You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org on 2014/07/10 16:18:25 UTC
[Bug 7066] New: Provide a systemd.timer for sa-update
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7066
Bug ID: 7066
Summary: Provide a systemd.timer for sa-update
Product: Spamassassin
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Building & Packaging
Assignee: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
Reporter: rumpelsepp@sevenbyte.org
Hi,
I think providing a systemd.timer for sa-update in spamassassin would be
useful. See also here in the arch linux bugtracker:
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/41157
Stefan
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7066] Provide a systemd.timer for sa-update
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7066
--- Comment #2 from Stefan Tatschner <ru...@sevenbyte.org> ---
Created attachment 5220
--> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=5220&action=edit
timer
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7066] Provide a systemd.timer for sa-update
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7066
--- Comment #3 from Kevin A. McGrail <km...@pccc.com> ---
Providing an OS specific configuration file such as a systemd.timer would at
best be something thrown into contrib.
Even the debian directory is showing signs of age and lack of attention which
is why we removed the spec file that used to be included.
Beyond that, I don't use systemd. This is something you might want to discuss
on the dev list because it's just going to languish with generic statements
that it's useful while providing no basis for why.
Regards,
KAM
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7066] Provide a systemd.timer for sa-update
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7066
Kevin A. McGrail <km...@pccc.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kmcgrail@pccc.com
--- Comment #5 from Kevin A. McGrail <km...@pccc.com> ---
Create a README file and I'll commit the files to contrib/systemd.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7066] Provide a systemd.timer for sa-update
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7066
Stefan Tatschner <ru...@sevenbyte.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rumpelsepp@sevenbyte.org
--- Comment #1 from Stefan Tatschner <ru...@sevenbyte.org> ---
Created attachment 5219
--> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=5219&action=edit
service file
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7066] Provide a systemd.timer for sa-update
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7066
--- Comment #4 from Stefan Tatschner <ru...@sevenbyte.org> ---
Systemd services and timers in general are distribution independent. So every
(systemd) linux distribution has to create the same service and timer files on
their own and include them in their packages. It is a common procedure to ask
whether these files could be included in upstream instead so several linux
distributions could benefit.
There is already an according discussion on the fedora bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064537
I think including these files just would save time in creating packages, so
that's the reason why I used the generic statement "useful".
Stefan
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7066] Provide a systemd.timer for sa-update
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7066
--- Comment #6 from Stefan Tatschner <ru...@sevenbyte.org> ---
Thanks. :)
I will ask the arch folks to review the files, then I will submit them here
again.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.