wes
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 10:59 PM, Wes McKinney <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It seems that ARROW-1282 is causing some users problems. We have the
> option of making a 0.5.1 release, but given how much work has reached
> master (or is about to reach master) I would be in favor of
> accelerating 0.6.0, cutting a release candidate within the next couple
> of days. We could aim for another release within 2-3 weeks after
> completing the Plasma IP clearance.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Uwe L. Korn <uw...@xhochy.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> from my side we're mostly fine for a 0.6.0 release. Currently I'm facing
>> a problem with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1302 in the
>> 0.5.0 OSX wheels. We need to fix this before 0.6.0. Also I would like to
>> look a bit more into the jemalloc issues that came up with 0.5.0 to get
>> some of them solved in the next release.
>>
>> Uwe
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017, at 04:55 PM, Wes McKinney wrote:
>>> hi all,
>>>
>>> We're already 40 patches into the next Arrow version. I just created
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1297 as a tracking issue
>>> so that any blocking issues can be tracked as we push forward to 0.6.0
>>>
>>> You can track the status of the release here (accessible from the
>>> "Projects" tab --> Releases in JIRA):
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARROW/versions/12341088
>>>
>>> We don't have any more data types slated for integration testing for
>>> this release, but it might be nice to try to finish one or more of
>>> them in the next week or two:
>>>
>>> - Fixed size binary
>>> - Fixed size lists
>>> - Decimal
>>> - Union
>>>
>>> As far as timeline for 0.6.0, I would like to push for an RC the week
>>> of 8/14 at latest (assuming we are ready to ship the Plasma C++ code),
>>> reducing scope if needed. Any contributions of code, documentation, or
>>> JIRA prioritization would be much appreciated.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Wes
Re: Arrow 0.6.0 release planning and timeline
Posted by Wes McKinney <we...@gmail.com>.
It seems that ARROW-1282 is causing some users problems. We have the
option of making a 0.5.1 release, but given how much work has reached
master (or is about to reach master) I would be in favor of
accelerating 0.6.0, cutting a release candidate within the next couple
of days. We could aim for another release within 2-3 weeks after
completing the Plasma IP clearance.
Thoughts?
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Uwe L. Korn <uw...@xhochy.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> from my side we're mostly fine for a 0.6.0 release. Currently I'm facing
> a problem with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1302 in the
> 0.5.0 OSX wheels. We need to fix this before 0.6.0. Also I would like to
> look a bit more into the jemalloc issues that came up with 0.5.0 to get
> some of them solved in the next release.
>
> Uwe
>
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017, at 04:55 PM, Wes McKinney wrote:
>> hi all,
>>
>> We're already 40 patches into the next Arrow version. I just created
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1297 as a tracking issue
>> so that any blocking issues can be tracked as we push forward to 0.6.0
>>
>> You can track the status of the release here (accessible from the
>> "Projects" tab --> Releases in JIRA):
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARROW/versions/12341088
>>
>> We don't have any more data types slated for integration testing for
>> this release, but it might be nice to try to finish one or more of
>> them in the next week or two:
>>
>> - Fixed size binary
>> - Fixed size lists
>> - Decimal
>> - Union
>>
>> As far as timeline for 0.6.0, I would like to push for an RC the week
>> of 8/14 at latest (assuming we are ready to ship the Plasma C++ code),
>> reducing scope if needed. Any contributions of code, documentation, or
>> JIRA prioritization would be much appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Wes