You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@curator.apache.org by "csulyj (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/12/22 16:16:46 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (CURATOR-283) LockInternals does not deal with
spurious weakup?
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
csulyj updated CURATOR-283:
---------------------------
Description:
I don't understand why method internalLockLoop doesn't not deal with spurious weakup?
I think it should be like this :
synchronized (obj) {
while (condition does not hold)
obj.wait(timeout);
... // Perform action appropriate to condition
}
was:
I don't understand why method internalLockLoop doesn't not deal with spurious weakup?
I think it should be like this :
synchronized (obj) {
while (condition does not hold)
obj.wait(timeout);
... // Perform action appropriate to condition
}
> LockInternals does not deal with spurious weakup?
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CURATOR-283
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-283
> Project: Apache Curator
> Issue Type: Test
> Components: Recipes
> Reporter: csulyj
> Priority: Trivial
>
> I don't understand why method internalLockLoop doesn't not deal with spurious weakup?
> I think it should be like this :
> synchronized (obj) {
> while (condition does not hold)
> obj.wait(timeout);
> ... // Perform action appropriate to condition
> }
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)