You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org by Thomas DeWeese <Th...@Kodak.com> on 2005/09/01 01:36:12 UTC

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35918] - [PATCH] Shapes are slightly shifted with respect to lines on larger graphics

Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Thanks for the hint. Sounds like rewriting PDFNumber.doubleOut using
> DecimalFormat makes sense. May I ask what you used before switching to
> DecimalFormat?

    Double.toString(double d),

    I just took a look, whats with the PDFNumber.doubleOut function????
It rounds numbers n+0.05 > x > n-0.05 to n (where n is an integer)?
That seems really hacky ;)

    Also I can almost assure you that NumberFormat will be _much_
faster than the current code.

> On 31.08.2005 14:32:01 Thomas DeWeese wrote:
> 
>>>I did a few things on PDFGraphics2D to improve the situation:
>>>http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=240344&view=rev
>>
>>    BTW Batik saw a significant performance increase when we went
>>to using a DecimalFormat object to write our strings.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Jeremias Maerki
>

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35918] - [PATCH] Shapes are slightly shifted with respect to lines on larger graphics

Posted by Jeremias Maerki <de...@greenmail.ch>.

Thanks. I'm convinced now that I should rewrite PDFNumber.doubleOut().

On 01.09.2005 01:36:12 Thomas DeWeese wrote:
> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > Thanks for the hint. Sounds like rewriting PDFNumber.doubleOut using
> > DecimalFormat makes sense. May I ask what you used before switching to
> > DecimalFormat?
> 
>     Double.toString(double d),
> 
>     I just took a look, whats with the PDFNumber.doubleOut function????
> It rounds numbers n+0.05 > x > n-0.05 to n (where n is an integer)?
> That seems really hacky ;)
> 
>     Also I can almost assure you that NumberFormat will be _much_
> faster than the current code.
> 
> > On 31.08.2005 14:32:01 Thomas DeWeese wrote:
> > 
> >>>I did a few things on PDFGraphics2D to improve the situation:
> >>>http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=240344&view=rev
> >>
> >>    BTW Batik saw a significant performance increase when we went
> >>to using a DecimalFormat object to write our strings.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Jeremias Maerki
> > 



Jeremias Maerki