Re: RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW

[Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org>]

Dan Mahoney, System Admin writes:
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Matthias Leisi wrote:
> >> On my end, I have degrees of control (false MXes, Blacklists,
> >> whitelists, greylists, sender callbacks, etc).  I have no such control
> >> over the LJ MX'es.
> >
> > Correct. But by setting (in your local.cf or equivalent)
> >
> > | trusted_networks 204.9.177.18
> >
> > you are telling SpamAssassin that this relay is not operated by a
> > spammer and that it should apply all black-/whitelist rules etc. to the
> > IP address one more hop away. Then, in the context of SpamAssassin, you
> > regain full control of connection-oriented rules.
> 
> interesting point, I suppose.  Kinda breaks the logic of "trusted 
> networks".

actually, this was exactly what trusted_networks was designed to do ;)

--j.