You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to cvs@httpd.apache.org by rp...@apache.org on 2021/09/09 14:57:48 UTC

svn commit: r1893180 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

Author: rpluem
Date: Thu Sep  9 14:57:48 2021
New Revision: 1893180

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1893180&view=rev
Log:
* Vote and promote [skip ci]

Modified:
    httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1893180&r1=1893179&r2=1893180&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Thu Sep  9 14:57:48 2021
@@ -141,19 +141,6 @@ RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS:
 PATCHES ACCEPTED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
   [ start all new proposals below, under PATCHES PROPOSED. ]
 
-PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
-  [ New proposals should be added at the end of the list ]
-
-  *) mod_xml2enc: Correctly handle Microsoft OOXML documents.  PR 64339
-     trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1884505
-     2.4.x patch: svn merge -c 1884505 ^/httpd/httpd/trunk .
-     +1: 
-     jailletc36: there has been some discussion about how to fix the issue.
-     I'm not sure that the commit above is the best solution
-     and other alternatives have been discussed in PR 64339.  If r1884505
-     is not the right fix, then it should be removed from trunk.
-     Putting it here is a way to revive the discussion
-
   *) back port: new ap_ssl_bind_outgoing for multi ssl support in proxy connections
      core/mod_proxy/mod_ssl:
        Adding outgoing flag to conn_rec, indicating a connection is
@@ -170,11 +157,20 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
      trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1890605
      2.4.x patch: https://github.com/apache/httpd/pull/203.diff
            PR: https://github.com/apache/httpd/pull/203
-     +1: icing, minfrin
-     rpluem says: I made comments on https://github.com/apache/httpd/pull/203,
-     but I cannot find them commented. Further more the PR currently has merge
-     conflicts.
-     icing says: conflicts resolved, comments commented.
+     +1: icing, minfrin, rpluem
+
+PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
+  [ New proposals should be added at the end of the list ]
+
+  *) mod_xml2enc: Correctly handle Microsoft OOXML documents.  PR 64339
+     trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1884505
+     2.4.x patch: svn merge -c 1884505 ^/httpd/httpd/trunk .
+     +1: 
+     jailletc36: there has been some discussion about how to fix the issue.
+     I'm not sure that the commit above is the best solution
+     and other alternatives have been discussed in PR 64339.  If r1884505
+     is not the right fix, then it should be removed from trunk.
+     Putting it here is a way to revive the discussion
 
 PATCHES/ISSUES THAT ARE BEING WORKED
   [ New entries should be added at the START of the list ]



Re: svn commit: r1893180 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

Posted by Ruediger Pluem <rp...@apache.org>.

On 9/9/21 5:23 PM, stefan@eissing.org wrote:
> Thanks for the nice dev-tools, Rüdiger!

Welcome. Happy that they are useful.

Regards

Rüdiger


Re: svn commit: r1893180 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

Posted by "stefan@eissing.org" <st...@eissing.org>.
Thanks for the nice dev-tools, Rüdiger!

> Am 09.09.2021 um 16:57 schrieb rpluem@apache.org:
> 
> Author: rpluem
> Date: Thu Sep  9 14:57:48 2021
> New Revision: 1893180
> 
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1893180&view=rev
> Log:
> * Vote and promote [skip ci]
> 
> Modified:
>    httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
> 
> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1893180&r1=1893179&r2=1893180&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Thu Sep  9 14:57:48 2021
> @@ -141,19 +141,6 @@ RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS:
> PATCHES ACCEPTED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
>   [ start all new proposals below, under PATCHES PROPOSED. ]
> 
> -PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
> -  [ New proposals should be added at the end of the list ]
> -
> -  *) mod_xml2enc: Correctly handle Microsoft OOXML documents.  PR 64339
> -     trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1884505
> -     2.4.x patch: svn merge -c 1884505 ^/httpd/httpd/trunk .
> -     +1: 
> -     jailletc36: there has been some discussion about how to fix the issue.
> -     I'm not sure that the commit above is the best solution
> -     and other alternatives have been discussed in PR 64339.  If r1884505
> -     is not the right fix, then it should be removed from trunk.
> -     Putting it here is a way to revive the discussion
> -
>   *) back port: new ap_ssl_bind_outgoing for multi ssl support in proxy connections
>      core/mod_proxy/mod_ssl:
>        Adding outgoing flag to conn_rec, indicating a connection is
> @@ -170,11 +157,20 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
>      trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1890605
>      2.4.x patch: https://github.com/apache/httpd/pull/203.diff
>            PR: https://github.com/apache/httpd/pull/203
> -     +1: icing, minfrin
> -     rpluem says: I made comments on https://github.com/apache/httpd/pull/203,
> -     but I cannot find them commented. Further more the PR currently has merge
> -     conflicts.
> -     icing says: conflicts resolved, comments commented.
> +     +1: icing, minfrin, rpluem
> +
> +PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
> +  [ New proposals should be added at the end of the list ]
> +
> +  *) mod_xml2enc: Correctly handle Microsoft OOXML documents.  PR 64339
> +     trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1884505
> +     2.4.x patch: svn merge -c 1884505 ^/httpd/httpd/trunk .
> +     +1: 
> +     jailletc36: there has been some discussion about how to fix the issue.
> +     I'm not sure that the commit above is the best solution
> +     and other alternatives have been discussed in PR 64339.  If r1884505
> +     is not the right fix, then it should be removed from trunk.
> +     Putting it here is a way to revive the discussion
> 
> PATCHES/ISSUES THAT ARE BEING WORKED
>   [ New entries should be added at the START of the list ]
> 
>