You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cxf.apache.org by Thomas Diesler <th...@jboss.com> on 2008/04/08 16:24:16 UTC

Running the jbossws testsuite against cxf-2.0.5

Hi Folks,

we (jboss) are in the process of migration our jbossws-native tests to a 
common testsuite that will run against all supported stacks.

http://jbws.dyndns.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=JBossWSSupportedStackComparison

We expect to see a number of failures with the respective stacks for 
which I plan to create individual jira issues. All failing tests will 
get listed in our exclude file and hance will make it into the next 
jbossws-cxf release notes.

Over the course of the next few releases we can then work to reduce 
these failures if needed.

cheers
-thomas

-- 
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thomas Diesler
Web Service Lead
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Re: Running the jbossws testsuite against cxf-2.0.5

Posted by Thomas Diesler <th...@jboss.com>.
... sure. Here you go

http://jbws.dyndns.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Building_From_Source#Checkout_and_build_JBossWS-CXF

Daniel Kulp wrote:
> Thomas,
> 
> When logging the jira issues with CXF, it would help if you could put a 
> link to the instructions on how to checkout and run the given test into 
> the issue.  Very few of us (possibly only me) have even tried to run the 
> JBoss tests so there isn't much (any) familiarity.  
> 
> Thanks!
> Dan
> 
> 
> 
> On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Thomas Diesler wrote:
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> we (jboss) are in the process of migration our jbossws-native tests to
>> a common testsuite that will run against all supported stacks.
>>
>> http://jbws.dyndns.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=JBossWSSupportedStack
>> Comparison
>>
>> We expect to see a number of failures with the respective stacks for
>> which I plan to create individual jira issues. All failing tests will
>> get listed in our exclude file and hance will make it into the next
>> jbossws-cxf release notes.
>>
>> Over the course of the next few releases we can then work to reduce
>> these failures if needed.
>>
>> cheers
>> -thomas
> 
> 
> 

-- 
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thomas Diesler
Web Service Lead
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Re: Running the jbossws testsuite against cxf-2.0.5

Posted by Daniel Kulp <da...@iona.com>.
Thomas,

When logging the jira issues with CXF, it would help if you could put a 
link to the instructions on how to checkout and run the given test into 
the issue.  Very few of us (possibly only me) have even tried to run the 
JBoss tests so there isn't much (any) familiarity.  

Thanks!
Dan



On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Thomas Diesler wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> we (jboss) are in the process of migration our jbossws-native tests to
> a common testsuite that will run against all supported stacks.
>
> http://jbws.dyndns.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=JBossWSSupportedStack
>Comparison
>
> We expect to see a number of failures with the respective stacks for
> which I plan to create individual jira issues. All failing tests will
> get listed in our exclude file and hance will make it into the next
> jbossws-cxf release notes.
>
> Over the course of the next few releases we can then work to reduce
> these failures if needed.
>
> cheers
> -thomas



-- 
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer
IONA
P: 781-902-8727    C: 508-380-7194
daniel.kulp@iona.com
http://www.dankulp.com/blog

Re: Running the jbossws testsuite against cxf-2.0.5

Posted by Jeff Genender <jg...@apache.org>.
Hi Thomas,

Let me try to explain this to the best of my knowledge, and I encourage
others to jump in who see if I have stated something that is not correct.

I don't know the contracts between Sun and JBoss, but as I understand
it, I don't believe you are allowed to share which tests pass with
anyone outside of JBoss, and we at Apache certainly cannot share TCK
information here.  In fact, each person at Apache who wishes to work on
the TCK must sign an NDA prohibiting the sharing of this type of
information.  IANAL, but I suspect JBoss is under a similar NDA and you
may wish to check with your legal department regarding this issue.

Due to the NDA at Apache, we have set up special mailing lists and
access to the TCK, but this minimally requires that you are a committer
of Apache and that you have signed the Apache NDA document as well as
access grant from the PMC.  This allows us to share TCK results and
discussion between those who are authorized to do so.

With that said, you certainly can report bugs that you encounter to the
CXF project, and also submit patches for those bugs.  If you run your
TCK, however you cannot state that it was a TCK test, and you cannot
share which TCK test that it was.  If you find an error when running
your TCK, I encourage you to reproduce the error with an orginal set of
code and engage the community with the problem and a possible solution,
and feel free to reference the JSR paragraph that shows the code does
not work.  But direct TCK test information sharing is not allowed and is
prohibited.

Please let me know if you have any additional questions.

Thanks,

Jeff

Thomas Diesler wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
> 
> Jeff Genender wrote:
>>
>> Jervis Liu wrote:
>>> You are very welcome. This will certainly benefit CXF a lot, so please
>>> keep filing jiras and test cases, we will make sure they are handled in
>>> a high priority.
>>>
>>> BTW, what is the plan of TCK on the JBoss side? Is there anything we
>>> need to do on the CXF side related to TCK?
>>
>> Lets try to keep TCK related issues on the TCK list please.  Thx.
> 
> I already setup the TCK5 environment for jbossws-cxf and run the first
> successful tests. How can I communicated TCK related issues?
> 
> cheers
> -thomas
> 
>>
>>
>> Jeff
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Jervis
>>>
>>> Thomas Diesler wrote:
>>>> Hi Folks,
>>>>
>>>> we (jboss) are in the process of migration our jbossws-native tests to
>>>> a common testsuite that will run against all supported stacks.
>>>>
>>>> http://jbws.dyndns.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=JBossWSSupportedStackComparison
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We expect to see a number of failures with the respective stacks for
>>>> which I plan to create individual jira issues. All failing tests will
>>>> get listed in our exclude file and hance will make it into the next
>>>> jbossws-cxf release notes.
>>>>
>>>> Over the course of the next few releases we can then work to reduce
>>>> these failures if needed.
>>>>
>>>> cheers
>>>> -thomas
>>>>
> 

Re: Running the jbossws testsuite against cxf-2.0.5

Posted by Thomas Diesler <th...@jboss.com>.
Hi Jeff,

Jeff Genender wrote:
> 
> Jervis Liu wrote:
>> You are very welcome. This will certainly benefit CXF a lot, so please
>> keep filing jiras and test cases, we will make sure they are handled in
>> a high priority.
>>
>> BTW, what is the plan of TCK on the JBoss side? Is there anything we
>> need to do on the CXF side related to TCK?
> 
> Lets try to keep TCK related issues on the TCK list please.  Thx.

I already setup the TCK5 environment for jbossws-cxf and run the first 
successful tests. How can I communicated TCK related issues?

cheers
-thomas

> 
> 
> Jeff
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> Cheers,
>> Jervis
>>
>> Thomas Diesler wrote:
>>> Hi Folks,
>>>
>>> we (jboss) are in the process of migration our jbossws-native tests to
>>> a common testsuite that will run against all supported stacks.
>>>
>>> http://jbws.dyndns.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=JBossWSSupportedStackComparison
>>>
>>>
>>> We expect to see a number of failures with the respective stacks for
>>> which I plan to create individual jira issues. All failing tests will
>>> get listed in our exclude file and hance will make it into the next
>>> jbossws-cxf release notes.
>>>
>>> Over the course of the next few releases we can then work to reduce
>>> these failures if needed.
>>>
>>> cheers
>>> -thomas
>>>

-- 
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thomas Diesler
Web Service Lead
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Re: Running the jbossws testsuite against cxf-2.0.5

Posted by Jeff Genender <jg...@apache.org>.

Jervis Liu wrote:
> You are very welcome. This will certainly benefit CXF a lot, so please
> keep filing jiras and test cases, we will make sure they are handled in
> a high priority.
> 
> BTW, what is the plan of TCK on the JBoss side? Is there anything we
> need to do on the CXF side related to TCK?

Lets try to keep TCK related issues on the TCK list please.  Thx.


Jeff




> 
> Cheers,
> Jervis
> 
> Thomas Diesler wrote:
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> we (jboss) are in the process of migration our jbossws-native tests to
>> a common testsuite that will run against all supported stacks.
>>
>> http://jbws.dyndns.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=JBossWSSupportedStackComparison
>>
>>
>> We expect to see a number of failures with the respective stacks for
>> which I plan to create individual jira issues. All failing tests will
>> get listed in our exclude file and hance will make it into the next
>> jbossws-cxf release notes.
>>
>> Over the course of the next few releases we can then work to reduce
>> these failures if needed.
>>
>> cheers
>> -thomas
>>

Re: Running the jbossws testsuite against cxf-2.0.5

Posted by Jervis Liu <je...@gmail.com>.
You are very welcome. This will certainly benefit CXF a lot, so please 
keep filing jiras and test cases, we will make sure they are handled in 
a high priority.

BTW, what is the plan of TCK on the JBoss side? Is there anything we 
need to do on the CXF side related to TCK?

Cheers,
Jervis

Thomas Diesler wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> we (jboss) are in the process of migration our jbossws-native tests to 
> a common testsuite that will run against all supported stacks.
>
> http://jbws.dyndns.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=JBossWSSupportedStackComparison 
>
>
> We expect to see a number of failures with the respective stacks for 
> which I plan to create individual jira issues. All failing tests will 
> get listed in our exclude file and hance will make it into the next 
> jbossws-cxf release notes.
>
> Over the course of the next few releases we can then work to reduce 
> these failures if needed.
>
> cheers
> -thomas
>