You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cxf.apache.org by Colm O hEigeartaigh <co...@apache.org> on 2013/05/23 15:45:09 UTC
wss4j2.0-port branch merged to trunk
Hi all,
In case you haven't noticed, I've merged the wss4j2.0-port branch to trunk
as it is getting a bit more mature + it was a pain having to keep it in
sync with trunk.
Colm.
--
Colm O hEigeartaigh
Talend Community Coder
http://coders.talend.com
Re: wss4j2.0-port branch merged to trunk
Posted by Colm O hEigeartaigh <co...@apache.org>.
Hi Oli,
> Is there a reason why the wss4j version is wss4j 2.0-SNAPSHOT instead of
2.0.0-SNAPSHOT?
Not really. I guess it should be the latter.
> I've got build issues that it can't find wss4j 2.0-SNAPSHOT. I've found
two groups org.apache.wss4j and org.apache.ws.security.wss4j.
> Which is the right one?
The former is the right one. I've built CXF trunk successfully with a clean
maven repo so the right artifacts are definately available.
Colm.
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Oliver Wulff <ow...@talend.com> wrote:
> Hi Colm
>
> That's cool.
>
> Is there a reason why the wss4j version is wss4j 2.0-SNAPSHOT instead of
> 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT?
>
> I've got build issues that it can't find wss4j 2.0-SNAPSHOT. I've found
> two groups org.apache.wss4j and org.apache.ws.security.wss4j. Which is the
> right one?
>
> Thanks
> Oli
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Andrei Shakirin [ashakirin@talend.com]
> Sent: 23 May 2013 16:28
> To: dev@cxf.apache.org; coheigea@apache.org
> Subject: RE: wss4j2.0-port branch merged to trunk
>
> Great job, Colm!
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:coheigea@apache.org]
> > Sent: Donnerstag, 23. Mai 2013 15:45
> > To: dev@cxf.apache.org
> > Subject: wss4j2.0-port branch merged to trunk
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > In case you haven't noticed, I've merged the wss4j2.0-port branch to
> trunk as
> > it is getting a bit more mature + it was a pain having to keep it in
> sync with
> > trunk.
> >
> > Colm.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Colm O hEigeartaigh
> >
> > Talend Community Coder
> > http://coders.talend.com
--
Colm O hEigeartaigh
Talend Community Coder
http://coders.talend.com
RE: wss4j2.0-port branch merged to trunk
Posted by Oliver Wulff <ow...@talend.com>.
Hi Colm
That's cool.
Is there a reason why the wss4j version is wss4j 2.0-SNAPSHOT instead of 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT?
I've got build issues that it can't find wss4j 2.0-SNAPSHOT. I've found two groups org.apache.wss4j and org.apache.ws.security.wss4j. Which is the right one?
Thanks
Oli
________________________________________
From: Andrei Shakirin [ashakirin@talend.com]
Sent: 23 May 2013 16:28
To: dev@cxf.apache.org; coheigea@apache.org
Subject: RE: wss4j2.0-port branch merged to trunk
Great job, Colm!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:coheigea@apache.org]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 23. Mai 2013 15:45
> To: dev@cxf.apache.org
> Subject: wss4j2.0-port branch merged to trunk
>
> Hi all,
>
> In case you haven't noticed, I've merged the wss4j2.0-port branch to trunk as
> it is getting a bit more mature + it was a pain having to keep it in sync with
> trunk.
>
> Colm.
>
>
> --
> Colm O hEigeartaigh
>
> Talend Community Coder
> http://coders.talend.com
RE: wss4j2.0-port branch merged to trunk
Posted by Andrei Shakirin <as...@talend.com>.
Great job, Colm!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:coheigea@apache.org]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 23. Mai 2013 15:45
> To: dev@cxf.apache.org
> Subject: wss4j2.0-port branch merged to trunk
>
> Hi all,
>
> In case you haven't noticed, I've merged the wss4j2.0-port branch to trunk as
> it is getting a bit more mature + it was a pain having to keep it in sync with
> trunk.
>
> Colm.
>
>
> --
> Colm O hEigeartaigh
>
> Talend Community Coder
> http://coders.talend.com
Re: wss4j2.0-port branch merged to trunk
Posted by Alessio Soldano <as...@redhat.com>.
Cool :)
On 05/23/2013 03:45 PM, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In case you haven't noticed, I've merged the wss4j2.0-port branch to trunk
> as it is getting a bit more mature + it was a pain having to keep it in
> sync with trunk.
>
> Colm.
>
>
--
Alessio Soldano
Web Service Lead, JBoss