You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by "Dain Sundstrom (JIRA)" <de...@geronimo.apache.org> on 2005/03/29 01:04:32 UTC
[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-620) ServiceAccessController does not support ip6address
ServiceAccessController does not support ip6address
---------------------------------------------------
Key: GERONIMO-620
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-620
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Components: OpenEJB
Reporter: Dain Sundstrom
Assigned to: Gianny DAMOUR
The ServiceAccessController class does not work with ip6 addresses. I have added an if statement that skips ip6 addresses.
Also I think we should use the standard ip bit mask filtering rule style for the masks that xinetd uses. I found a ok description of the style here http://www.hn.edu.cn/book/NetWork/NetworkingBookshelf_2ndEd/tcp/ch12_05.htm (look near the bottom of this page) but I bet there are better ones out there.
172.16.12.5 defines a specific host
129.6.0.0 defines all hosts with an address that begins with 129.6
0.0.0.0 matches all addresses
172.16.12.{3,6,8,23} defines four different hosts: 172.16.12.3, 172.16.12.6, 172.16.12.8, and 172.16.12.23
172.16.12.128/25 match every address from 172.16.12.128 to 172.16.12.255
I also think you can do the following which is an address and a mask:
172.16.12.0/255.255.224.0
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-620) ServiceAccessController does not support ip6address
Posted by "Gianny DAMOUR (JIRA)" <de...@geronimo.apache.org>.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-620?page=history ]
Gianny DAMOUR closed GERONIMO-620:
----------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version: 1.0-M4
IPv6 is now supported. Also the syntax to specify IP address restrictions is now compliant with some of the xinetd syntax.
Note, compressed IPv6 notations are not supported.
> ServiceAccessController does not support ip6address
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-620
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-620
> Project: Geronimo
> Type: Bug
> Components: OpenEJB
> Reporter: Dain Sundstrom
> Assignee: Gianny DAMOUR
> Fix For: 1.0-M4
>
> The ServiceAccessController class does not work with ip6 addresses. I have added an if statement that skips ip6 addresses.
> Also I think we should use the standard ip bit mask filtering rule style for the masks that xinetd uses. I found a ok description of the style here http://www.hn.edu.cn/book/NetWork/NetworkingBookshelf_2ndEd/tcp/ch12_05.htm (look near the bottom of this page) but I bet there are better ones out there.
> 172.16.12.5 defines a specific host
> 129.6.0.0 defines all hosts with an address that begins with 129.6
> 0.0.0.0 matches all addresses
> 172.16.12.{3,6,8,23} defines four different hosts: 172.16.12.3, 172.16.12.6, 172.16.12.8, and 172.16.12.23
> 172.16.12.128/25 match every address from 172.16.12.128 to 172.16.12.255
> I also think you can do the following which is an address and a mask:
> 172.16.12.0/255.255.224.0
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira