You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@couchdb.apache.org by Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com> on 2010/08/18 18:26:34 UTC
request.sec or request.secObj ?
Hi all,
I want to expose the security object to shows, lists, updates and
validate function, so we could eventually add some metadata to a db
(idea come from jcrhis@) . It's relatively easy but I hesitate about
the variable name . My preferece go for secObj (like we have userCtx).
What do you think ?
- benoit
Re: request.sec or request.secObj ?
Posted by Klaus Trainer <kl...@web.de>.
+1 for secObj
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 18:26 +0200, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I want to expose the security object to shows, lists, updates and
> validate function, so we could eventually add some metadata to a db
> (idea come from jcrhis@) . It's relatively easy but I hesitate about
> the variable name . My preferece go for secObj (like we have userCtx).
> What do you think ?
>
> - benoit
Re: request.sec or request.secObj ?
Posted by Robert Newson <ro...@gmail.com>.
secObj sounds good
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Filipe David Manana
<fd...@apache.org> wrote:
> secObj as well
>
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I want to expose the security object to shows, lists, updates and
>> validate function, so we could eventually add some metadata to a db
>> (idea come from jcrhis@) . It's relatively easy but I hesitate about
>> the variable name . My preferece go for secObj (like we have userCtx).
>> What do you think ?
>>
>> - benoit
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Filipe David Manana,
> fdmanana@gmail.com, fdmanana@apache.org
>
> "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
> Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
> That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
>
Re: request.sec or request.secObj ?
Posted by Filipe David Manana <fd...@apache.org>.
secObj as well
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I want to expose the security object to shows, lists, updates and
> validate function, so we could eventually add some metadata to a db
> (idea come from jcrhis@) . It's relatively easy but I hesitate about
> the variable name . My preferece go for secObj (like we have userCtx).
> What do you think ?
>
> - benoit
>
--
Filipe David Manana,
fdmanana@gmail.com, fdmanana@apache.org
"Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."