You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Paul Elschot (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/03/06 17:43:39 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6328) Make Filter.clone and Filter.setBoost throw an UnsupportedOperationException

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14350561#comment-14350561 ] 

Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-6328:
--------------------------------------

I am probably late with this, but anyway. Using a stricter result type (subclass of the result type) in a subclass method was not available in Java at the time LUCENE-1518, but it is now.

That means that there is an alternative that was not available at the time of LUCENE-1518, and that is to make Weight a subclass of Filter. This involves using a subclass result type for the Weight.scorer method (returning Scorer) and than for the (meanwhile old) Filter.docIdSet.iterator method (returning DISI). These methods should be merged into one in that case.

I have not tried this, but my guess is that this approach will simplify the code in many places.

> Make Filter.clone and Filter.setBoost throw an UnsupportedOperationException
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-6328
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6328
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Adrien Grand
>            Assignee: Adrien Grand
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: Trunk, 5.1
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-6328.patch
>
>
> The rewrite process uses a combination of calls to clone() and setBoost(boost) in order to rewrite queries. This is a bit weird for filters given that they were not originally designed to care about scoring.
> Using a filter directly as a query fails unit tests today since filters do not pass the QueryUtils checks: it is expected that cloning and changing the boost results in an instance which is unequal. However existing filters do not take into account the getBoost() parameter inherited from Query so this test fails.
> I think it would be less error-prone to throw an UnsupportedOperationException for clone() and setBoost() on filters and disable the check in QueryUtils for filters.
> In order to keep rewriting working, filters could rewrite to a CSQ around themselves so that clone() and setBoost() would be called on the CSQ.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org