You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by Warren Togami <wt...@redhat.com> on 2009/07/22 05:28:05 UTC
mboxget output should be mbox?
When I redirect mboxget to a file, the resulting file seems to be not
readable as an mbox file itself. Should it be?
Trying to figure a way to automatically tell my users doing hand
classification which mails they should examine without me reading their
mail.
Warren
Re: mboxget output should be mbox?
Posted by Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org>.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 03:53, Matt Kettler<mk...@verizon.net> wrote:
> Warren Togami wrote:
>> When I redirect mboxget to a file, the resulting file seems to be not
>> readable as an mbox file itself. Should it be?
>>
>> Trying to figure a way to automatically tell my users doing hand
>> classification which mails they should examine without me reading
>> their mail.
>
> AFAIK, that tool extracts the message as a plain rfc-822 message, not as
> another mailbox file.
hmm. good point, it probably should! patches accepted....
--
--j.
Re: mboxget output should be mbox?
Posted by Matt Kettler <mk...@verizon.net>.
Warren Togami wrote:
> When I redirect mboxget to a file, the resulting file seems to be not
> readable as an mbox file itself. Should it be?
>
> Trying to figure a way to automatically tell my users doing hand
> classification which mails they should examine without me reading
> their mail.
AFAIK, that tool extracts the message as a plain rfc-822 message, not as
another mailbox file.