You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by "Roy T. Fielding" <fi...@apache.org> on 2003/09/19 03:08:32 UTC

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/docs/manual/misc relevant_standards.html.en relevant_standards.xml

>          <dt><a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2617.txt">RFC 
> 2617</a>
>   -      (Draft standard)</dt>
>   +      (Standards Track)</dt>

IETF standards track:

    Internet Draft < Proposed Standard < Draft Standard < Standard

2617 is a Draft Standard, like 2616.

....Roy

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/docs/manual/misc relevant_standards.html.en relevant_standards.xml

Posted by André Malo <nd...@perlig.de>.
* Erik Abele wrote:

> Done.

Thanks.

nd

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/docs/manual/misc relevant_standards.html.en relevant_standards.xml

Posted by Erik Abele <er...@codefaktor.de>.
On 19/09/2003, at 08:45, André Malo wrote:

> Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>
>>>          <dt><a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2617.txt">RFC 
>>> 2617</a>
>>>   -      (Draft standard)</dt>
>>>   +      (Standards Track)</dt>
>>
>>
>> IETF standards track:
>>
>>    Internet Draft < Proposed Standard < Draft Standard < Standard
>>
>> 2617 is a Draft Standard, like 2616.
>
> Doh, sorry. Can someone please ( re-)correct it? I have currently no 
> cvs access from here... Thanks.
>
> nd

Done.

Cheers,
Erik

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/docs/manual/misc relevant_standards.html.en relevant_standards.xml

Posted by André Malo <nd...@perlig.de>.
Roy T. Fielding wrote:

>>          <dt><a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2617.txt">RFC 
>> 2617</a>
>>   -      (Draft standard)</dt>
>>   +      (Standards Track)</dt>
>
>
> IETF standards track:
>
>    Internet Draft < Proposed Standard < Draft Standard < Standard
>
> 2617 is a Draft Standard, like 2616.

Doh, sorry. Can someone please ( re-)correct it? I have currently no cvs 
access from here... Thanks.

nd