You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cassandra.apache.org by "Benjamin Lerer (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/01/29 10:32:35 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (CASSANDRA-7855) Genralize use of IN for compound
partition keys
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Benjamin Lerer updated CASSANDRA-7855:
--------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.1.3)
3.0
> Genralize use of IN for compound partition keys
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-7855
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7855
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Sylvain Lebresne
> Assignee: Benjamin Lerer
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: cql
> Fix For: 3.0
>
>
> When you have a compount partition key, we currently only support to have a {{IN}} on the last column of that partition key. So given:
> {noformat}
> CREATE TABLE foo (
> k1 int,
> k2 int,
> v int,
> PRIMARY KEY ((k1, k2))
> )
> {noformat}
> we allow
> {noformat}
> SELECT * FROM foo WHERE k1 = 0 AND k2 IN (1, 2)
> {noformat}
> but not
> {noformat}
> SELECT * FROM foo WHERE k1 IN (0, 1) AND k2 IN (1, 2)
> {noformat}
> There is no particular reason for us not supporting the later (to the best of my knowledge) since it's reasonably straighforward, so we should fix it.
> I'll note that using {{IN}} on a partition key is not necessarily a better idea than parallelizing queries server client side so this syntax, when introduced, should probably be used sparingly, but given we do support IN on partition keys, I see no reason not to extend it to compound PK properly.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)