You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to modperl@perl.apache.org by Robin Berjon <ro...@knowscape.com> on 2000/12/08 15:41:20 UTC

Re: Alliance? WAS -> Re: RFC: mod_perl advocacy project resurrection

At 08:13 08/12/2000 +0800, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
>The could be although ActiveState has a product that competes with mod_perl 
>on the NT side called PerlEx.
>
>What is too bad about the silence about the relationship is that PerlEx as 
>a product could really benefit from evolving upon the back of a mod_perl 
>code base.

In addition to that, they also have Zope-Perl, which iirc is run for AS by
Gisle Aas, who probably knows a lot about mod_perl. Now if AS would support
mod_perl, they'd get a very broad range of products for the dynamic server
marketplace. That could be a good argument for them support mod_perl.

-- robin b.
Paranoids are people, too; they have their own problems.  It's easy to
criticize, but if everybody hated you, you'd be paranoid too.