You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openwebbeans.apache.org by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> on 2014/10/01 20:23:06 UTC
You shall not pass!
But we do!
Folks, I'm proud to announce that we finally pass the standalone part of the CDI-1.2 TCK!
Please, all do checkout our latest OWB 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT (or simply compile it yourself [1]) and test YOUR application with it. Any feedback is welcome!
I like to kick off the release train for OWB tomorrow.
We will now continue with cleanup and performance improvements. And also with working on the EE TCK over in TomEE.
txs and LieGrue,
strub
Re: You shall not pass!
Posted by Gerhard Petracek <ge...@gmail.com>.
really great! i've tested some applications as well as [1] and everything
looks fine!
regards,
gerhard
[1] https://github.com/CDIatWork/IdeaFork
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF/JavaEE powerhouse -
JavaEE Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2014-10-01 20:23 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
> But we do!
>
> Folks, I'm proud to announce that we finally pass the standalone part of
> the CDI-1.2 TCK!
>
> Please, all do checkout our latest OWB 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT (or simply compile
> it yourself [1]) and test YOUR application with it. Any feedback is welcome!
>
> I like to kick off the release train for OWB tomorrow.
>
> We will now continue with cleanup and performance improvements. And also
> with working on the EE TCK over in TomEE.
>
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
Re: You shall not pass!
Posted by Gerhard Petracek <ge...@gmail.com>.
really great! i've tested some applications as well as [1] and everything
looks fine!
regards,
gerhard
[1] https://github.com/CDIatWork/IdeaFork
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF/JavaEE powerhouse -
JavaEE Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2014-10-01 20:23 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
> But we do!
>
> Folks, I'm proud to announce that we finally pass the standalone part of
> the CDI-1.2 TCK!
>
> Please, all do checkout our latest OWB 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT (or simply compile
> it yourself [1]) and test YOUR application with it. Any feedback is welcome!
>
> I like to kick off the release train for OWB tomorrow.
>
> We will now continue with cleanup and performance improvements. And also
> with working on the EE TCK over in TomEE.
>
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
Re: You shall not pass!
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
before releasing do we add in openwebbeans.properties the list of
excluded jars like in tomee for instance? In TomEE we have a small
(;)) list here http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/trunk/container/openejb-core/src/main/resources/default.exclusions
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-10-06 10:44 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>:
> great! my apps are working fine now!
>
> 2014-10-06 9:57 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>
>> should be ok now, issue was cache + maven classpath (jetty)
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>> 2014-10-05 21:01 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>> > surely when we resolve the injection (normally in validate(beans) but
>> > same method is called by bm.validation(injectionPoint)
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >
>> >
>> > 2014-10-05 20:39 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <
>> andraschko.thomas@gmail.com>:
>> >> Created a small sample here:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1022
>> >> AFAICS the injectoin points are validated to early.
>> >>
>> >> 2014-10-02 14:17 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>> >>
>> >>> it is done when we validate injection points so everything should be
>> there
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> >>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> >>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> >>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> 2014-10-02 14:14 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <
>> andraschko.thomas@gmail.com
>> >>> >:
>> >>> > It worked fine and now, if i start my app, each time another
>> >>> injectionpoint
>> >>> > is "invalid".
>> >>> > Therefore i don't think it's usefull to share a single bean.
>> >>> > The most times it's a simple injection - without
>> alternatives/specializes
>> >>> > etc. So nothing special here.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Could it be possible that it's to early and not ALL beans are loaded
>> at
>> >>> > this time?
>> >>> > I have a around 10 jars with beans, maybe it depdends on the order
>> of the
>> >>> > jar loading?
>> >>> >
>> >>> > 2014-10-02 13:59 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com
>> >:
>> >>> >
>> >>> >> We validate injection point more drastically now, surely the cause.
>> Can
>> >>> you
>> >>> >> share AnyBean and where it is injected?
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Le jeudi 2 octobre 2014, Thomas Andraschko <
>> andraschko.thomas@gmail.com>
>> >>> a
>> >>> >> écrit :
>> >>> >> > Fixed! :)
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > But i really have a weird problem, i get the follwowing exception
>> on
>> >>> >> every
>> >>> >> > startup with another bean:
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > javax.enterprise.inject.spi.DeploymentException:
>> >>> >> > org.apache.webbeans.exception.WebBeansConfigurationException:
>> Error
>> >>> while
>> >>> >> > sending SystemEvent to a CDI Extension!
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.portable.events.generics.GProcessAnnotatedType@46573acf
>> >>> >> > at
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> org.apache.webbeans.config.BeansDeployer.deploy(BeansDeployer.java:284)
>> >>> >> > at
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.lifecycle.AbstractLifeCycle.bootstrapApplication(AbstractLifeCycle.java:138)
>> >>> >> > at
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.lifecycle.AbstractLifeCycle.startApplication(AbstractLifeCycle.java:104)
>> >>> >> > at
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.web.lifecycle.WebContainerLifecycle.startApplication(WebContainerLifecycle.java:89)
>> >>> >> > at
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.servlet.WebBeansConfigurationListener.contextInitialized(WebBeansConfigurationListener.java:86)
>> >>> >> > at
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.callContextInitialized(ContextHandler.java:800)
>> >>> >> > ... Caused by:
>> >>> >> > javax.enterprise.inject.UnsatisfiedResolutionException: Api type
>> >>> >> > [de.test.Anybean] is not found with the qualifiers <|Qualifiers:
>> >>> >> > [@javax.enterprise.inject.Default()]<|for injection into Field
>> >>> Injection
>> >>> >> > Point, field name : selectItemNone, Bean Owner : [null]
>> >>> >> > at
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.util.InjectionExceptionUtil.throwUnsatisfiedResolutionException(InjectionExceptionUtil.java:65)
>> >>> >> > at
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.container.InjectionResolver.checkInjectionPoint(InjectionResolver.java:221)
>> >>> >> > at
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.validate(BeanManagerImpl.java:1149)
>> >>> >> > at
>> >>> >> >
>> org.apache.webbeans.util.WebBeansUtil.validate(WebBeansUtil.java:1683)
>> >>> >> > at
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.createInjectionTarget(BeanManagerImpl.java:1169)
>> >>> >> > at
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.container.InjectableBeanManager.createInjectionTarget(InjectableBeanManager.java:101)
>> >>> >> > at
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> org.apache.deltaspike.core.util.bean.BeanBuilder.readFromType(BeanBuilder.java:116)
>> >>> >> > at
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> org.apache.deltaspike.jsf.impl.injection.proxy.ConverterAndValidatorProxyExtension.findConverterAndValidatorsWhichNeedProxiesForDependencyInjectionSupport(ConverterAndValidatorProxyExtension.java:73)
>> >>> >> > at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor20.invoke(Unknown
>> Source)
>> >>> >> > at
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>> >>> >> > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
>> >>> >> > at
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.event.ObserverMethodImpl.invoke(ObserverMethodImpl.java:343)
>> >>> >> > at
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.event.ContainerEventObserverMethodImpl.invoke(ContainerEventObserverMethodImpl.java:82)
>> >>> >> > at
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.event.ObserverMethodImpl.notify(ObserverMethodImpl.java:308)
>> >>> >> > at
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.event.NotificationManager.fireEvent(NotificationManager.java:599)
>> >>> >> > at
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.fireEvent(BeanManagerImpl.java:453)
>> >>> >> > at
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.fireEvent(BeanManagerImpl.java:438)
>> >>> >> > at
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.util.WebBeansUtil.fireProcessAnnotatedTypeEvent(WebBeansUtil.java:1008)
>> >>> >> > at
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.config.BeansDeployer.annotatedTypesFromClassPath(BeansDeployer.java:844)
>> >>> >> > at
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> org.apache.webbeans.config.BeansDeployer.deploy(BeansDeployer.java:228)
>> >>> >> > at
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.lifecycle.AbstractLifeCycle.bootstrapApplication(AbstractLifeCycle.java:138)
>> >>> >> > at
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.lifecycle.AbstractLifeCycle.startApplication(AbstractLifeCycle.java:104)
>> >>> >> > at
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.web.lifecycle.WebContainerLifecycle.startApplication(WebContainerLifecycle.java:89)
>> >>> >> > at
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.servlet.WebBeansConfigurationListener.contextInitialized(WebBeansConfigurationListener.java:86)
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > Works fine with Weld and OWB 1.1.x and OWB 1.2.x.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > 2014-10-02 12:46 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>> >>> >:
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >> @Thomas: +1 WEB-INF/beans.xml is not a valid resource even in
>> tomcat
>> >>> >> >> and by spec (servlet)
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> Also ensure to be very up to date since we added few fixes since
>> the
>> >>> >> >> announcement
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >>> >> >> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> >>> >> >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> >>> >> >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> >>> >> >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> 2014-10-02 11:58 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <
>> >>> >> andraschko.thomas@gmail.com
>> >>> >> >> >:
>> >>> >> >> > Have some problems...
>> >>> >> >> > Already created a issue about WEB-INF/beans.xml lookup with a
>> >>> possible
>> >>> >> >> fix
>> >>> >> >> > - please have look at it.
>> >>> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> > I also have a
>> >>> javax.enterprise.inject.UnsatisfiedResolutionException
>> >>> >> for
>> >>> >> >> a
>> >>> >> >> > bean without a deviration.
>> >>> >> >> > I will try to find the reason later.
>> >>> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> > 2014-10-02 10:37 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <
>> >>> >> >> andraschko.thomas@gmail.com>:
>> >>> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >> Great guys, thanks!
>> >>> >> >> >> Will test my apps today!
>> >>> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> 2014-10-02 10:28 GMT+02:00 Arne Limburg <
>> >>> >> arne.limburg@openknowledge.de
>> >>> >> >> >:
>> >>> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >>> Yes,
>> >>> >> >> >>> I¹ll use that time to work out these ugly generics issues
>> with
>> >>> the
>> >>> >> >> cdi-tck
>> >>> >> >> >>> team, so we can get rid of these ugly hacks in GenericsUtil,
>> that
>> >>> >> the
>> >>> >> >> tck
>> >>> >> >> >>> made us implement.
>> >>> >> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >>> Cheers,
>> >>> >> >> >>> Arne
>> >>> >> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >>> Am 01.10.14 20:33 schrieb "Jens Schumann" unter
>> >>> >> >> >>> <je...@openknowledge.de>:
>> >>> >> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >Congratulation!
>> >>> >> >> >>> >
>> >>> >> >> >>> >.oO(I always assumed, that we have to wait till the end of
>> >>> Arne's
>> >>> >> >> >>> >upcoming parental leave;)
>> >>> >> >> >>> >
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> On 01 Oct 2014, at 20:23, "Mark Struberg" <
>> struberg@yahoo.de>
>> >>> >> >> wrote:
>> >>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> But we do!
>> >>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> Folks, I'm proud to announce that we finally pass the
>> >>> standalone
>> >>> >> >> part
>> >>> >> >> >>> >>of the CDI-1.2 TCK!
>> >>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> Please, all do checkout our latest OWB 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT (or
>> >>> simply
>> >>> >> >> >>> >>compile it yourself [1]) and test YOUR application with
>> it. Any
>> >>> >> >> feedback
>> >>> >> >> >>> >>is welcome!
>> >>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> I like to kick off the release train for OWB tomorrow.
>> >>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> We will now continue with cleanup and performance
>> >>> improvements.
>> >>> >> And
>> >>> >> >> >>> >>also with working on the EE TCK over in TomEE.
>> >>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> txs and LieGrue,
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> strub
>> >>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >>> >> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> --
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >>> >> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> >>> >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> >>> >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> >>> >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>>
Re: You shall not pass!
Posted by Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>.
great! my apps are working fine now!
2014-10-06 9:57 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> should be ok now, issue was cache + maven classpath (jetty)
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
> 2014-10-05 21:01 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> > surely when we resolve the injection (normally in validate(beans) but
> > same method is called by bm.validation(injectionPoint)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > Twitter: @rmannibucau
> > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >
> >
> > 2014-10-05 20:39 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.thomas@gmail.com>:
> >> Created a small sample here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1022
> >> AFAICS the injectoin points are validated to early.
> >>
> >> 2014-10-02 14:17 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> >>
> >>> it is done when we validate injection points so everything should be
> there
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> >>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> >>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> >>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2014-10-02 14:14 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.thomas@gmail.com
> >>> >:
> >>> > It worked fine and now, if i start my app, each time another
> >>> injectionpoint
> >>> > is "invalid".
> >>> > Therefore i don't think it's usefull to share a single bean.
> >>> > The most times it's a simple injection - without
> alternatives/specializes
> >>> > etc. So nothing special here.
> >>> >
> >>> > Could it be possible that it's to early and not ALL beans are loaded
> at
> >>> > this time?
> >>> > I have a around 10 jars with beans, maybe it depdends on the order
> of the
> >>> > jar loading?
> >>> >
> >>> > 2014-10-02 13:59 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com
> >:
> >>> >
> >>> >> We validate injection point more drastically now, surely the cause.
> Can
> >>> you
> >>> >> share AnyBean and where it is injected?
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Le jeudi 2 octobre 2014, Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.thomas@gmail.com>
> >>> a
> >>> >> écrit :
> >>> >> > Fixed! :)
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > But i really have a weird problem, i get the follwowing exception
> on
> >>> >> every
> >>> >> > startup with another bean:
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > javax.enterprise.inject.spi.DeploymentException:
> >>> >> > org.apache.webbeans.exception.WebBeansConfigurationException:
> Error
> >>> while
> >>> >> > sending SystemEvent to a CDI Extension!
> >>> >> >
> >>> >>
> >>>
> org.apache.webbeans.portable.events.generics.GProcessAnnotatedType@46573acf
> >>> >> > at
> >>> >> >
> >>> org.apache.webbeans.config.BeansDeployer.deploy(BeansDeployer.java:284)
> >>> >> > at
> >>> >> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> org.apache.webbeans.lifecycle.AbstractLifeCycle.bootstrapApplication(AbstractLifeCycle.java:138)
> >>> >> > at
> >>> >> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> org.apache.webbeans.lifecycle.AbstractLifeCycle.startApplication(AbstractLifeCycle.java:104)
> >>> >> > at
> >>> >> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> org.apache.webbeans.web.lifecycle.WebContainerLifecycle.startApplication(WebContainerLifecycle.java:89)
> >>> >> > at
> >>> >> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> org.apache.webbeans.servlet.WebBeansConfigurationListener.contextInitialized(WebBeansConfigurationListener.java:86)
> >>> >> > at
> >>> >> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.callContextInitialized(ContextHandler.java:800)
> >>> >> > ... Caused by:
> >>> >> > javax.enterprise.inject.UnsatisfiedResolutionException: Api type
> >>> >> > [de.test.Anybean] is not found with the qualifiers <|Qualifiers:
> >>> >> > [@javax.enterprise.inject.Default()]<|for injection into Field
> >>> Injection
> >>> >> > Point, field name : selectItemNone, Bean Owner : [null]
> >>> >> > at
> >>> >> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> org.apache.webbeans.util.InjectionExceptionUtil.throwUnsatisfiedResolutionException(InjectionExceptionUtil.java:65)
> >>> >> > at
> >>> >> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> org.apache.webbeans.container.InjectionResolver.checkInjectionPoint(InjectionResolver.java:221)
> >>> >> > at
> >>> >> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.validate(BeanManagerImpl.java:1149)
> >>> >> > at
> >>> >> >
> org.apache.webbeans.util.WebBeansUtil.validate(WebBeansUtil.java:1683)
> >>> >> > at
> >>> >> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.createInjectionTarget(BeanManagerImpl.java:1169)
> >>> >> > at
> >>> >> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> org.apache.webbeans.container.InjectableBeanManager.createInjectionTarget(InjectableBeanManager.java:101)
> >>> >> > at
> >>> >> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> org.apache.deltaspike.core.util.bean.BeanBuilder.readFromType(BeanBuilder.java:116)
> >>> >> > at
> >>> >> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> org.apache.deltaspike.jsf.impl.injection.proxy.ConverterAndValidatorProxyExtension.findConverterAndValidatorsWhichNeedProxiesForDependencyInjectionSupport(ConverterAndValidatorProxyExtension.java:73)
> >>> >> > at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor20.invoke(Unknown
> Source)
> >>> >> > at
> >>> >> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> >>> >> > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
> >>> >> > at
> >>> >> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> org.apache.webbeans.event.ObserverMethodImpl.invoke(ObserverMethodImpl.java:343)
> >>> >> > at
> >>> >> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> org.apache.webbeans.event.ContainerEventObserverMethodImpl.invoke(ContainerEventObserverMethodImpl.java:82)
> >>> >> > at
> >>> >> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> org.apache.webbeans.event.ObserverMethodImpl.notify(ObserverMethodImpl.java:308)
> >>> >> > at
> >>> >> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> org.apache.webbeans.event.NotificationManager.fireEvent(NotificationManager.java:599)
> >>> >> > at
> >>> >> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.fireEvent(BeanManagerImpl.java:453)
> >>> >> > at
> >>> >> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.fireEvent(BeanManagerImpl.java:438)
> >>> >> > at
> >>> >> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> org.apache.webbeans.util.WebBeansUtil.fireProcessAnnotatedTypeEvent(WebBeansUtil.java:1008)
> >>> >> > at
> >>> >> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> org.apache.webbeans.config.BeansDeployer.annotatedTypesFromClassPath(BeansDeployer.java:844)
> >>> >> > at
> >>> >> >
> >>> org.apache.webbeans.config.BeansDeployer.deploy(BeansDeployer.java:228)
> >>> >> > at
> >>> >> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> org.apache.webbeans.lifecycle.AbstractLifeCycle.bootstrapApplication(AbstractLifeCycle.java:138)
> >>> >> > at
> >>> >> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> org.apache.webbeans.lifecycle.AbstractLifeCycle.startApplication(AbstractLifeCycle.java:104)
> >>> >> > at
> >>> >> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> org.apache.webbeans.web.lifecycle.WebContainerLifecycle.startApplication(WebContainerLifecycle.java:89)
> >>> >> > at
> >>> >> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> org.apache.webbeans.servlet.WebBeansConfigurationListener.contextInitialized(WebBeansConfigurationListener.java:86)
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > Works fine with Weld and OWB 1.1.x and OWB 1.2.x.
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > 2014-10-02 12:46 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibucau@gmail.com
> >>> >:
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >> @Thomas: +1 WEB-INF/beans.xml is not a valid resource even in
> tomcat
> >>> >> >> and by spec (servlet)
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> Also ensure to be very up to date since we added few fixes since
> the
> >>> >> >> announcement
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>> >> >> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> >>> >> >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> >>> >> >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> >>> >> >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> 2014-10-02 11:58 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <
> >>> >> andraschko.thomas@gmail.com
> >>> >> >> >:
> >>> >> >> > Have some problems...
> >>> >> >> > Already created a issue about WEB-INF/beans.xml lookup with a
> >>> possible
> >>> >> >> fix
> >>> >> >> > - please have look at it.
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> > I also have a
> >>> javax.enterprise.inject.UnsatisfiedResolutionException
> >>> >> for
> >>> >> >> a
> >>> >> >> > bean without a deviration.
> >>> >> >> > I will try to find the reason later.
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> > 2014-10-02 10:37 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <
> >>> >> >> andraschko.thomas@gmail.com>:
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> Great guys, thanks!
> >>> >> >> >> Will test my apps today!
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> 2014-10-02 10:28 GMT+02:00 Arne Limburg <
> >>> >> arne.limburg@openknowledge.de
> >>> >> >> >:
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >>> Yes,
> >>> >> >> >>> I¹ll use that time to work out these ugly generics issues
> with
> >>> the
> >>> >> >> cdi-tck
> >>> >> >> >>> team, so we can get rid of these ugly hacks in GenericsUtil,
> that
> >>> >> the
> >>> >> >> tck
> >>> >> >> >>> made us implement.
> >>> >> >> >>>
> >>> >> >> >>> Cheers,
> >>> >> >> >>> Arne
> >>> >> >> >>>
> >>> >> >> >>>
> >>> >> >> >>> Am 01.10.14 20:33 schrieb "Jens Schumann" unter
> >>> >> >> >>> <je...@openknowledge.de>:
> >>> >> >> >>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >Congratulation!
> >>> >> >> >>> >
> >>> >> >> >>> >.oO(I always assumed, that we have to wait till the end of
> >>> Arne's
> >>> >> >> >>> >upcoming parental leave;)
> >>> >> >> >>> >
> >>> >> >> >>> >> On 01 Oct 2014, at 20:23, "Mark Struberg" <
> struberg@yahoo.de>
> >>> >> >> wrote:
> >>> >> >> >>> >>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> But we do!
> >>> >> >> >>> >>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> Folks, I'm proud to announce that we finally pass the
> >>> standalone
> >>> >> >> part
> >>> >> >> >>> >>of the CDI-1.2 TCK!
> >>> >> >> >>> >>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> Please, all do checkout our latest OWB 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT (or
> >>> simply
> >>> >> >> >>> >>compile it yourself [1]) and test YOUR application with
> it. Any
> >>> >> >> feedback
> >>> >> >> >>> >>is welcome!
> >>> >> >> >>> >>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> I like to kick off the release train for OWB tomorrow.
> >>> >> >> >>> >>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> We will now continue with cleanup and performance
> >>> improvements.
> >>> >> And
> >>> >> >> >>> >>also with working on the EE TCK over in TomEE.
> >>> >> >> >>> >>
> >>> >> >> >>> >>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> txs and LieGrue,
> >>> >> >> >>> >> strub
> >>> >> >> >>> >>
> >>> >> >> >>>
> >>> >> >> >>>
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >> --
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>> >> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> >>> >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> >>> >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> >>> >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >>> >>
> >>>
>
Re: You shall not pass!
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
should be ok now, issue was cache + maven classpath (jetty)
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-10-05 21:01 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> surely when we resolve the injection (normally in validate(beans) but
> same method is called by bm.validation(injectionPoint)
>
>
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
> 2014-10-05 20:39 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>:
>> Created a small sample here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1022
>> AFAICS the injectoin points are validated to early.
>>
>> 2014-10-02 14:17 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> it is done when we validate injection points so everything should be there
>>>
>>>
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>
>>>
>>> 2014-10-02 14:14 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.thomas@gmail.com
>>> >:
>>> > It worked fine and now, if i start my app, each time another
>>> injectionpoint
>>> > is "invalid".
>>> > Therefore i don't think it's usefull to share a single bean.
>>> > The most times it's a simple injection - without alternatives/specializes
>>> > etc. So nothing special here.
>>> >
>>> > Could it be possible that it's to early and not ALL beans are loaded at
>>> > this time?
>>> > I have a around 10 jars with beans, maybe it depdends on the order of the
>>> > jar loading?
>>> >
>>> > 2014-10-02 13:59 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>>> >
>>> >> We validate injection point more drastically now, surely the cause. Can
>>> you
>>> >> share AnyBean and where it is injected?
>>> >>
>>> >> Le jeudi 2 octobre 2014, Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>
>>> a
>>> >> écrit :
>>> >> > Fixed! :)
>>> >> >
>>> >> > But i really have a weird problem, i get the follwowing exception on
>>> >> every
>>> >> > startup with another bean:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > javax.enterprise.inject.spi.DeploymentException:
>>> >> > org.apache.webbeans.exception.WebBeansConfigurationException: Error
>>> while
>>> >> > sending SystemEvent to a CDI Extension!
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.webbeans.portable.events.generics.GProcessAnnotatedType@46573acf
>>> >> > at
>>> >> >
>>> org.apache.webbeans.config.BeansDeployer.deploy(BeansDeployer.java:284)
>>> >> > at
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.webbeans.lifecycle.AbstractLifeCycle.bootstrapApplication(AbstractLifeCycle.java:138)
>>> >> > at
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.webbeans.lifecycle.AbstractLifeCycle.startApplication(AbstractLifeCycle.java:104)
>>> >> > at
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.webbeans.web.lifecycle.WebContainerLifecycle.startApplication(WebContainerLifecycle.java:89)
>>> >> > at
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.webbeans.servlet.WebBeansConfigurationListener.contextInitialized(WebBeansConfigurationListener.java:86)
>>> >> > at
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.callContextInitialized(ContextHandler.java:800)
>>> >> > ... Caused by:
>>> >> > javax.enterprise.inject.UnsatisfiedResolutionException: Api type
>>> >> > [de.test.Anybean] is not found with the qualifiers <|Qualifiers:
>>> >> > [@javax.enterprise.inject.Default()]<|for injection into Field
>>> Injection
>>> >> > Point, field name : selectItemNone, Bean Owner : [null]
>>> >> > at
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.webbeans.util.InjectionExceptionUtil.throwUnsatisfiedResolutionException(InjectionExceptionUtil.java:65)
>>> >> > at
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.webbeans.container.InjectionResolver.checkInjectionPoint(InjectionResolver.java:221)
>>> >> > at
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.validate(BeanManagerImpl.java:1149)
>>> >> > at
>>> >> > org.apache.webbeans.util.WebBeansUtil.validate(WebBeansUtil.java:1683)
>>> >> > at
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.createInjectionTarget(BeanManagerImpl.java:1169)
>>> >> > at
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.webbeans.container.InjectableBeanManager.createInjectionTarget(InjectableBeanManager.java:101)
>>> >> > at
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.deltaspike.core.util.bean.BeanBuilder.readFromType(BeanBuilder.java:116)
>>> >> > at
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.deltaspike.jsf.impl.injection.proxy.ConverterAndValidatorProxyExtension.findConverterAndValidatorsWhichNeedProxiesForDependencyInjectionSupport(ConverterAndValidatorProxyExtension.java:73)
>>> >> > at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor20.invoke(Unknown Source)
>>> >> > at
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>>> >> > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
>>> >> > at
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.webbeans.event.ObserverMethodImpl.invoke(ObserverMethodImpl.java:343)
>>> >> > at
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.webbeans.event.ContainerEventObserverMethodImpl.invoke(ContainerEventObserverMethodImpl.java:82)
>>> >> > at
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.webbeans.event.ObserverMethodImpl.notify(ObserverMethodImpl.java:308)
>>> >> > at
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.webbeans.event.NotificationManager.fireEvent(NotificationManager.java:599)
>>> >> > at
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.fireEvent(BeanManagerImpl.java:453)
>>> >> > at
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.fireEvent(BeanManagerImpl.java:438)
>>> >> > at
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.webbeans.util.WebBeansUtil.fireProcessAnnotatedTypeEvent(WebBeansUtil.java:1008)
>>> >> > at
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.webbeans.config.BeansDeployer.annotatedTypesFromClassPath(BeansDeployer.java:844)
>>> >> > at
>>> >> >
>>> org.apache.webbeans.config.BeansDeployer.deploy(BeansDeployer.java:228)
>>> >> > at
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.webbeans.lifecycle.AbstractLifeCycle.bootstrapApplication(AbstractLifeCycle.java:138)
>>> >> > at
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.webbeans.lifecycle.AbstractLifeCycle.startApplication(AbstractLifeCycle.java:104)
>>> >> > at
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.webbeans.web.lifecycle.WebContainerLifecycle.startApplication(WebContainerLifecycle.java:89)
>>> >> > at
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.webbeans.servlet.WebBeansConfigurationListener.contextInitialized(WebBeansConfigurationListener.java:86)
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Works fine with Weld and OWB 1.1.x and OWB 1.2.x.
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > 2014-10-02 12:46 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>> >:
>>> >> >
>>> >> >> @Thomas: +1 WEB-INF/beans.xml is not a valid resource even in tomcat
>>> >> >> and by spec (servlet)
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Also ensure to be very up to date since we added few fixes since the
>>> >> >> announcement
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> >> >> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>>> >> >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>>> >> >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>>> >> >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> 2014-10-02 11:58 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <
>>> >> andraschko.thomas@gmail.com
>>> >> >> >:
>>> >> >> > Have some problems...
>>> >> >> > Already created a issue about WEB-INF/beans.xml lookup with a
>>> possible
>>> >> >> fix
>>> >> >> > - please have look at it.
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > I also have a
>>> javax.enterprise.inject.UnsatisfiedResolutionException
>>> >> for
>>> >> >> a
>>> >> >> > bean without a deviration.
>>> >> >> > I will try to find the reason later.
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > 2014-10-02 10:37 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <
>>> >> >> andraschko.thomas@gmail.com>:
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >> Great guys, thanks!
>>> >> >> >> Will test my apps today!
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> 2014-10-02 10:28 GMT+02:00 Arne Limburg <
>>> >> arne.limburg@openknowledge.de
>>> >> >> >:
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>> Yes,
>>> >> >> >>> I¹ll use that time to work out these ugly generics issues with
>>> the
>>> >> >> cdi-tck
>>> >> >> >>> team, so we can get rid of these ugly hacks in GenericsUtil, that
>>> >> the
>>> >> >> tck
>>> >> >> >>> made us implement.
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>> Cheers,
>>> >> >> >>> Arne
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>> Am 01.10.14 20:33 schrieb "Jens Schumann" unter
>>> >> >> >>> <je...@openknowledge.de>:
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>> >Congratulation!
>>> >> >> >>> >
>>> >> >> >>> >.oO(I always assumed, that we have to wait till the end of
>>> Arne's
>>> >> >> >>> >upcoming parental leave;)
>>> >> >> >>> >
>>> >> >> >>> >> On 01 Oct 2014, at 20:23, "Mark Struberg" <st...@yahoo.de>
>>> >> >> wrote:
>>> >> >> >>> >>
>>> >> >> >>> >> But we do!
>>> >> >> >>> >>
>>> >> >> >>> >> Folks, I'm proud to announce that we finally pass the
>>> standalone
>>> >> >> part
>>> >> >> >>> >>of the CDI-1.2 TCK!
>>> >> >> >>> >>
>>> >> >> >>> >> Please, all do checkout our latest OWB 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT (or
>>> simply
>>> >> >> >>> >>compile it yourself [1]) and test YOUR application with it. Any
>>> >> >> feedback
>>> >> >> >>> >>is welcome!
>>> >> >> >>> >>
>>> >> >> >>> >> I like to kick off the release train for OWB tomorrow.
>>> >> >> >>> >>
>>> >> >> >>> >> We will now continue with cleanup and performance
>>> improvements.
>>> >> And
>>> >> >> >>> >>also with working on the EE TCK over in TomEE.
>>> >> >> >>> >>
>>> >> >> >>> >>
>>> >> >> >>> >> txs and LieGrue,
>>> >> >> >>> >> strub
>>> >> >> >>> >>
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> >> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>>> >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>>> >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>>> >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>> >>
>>>
Re: You shall not pass!
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
surely when we resolve the injection (normally in validate(beans) but
same method is called by bm.validation(injectionPoint)
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-10-05 20:39 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>:
> Created a small sample here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1022
> AFAICS the injectoin points are validated to early.
>
> 2014-10-02 14:17 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>
>> it is done when we validate injection points so everything should be there
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>> 2014-10-02 14:14 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.thomas@gmail.com
>> >:
>> > It worked fine and now, if i start my app, each time another
>> injectionpoint
>> > is "invalid".
>> > Therefore i don't think it's usefull to share a single bean.
>> > The most times it's a simple injection - without alternatives/specializes
>> > etc. So nothing special here.
>> >
>> > Could it be possible that it's to early and not ALL beans are loaded at
>> > this time?
>> > I have a around 10 jars with beans, maybe it depdends on the order of the
>> > jar loading?
>> >
>> > 2014-10-02 13:59 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>> >
>> >> We validate injection point more drastically now, surely the cause. Can
>> you
>> >> share AnyBean and where it is injected?
>> >>
>> >> Le jeudi 2 octobre 2014, Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>
>> a
>> >> écrit :
>> >> > Fixed! :)
>> >> >
>> >> > But i really have a weird problem, i get the follwowing exception on
>> >> every
>> >> > startup with another bean:
>> >> >
>> >> > javax.enterprise.inject.spi.DeploymentException:
>> >> > org.apache.webbeans.exception.WebBeansConfigurationException: Error
>> while
>> >> > sending SystemEvent to a CDI Extension!
>> >> >
>> >>
>> org.apache.webbeans.portable.events.generics.GProcessAnnotatedType@46573acf
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> org.apache.webbeans.config.BeansDeployer.deploy(BeansDeployer.java:284)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> org.apache.webbeans.lifecycle.AbstractLifeCycle.bootstrapApplication(AbstractLifeCycle.java:138)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> org.apache.webbeans.lifecycle.AbstractLifeCycle.startApplication(AbstractLifeCycle.java:104)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> org.apache.webbeans.web.lifecycle.WebContainerLifecycle.startApplication(WebContainerLifecycle.java:89)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> org.apache.webbeans.servlet.WebBeansConfigurationListener.contextInitialized(WebBeansConfigurationListener.java:86)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.callContextInitialized(ContextHandler.java:800)
>> >> > ... Caused by:
>> >> > javax.enterprise.inject.UnsatisfiedResolutionException: Api type
>> >> > [de.test.Anybean] is not found with the qualifiers <|Qualifiers:
>> >> > [@javax.enterprise.inject.Default()]<|for injection into Field
>> Injection
>> >> > Point, field name : selectItemNone, Bean Owner : [null]
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> org.apache.webbeans.util.InjectionExceptionUtil.throwUnsatisfiedResolutionException(InjectionExceptionUtil.java:65)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> org.apache.webbeans.container.InjectionResolver.checkInjectionPoint(InjectionResolver.java:221)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.validate(BeanManagerImpl.java:1149)
>> >> > at
>> >> > org.apache.webbeans.util.WebBeansUtil.validate(WebBeansUtil.java:1683)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.createInjectionTarget(BeanManagerImpl.java:1169)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> org.apache.webbeans.container.InjectableBeanManager.createInjectionTarget(InjectableBeanManager.java:101)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> org.apache.deltaspike.core.util.bean.BeanBuilder.readFromType(BeanBuilder.java:116)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> org.apache.deltaspike.jsf.impl.injection.proxy.ConverterAndValidatorProxyExtension.findConverterAndValidatorsWhichNeedProxiesForDependencyInjectionSupport(ConverterAndValidatorProxyExtension.java:73)
>> >> > at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor20.invoke(Unknown Source)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>> >> > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> org.apache.webbeans.event.ObserverMethodImpl.invoke(ObserverMethodImpl.java:343)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> org.apache.webbeans.event.ContainerEventObserverMethodImpl.invoke(ContainerEventObserverMethodImpl.java:82)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> org.apache.webbeans.event.ObserverMethodImpl.notify(ObserverMethodImpl.java:308)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> org.apache.webbeans.event.NotificationManager.fireEvent(NotificationManager.java:599)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.fireEvent(BeanManagerImpl.java:453)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.fireEvent(BeanManagerImpl.java:438)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> org.apache.webbeans.util.WebBeansUtil.fireProcessAnnotatedTypeEvent(WebBeansUtil.java:1008)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> org.apache.webbeans.config.BeansDeployer.annotatedTypesFromClassPath(BeansDeployer.java:844)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> org.apache.webbeans.config.BeansDeployer.deploy(BeansDeployer.java:228)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> org.apache.webbeans.lifecycle.AbstractLifeCycle.bootstrapApplication(AbstractLifeCycle.java:138)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> org.apache.webbeans.lifecycle.AbstractLifeCycle.startApplication(AbstractLifeCycle.java:104)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> org.apache.webbeans.web.lifecycle.WebContainerLifecycle.startApplication(WebContainerLifecycle.java:89)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> org.apache.webbeans.servlet.WebBeansConfigurationListener.contextInitialized(WebBeansConfigurationListener.java:86)
>> >> >
>> >> > Works fine with Weld and OWB 1.1.x and OWB 1.2.x.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > 2014-10-02 12:46 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com
>> >:
>> >> >
>> >> >> @Thomas: +1 WEB-INF/beans.xml is not a valid resource even in tomcat
>> >> >> and by spec (servlet)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Also ensure to be very up to date since we added few fixes since the
>> >> >> announcement
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >> >> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> >> >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> >> >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> >> >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 2014-10-02 11:58 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <
>> >> andraschko.thomas@gmail.com
>> >> >> >:
>> >> >> > Have some problems...
>> >> >> > Already created a issue about WEB-INF/beans.xml lookup with a
>> possible
>> >> >> fix
>> >> >> > - please have look at it.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I also have a
>> javax.enterprise.inject.UnsatisfiedResolutionException
>> >> for
>> >> >> a
>> >> >> > bean without a deviration.
>> >> >> > I will try to find the reason later.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > 2014-10-02 10:37 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <
>> >> >> andraschko.thomas@gmail.com>:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Great guys, thanks!
>> >> >> >> Will test my apps today!
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> 2014-10-02 10:28 GMT+02:00 Arne Limburg <
>> >> arne.limburg@openknowledge.de
>> >> >> >:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> Yes,
>> >> >> >>> I¹ll use that time to work out these ugly generics issues with
>> the
>> >> >> cdi-tck
>> >> >> >>> team, so we can get rid of these ugly hacks in GenericsUtil, that
>> >> the
>> >> >> tck
>> >> >> >>> made us implement.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> Cheers,
>> >> >> >>> Arne
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> Am 01.10.14 20:33 schrieb "Jens Schumann" unter
>> >> >> >>> <je...@openknowledge.de>:
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> >Congratulation!
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> >.oO(I always assumed, that we have to wait till the end of
>> Arne's
>> >> >> >>> >upcoming parental leave;)
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> >> On 01 Oct 2014, at 20:23, "Mark Struberg" <st...@yahoo.de>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> But we do!
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> Folks, I'm proud to announce that we finally pass the
>> standalone
>> >> >> part
>> >> >> >>> >>of the CDI-1.2 TCK!
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> Please, all do checkout our latest OWB 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT (or
>> simply
>> >> >> >>> >>compile it yourself [1]) and test YOUR application with it. Any
>> >> >> feedback
>> >> >> >>> >>is welcome!
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> I like to kick off the release train for OWB tomorrow.
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> We will now continue with cleanup and performance
>> improvements.
>> >> And
>> >> >> >>> >>also with working on the EE TCK over in TomEE.
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> txs and LieGrue,
>> >> >> >>> >> strub
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >>
>>
Re: You shall not pass!
Posted by Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>.
Created a small sample here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1022
AFAICS the injectoin points are validated to early.
2014-10-02 14:17 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> it is done when we validate injection points so everything should be there
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
> 2014-10-02 14:14 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.thomas@gmail.com
> >:
> > It worked fine and now, if i start my app, each time another
> injectionpoint
> > is "invalid".
> > Therefore i don't think it's usefull to share a single bean.
> > The most times it's a simple injection - without alternatives/specializes
> > etc. So nothing special here.
> >
> > Could it be possible that it's to early and not ALL beans are loaded at
> > this time?
> > I have a around 10 jars with beans, maybe it depdends on the order of the
> > jar loading?
> >
> > 2014-10-02 13:59 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> We validate injection point more drastically now, surely the cause. Can
> you
> >> share AnyBean and where it is injected?
> >>
> >> Le jeudi 2 octobre 2014, Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>
> a
> >> écrit :
> >> > Fixed! :)
> >> >
> >> > But i really have a weird problem, i get the follwowing exception on
> >> every
> >> > startup with another bean:
> >> >
> >> > javax.enterprise.inject.spi.DeploymentException:
> >> > org.apache.webbeans.exception.WebBeansConfigurationException: Error
> while
> >> > sending SystemEvent to a CDI Extension!
> >> >
> >>
> org.apache.webbeans.portable.events.generics.GProcessAnnotatedType@46573acf
> >> > at
> >> >
> org.apache.webbeans.config.BeansDeployer.deploy(BeansDeployer.java:284)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> org.apache.webbeans.lifecycle.AbstractLifeCycle.bootstrapApplication(AbstractLifeCycle.java:138)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> org.apache.webbeans.lifecycle.AbstractLifeCycle.startApplication(AbstractLifeCycle.java:104)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> org.apache.webbeans.web.lifecycle.WebContainerLifecycle.startApplication(WebContainerLifecycle.java:89)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> org.apache.webbeans.servlet.WebBeansConfigurationListener.contextInitialized(WebBeansConfigurationListener.java:86)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.callContextInitialized(ContextHandler.java:800)
> >> > ... Caused by:
> >> > javax.enterprise.inject.UnsatisfiedResolutionException: Api type
> >> > [de.test.Anybean] is not found with the qualifiers <|Qualifiers:
> >> > [@javax.enterprise.inject.Default()]<|for injection into Field
> Injection
> >> > Point, field name : selectItemNone, Bean Owner : [null]
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> org.apache.webbeans.util.InjectionExceptionUtil.throwUnsatisfiedResolutionException(InjectionExceptionUtil.java:65)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> org.apache.webbeans.container.InjectionResolver.checkInjectionPoint(InjectionResolver.java:221)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.validate(BeanManagerImpl.java:1149)
> >> > at
> >> > org.apache.webbeans.util.WebBeansUtil.validate(WebBeansUtil.java:1683)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.createInjectionTarget(BeanManagerImpl.java:1169)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> org.apache.webbeans.container.InjectableBeanManager.createInjectionTarget(InjectableBeanManager.java:101)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> org.apache.deltaspike.core.util.bean.BeanBuilder.readFromType(BeanBuilder.java:116)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> org.apache.deltaspike.jsf.impl.injection.proxy.ConverterAndValidatorProxyExtension.findConverterAndValidatorsWhichNeedProxiesForDependencyInjectionSupport(ConverterAndValidatorProxyExtension.java:73)
> >> > at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor20.invoke(Unknown Source)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> >> > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> org.apache.webbeans.event.ObserverMethodImpl.invoke(ObserverMethodImpl.java:343)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> org.apache.webbeans.event.ContainerEventObserverMethodImpl.invoke(ContainerEventObserverMethodImpl.java:82)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> org.apache.webbeans.event.ObserverMethodImpl.notify(ObserverMethodImpl.java:308)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> org.apache.webbeans.event.NotificationManager.fireEvent(NotificationManager.java:599)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.fireEvent(BeanManagerImpl.java:453)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.fireEvent(BeanManagerImpl.java:438)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> org.apache.webbeans.util.WebBeansUtil.fireProcessAnnotatedTypeEvent(WebBeansUtil.java:1008)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> org.apache.webbeans.config.BeansDeployer.annotatedTypesFromClassPath(BeansDeployer.java:844)
> >> > at
> >> >
> org.apache.webbeans.config.BeansDeployer.deploy(BeansDeployer.java:228)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> org.apache.webbeans.lifecycle.AbstractLifeCycle.bootstrapApplication(AbstractLifeCycle.java:138)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> org.apache.webbeans.lifecycle.AbstractLifeCycle.startApplication(AbstractLifeCycle.java:104)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> org.apache.webbeans.web.lifecycle.WebContainerLifecycle.startApplication(WebContainerLifecycle.java:89)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> org.apache.webbeans.servlet.WebBeansConfigurationListener.contextInitialized(WebBeansConfigurationListener.java:86)
> >> >
> >> > Works fine with Weld and OWB 1.1.x and OWB 1.2.x.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 2014-10-02 12:46 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com
> >:
> >> >
> >> >> @Thomas: +1 WEB-INF/beans.xml is not a valid resource even in tomcat
> >> >> and by spec (servlet)
> >> >>
> >> >> Also ensure to be very up to date since we added few fixes since the
> >> >> announcement
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> >> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> >> >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> >> >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> >> >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> 2014-10-02 11:58 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <
> >> andraschko.thomas@gmail.com
> >> >> >:
> >> >> > Have some problems...
> >> >> > Already created a issue about WEB-INF/beans.xml lookup with a
> possible
> >> >> fix
> >> >> > - please have look at it.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I also have a
> javax.enterprise.inject.UnsatisfiedResolutionException
> >> for
> >> >> a
> >> >> > bean without a deviration.
> >> >> > I will try to find the reason later.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > 2014-10-02 10:37 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <
> >> >> andraschko.thomas@gmail.com>:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Great guys, thanks!
> >> >> >> Will test my apps today!
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> 2014-10-02 10:28 GMT+02:00 Arne Limburg <
> >> arne.limburg@openknowledge.de
> >> >> >:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> Yes,
> >> >> >>> I¹ll use that time to work out these ugly generics issues with
> the
> >> >> cdi-tck
> >> >> >>> team, so we can get rid of these ugly hacks in GenericsUtil, that
> >> the
> >> >> tck
> >> >> >>> made us implement.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Cheers,
> >> >> >>> Arne
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Am 01.10.14 20:33 schrieb "Jens Schumann" unter
> >> >> >>> <je...@openknowledge.de>:
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> >Congratulation!
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> >.oO(I always assumed, that we have to wait till the end of
> Arne's
> >> >> >>> >upcoming parental leave;)
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> >> On 01 Oct 2014, at 20:23, "Mark Struberg" <st...@yahoo.de>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >>> >> But we do!
> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >>> >> Folks, I'm proud to announce that we finally pass the
> standalone
> >> >> part
> >> >> >>> >>of the CDI-1.2 TCK!
> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >>> >> Please, all do checkout our latest OWB 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT (or
> simply
> >> >> >>> >>compile it yourself [1]) and test YOUR application with it. Any
> >> >> feedback
> >> >> >>> >>is welcome!
> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >>> >> I like to kick off the release train for OWB tomorrow.
> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >>> >> We will now continue with cleanup and performance
> improvements.
> >> And
> >> >> >>> >>also with working on the EE TCK over in TomEE.
> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >>> >> txs and LieGrue,
> >> >> >>> >> strub
> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >>
> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >>
>
Re: You shall not pass!
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
it is done when we validate injection points so everything should be there
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-10-02 14:14 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>:
> It worked fine and now, if i start my app, each time another injectionpoint
> is "invalid".
> Therefore i don't think it's usefull to share a single bean.
> The most times it's a simple injection - without alternatives/specializes
> etc. So nothing special here.
>
> Could it be possible that it's to early and not ALL beans are loaded at
> this time?
> I have a around 10 jars with beans, maybe it depdends on the order of the
> jar loading?
>
> 2014-10-02 13:59 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>
>> We validate injection point more drastically now, surely the cause. Can you
>> share AnyBean and where it is injected?
>>
>> Le jeudi 2 octobre 2014, Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com> a
>> écrit :
>> > Fixed! :)
>> >
>> > But i really have a weird problem, i get the follwowing exception on
>> every
>> > startup with another bean:
>> >
>> > javax.enterprise.inject.spi.DeploymentException:
>> > org.apache.webbeans.exception.WebBeansConfigurationException: Error while
>> > sending SystemEvent to a CDI Extension!
>> >
>> org.apache.webbeans.portable.events.generics.GProcessAnnotatedType@46573acf
>> > at
>> > org.apache.webbeans.config.BeansDeployer.deploy(BeansDeployer.java:284)
>> > at
>> >
>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.lifecycle.AbstractLifeCycle.bootstrapApplication(AbstractLifeCycle.java:138)
>> > at
>> >
>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.lifecycle.AbstractLifeCycle.startApplication(AbstractLifeCycle.java:104)
>> > at
>> >
>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.web.lifecycle.WebContainerLifecycle.startApplication(WebContainerLifecycle.java:89)
>> > at
>> >
>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.servlet.WebBeansConfigurationListener.contextInitialized(WebBeansConfigurationListener.java:86)
>> > at
>> >
>>
>> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.callContextInitialized(ContextHandler.java:800)
>> > ... Caused by:
>> > javax.enterprise.inject.UnsatisfiedResolutionException: Api type
>> > [de.test.Anybean] is not found with the qualifiers <|Qualifiers:
>> > [@javax.enterprise.inject.Default()]<|for injection into Field Injection
>> > Point, field name : selectItemNone, Bean Owner : [null]
>> > at
>> >
>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.util.InjectionExceptionUtil.throwUnsatisfiedResolutionException(InjectionExceptionUtil.java:65)
>> > at
>> >
>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.container.InjectionResolver.checkInjectionPoint(InjectionResolver.java:221)
>> > at
>> >
>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.validate(BeanManagerImpl.java:1149)
>> > at
>> > org.apache.webbeans.util.WebBeansUtil.validate(WebBeansUtil.java:1683)
>> > at
>> >
>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.createInjectionTarget(BeanManagerImpl.java:1169)
>> > at
>> >
>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.container.InjectableBeanManager.createInjectionTarget(InjectableBeanManager.java:101)
>> > at
>> >
>>
>> org.apache.deltaspike.core.util.bean.BeanBuilder.readFromType(BeanBuilder.java:116)
>> > at
>> >
>>
>> org.apache.deltaspike.jsf.impl.injection.proxy.ConverterAndValidatorProxyExtension.findConverterAndValidatorsWhichNeedProxiesForDependencyInjectionSupport(ConverterAndValidatorProxyExtension.java:73)
>> > at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor20.invoke(Unknown Source)
>> > at
>> >
>>
>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>> > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
>> > at
>> >
>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.event.ObserverMethodImpl.invoke(ObserverMethodImpl.java:343)
>> > at
>> >
>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.event.ContainerEventObserverMethodImpl.invoke(ContainerEventObserverMethodImpl.java:82)
>> > at
>> >
>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.event.ObserverMethodImpl.notify(ObserverMethodImpl.java:308)
>> > at
>> >
>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.event.NotificationManager.fireEvent(NotificationManager.java:599)
>> > at
>> >
>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.fireEvent(BeanManagerImpl.java:453)
>> > at
>> >
>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.fireEvent(BeanManagerImpl.java:438)
>> > at
>> >
>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.util.WebBeansUtil.fireProcessAnnotatedTypeEvent(WebBeansUtil.java:1008)
>> > at
>> >
>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.config.BeansDeployer.annotatedTypesFromClassPath(BeansDeployer.java:844)
>> > at
>> > org.apache.webbeans.config.BeansDeployer.deploy(BeansDeployer.java:228)
>> > at
>> >
>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.lifecycle.AbstractLifeCycle.bootstrapApplication(AbstractLifeCycle.java:138)
>> > at
>> >
>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.lifecycle.AbstractLifeCycle.startApplication(AbstractLifeCycle.java:104)
>> > at
>> >
>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.web.lifecycle.WebContainerLifecycle.startApplication(WebContainerLifecycle.java:89)
>> > at
>> >
>>
>> org.apache.webbeans.servlet.WebBeansConfigurationListener.contextInitialized(WebBeansConfigurationListener.java:86)
>> >
>> > Works fine with Weld and OWB 1.1.x and OWB 1.2.x.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 2014-10-02 12:46 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>> >
>> >> @Thomas: +1 WEB-INF/beans.xml is not a valid resource even in tomcat
>> >> and by spec (servlet)
>> >>
>> >> Also ensure to be very up to date since we added few fixes since the
>> >> announcement
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 2014-10-02 11:58 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <
>> andraschko.thomas@gmail.com
>> >> >:
>> >> > Have some problems...
>> >> > Already created a issue about WEB-INF/beans.xml lookup with a possible
>> >> fix
>> >> > - please have look at it.
>> >> >
>> >> > I also have a javax.enterprise.inject.UnsatisfiedResolutionException
>> for
>> >> a
>> >> > bean without a deviration.
>> >> > I will try to find the reason later.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > 2014-10-02 10:37 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <
>> >> andraschko.thomas@gmail.com>:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Great guys, thanks!
>> >> >> Will test my apps today!
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 2014-10-02 10:28 GMT+02:00 Arne Limburg <
>> arne.limburg@openknowledge.de
>> >> >:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> Yes,
>> >> >>> I¹ll use that time to work out these ugly generics issues with the
>> >> cdi-tck
>> >> >>> team, so we can get rid of these ugly hacks in GenericsUtil, that
>> the
>> >> tck
>> >> >>> made us implement.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Cheers,
>> >> >>> Arne
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Am 01.10.14 20:33 schrieb "Jens Schumann" unter
>> >> >>> <je...@openknowledge.de>:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> >Congratulation!
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >.oO(I always assumed, that we have to wait till the end of Arne's
>> >> >>> >upcoming parental leave;)
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >> On 01 Oct 2014, at 20:23, "Mark Struberg" <st...@yahoo.de>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> But we do!
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> Folks, I'm proud to announce that we finally pass the standalone
>> >> part
>> >> >>> >>of the CDI-1.2 TCK!
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> Please, all do checkout our latest OWB 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT (or simply
>> >> >>> >>compile it yourself [1]) and test YOUR application with it. Any
>> >> feedback
>> >> >>> >>is welcome!
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> I like to kick off the release train for OWB tomorrow.
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> We will now continue with cleanup and performance improvements.
>> And
>> >> >>> >>also with working on the EE TCK over in TomEE.
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> txs and LieGrue,
>> >> >>> >> strub
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
Re: You shall not pass!
Posted by Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>.
It worked fine and now, if i start my app, each time another injectionpoint
is "invalid".
Therefore i don't think it's usefull to share a single bean.
The most times it's a simple injection - without alternatives/specializes
etc. So nothing special here.
Could it be possible that it's to early and not ALL beans are loaded at
this time?
I have a around 10 jars with beans, maybe it depdends on the order of the
jar loading?
2014-10-02 13:59 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> We validate injection point more drastically now, surely the cause. Can you
> share AnyBean and where it is injected?
>
> Le jeudi 2 octobre 2014, Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com> a
> écrit :
> > Fixed! :)
> >
> > But i really have a weird problem, i get the follwowing exception on
> every
> > startup with another bean:
> >
> > javax.enterprise.inject.spi.DeploymentException:
> > org.apache.webbeans.exception.WebBeansConfigurationException: Error while
> > sending SystemEvent to a CDI Extension!
> >
> org.apache.webbeans.portable.events.generics.GProcessAnnotatedType@46573acf
> > at
> > org.apache.webbeans.config.BeansDeployer.deploy(BeansDeployer.java:284)
> > at
> >
>
> org.apache.webbeans.lifecycle.AbstractLifeCycle.bootstrapApplication(AbstractLifeCycle.java:138)
> > at
> >
>
> org.apache.webbeans.lifecycle.AbstractLifeCycle.startApplication(AbstractLifeCycle.java:104)
> > at
> >
>
> org.apache.webbeans.web.lifecycle.WebContainerLifecycle.startApplication(WebContainerLifecycle.java:89)
> > at
> >
>
> org.apache.webbeans.servlet.WebBeansConfigurationListener.contextInitialized(WebBeansConfigurationListener.java:86)
> > at
> >
>
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.callContextInitialized(ContextHandler.java:800)
> > ... Caused by:
> > javax.enterprise.inject.UnsatisfiedResolutionException: Api type
> > [de.test.Anybean] is not found with the qualifiers <|Qualifiers:
> > [@javax.enterprise.inject.Default()]<|for injection into Field Injection
> > Point, field name : selectItemNone, Bean Owner : [null]
> > at
> >
>
> org.apache.webbeans.util.InjectionExceptionUtil.throwUnsatisfiedResolutionException(InjectionExceptionUtil.java:65)
> > at
> >
>
> org.apache.webbeans.container.InjectionResolver.checkInjectionPoint(InjectionResolver.java:221)
> > at
> >
>
> org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.validate(BeanManagerImpl.java:1149)
> > at
> > org.apache.webbeans.util.WebBeansUtil.validate(WebBeansUtil.java:1683)
> > at
> >
>
> org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.createInjectionTarget(BeanManagerImpl.java:1169)
> > at
> >
>
> org.apache.webbeans.container.InjectableBeanManager.createInjectionTarget(InjectableBeanManager.java:101)
> > at
> >
>
> org.apache.deltaspike.core.util.bean.BeanBuilder.readFromType(BeanBuilder.java:116)
> > at
> >
>
> org.apache.deltaspike.jsf.impl.injection.proxy.ConverterAndValidatorProxyExtension.findConverterAndValidatorsWhichNeedProxiesForDependencyInjectionSupport(ConverterAndValidatorProxyExtension.java:73)
> > at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor20.invoke(Unknown Source)
> > at
> >
>
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
> > at
> >
>
> org.apache.webbeans.event.ObserverMethodImpl.invoke(ObserverMethodImpl.java:343)
> > at
> >
>
> org.apache.webbeans.event.ContainerEventObserverMethodImpl.invoke(ContainerEventObserverMethodImpl.java:82)
> > at
> >
>
> org.apache.webbeans.event.ObserverMethodImpl.notify(ObserverMethodImpl.java:308)
> > at
> >
>
> org.apache.webbeans.event.NotificationManager.fireEvent(NotificationManager.java:599)
> > at
> >
>
> org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.fireEvent(BeanManagerImpl.java:453)
> > at
> >
>
> org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.fireEvent(BeanManagerImpl.java:438)
> > at
> >
>
> org.apache.webbeans.util.WebBeansUtil.fireProcessAnnotatedTypeEvent(WebBeansUtil.java:1008)
> > at
> >
>
> org.apache.webbeans.config.BeansDeployer.annotatedTypesFromClassPath(BeansDeployer.java:844)
> > at
> > org.apache.webbeans.config.BeansDeployer.deploy(BeansDeployer.java:228)
> > at
> >
>
> org.apache.webbeans.lifecycle.AbstractLifeCycle.bootstrapApplication(AbstractLifeCycle.java:138)
> > at
> >
>
> org.apache.webbeans.lifecycle.AbstractLifeCycle.startApplication(AbstractLifeCycle.java:104)
> > at
> >
>
> org.apache.webbeans.web.lifecycle.WebContainerLifecycle.startApplication(WebContainerLifecycle.java:89)
> > at
> >
>
> org.apache.webbeans.servlet.WebBeansConfigurationListener.contextInitialized(WebBeansConfigurationListener.java:86)
> >
> > Works fine with Weld and OWB 1.1.x and OWB 1.2.x.
> >
> >
> >
> > 2014-10-02 12:46 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> @Thomas: +1 WEB-INF/beans.xml is not a valid resource even in tomcat
> >> and by spec (servlet)
> >>
> >> Also ensure to be very up to date since we added few fixes since the
> >> announcement
> >>
> >>
> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >>
> >>
> >> 2014-10-02 11:58 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.thomas@gmail.com
> >> >:
> >> > Have some problems...
> >> > Already created a issue about WEB-INF/beans.xml lookup with a possible
> >> fix
> >> > - please have look at it.
> >> >
> >> > I also have a javax.enterprise.inject.UnsatisfiedResolutionException
> for
> >> a
> >> > bean without a deviration.
> >> > I will try to find the reason later.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 2014-10-02 10:37 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <
> >> andraschko.thomas@gmail.com>:
> >> >
> >> >> Great guys, thanks!
> >> >> Will test my apps today!
> >> >>
> >> >> 2014-10-02 10:28 GMT+02:00 Arne Limburg <
> arne.limburg@openknowledge.de
> >> >:
> >> >>
> >> >>> Yes,
> >> >>> I¹ll use that time to work out these ugly generics issues with the
> >> cdi-tck
> >> >>> team, so we can get rid of these ugly hacks in GenericsUtil, that
> the
> >> tck
> >> >>> made us implement.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Cheers,
> >> >>> Arne
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Am 01.10.14 20:33 schrieb "Jens Schumann" unter
> >> >>> <je...@openknowledge.de>:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> >Congratulation!
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >.oO(I always assumed, that we have to wait till the end of Arne's
> >> >>> >upcoming parental leave;)
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >> On 01 Oct 2014, at 20:23, "Mark Struberg" <st...@yahoo.de>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> But we do!
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> Folks, I'm proud to announce that we finally pass the standalone
> >> part
> >> >>> >>of the CDI-1.2 TCK!
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> Please, all do checkout our latest OWB 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT (or simply
> >> >>> >>compile it yourself [1]) and test YOUR application with it. Any
> >> feedback
> >> >>> >>is welcome!
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> I like to kick off the release train for OWB tomorrow.
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> We will now continue with cleanup and performance improvements.
> And
> >> >>> >>also with working on the EE TCK over in TomEE.
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> txs and LieGrue,
> >> >>> >> strub
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >>
> >
>
> --
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
Re: You shall not pass!
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
We validate injection point more drastically now, surely the cause. Can you
share AnyBean and where it is injected?
Le jeudi 2 octobre 2014, Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com> a
écrit :
> Fixed! :)
>
> But i really have a weird problem, i get the follwowing exception on every
> startup with another bean:
>
> javax.enterprise.inject.spi.DeploymentException:
> org.apache.webbeans.exception.WebBeansConfigurationException: Error while
> sending SystemEvent to a CDI Extension!
>
org.apache.webbeans.portable.events.generics.GProcessAnnotatedType@46573acf
> at
> org.apache.webbeans.config.BeansDeployer.deploy(BeansDeployer.java:284)
> at
>
org.apache.webbeans.lifecycle.AbstractLifeCycle.bootstrapApplication(AbstractLifeCycle.java:138)
> at
>
org.apache.webbeans.lifecycle.AbstractLifeCycle.startApplication(AbstractLifeCycle.java:104)
> at
>
org.apache.webbeans.web.lifecycle.WebContainerLifecycle.startApplication(WebContainerLifecycle.java:89)
> at
>
org.apache.webbeans.servlet.WebBeansConfigurationListener.contextInitialized(WebBeansConfigurationListener.java:86)
> at
>
org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.callContextInitialized(ContextHandler.java:800)
> ... Caused by:
> javax.enterprise.inject.UnsatisfiedResolutionException: Api type
> [de.test.Anybean] is not found with the qualifiers <|Qualifiers:
> [@javax.enterprise.inject.Default()]<|for injection into Field Injection
> Point, field name : selectItemNone, Bean Owner : [null]
> at
>
org.apache.webbeans.util.InjectionExceptionUtil.throwUnsatisfiedResolutionException(InjectionExceptionUtil.java:65)
> at
>
org.apache.webbeans.container.InjectionResolver.checkInjectionPoint(InjectionResolver.java:221)
> at
>
org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.validate(BeanManagerImpl.java:1149)
> at
> org.apache.webbeans.util.WebBeansUtil.validate(WebBeansUtil.java:1683)
> at
>
org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.createInjectionTarget(BeanManagerImpl.java:1169)
> at
>
org.apache.webbeans.container.InjectableBeanManager.createInjectionTarget(InjectableBeanManager.java:101)
> at
>
org.apache.deltaspike.core.util.bean.BeanBuilder.readFromType(BeanBuilder.java:116)
> at
>
org.apache.deltaspike.jsf.impl.injection.proxy.ConverterAndValidatorProxyExtension.findConverterAndValidatorsWhichNeedProxiesForDependencyInjectionSupport(ConverterAndValidatorProxyExtension.java:73)
> at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor20.invoke(Unknown Source)
> at
>
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
> at
>
org.apache.webbeans.event.ObserverMethodImpl.invoke(ObserverMethodImpl.java:343)
> at
>
org.apache.webbeans.event.ContainerEventObserverMethodImpl.invoke(ContainerEventObserverMethodImpl.java:82)
> at
>
org.apache.webbeans.event.ObserverMethodImpl.notify(ObserverMethodImpl.java:308)
> at
>
org.apache.webbeans.event.NotificationManager.fireEvent(NotificationManager.java:599)
> at
>
org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.fireEvent(BeanManagerImpl.java:453)
> at
>
org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.fireEvent(BeanManagerImpl.java:438)
> at
>
org.apache.webbeans.util.WebBeansUtil.fireProcessAnnotatedTypeEvent(WebBeansUtil.java:1008)
> at
>
org.apache.webbeans.config.BeansDeployer.annotatedTypesFromClassPath(BeansDeployer.java:844)
> at
> org.apache.webbeans.config.BeansDeployer.deploy(BeansDeployer.java:228)
> at
>
org.apache.webbeans.lifecycle.AbstractLifeCycle.bootstrapApplication(AbstractLifeCycle.java:138)
> at
>
org.apache.webbeans.lifecycle.AbstractLifeCycle.startApplication(AbstractLifeCycle.java:104)
> at
>
org.apache.webbeans.web.lifecycle.WebContainerLifecycle.startApplication(WebContainerLifecycle.java:89)
> at
>
org.apache.webbeans.servlet.WebBeansConfigurationListener.contextInitialized(WebBeansConfigurationListener.java:86)
>
> Works fine with Weld and OWB 1.1.x and OWB 1.2.x.
>
>
>
> 2014-10-02 12:46 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>
>> @Thomas: +1 WEB-INF/beans.xml is not a valid resource even in tomcat
>> and by spec (servlet)
>>
>> Also ensure to be very up to date since we added few fixes since the
>> announcement
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>> 2014-10-02 11:58 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.thomas@gmail.com
>> >:
>> > Have some problems...
>> > Already created a issue about WEB-INF/beans.xml lookup with a possible
>> fix
>> > - please have look at it.
>> >
>> > I also have a javax.enterprise.inject.UnsatisfiedResolutionException
for
>> a
>> > bean without a deviration.
>> > I will try to find the reason later.
>> >
>> >
>> > 2014-10-02 10:37 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <
>> andraschko.thomas@gmail.com>:
>> >
>> >> Great guys, thanks!
>> >> Will test my apps today!
>> >>
>> >> 2014-10-02 10:28 GMT+02:00 Arne Limburg <arne.limburg@openknowledge.de
>> >:
>> >>
>> >>> Yes,
>> >>> I¹ll use that time to work out these ugly generics issues with the
>> cdi-tck
>> >>> team, so we can get rid of these ugly hacks in GenericsUtil, that the
>> tck
>> >>> made us implement.
>> >>>
>> >>> Cheers,
>> >>> Arne
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Am 01.10.14 20:33 schrieb "Jens Schumann" unter
>> >>> <je...@openknowledge.de>:
>> >>>
>> >>> >Congratulation!
>> >>> >
>> >>> >.oO(I always assumed, that we have to wait till the end of Arne's
>> >>> >upcoming parental leave;)
>> >>> >
>> >>> >> On 01 Oct 2014, at 20:23, "Mark Struberg" <st...@yahoo.de>
>> wrote:
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> But we do!
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Folks, I'm proud to announce that we finally pass the standalone
>> part
>> >>> >>of the CDI-1.2 TCK!
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Please, all do checkout our latest OWB 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT (or simply
>> >>> >>compile it yourself [1]) and test YOUR application with it. Any
>> feedback
>> >>> >>is welcome!
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> I like to kick off the release train for OWB tomorrow.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> We will now continue with cleanup and performance improvements.
And
>> >>> >>also with working on the EE TCK over in TomEE.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> txs and LieGrue,
>> >>> >> strub
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>>
>
--
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
Re: You shall not pass!
Posted by Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>.
Fixed! :)
But i really have a weird problem, i get the follwowing exception on every
startup with another bean:
javax.enterprise.inject.spi.DeploymentException:
org.apache.webbeans.exception.WebBeansConfigurationException: Error while
sending SystemEvent to a CDI Extension!
org.apache.webbeans.portable.events.generics.GProcessAnnotatedType@46573acf
at
org.apache.webbeans.config.BeansDeployer.deploy(BeansDeployer.java:284)
at
org.apache.webbeans.lifecycle.AbstractLifeCycle.bootstrapApplication(AbstractLifeCycle.java:138)
at
org.apache.webbeans.lifecycle.AbstractLifeCycle.startApplication(AbstractLifeCycle.java:104)
at
org.apache.webbeans.web.lifecycle.WebContainerLifecycle.startApplication(WebContainerLifecycle.java:89)
at
org.apache.webbeans.servlet.WebBeansConfigurationListener.contextInitialized(WebBeansConfigurationListener.java:86)
at
org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.callContextInitialized(ContextHandler.java:800)
... Caused by:
javax.enterprise.inject.UnsatisfiedResolutionException: Api type
[de.test.Anybean] is not found with the qualifiers <|Qualifiers:
[@javax.enterprise.inject.Default()]<|for injection into Field Injection
Point, field name : selectItemNone, Bean Owner : [null]
at
org.apache.webbeans.util.InjectionExceptionUtil.throwUnsatisfiedResolutionException(InjectionExceptionUtil.java:65)
at
org.apache.webbeans.container.InjectionResolver.checkInjectionPoint(InjectionResolver.java:221)
at
org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.validate(BeanManagerImpl.java:1149)
at
org.apache.webbeans.util.WebBeansUtil.validate(WebBeansUtil.java:1683)
at
org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.createInjectionTarget(BeanManagerImpl.java:1169)
at
org.apache.webbeans.container.InjectableBeanManager.createInjectionTarget(InjectableBeanManager.java:101)
at
org.apache.deltaspike.core.util.bean.BeanBuilder.readFromType(BeanBuilder.java:116)
at
org.apache.deltaspike.jsf.impl.injection.proxy.ConverterAndValidatorProxyExtension.findConverterAndValidatorsWhichNeedProxiesForDependencyInjectionSupport(ConverterAndValidatorProxyExtension.java:73)
at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor20.invoke(Unknown Source)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
at
org.apache.webbeans.event.ObserverMethodImpl.invoke(ObserverMethodImpl.java:343)
at
org.apache.webbeans.event.ContainerEventObserverMethodImpl.invoke(ContainerEventObserverMethodImpl.java:82)
at
org.apache.webbeans.event.ObserverMethodImpl.notify(ObserverMethodImpl.java:308)
at
org.apache.webbeans.event.NotificationManager.fireEvent(NotificationManager.java:599)
at
org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.fireEvent(BeanManagerImpl.java:453)
at
org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.fireEvent(BeanManagerImpl.java:438)
at
org.apache.webbeans.util.WebBeansUtil.fireProcessAnnotatedTypeEvent(WebBeansUtil.java:1008)
at
org.apache.webbeans.config.BeansDeployer.annotatedTypesFromClassPath(BeansDeployer.java:844)
at
org.apache.webbeans.config.BeansDeployer.deploy(BeansDeployer.java:228)
at
org.apache.webbeans.lifecycle.AbstractLifeCycle.bootstrapApplication(AbstractLifeCycle.java:138)
at
org.apache.webbeans.lifecycle.AbstractLifeCycle.startApplication(AbstractLifeCycle.java:104)
at
org.apache.webbeans.web.lifecycle.WebContainerLifecycle.startApplication(WebContainerLifecycle.java:89)
at
org.apache.webbeans.servlet.WebBeansConfigurationListener.contextInitialized(WebBeansConfigurationListener.java:86)
Works fine with Weld and OWB 1.1.x and OWB 1.2.x.
2014-10-02 12:46 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> @Thomas: +1 WEB-INF/beans.xml is not a valid resource even in tomcat
> and by spec (servlet)
>
> Also ensure to be very up to date since we added few fixes since the
> announcement
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
> 2014-10-02 11:58 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.thomas@gmail.com
> >:
> > Have some problems...
> > Already created a issue about WEB-INF/beans.xml lookup with a possible
> fix
> > - please have look at it.
> >
> > I also have a javax.enterprise.inject.UnsatisfiedResolutionException for
> a
> > bean without a deviration.
> > I will try to find the reason later.
> >
> >
> > 2014-10-02 10:37 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.thomas@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> Great guys, thanks!
> >> Will test my apps today!
> >>
> >> 2014-10-02 10:28 GMT+02:00 Arne Limburg <arne.limburg@openknowledge.de
> >:
> >>
> >>> Yes,
> >>> I¹ll use that time to work out these ugly generics issues with the
> cdi-tck
> >>> team, so we can get rid of these ugly hacks in GenericsUtil, that the
> tck
> >>> made us implement.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Arne
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Am 01.10.14 20:33 schrieb "Jens Schumann" unter
> >>> <je...@openknowledge.de>:
> >>>
> >>> >Congratulation!
> >>> >
> >>> >.oO(I always assumed, that we have to wait till the end of Arne's
> >>> >upcoming parental leave;)
> >>> >
> >>> >> On 01 Oct 2014, at 20:23, "Mark Struberg" <st...@yahoo.de>
> wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> But we do!
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Folks, I'm proud to announce that we finally pass the standalone
> part
> >>> >>of the CDI-1.2 TCK!
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Please, all do checkout our latest OWB 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT (or simply
> >>> >>compile it yourself [1]) and test YOUR application with it. Any
> feedback
> >>> >>is welcome!
> >>> >>
> >>> >> I like to kick off the release train for OWB tomorrow.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> We will now continue with cleanup and performance improvements. And
> >>> >>also with working on the EE TCK over in TomEE.
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> txs and LieGrue,
> >>> >> strub
> >>> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
Re: You shall not pass!
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
@Thomas: +1 WEB-INF/beans.xml is not a valid resource even in tomcat
and by spec (servlet)
Also ensure to be very up to date since we added few fixes since the
announcement
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-10-02 11:58 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>:
> Have some problems...
> Already created a issue about WEB-INF/beans.xml lookup with a possible fix
> - please have look at it.
>
> I also have a javax.enterprise.inject.UnsatisfiedResolutionException for a
> bean without a deviration.
> I will try to find the reason later.
>
>
> 2014-10-02 10:37 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Great guys, thanks!
>> Will test my apps today!
>>
>> 2014-10-02 10:28 GMT+02:00 Arne Limburg <ar...@openknowledge.de>:
>>
>>> Yes,
>>> I¹ll use that time to work out these ugly generics issues with the cdi-tck
>>> team, so we can get rid of these ugly hacks in GenericsUtil, that the tck
>>> made us implement.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Arne
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 01.10.14 20:33 schrieb "Jens Schumann" unter
>>> <je...@openknowledge.de>:
>>>
>>> >Congratulation!
>>> >
>>> >.oO(I always assumed, that we have to wait till the end of Arne's
>>> >upcoming parental leave;)
>>> >
>>> >> On 01 Oct 2014, at 20:23, "Mark Struberg" <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> But we do!
>>> >>
>>> >> Folks, I'm proud to announce that we finally pass the standalone part
>>> >>of the CDI-1.2 TCK!
>>> >>
>>> >> Please, all do checkout our latest OWB 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT (or simply
>>> >>compile it yourself [1]) and test YOUR application with it. Any feedback
>>> >>is welcome!
>>> >>
>>> >> I like to kick off the release train for OWB tomorrow.
>>> >>
>>> >> We will now continue with cleanup and performance improvements. And
>>> >>also with working on the EE TCK over in TomEE.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> txs and LieGrue,
>>> >> strub
>>> >>
>>>
>>>
>>
Re: You shall not pass!
Posted by Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>.
Have some problems...
Already created a issue about WEB-INF/beans.xml lookup with a possible fix
- please have look at it.
I also have a javax.enterprise.inject.UnsatisfiedResolutionException for a
bean without a deviration.
I will try to find the reason later.
2014-10-02 10:37 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>:
> Great guys, thanks!
> Will test my apps today!
>
> 2014-10-02 10:28 GMT+02:00 Arne Limburg <ar...@openknowledge.de>:
>
>> Yes,
>> I¹ll use that time to work out these ugly generics issues with the cdi-tck
>> team, so we can get rid of these ugly hacks in GenericsUtil, that the tck
>> made us implement.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Arne
>>
>>
>> Am 01.10.14 20:33 schrieb "Jens Schumann" unter
>> <je...@openknowledge.de>:
>>
>> >Congratulation!
>> >
>> >.oO(I always assumed, that we have to wait till the end of Arne's
>> >upcoming parental leave;)
>> >
>> >> On 01 Oct 2014, at 20:23, "Mark Struberg" <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> But we do!
>> >>
>> >> Folks, I'm proud to announce that we finally pass the standalone part
>> >>of the CDI-1.2 TCK!
>> >>
>> >> Please, all do checkout our latest OWB 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT (or simply
>> >>compile it yourself [1]) and test YOUR application with it. Any feedback
>> >>is welcome!
>> >>
>> >> I like to kick off the release train for OWB tomorrow.
>> >>
>> >> We will now continue with cleanup and performance improvements. And
>> >>also with working on the EE TCK over in TomEE.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> txs and LieGrue,
>> >> strub
>> >>
>>
>>
>
Re: You shall not pass!
Posted by Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>.
Great guys, thanks!
Will test my apps today!
2014-10-02 10:28 GMT+02:00 Arne Limburg <ar...@openknowledge.de>:
> Yes,
> I¹ll use that time to work out these ugly generics issues with the cdi-tck
> team, so we can get rid of these ugly hacks in GenericsUtil, that the tck
> made us implement.
>
> Cheers,
> Arne
>
>
> Am 01.10.14 20:33 schrieb "Jens Schumann" unter
> <je...@openknowledge.de>:
>
> >Congratulation!
> >
> >.oO(I always assumed, that we have to wait till the end of Arne's
> >upcoming parental leave;)
> >
> >> On 01 Oct 2014, at 20:23, "Mark Struberg" <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> But we do!
> >>
> >> Folks, I'm proud to announce that we finally pass the standalone part
> >>of the CDI-1.2 TCK!
> >>
> >> Please, all do checkout our latest OWB 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT (or simply
> >>compile it yourself [1]) and test YOUR application with it. Any feedback
> >>is welcome!
> >>
> >> I like to kick off the release train for OWB tomorrow.
> >>
> >> We will now continue with cleanup and performance improvements. And
> >>also with working on the EE TCK over in TomEE.
> >>
> >>
> >> txs and LieGrue,
> >> strub
> >>
>
>
Re: You shall not pass!
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
this was deployed tonight so if owb was not it is not up to
date...that said I wouldn't be surprise this is a real error, can you
share something showing it?
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-10-02 8:30 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
>
> Looks like the TomEE build did not yet pick up latest OWB.
>
>> at org.apache.webbeans.event.NotificationManager.fireEvent(NotificationManager.java:616)
>
> This points to an invalid line.
>
> Could you probably build OWB locally and add
>
>
> <libs>
> <lib>remove:openwebbeans-impl</lib>
> <lib>org.apache.openwebbeans:openwebbeans-impl:1.5.0-SNAPSHOT</lib>
> </libs>
>
> to your maven-tomee-plugin configuration?
>
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> On Thursday, 2 October 2014, 7:20, "karl.kilden@gmail.com" <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>
>>Hi Mark, catalina.out is in the gist
>>
>>Skickat från min iPhone
>>
>>
>>> 2 okt 2014 kl. 07:10 skrev Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
>>>
>>> can you share any stack trace or error message?
>>>
>>> LieGrue,
>>> strub
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> On Wednesday, 1 October 2014, 22:12, Karl Kildén <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Very nice! Great job everyone.
>>>>
>>>> My main tomee app blew up completely after downloading a snap here:
>>>> http://tomee.apache.org/download/tomee-2.0.0-snapshot.html
>>>>
>>>> Seems it's a pretty new snapshot...
>>>>
>>>> https://gist.github.com/karlkilden/58f4ef9839e8fe47530c
>>>>
>>>> cheers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 1 October 2014 20:33, Jens Schumann <je...@openknowledge.de>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Congratulation!
>>>>>
>>>>> .oO(I always assumed, that we have to wait till the end of Arne's
>>>> upcoming
>>>>> parental leave;)
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 01 Oct 2014, at 20:23, "Mark Struberg"
>>>> <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But we do!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Folks, I'm proud to announce that we finally pass the standalone
>>>> part of
>>>>> the CDI-1.2 TCK!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please, all do checkout our latest OWB 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT (or simply
>>>> compile
>>>>> it yourself [1]) and test YOUR application with it. Any feedback is
>>>> welcome!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I like to kick off the release train for OWB tomorrow.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We will now continue with cleanup and performance improvements. And
>>>> also
>>>>> with working on the EE TCK over in TomEE.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
Re: You shall not pass!
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
Looks like the TomEE build did not yet pick up latest OWB.
> at org.apache.webbeans.event.NotificationManager.fireEvent(NotificationManager.java:616)
This points to an invalid line.
Could you probably build OWB locally and add
<libs>
<lib>remove:openwebbeans-impl</lib>
<lib>org.apache.openwebbeans:openwebbeans-impl:1.5.0-SNAPSHOT</lib>
</libs>
to your maven-tomee-plugin configuration?
txs and LieGrue,
strub
On Thursday, 2 October 2014, 7:20, "karl.kilden@gmail.com" <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>Hi Mark, catalina.out is in the gist
>
>Skickat från min iPhone
>
>
>> 2 okt 2014 kl. 07:10 skrev Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
>>
>> can you share any stack trace or error message?
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>> On Wednesday, 1 October 2014, 22:12, Karl Kildén <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Very nice! Great job everyone.
>>>
>>> My main tomee app blew up completely after downloading a snap here:
>>> http://tomee.apache.org/download/tomee-2.0.0-snapshot.html
>>>
>>> Seems it's a pretty new snapshot...
>>>
>>> https://gist.github.com/karlkilden/58f4ef9839e8fe47530c
>>>
>>> cheers
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1 October 2014 20:33, Jens Schumann <je...@openknowledge.de>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Congratulation!
>>>>
>>>> .oO(I always assumed, that we have to wait till the end of Arne's
>>> upcoming
>>>> parental leave;)
>>>>
>>>>> On 01 Oct 2014, at 20:23, "Mark Struberg"
>>> <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> But we do!
>>>>>
>>>>> Folks, I'm proud to announce that we finally pass the standalone
>>> part of
>>>> the CDI-1.2 TCK!
>>>>>
>>>>> Please, all do checkout our latest OWB 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT (or simply
>>> compile
>>>> it yourself [1]) and test YOUR application with it. Any feedback is
>>> welcome!
>>>>>
>>>>> I like to kick off the release train for OWB tomorrow.
>>>>>
>>>>> We will now continue with cleanup and performance improvements. And
>>> also
>>>> with working on the EE TCK over in TomEE.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>>> strub
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
>
Re: You shall not pass!
Posted by ka...@gmail.com.
Hi Mark, catalina.out is in the gist
Skickat från min iPhone
> 2 okt 2014 kl. 07:10 skrev Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
>
> can you share any stack trace or error message?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
>>> On Wednesday, 1 October 2014, 22:12, Karl Kildén <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Very nice! Great job everyone.
>>
>> My main tomee app blew up completely after downloading a snap here:
>> http://tomee.apache.org/download/tomee-2.0.0-snapshot.html
>>
>> Seems it's a pretty new snapshot...
>>
>> https://gist.github.com/karlkilden/58f4ef9839e8fe47530c
>>
>> cheers
>>
>>
>> On 1 October 2014 20:33, Jens Schumann <je...@openknowledge.de>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Congratulation!
>>>
>>> .oO(I always assumed, that we have to wait till the end of Arne's
>> upcoming
>>> parental leave;)
>>>
>>>> On 01 Oct 2014, at 20:23, "Mark Struberg"
>> <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> But we do!
>>>>
>>>> Folks, I'm proud to announce that we finally pass the standalone
>> part of
>>> the CDI-1.2 TCK!
>>>>
>>>> Please, all do checkout our latest OWB 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT (or simply
>> compile
>>> it yourself [1]) and test YOUR application with it. Any feedback is
>> welcome!
>>>>
>>>> I like to kick off the release train for OWB tomorrow.
>>>>
>>>> We will now continue with cleanup and performance improvements. And
>> also
>>> with working on the EE TCK over in TomEE.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>> strub
>>>>
>>>
>>
Re: You shall not pass!
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
can you share any stack trace or error message?
LieGrue,
strub
> On Wednesday, 1 October 2014, 22:12, Karl Kildén <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Very nice! Great job everyone.
>
> My main tomee app blew up completely after downloading a snap here:
> http://tomee.apache.org/download/tomee-2.0.0-snapshot.html
>
> Seems it's a pretty new snapshot...
>
> https://gist.github.com/karlkilden/58f4ef9839e8fe47530c
>
> cheers
>
>
> On 1 October 2014 20:33, Jens Schumann <je...@openknowledge.de>
> wrote:
>
>> Congratulation!
>>
>> .oO(I always assumed, that we have to wait till the end of Arne's
> upcoming
>> parental leave;)
>>
>> > On 01 Oct 2014, at 20:23, "Mark Struberg"
> <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>> >
>> > But we do!
>> >
>> > Folks, I'm proud to announce that we finally pass the standalone
> part of
>> the CDI-1.2 TCK!
>> >
>> > Please, all do checkout our latest OWB 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT (or simply
> compile
>> it yourself [1]) and test YOUR application with it. Any feedback is
> welcome!
>> >
>> > I like to kick off the release train for OWB tomorrow.
>> >
>> > We will now continue with cleanup and performance improvements. And
> also
>> with working on the EE TCK over in TomEE.
>> >
>> >
>> > txs and LieGrue,
>> > strub
>> >
>>
>
Re: You shall not pass!
Posted by Karl Kildén <ka...@gmail.com>.
Very nice! Great job everyone.
My main tomee app blew up completely after downloading a snap here:
http://tomee.apache.org/download/tomee-2.0.0-snapshot.html
Seems it's a pretty new snapshot...
https://gist.github.com/karlkilden/58f4ef9839e8fe47530c
cheers
On 1 October 2014 20:33, Jens Schumann <je...@openknowledge.de>
wrote:
> Congratulation!
>
> .oO(I always assumed, that we have to wait till the end of Arne's upcoming
> parental leave;)
>
> > On 01 Oct 2014, at 20:23, "Mark Struberg" <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> >
> > But we do!
> >
> > Folks, I'm proud to announce that we finally pass the standalone part of
> the CDI-1.2 TCK!
> >
> > Please, all do checkout our latest OWB 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT (or simply compile
> it yourself [1]) and test YOUR application with it. Any feedback is welcome!
> >
> > I like to kick off the release train for OWB tomorrow.
> >
> > We will now continue with cleanup and performance improvements. And also
> with working on the EE TCK over in TomEE.
> >
> >
> > txs and LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
>
Re: You shall not pass!
Posted by Arne Limburg <ar...@openknowledge.de>.
Yes,
I¹ll use that time to work out these ugly generics issues with the cdi-tck
team, so we can get rid of these ugly hacks in GenericsUtil, that the tck
made us implement.
Cheers,
Arne
Am 01.10.14 20:33 schrieb "Jens Schumann" unter
<je...@openknowledge.de>:
>Congratulation!
>
>.oO(I always assumed, that we have to wait till the end of Arne's
>upcoming parental leave;)
>
>> On 01 Oct 2014, at 20:23, "Mark Struberg" <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>>
>> But we do!
>>
>> Folks, I'm proud to announce that we finally pass the standalone part
>>of the CDI-1.2 TCK!
>>
>> Please, all do checkout our latest OWB 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT (or simply
>>compile it yourself [1]) and test YOUR application with it. Any feedback
>>is welcome!
>>
>> I like to kick off the release train for OWB tomorrow.
>>
>> We will now continue with cleanup and performance improvements. And
>>also with working on the EE TCK over in TomEE.
>>
>>
>> txs and LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
Re: You shall not pass!
Posted by Jens Schumann <je...@openknowledge.de>.
Congratulation!
.oO(I always assumed, that we have to wait till the end of Arne's upcoming parental leave;)
> On 01 Oct 2014, at 20:23, "Mark Struberg" <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>
> But we do!
>
> Folks, I'm proud to announce that we finally pass the standalone part of the CDI-1.2 TCK!
>
> Please, all do checkout our latest OWB 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT (or simply compile it yourself [1]) and test YOUR application with it. Any feedback is welcome!
>
> I like to kick off the release train for OWB tomorrow.
>
> We will now continue with cleanup and performance improvements. And also with working on the EE TCK over in TomEE.
>
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
Re: You shall not pass!
Posted by Jens Schumann <je...@openknowledge.de>.
Congratulation!
.oO(I always assumed, that we have to wait till the end of Arne's upcoming parental leave;)
> On 01 Oct 2014, at 20:23, "Mark Struberg" <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>
> But we do!
>
> Folks, I'm proud to announce that we finally pass the standalone part of the CDI-1.2 TCK!
>
> Please, all do checkout our latest OWB 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT (or simply compile it yourself [1]) and test YOUR application with it. Any feedback is welcome!
>
> I like to kick off the release train for OWB tomorrow.
>
> We will now continue with cleanup and performance improvements. And also with working on the EE TCK over in TomEE.
>
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>