Re: Perl regex crash on large HTML table under SPAMD - SOLVED

[Dominic Germain <ma...@sogetel.com>]

replacing "*" by "{0,30}" fixed my problem! The regex works for small  
tables without crashing spamd childs.

IMO, upgrading to Perl 5.10 on OSX is not recommended... Apple is  
tweeking a lot of stuff and there is always chances that a future OSX  
update will screw up everything.

many thanks!


Dominic Germain
---------------------------------------------
Administrateur réseau / Network administrator
Sogetel
www.sogetel.net

mailinglists@sogetel.com



Le 08-08-05 à 15:23, Justin Mason a écrit :

>
> Dominic Germain writes:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm running the following rules in my local rules for a while and it
>> works flawlessly under RedHat EL 3 (Perl 5.8.0):
>>
>> rawbody	TABLEOBFU /
>> <td([^>]|"[^"]*"|'[^']*')*>(<([^>]|"[^"]*"|'[^']*')*>)*[a-z]{1,2}
>> (<([^>]|"[^"]*"|'[^']*')*>)*<\/td([^>]|"[^"]*"|'[^']*')*>/i
>>
>> Recently, we move to Apple Mac OS X 10.5 server with Perl 5.8.8.  We
>> start getting SIGCHLD error and 0/0 scores.  I've found that  
>> TABLEOBFU
>> rule crash if there is a large table (~32k) inside the mail...  I was
>> able to reproduce it under Redhat EL 5 also (Perl 5.8.8) but HTML  
>> must
>> be 2 times larger (~64k).
>>
>> I also try with the following rule I got from the mailing list.  Same
>> problem.
>>
>> rawbody TABLEOBFU /
>> <td([^>]|"[^"]*"|'[^']*')*>(<([^>]|"[^"]*"|'[^']*')*>)*[a-z]{1,2}
>> (<([^>]|"[^"]*"|'[^']*')*>)*<\/td([^>]|"[^"]*"|'[^']*')*>/i
>>
>> It seems to be something related to allocated memory for the spamd
>> script...
>>
>> Anything known about that issue?  Is is possible to "skip" a test
>> according to mail size?
>
> The best fix would be to rewrite those rules not to use /*/, to use
> /{0,n}/ instead, and to use /(?...)/ instead of /(...)/ .   You  
> could also
> upgrade to perl 5.10, which may have this bug fixed iirc; however you
> would still be vulnerable to another side-effect of that kind of  
> regexp,
> which is exponential runtime. unlimited quantifiers like + and * are  
> very
> bad news in SA rules.
>
> --j.