You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@airavata.apache.org by Shameera Rathnayaka <sh...@gmail.com> on 2013/08/11 17:33:56 UTC
Integrating GSoC Master project building blocks
Hi All,
As everybody agreed, this is the time for $Subject. As a first step we can
plug registry with front-end web UI. For this we can have one or few
hangout calls and work together to make it functioning. Please suggest if
you have a different approach for this. Please refer this wiki
page<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRAVATA/JavaScript+Regsitry+Client>for
airavata JS registry client API.
@Sanchit,
We were talking about writing a registry API as an angular service, But if
we do that then this registry api gets strictly bind to the angular. IMO it
is not good. If we provide this as a native JS API which we currently have,
then we are not bound to any framework and others can also use this API and
write their own UI. What if we write a Angular service which use this API
and use that Angular service for your implementation. We can do it , isn't
it?
@Subho,
As you had asked i have added about how we can locally deploy and test our
master project in local machine, into above wiki page under "Deploy
JavaScript Registry" section. As this is not the correct way to deploy our
final service i have stroked out the content. Later we can remove that.
Thanks,
Shameera.
--
Best Regards,
Shameera Rathnayaka.
email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
Re: Integrating GSoC Master project building blocks
Posted by Danushka Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com>.
Guys,
Have submitted all required source code by now?.
I would like to have something runnable out-of-the-box as the immediate
next step of the integration exercise. Any documentation on the UI bits
would also be helpful.
Thanks,
Danushka
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <shameerainfo@gmail.com
> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> As everybody agreed, this is the time for $Subject. As a first step we can
> plug registry with front-end web UI. For this we can have one or few
> hangout calls and work together to make it functioning. Please suggest if
> you have a different approach for this. Please refer this wiki page<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRAVATA/JavaScript+Regsitry+Client>for airavata JS registry client API.
>
> @Sanchit,
> We were talking about writing a registry API as an angular service, But if
> we do that then this registry api gets strictly bind to the angular. IMO it
> is not good. If we provide this as a native JS API which we currently have,
> then we are not bound to any framework and others can also use this API and
> write their own UI. What if we write a Angular service which use this API
> and use that Angular service for your implementation. We can do it , isn't
> it?
>
> @Subho,
> As you had asked i have added about how we can locally deploy and test our
> master project in local machine, into above wiki page under "Deploy
> JavaScript Registry" section. As this is not the correct way to deploy our
> final service i have stroked out the content. Later we can remove that.
>
> Thanks,
> Shameera.
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>
> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>
Re: Integrating GSoC Master project building blocks
Posted by Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>.
So am i
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Vijayendra Grampurohit <
vijayendra.sdm@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am ready.
>
> Regards
> Vijayendra
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> H
>> i Danushka,
>>
>> I am ready for that. Could you please send the hangout url ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Shameera.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Guys are we having the hangout today?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Vijayendra Grampurohit <
>>> vijayendra.sdm@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> Can we postpone the call by 30 minutes. Can we start the call at 10 PM
>>>> (IST)?
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Vijayendra
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 1:13 AM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>> Is the hangout on schedule?
>>>>>
>>>>> Can we please have a plan to have a tutorial similar to the Airavata
>>>>> in 10 minute tutorial [1] using the web version?
>>>>>
>>>>> Suresh
>>>>> [1] -
>>>>> http://airavata.apache.org/documentation/tutorials/airavata-in-10-minutes.html
>>>>> On Aug 14, 2013, at 12:10 AM, Vijayendra Grampurohit <
>>>>> vijayendra.sdm@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > Hi
>>>>> >
>>>>> > It would be fine for me
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Regards
>>>>> > Vijayendra
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> > + for a hangout this Saturday. 9:30 PM (IST) would be fine by me.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Thanks,
>>>>> > Danushka
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> > Hi Sanchit,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> > Hi Shameera
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Well It is good if we have a native JS API which is not bound to any
>>>>> framework,but I am not sure whether we can use the JS API directly in
>>>>> Angular service due to angular constraints, else we have to replicate the
>>>>> code.
>>>>> > Can we have a hangout sometime this weekend ? please reply with a
>>>>> suitable time?
>>>>> > yes sure lets have a hangout, Dhanushka could you arrange this
>>>>> hangout?. What about this Saturday 7.30 pm (IST) , 10.00 am (EST)? we can
>>>>> complete the parts that need to fix for this integration these days.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > @Dhanushka +1, yes little documentation on UI part would be good.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Thanks,
>>>>> > Shameera.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Regards
>>>>> > Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> > Hi All,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > As everybody agreed, this is the time for $Subject. As a first step
>>>>> we can plug registry with front-end web UI. For this we can have one or few
>>>>> hangout calls and work together to make it functioning. Please suggest if
>>>>> you have a different approach for this. Please refer this wiki page for
>>>>> airavata JS registry client API.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > @Sanchit,
>>>>> > We were talking about writing a registry API as an angular service,
>>>>> But if we do that then this registry api gets strictly bind to the angular.
>>>>> IMO it is not good. If we provide this as a native JS API which we
>>>>> currently have, then we are not bound to any framework and others can also
>>>>> use this API and write their own UI. What if we write a Angular service
>>>>> which use this API and use that Angular service for your implementation. We
>>>>> can do it , isn't it?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > @Subho,
>>>>> > As you had asked i have added about how we can locally deploy and
>>>>> test our master project in local machine, into above wiki page under
>>>>> "Deploy JavaScript Registry" section. As this is not the correct way to
>>>>> deploy our final service i have stroked out the content. Later we can
>>>>> remove that.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Thanks,
>>>>> > Shameera.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > --
>>>>> > Best Regards,
>>>>> > Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>>> > Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > --
>>>>> > Best Regards,
>>>>> > Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>>> > Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>
>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>
>
>
--
Cheers,
Subho
Re: Integrating GSoC Master project building blocks
Posted by Danushka Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com>.
https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/ec044a7fdcb4a68e604bed26c47eb60328d642b8?authuser=0&hl=en
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
> It fine with me.
>
> Regards
> Sanchit Aggarwal
> MS Research (Computer Science)
> Center for Visual Information Technology
> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> Contact - 9581417330
>
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Vijayendra Grampurohit <
> vijayendra.sdm@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I am ready.
>>
>> Regards
>> Vijayendra
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> H
>>> i Danushka,
>>>
>>> I am ready for that. Could you please send the hangout url ?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Shameera.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Guys are we having the hangout today?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Vijayendra Grampurohit <
>>>> vijayendra.sdm@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> Can we postpone the call by 30 minutes. Can we start the call at 10 PM
>>>>> (IST)?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Vijayendra
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 1:13 AM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is the hangout on schedule?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can we please have a plan to have a tutorial similar to the Airavata
>>>>>> in 10 minute tutorial [1] using the web version?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Suresh
>>>>>> [1] -
>>>>>> http://airavata.apache.org/documentation/tutorials/airavata-in-10-minutes.html
>>>>>> On Aug 14, 2013, at 12:10 AM, Vijayendra Grampurohit <
>>>>>> vijayendra.sdm@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > Hi
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > It would be fine for me
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Regards
>>>>>> > Vijayendra
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> > + for a hangout this Saturday. 9:30 PM (IST) would be fine by me.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Thanks,
>>>>>> > Danushka
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> > Hi Sanchit,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> > Hi Shameera
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Well It is good if we have a native JS API which is not bound to
>>>>>> any framework,but I am not sure whether we can use the JS API directly in
>>>>>> Angular service due to angular constraints, else we have to replicate the
>>>>>> code.
>>>>>> > Can we have a hangout sometime this weekend ? please reply with a
>>>>>> suitable time?
>>>>>> > yes sure lets have a hangout, Dhanushka could you arrange this
>>>>>> hangout?. What about this Saturday 7.30 pm (IST) , 10.00 am (EST)? we can
>>>>>> complete the parts that need to fix for this integration these days.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > @Dhanushka +1, yes little documentation on UI part would be good.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Thanks,
>>>>>> > Shameera.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Regards
>>>>>> > Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> > Hi All,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > As everybody agreed, this is the time for $Subject. As a first step
>>>>>> we can plug registry with front-end web UI. For this we can have one or few
>>>>>> hangout calls and work together to make it functioning. Please suggest if
>>>>>> you have a different approach for this. Please refer this wiki page for
>>>>>> airavata JS registry client API.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > @Sanchit,
>>>>>> > We were talking about writing a registry API as an angular service,
>>>>>> But if we do that then this registry api gets strictly bind to the angular.
>>>>>> IMO it is not good. If we provide this as a native JS API which we
>>>>>> currently have, then we are not bound to any framework and others can also
>>>>>> use this API and write their own UI. What if we write a Angular service
>>>>>> which use this API and use that Angular service for your implementation. We
>>>>>> can do it , isn't it?
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > @Subho,
>>>>>> > As you had asked i have added about how we can locally deploy and
>>>>>> test our master project in local machine, into above wiki page under
>>>>>> "Deploy JavaScript Registry" section. As this is not the correct way to
>>>>>> deploy our final service i have stroked out the content. Later we can
>>>>>> remove that.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Thanks,
>>>>>> > Shameera.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > --
>>>>>> > Best Regards,
>>>>>> > Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>>>> > Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > --
>>>>>> > Best Regards,
>>>>>> > Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>>>> > Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>
>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Integrating GSoC Master project building blocks
Posted by Sanchit Aggarwal <sa...@gmail.com>.
Hi
It fine with me.
Regards
Sanchit Aggarwal
MS Research (Computer Science)
Center for Visual Information Technology
IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
Contact - 9581417330
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Vijayendra Grampurohit <
vijayendra.sdm@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am ready.
>
> Regards
> Vijayendra
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> H
>> i Danushka,
>>
>> I am ready for that. Could you please send the hangout url ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Shameera.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Guys are we having the hangout today?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Vijayendra Grampurohit <
>>> vijayendra.sdm@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> Can we postpone the call by 30 minutes. Can we start the call at 10 PM
>>>> (IST)?
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Vijayendra
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 1:13 AM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>> Is the hangout on schedule?
>>>>>
>>>>> Can we please have a plan to have a tutorial similar to the Airavata
>>>>> in 10 minute tutorial [1] using the web version?
>>>>>
>>>>> Suresh
>>>>> [1] -
>>>>> http://airavata.apache.org/documentation/tutorials/airavata-in-10-minutes.html
>>>>> On Aug 14, 2013, at 12:10 AM, Vijayendra Grampurohit <
>>>>> vijayendra.sdm@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > Hi
>>>>> >
>>>>> > It would be fine for me
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Regards
>>>>> > Vijayendra
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> > + for a hangout this Saturday. 9:30 PM (IST) would be fine by me.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Thanks,
>>>>> > Danushka
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> > Hi Sanchit,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> > Hi Shameera
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Well It is good if we have a native JS API which is not bound to any
>>>>> framework,but I am not sure whether we can use the JS API directly in
>>>>> Angular service due to angular constraints, else we have to replicate the
>>>>> code.
>>>>> > Can we have a hangout sometime this weekend ? please reply with a
>>>>> suitable time?
>>>>> > yes sure lets have a hangout, Dhanushka could you arrange this
>>>>> hangout?. What about this Saturday 7.30 pm (IST) , 10.00 am (EST)? we can
>>>>> complete the parts that need to fix for this integration these days.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > @Dhanushka +1, yes little documentation on UI part would be good.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Thanks,
>>>>> > Shameera.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Regards
>>>>> > Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> > Hi All,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > As everybody agreed, this is the time for $Subject. As a first step
>>>>> we can plug registry with front-end web UI. For this we can have one or few
>>>>> hangout calls and work together to make it functioning. Please suggest if
>>>>> you have a different approach for this. Please refer this wiki page for
>>>>> airavata JS registry client API.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > @Sanchit,
>>>>> > We were talking about writing a registry API as an angular service,
>>>>> But if we do that then this registry api gets strictly bind to the angular.
>>>>> IMO it is not good. If we provide this as a native JS API which we
>>>>> currently have, then we are not bound to any framework and others can also
>>>>> use this API and write their own UI. What if we write a Angular service
>>>>> which use this API and use that Angular service for your implementation. We
>>>>> can do it , isn't it?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > @Subho,
>>>>> > As you had asked i have added about how we can locally deploy and
>>>>> test our master project in local machine, into above wiki page under
>>>>> "Deploy JavaScript Registry" section. As this is not the correct way to
>>>>> deploy our final service i have stroked out the content. Later we can
>>>>> remove that.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Thanks,
>>>>> > Shameera.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > --
>>>>> > Best Regards,
>>>>> > Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>>> > Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > --
>>>>> > Best Regards,
>>>>> > Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>>> > Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>
>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>
>
>
Re: Integrating GSoC Master project building blocks
Posted by Vijayendra Grampurohit <vi...@gmail.com>.
Hi
I am ready.
Regards
Vijayendra
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
> H
> i Danushka,
>
> I am ready for that. Could you please send the hangout url ?
>
> Thanks,
> Shameera.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Guys are we having the hangout today?
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Vijayendra Grampurohit <
>> vijayendra.sdm@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Can we postpone the call by 30 minutes. Can we start the call at 10 PM
>>> (IST)?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Vijayendra
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 1:13 AM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> Is the hangout on schedule?
>>>>
>>>> Can we please have a plan to have a tutorial similar to the Airavata in
>>>> 10 minute tutorial [1] using the web version?
>>>>
>>>> Suresh
>>>> [1] -
>>>> http://airavata.apache.org/documentation/tutorials/airavata-in-10-minutes.html
>>>> On Aug 14, 2013, at 12:10 AM, Vijayendra Grampurohit <
>>>> vijayendra.sdm@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Hi
>>>> >
>>>> > It would be fine for me
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Regards
>>>> > Vijayendra
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > + for a hangout this Saturday. 9:30 PM (IST) would be fine by me.
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks,
>>>> > Danushka
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > Hi Sanchit,
>>>> >
>>>> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > Hi Shameera
>>>> >
>>>> > Well It is good if we have a native JS API which is not bound to any
>>>> framework,but I am not sure whether we can use the JS API directly in
>>>> Angular service due to angular constraints, else we have to replicate the
>>>> code.
>>>> > Can we have a hangout sometime this weekend ? please reply with a
>>>> suitable time?
>>>> > yes sure lets have a hangout, Dhanushka could you arrange this
>>>> hangout?. What about this Saturday 7.30 pm (IST) , 10.00 am (EST)? we can
>>>> complete the parts that need to fix for this integration these days.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > @Dhanushka +1, yes little documentation on UI part would be good.
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks,
>>>> > Shameera.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Regards
>>>> > Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > Hi All,
>>>> >
>>>> > As everybody agreed, this is the time for $Subject. As a first step
>>>> we can plug registry with front-end web UI. For this we can have one or few
>>>> hangout calls and work together to make it functioning. Please suggest if
>>>> you have a different approach for this. Please refer this wiki page for
>>>> airavata JS registry client API.
>>>> >
>>>> > @Sanchit,
>>>> > We were talking about writing a registry API as an angular service,
>>>> But if we do that then this registry api gets strictly bind to the angular.
>>>> IMO it is not good. If we provide this as a native JS API which we
>>>> currently have, then we are not bound to any framework and others can also
>>>> use this API and write their own UI. What if we write a Angular service
>>>> which use this API and use that Angular service for your implementation. We
>>>> can do it , isn't it?
>>>> >
>>>> > @Subho,
>>>> > As you had asked i have added about how we can locally deploy and
>>>> test our master project in local machine, into above wiki page under
>>>> "Deploy JavaScript Registry" section. As this is not the correct way to
>>>> deploy our final service i have stroked out the content. Later we can
>>>> remove that.
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks,
>>>> > Shameera.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > Best Regards,
>>>> > Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>> >
>>>> > email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>> > Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > Best Regards,
>>>> > Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>> >
>>>> > email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>> > Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>
> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>
Re: Integrating GSoC Master project building blocks
Posted by Shameera Rathnayaka <sh...@gmail.com>.
H
i Danushka,
I am ready for that. Could you please send the hangout url ?
Thanks,
Shameera.
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
> Guys are we having the hangout today?
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Vijayendra Grampurohit <
> vijayendra.sdm@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Can we postpone the call by 30 minutes. Can we start the call at 10 PM
>> (IST)?
>>
>> Regards
>> Vijayendra
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 1:13 AM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Is the hangout on schedule?
>>>
>>> Can we please have a plan to have a tutorial similar to the Airavata in
>>> 10 minute tutorial [1] using the web version?
>>>
>>> Suresh
>>> [1] -
>>> http://airavata.apache.org/documentation/tutorials/airavata-in-10-minutes.html
>>> On Aug 14, 2013, at 12:10 AM, Vijayendra Grampurohit <
>>> vijayendra.sdm@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi
>>> >
>>> > It would be fine for me
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Regards
>>> > Vijayendra
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > + for a hangout this Saturday. 9:30 PM (IST) would be fine by me.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Danushka
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Hi Sanchit,
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Hi Shameera
>>> >
>>> > Well It is good if we have a native JS API which is not bound to any
>>> framework,but I am not sure whether we can use the JS API directly in
>>> Angular service due to angular constraints, else we have to replicate the
>>> code.
>>> > Can we have a hangout sometime this weekend ? please reply with a
>>> suitable time?
>>> > yes sure lets have a hangout, Dhanushka could you arrange this
>>> hangout?. What about this Saturday 7.30 pm (IST) , 10.00 am (EST)? we can
>>> complete the parts that need to fix for this integration these days.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > @Dhanushka +1, yes little documentation on UI part would be good.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Shameera.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Regards
>>> > Sanchit Aggarwal
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Hi All,
>>> >
>>> > As everybody agreed, this is the time for $Subject. As a first step we
>>> can plug registry with front-end web UI. For this we can have one or few
>>> hangout calls and work together to make it functioning. Please suggest if
>>> you have a different approach for this. Please refer this wiki page for
>>> airavata JS registry client API.
>>> >
>>> > @Sanchit,
>>> > We were talking about writing a registry API as an angular service,
>>> But if we do that then this registry api gets strictly bind to the angular.
>>> IMO it is not good. If we provide this as a native JS API which we
>>> currently have, then we are not bound to any framework and others can also
>>> use this API and write their own UI. What if we write a Angular service
>>> which use this API and use that Angular service for your implementation. We
>>> can do it , isn't it?
>>> >
>>> > @Subho,
>>> > As you had asked i have added about how we can locally deploy and test
>>> our master project in local machine, into above wiki page under "Deploy
>>> JavaScript Registry" section. As this is not the correct way to deploy our
>>> final service i have stroked out the content. Later we can remove that.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Shameera.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Best Regards,
>>> > Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>> >
>>> > email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>> > Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Best Regards,
>>> > Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>> >
>>> > email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>> > Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>
--
Best Regards,
Shameera Rathnayaka.
email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
Re: Integrating GSoC Master project building blocks
Posted by Danushka Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com>.
Guys are we having the hangout today?
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Vijayendra Grampurohit <
vijayendra.sdm@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Can we postpone the call by 30 minutes. Can we start the call at 10 PM
> (IST)?
>
> Regards
> Vijayendra
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 1:13 AM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Is the hangout on schedule?
>>
>> Can we please have a plan to have a tutorial similar to the Airavata in
>> 10 minute tutorial [1] using the web version?
>>
>> Suresh
>> [1] -
>> http://airavata.apache.org/documentation/tutorials/airavata-in-10-minutes.html
>> On Aug 14, 2013, at 12:10 AM, Vijayendra Grampurohit <
>> vijayendra.sdm@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > It would be fine for me
>> >
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Vijayendra
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > + for a hangout this Saturday. 9:30 PM (IST) would be fine by me.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Danushka
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi Sanchit,
>> >
>> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi Shameera
>> >
>> > Well It is good if we have a native JS API which is not bound to any
>> framework,but I am not sure whether we can use the JS API directly in
>> Angular service due to angular constraints, else we have to replicate the
>> code.
>> > Can we have a hangout sometime this weekend ? please reply with a
>> suitable time?
>> > yes sure lets have a hangout, Dhanushka could you arrange this
>> hangout?. What about this Saturday 7.30 pm (IST) , 10.00 am (EST)? we can
>> complete the parts that need to fix for this integration these days.
>> >
>> >
>> > @Dhanushka +1, yes little documentation on UI part would be good.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Shameera.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Sanchit Aggarwal
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > As everybody agreed, this is the time for $Subject. As a first step we
>> can plug registry with front-end web UI. For this we can have one or few
>> hangout calls and work together to make it functioning. Please suggest if
>> you have a different approach for this. Please refer this wiki page for
>> airavata JS registry client API.
>> >
>> > @Sanchit,
>> > We were talking about writing a registry API as an angular service, But
>> if we do that then this registry api gets strictly bind to the angular. IMO
>> it is not good. If we provide this as a native JS API which we currently
>> have, then we are not bound to any framework and others can also use this
>> API and write their own UI. What if we write a Angular service which use
>> this API and use that Angular service for your implementation. We can do it
>> , isn't it?
>> >
>> > @Subho,
>> > As you had asked i have added about how we can locally deploy and test
>> our master project in local machine, into above wiki page under "Deploy
>> JavaScript Registry" section. As this is not the correct way to deploy our
>> final service i have stroked out the content. Later we can remove that.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Shameera.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Best Regards,
>> > Shameera Rathnayaka.
>> >
>> > email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>> > Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Best Regards,
>> > Shameera Rathnayaka.
>> >
>> > email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>> > Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
Re: Integrating GSoC Master project building blocks
Posted by Vijayendra Grampurohit <vi...@gmail.com>.
Hi
Can we postpone the call by 30 minutes. Can we start the call at 10 PM
(IST)?
Regards
Vijayendra
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 1:13 AM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Is the hangout on schedule?
>
> Can we please have a plan to have a tutorial similar to the Airavata in 10
> minute tutorial [1] using the web version?
>
> Suresh
> [1] -
> http://airavata.apache.org/documentation/tutorials/airavata-in-10-minutes.html
> On Aug 14, 2013, at 12:10 AM, Vijayendra Grampurohit <
> vijayendra.sdm@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > It would be fine for me
> >
> >
> > Regards
> > Vijayendra
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
> > + for a hangout this Saturday. 9:30 PM (IST) would be fine by me.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Danushka
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Sanchit,
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Shameera
> >
> > Well It is good if we have a native JS API which is not bound to any
> framework,but I am not sure whether we can use the JS API directly in
> Angular service due to angular constraints, else we have to replicate the
> code.
> > Can we have a hangout sometime this weekend ? please reply with a
> suitable time?
> > yes sure lets have a hangout, Dhanushka could you arrange this hangout?.
> What about this Saturday 7.30 pm (IST) , 10.00 am (EST)? we can complete
> the parts that need to fix for this integration these days.
> >
> >
> > @Dhanushka +1, yes little documentation on UI part would be good.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shameera.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards
> > Sanchit Aggarwal
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > As everybody agreed, this is the time for $Subject. As a first step we
> can plug registry with front-end web UI. For this we can have one or few
> hangout calls and work together to make it functioning. Please suggest if
> you have a different approach for this. Please refer this wiki page for
> airavata JS registry client API.
> >
> > @Sanchit,
> > We were talking about writing a registry API as an angular service, But
> if we do that then this registry api gets strictly bind to the angular. IMO
> it is not good. If we provide this as a native JS API which we currently
> have, then we are not bound to any framework and others can also use this
> API and write their own UI. What if we write a Angular service which use
> this API and use that Angular service for your implementation. We can do it
> , isn't it?
> >
> > @Subho,
> > As you had asked i have added about how we can locally deploy and test
> our master project in local machine, into above wiki page under "Deploy
> JavaScript Registry" section. As this is not the correct way to deploy our
> final service i have stroked out the content. Later we can remove that.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shameera.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards,
> > Shameera Rathnayaka.
> >
> > email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
> > Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards,
> > Shameera Rathnayaka.
> >
> > email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
> > Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
> >
> >
>
>
Re: Integrating GSoC Master project building blocks
Posted by Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org>.
Hi All,
Is the hangout on schedule?
Can we please have a plan to have a tutorial similar to the Airavata in 10 minute tutorial [1] using the web version?
Suresh
[1] - http://airavata.apache.org/documentation/tutorials/airavata-in-10-minutes.html
On Aug 14, 2013, at 12:10 AM, Vijayendra Grampurohit <vi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> It would be fine for me
>
>
> Regards
> Vijayendra
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> + for a hangout this Saturday. 9:30 PM (IST) would be fine by me.
>
> Thanks,
> Danushka
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Sanchit,
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Shameera
>
> Well It is good if we have a native JS API which is not bound to any framework,but I am not sure whether we can use the JS API directly in Angular service due to angular constraints, else we have to replicate the code.
> Can we have a hangout sometime this weekend ? please reply with a suitable time?
> yes sure lets have a hangout, Dhanushka could you arrange this hangout?. What about this Saturday 7.30 pm (IST) , 10.00 am (EST)? we can complete the parts that need to fix for this integration these days.
>
>
> @Dhanushka +1, yes little documentation on UI part would be good.
>
> Thanks,
> Shameera.
>
>
>
>
> Regards
> Sanchit Aggarwal
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> As everybody agreed, this is the time for $Subject. As a first step we can plug registry with front-end web UI. For this we can have one or few hangout calls and work together to make it functioning. Please suggest if you have a different approach for this. Please refer this wiki page for airavata JS registry client API.
>
> @Sanchit,
> We were talking about writing a registry API as an angular service, But if we do that then this registry api gets strictly bind to the angular. IMO it is not good. If we provide this as a native JS API which we currently have, then we are not bound to any framework and others can also use this API and write their own UI. What if we write a Angular service which use this API and use that Angular service for your implementation. We can do it , isn't it?
>
> @Subho,
> As you had asked i have added about how we can locally deploy and test our master project in local machine, into above wiki page under "Deploy JavaScript Registry" section. As this is not the correct way to deploy our final service i have stroked out the content. Later we can remove that.
>
> Thanks,
> Shameera.
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>
> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>
> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>
>
Re: Integrating GSoC Master project building blocks
Posted by Vijayendra Grampurohit <vi...@gmail.com>.
Hi
It would be fine for me
Regards
Vijayendra
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
> + for a hangout this Saturday. 9:30 PM (IST) would be fine by me.
>
> Thanks,
> Danushka
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Sanchit,
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Shameera
>>>
>>> Well It is good if we have a native JS API which is not bound to any
>>> framework,but I am not sure whether we can use the JS API directly in
>>> Angular service due to angular constraints, else we have to replicate the
>>> code.
>>> Can we have a hangout sometime this weekend ? please reply with a
>>> suitable time?
>>>
>> yes sure lets have a hangout, Dhanushka could you arrange this hangout?.
>> What about this Saturday 7.30 pm (IST) , 10.00 am (EST)? we can complete
>> the parts that need to fix for this integration these days.
>>
>>
>> @Dhanushka +1, yes little documentation on UI part would be good.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Shameera.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> As everybody agreed, this is the time for $Subject. As a first step we
>>>> can plug registry with front-end web UI. For this we can have one or few
>>>> hangout calls and work together to make it functioning. Please suggest if
>>>> you have a different approach for this. Please refer this wiki page<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRAVATA/JavaScript+Regsitry+Client>for airavata JS registry client API.
>>>>
>>>> @Sanchit,
>>>> We were talking about writing a registry API as an angular service, But
>>>> if we do that then this registry api gets strictly bind to the angular. IMO
>>>> it is not good. If we provide this as a native JS API which we currently
>>>> have, then we are not bound to any framework and others can also use this
>>>> API and write their own UI. What if we write a Angular service which use
>>>> this API and use that Angular service for your implementation. We can do it
>>>> , isn't it?
>>>>
>>>> @Subho,
>>>> As you had asked i have added about how we can locally deploy and test
>>>> our master project in local machine, into above wiki page under "Deploy
>>>> JavaScript Registry" section. As this is not the correct way to deploy our
>>>> final service i have stroked out the content. Later we can remove that.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Shameera.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>
>>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>
>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>
>
>
Re: Integrating GSoC Master project building blocks
Posted by Danushka Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com>.
+ for a hangout this Saturday. 9:30 PM (IST) would be fine by me.
Thanks,
Danushka
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <shameerainfo@gmail.com
> wrote:
> Hi Sanchit,
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Shameera
>>
>> Well It is good if we have a native JS API which is not bound to any
>> framework,but I am not sure whether we can use the JS API directly in
>> Angular service due to angular constraints, else we have to replicate the
>> code.
>> Can we have a hangout sometime this weekend ? please reply with a
>> suitable time?
>>
> yes sure lets have a hangout, Dhanushka could you arrange this hangout?.
> What about this Saturday 7.30 pm (IST) , 10.00 am (EST)? we can complete
> the parts that need to fix for this integration these days.
>
>
> @Dhanushka +1, yes little documentation on UI part would be good.
>
> Thanks,
> Shameera.
>
>
>
>
>>
>> Regards
>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> As everybody agreed, this is the time for $Subject. As a first step we
>>> can plug registry with front-end web UI. For this we can have one or few
>>> hangout calls and work together to make it functioning. Please suggest if
>>> you have a different approach for this. Please refer this wiki page<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRAVATA/JavaScript+Regsitry+Client>for airavata JS registry client API.
>>>
>>> @Sanchit,
>>> We were talking about writing a registry API as an angular service, But
>>> if we do that then this registry api gets strictly bind to the angular. IMO
>>> it is not good. If we provide this as a native JS API which we currently
>>> have, then we are not bound to any framework and others can also use this
>>> API and write their own UI. What if we write a Angular service which use
>>> this API and use that Angular service for your implementation. We can do it
>>> , isn't it?
>>>
>>> @Subho,
>>> As you had asked i have added about how we can locally deploy and test
>>> our master project in local machine, into above wiki page under "Deploy
>>> JavaScript Registry" section. As this is not the correct way to deploy our
>>> final service i have stroked out the content. Later we can remove that.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Shameera.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>
>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>
> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>
Re: Integrating GSoC Master project building blocks
Posted by Shameera Rathnayaka <sh...@gmail.com>.
Hi Sanchit,
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Shameera
>
> Well It is good if we have a native JS API which is not bound to any
> framework,but I am not sure whether we can use the JS API directly in
> Angular service due to angular constraints, else we have to replicate the
> code.
> Can we have a hangout sometime this weekend ? please reply with a suitable
> time?
>
yes sure lets have a hangout, Dhanushka could you arrange this hangout?.
What about this Saturday 7.30 pm (IST) , 10.00 am (EST)? we can complete
the parts that need to fix for this integration these days.
@Dhanushka +1, yes little documentation on UI part would be good.
Thanks,
Shameera.
>
> Regards
> Sanchit Aggarwal
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> As everybody agreed, this is the time for $Subject. As a first step we
>> can plug registry with front-end web UI. For this we can have one or few
>> hangout calls and work together to make it functioning. Please suggest if
>> you have a different approach for this. Please refer this wiki page<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRAVATA/JavaScript+Regsitry+Client>for airavata JS registry client API.
>>
>> @Sanchit,
>> We were talking about writing a registry API as an angular service, But
>> if we do that then this registry api gets strictly bind to the angular. IMO
>> it is not good. If we provide this as a native JS API which we currently
>> have, then we are not bound to any framework and others can also use this
>> API and write their own UI. What if we write a Angular service which use
>> this API and use that Angular service for your implementation. We can do it
>> , isn't it?
>>
>> @Subho,
>> As you had asked i have added about how we can locally deploy and test
>> our master project in local machine, into above wiki page under "Deploy
>> JavaScript Registry" section. As this is not the correct way to deploy our
>> final service i have stroked out the content. Later we can remove that.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Shameera.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>
>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>
>
>
--
Best Regards,
Shameera Rathnayaka.
email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
Re: Integrating GSoC Master project building blocks
Posted by Sanchit Aggarwal <sa...@gmail.com>.
Hi Shameera
Well It is good if we have a native JS API which is not bound to any
framework,but I am not sure whether we can use the JS API directly in
Angular service due to angular constraints, else we have to replicate the
code.
Can we have a hangout sometime this weekend ? please reply with a suitable
time?
Regards
Sanchit Aggarwal
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <shameerainfo@gmail.com
> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> As everybody agreed, this is the time for $Subject. As a first step we can
> plug registry with front-end web UI. For this we can have one or few
> hangout calls and work together to make it functioning. Please suggest if
> you have a different approach for this. Please refer this wiki page<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRAVATA/JavaScript+Regsitry+Client>for airavata JS registry client API.
>
> @Sanchit,
> We were talking about writing a registry API as an angular service, But if
> we do that then this registry api gets strictly bind to the angular. IMO it
> is not good. If we provide this as a native JS API which we currently have,
> then we are not bound to any framework and others can also use this API and
> write their own UI. What if we write a Angular service which use this API
> and use that Angular service for your implementation. We can do it , isn't
> it?
>
> @Subho,
> As you had asked i have added about how we can locally deploy and test our
> master project in local machine, into above wiki page under "Deploy
> JavaScript Registry" section. As this is not the correct way to deploy our
> final service i have stroked out the content. Later we can remove that.
>
> Thanks,
> Shameera.
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>
> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>