You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@harmony.apache.org by Oliver Deakin <ol...@googlemail.com> on 2010/09/02 17:26:30 UTC
Re: [milestone] Proposed next milestone plans
Results for my java 5 tree on Windows x86 at r991925:
5 failures:
java.awt.ButtonRTest.testHarmony3701
java.awt.WindowTest.testSetLocationRelativeTo
javax.swing.ImageIcon_MultithreadedTest.testSetImageObserver
javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicScrollBarUITest.testGetThumbBounds
org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.net.URLConnectionTest.test_getInputStream
1 error:
org.apache.harmony.jpda.tests.jdwp.MultiSession.ClassObjectIDTest.testClassObjectID001
- timeout
I don't think there's anything unusual there and nothing new since the
last release. I've just kicked off the java 6 tests, will report the
results on the other thread when they complete.
Regards,
Oliver
On 30/08/2010 10:30, Charles Lee wrote:
> New status:
>
> Running swing module alone, all test case pass except
> javax.swing.ImageIcon_MultithreadedTest<vmcrash/0_CrashedTests.html#javax.swing.ImageIcon_MultithreadedTest>
> is crashed. Running it separately, the test case passed.
>
> 3 vm crashed test cases were passed by running them separately.
>
> testHarmony5215 method in testcase java.awt.event.MouseEventTest was also
> failed by a NullPointerException running on RI(jdk6_13), it maybe the
> problem of test case.
>
> So the result seems good for me on linux 32 platform.
>
> P.S. I can not report the result running on my windows platform, because it
> always throw OutOfMemory exception, though I have raised the usage to 1.5G.
>
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Charles Lee<li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Environment:
>>
>> Linux lee-desktop 2.6.31-22-generic #64-Ubuntu SMP Tue Aug 24 09:31:57 UTC
>> 2010 i686 GNU/Linux
>> gcc version 4.4.1 (Ubuntu 4.4.1-4ubuntu9)
>>
>> result:
>>
>> Tests Failures Errors Success rate Time 22328<http://all-tests.html> 17<http://alltests-fails.html>
>> 3<http://alltests-errors.html> 99.91% 1870.109
>>
>> Failures are all in the swing module.
>> Errors: there are 2 errors (one in swing, one in awt) and 3 vm crashes.
>>
>> The test result is not static. I will test the failures and errors
>> seperately.
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 2:41 AM, Tim Ellison<t....@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Just a reminder that we are in code freeze for the next milestone publish.
>>>
>>> Only code changes now are fixes that are addressing regressions or
>>> blockers for the milestones, and only after two committers declare them
>>> good.
>>>
>>> Help from everyone with extra testing and checking appreciated.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Tim
>>>
>>> On 18/Aug/2010 10:30, Tim Ellison wrote:
>>>> We've had lots of good fixes and improvements in the codebase over the
>>>> last few months, so time to take stock with another of our regular
>>>> milestones.
>>>>
>>>> I would like to propose the following schedule for 5.0M15& 6.0M3.
>>>>
>>>> Feature freeze Fri 20th August
>>>> Code freeze Fri 27th August
>>>> Publish Fri 3rd September
>>>>
>>>> If there are any objections or problems with these dates please say.
>>>> As usual, we will track issues that must be fixed for these releases
>>>> using the JIRA "Fix for" field. To see the list visit the Harmony JIRA
>>>> homepage at:
>>>>
>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY
>>>>
>>>> and click the "Road Map" link.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Tim
>>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Yours sincerely,
>> Charles Lee
>>
>>
>
--
Oliver Deakin
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
Re: [milestone] Proposed next milestone plans
Posted by Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com>.
On 03/Sep/2010 23:45, Mark Hindess wrote:
> In message <4C...@gmail.com>, Tim Ellison writes:
> I am likely to end up producing at least some of the linux artifacts so
> I am happy to produce them all (nicluding windows) and start the vote if
> you want.
Sure, thanks. Let me know when you have src packages on people.a.o and
I'll test them during the vote period.
Regards,
Tim
Re: [milestone] Proposed next milestone plans
Posted by Mark Hindess <ma...@googlemail.com>.
In message <4C...@gmail.com>, Tim Ellison writes:
>
> I see good test results on the Java 5 branch on a WinXP/IA32 MSVS2003
> platform too. No new failures.
>
> Is anyone else still running tests? I'd like to start a vote soon and
> reopen the code for development.
I've run tests on linux i386/amd64 and debian packages for those
platforms.
I've not bothered with win32 as that seems to get enough attention.
I am still trying to get win64 test results.
I am likely to end up producing at least some of the linux artifacts so
I am happy to produce them all (nicluding windows) and start the vote if
you want.
Regards,
-Mark.
> On 03/Sep/2010 09:21, Catherine Hope wrote:
> > I get the same 2 permanent failures as Charles on Linux x86-32 (running
> > 2.6.32-21-generic #32-Ubuntu with gcc version 4.4.3)
> >
> > java.awt.event.MouseEventTest
> > java.lang.NullPointerException
> > at java.awt.event.MouseEventTest.testHarmony5215(MouseEventTest.java:181)
> >
> > org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.net.MulticastSocketTest
> > junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: Group member did not recv data
> > expected:<[Hello World]> but was:<[�]>
> > at
> > org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.net.MulticastSocketTest.test_joinGroupLj
> ava_net_SocketAddressLjava_net_NetworkInterface(MulticastSocketTest.java:429)
> >
> > I think these are the best test results for any milestone I've had on my
> > machine.
> >
> > Cath
> >
>
Re: [milestone] Proposed next milestone plans
Posted by Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com>.
I see good test results on the Java 5 branch on a WinXP/IA32 MSVS2003
platform too. No new failures.
Is anyone else still running tests? I'd like to start a vote soon and
reopen the code for development.
Regards,
Tim
On 03/Sep/2010 09:21, Catherine Hope wrote:
> I get the same 2 permanent failures as Charles on Linux x86-32 (running
> 2.6.32-21-generic #32-Ubuntu with gcc version 4.4.3)
>
> java.awt.event.MouseEventTest
> java.lang.NullPointerException
> at java.awt.event.MouseEventTest.testHarmony5215(MouseEventTest.java:181)
>
> org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.net.MulticastSocketTest
> junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: Group member did not recv data
> expected:<[Hello World]> but was:<[�]>
> at
> org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.net.MulticastSocketTest.test_joinGroupLjava_net_SocketAddressLjava_net_NetworkInterface(MulticastSocketTest.java:429)
>
> I think these are the best test results for any milestone I've had on my
> machine.
>
> Cath
>
Re: [milestone] Proposed next milestone plans
Posted by Catherine Hope <ca...@googlemail.com>.
Hi Ray,
Yes, that patch fixes the MulticastSocketTest failure for me.
Best wishes,
Cath
Re: [milestone] Proposed next milestone plans
Posted by Ray Chen <cl...@gmail.com>.
Hi Cath,
For the MulticastSocketTest failure, can you try the patch JIRA6633?
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Catherine Hope
<ca...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I get the same 2 permanent failures as Charles on Linux x86-32 (running
> 2.6.32-21-generic #32-Ubuntu with gcc version 4.4.3)
>
> java.awt.event.MouseEventTest
> java.lang.NullPointerException
> at java.awt.event.MouseEventTest.testHarmony5215(MouseEventTest.java:181)
>
> org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.net.MulticastSocketTest
> junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: Group member did not recv data
> expected:<[Hello World]> but was:<[�]>
> at
> org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.net.MulticastSocketTest.test_joinGroupLjava_net_SocketAddressLjava_net_NetworkInterface(MulticastSocketTest.java:429)
>
> I think these are the best test results for any milestone I've had on my
> machine.
>
> Cath
>
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
Re: [milestone] Proposed next milestone plans
Posted by Catherine Hope <ca...@googlemail.com>.
I get the same 2 permanent failures as Charles on Linux x86-32 (running
2.6.32-21-generic #32-Ubuntu with gcc version 4.4.3)
java.awt.event.MouseEventTest
java.lang.NullPointerException
at java.awt.event.MouseEventTest.testHarmony5215(MouseEventTest.java:181)
org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.net.MulticastSocketTest
junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: Group member did not recv data
expected:<[Hello World]> but was:<[�]>
at
org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.net.MulticastSocketTest.test_joinGroupLjava_net_SocketAddressLjava_net_NetworkInterface(MulticastSocketTest.java:429)
I think these are the best test results for any milestone I've had on my
machine.
Cath