Javascript UDF's

[Dan Young <da...@gmail.com>]

Can anyone comment on whether or not Javascript UDFs are here to stay? on
the wiki it states "*Note:* *JavaScript UDFs are an experimental feature."*
*
*
*Regards,*
*
Dan*
*
*

Re: Javascript UDF's

[Dan Young <da...@gmail.com>]

Cool beans, just curious because I've been using them more and more. The
one bug I've found I have submitted in jira.  Great news!

Regards,

Dan


On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Jonathan Coveney <jc...@gmail.com>wrote:

> They are here to stay and I reckon some development work will be put into
> making them better, but it's experimental because a) the API's etc are
> subject to change and b) it hasn't been fully battletested. But every time
> you use it and submit bugs, a pig gets its wings.
>
> But knowing that you're interested in them will galvanize us to make them
> better :) You should give feedback on features you'd like, syntax that
> would be useful, etc.
>
> 2012/4/12 Dan Young <da...@gmail.com>
>
> > Can anyone comment on whether or not Javascript UDFs are here to stay? on
> > the wiki it states "*Note:* *JavaScript UDFs are an experimental
> feature."*
> > *
> > *
> > *Regards,*
> > *
> > Dan*
> > *
> > *
> >
>

Re: Javascript UDF's

[Jonathan Coveney <jc...@gmail.com>]

They are here to stay and I reckon some development work will be put into
making them better, but it's experimental because a) the API's etc are
subject to change and b) it hasn't been fully battletested. But every time
you use it and submit bugs, a pig gets its wings.

But knowing that you're interested in them will galvanize us to make them
better :) You should give feedback on features you'd like, syntax that
would be useful, etc.

2012/4/12 Dan Young <da...@gmail.com>

> Can anyone comment on whether or not Javascript UDFs are here to stay? on
> the wiki it states "*Note:* *JavaScript UDFs are an experimental feature."*
> *
> *
> *Regards,*
> *
> Dan*
> *
> *
>