You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mina.apache.org by "Goldstein Lyor (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/02/14 16:15:18 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (SSHD-642) Pad RSA signatures with zeroes if necessary to complete the expected signature size

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-642?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Goldstein Lyor updated SSHD-642:
--------------------------------
    Summary: Pad RSA signatures with zeroes if necessary to complete the expected signature size  (was: Authentication failed: Signature length not correct: got 255 but was expecting 256)

> Pad RSA signatures with zeroes if necessary to complete the expected signature size
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SSHD-642
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-642
>             Project: MINA SSHD
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.0
>            Reporter: Eugene Petrenko
>
> This issue I observe with quite low probability. It turns out that RSA signature verification fails and thus SSH key authentication fails. (This is a bit strange that key verification is executed BEFORE signature is checked). 
> In my cases it fails with Trilead SSH2 client. 
> From the code it fails inside JCE where it is asserted message size if not trimmed. (Exception is not getting properly logged, but it is possible to find the message in sun/security/rsa/RSASignature.java file)
> In the sources of Trilead I see the code, that may trim leading zero byte from the signature. Signature here is encoded with type and data, so that org.apache.sshd.common.signature.AbstractSignature#extractEncodedSignature is executed and not-null is returned).
> https://github.com/JetBrains/intellij-community/blob/master/plugins/cvs/trilead-ssh2-build213/src/com/trilead/ssh2/signature/RSASHA1Verify.java#L98
> As you may see from the link this is the way they understand the standard. 
> I checked JSch code, and there is not such a byte trim there. 
> It may mean Mina SSHD should attempt to workaround it and add zero bites back



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)