You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@solr.apache.org by "Shawn Heisey (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/08/20 19:17:00 UTC
[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-3393) Implement an optimized LFUCache
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Shawn Heisey resolved SOLR-3393.
--------------------------------
Fix Version/s: (was: 6.0)
(was: 4.9)
Assignee: (was: Shawn Heisey)
Resolution: Won't Fix
A better alternative has already been implemented – CaffeineCache.
> Implement an optimized LFUCache
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-3393
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3393
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: search
> Affects Versions: 3.6, 4.0-ALPHA
> Reporter: Shawn Heisey
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: SOLR-3393-4x-withdecay.patch, SOLR-3393-trunk-withdecay.patch, SOLR-3393.patch, SOLR-3393.patch, SOLR-3393.patch, SOLR-3393.patch, SOLR-3393.patch, SOLR-3393.patch, SOLR-3393.patch
>
>
> SOLR-2906 gave us an inefficient LFU cache modeled on FastLRUCache/ConcurrentLRUCache. It could use some serious improvement. The following project includes an Apache 2.0 licensed O(1) implementation. The second link is the paper (PDF warning) it was based on:
> https://github.com/chirino/hawtdb
> http://dhruvbird.com/lfu.pdf
> Using this project and paper, I will attempt to make a new O(1) cache called FastLFUCache that is modeled on LRUCache.java. This will (for now) leave the existing LFUCache/ConcurrentLFUCache implementation in place.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@solr.apache.org