You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@servicemix.apache.org by kaarthikl <ka...@nsn.com> on 2009/10/13 13:32:27 UTC
Re: servicemix-web.war over servicemix standalone
Hi Guillaume
Does that mean, that we cannot create new BC\SE and add it to the
servicemix-web?
cheers
Kaarthik
gnodet wrote:
>
> It's up to you if you want to embed servicemix to use it as a tool
> (like Mule for example) and rely on a static configuration file, or to
> use it as a container (like a web container) so you can deploy
> components / service assemblies at runtime.
> This is the main difference between the two modes.
>
> If you look at servicemix-web (in the examples of the distribution),
> you will find it.
> It is named applicationContext.xml, but otherwise is the same.
>
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
>
> On 4/28/06, devg <de...@impactplm.com> wrote:
>>
>> I am new to servicemix (still trying to decide over Mule).
>>
>> My question:
>>
>> What is the advantage of deploying as a webapp over using servicemix
>> standalone ?
>>
>> Also, where is the servicemix.xml file for the webapp? Doesn't it need
>> one?
>>
>> Thnx
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/servicemix-web.war-over-servicemix-standalone-t1525873.html#a4144522
>> Sent from the ServiceMix - User forum at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/servicemix-web.war-over-servicemix-standalone-tp4144522p25871204.html
Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.