You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@mesos.apache.org by "Till Toenshoff (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/07/04 16:53:11 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (MESOS-5730) Sandbox access authorization should
fail for non existing sandboxes.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Till Toenshoff updated MESOS-5730:
----------------------------------
Priority: Major (was: Blocker)
> Sandbox access authorization should fail for non existing sandboxes.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MESOS-5730
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5730
> Project: Mesos
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: security
> Affects Versions: 1.0.0
> Reporter: Till Toenshoff
> Labels: authorization, mesosphere, security
> Fix For: 1.0.0
>
>
> The local authorizer currently tries to authorize {{ACCESS_SANDBOX}} even if no further object specification - e.g. {{framework_info}} or {{executor_info}}) where specified / available at that time.
> Given that there is likely no sandbox available if there was no {{executor_info}} provided, I think we should actually fail instead of allow or deny (403).
> A failure would result into an IMHO more appropriate ServiceUnavailable (503).
> See https://github.com/apache/mesos/commit/c8d67590064e35566274116cede9c6a733187b48#diff-dd692b1640b2628014feca01a94ba1e1R241
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)