You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to log4j-dev@logging.apache.org by Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com> on 2014/03/20 14:06:54 UTC
Is it ok to update log4j 1?
Like for bug fixes. Make a new patch release perhaps. Just curious; I
haven't even looked at the old codebase.
--
Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>
Re: Is it ok to update log4j 1?
Posted by Christian Grobmeier <gr...@gmail.com>.
Glad if you would help. With l0g4j2 its not longer that urgent
but we have actually a few things to address.
However as Gary mentioned, its PITA. On the other hand, I have released
the last 1.2.17 and I already knew about a couple of problems...
On 21 Mar 2014, at 14:02, Matt Sicker wrote:
> Ah, ok. I might take a look at any simple bugs in 1 after we release
> 2.0.
>
> On Thursday, 20 March 2014, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> And _building and releasing_ v1 is painful IIRC.
>>
>> Gary
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Ralph Goers
>> <ralph.goers@dslextreme.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ralph.goers@dslextreme.com');>
>>> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, there is nothing stopping you from doing that except for time.
>>> Most
>>> of us would just prefer to get 2.0 to GA and don’t have time to
>>> work on
>>> both.
>>>
>>> Ralph
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mar 20, 2014, at 6:06 AM, Matt Sicker
>>> <boards@gmail.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','boards@gmail.com');>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Like for bug fixes. Make a new patch release perhaps. Just curious;
>>> I
>>> haven't even looked at the old codebase.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matt Sicker
>>> <boards@gmail.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','boards@gmail.com');>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> E-Mail:
>> garydgregory@gmail.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','garydgregory@gmail.com');>|
>> ggregory@apache.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ggregory@apache.org');>
>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second
>> Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>
>
>
> --
> Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>
---
http://www.grobmeier.de
The Zen Programmer: http://bit.ly/12lC6DL
@grobmeier
GPG: 0xA5CC90DB
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
Re: Is it ok to update log4j 1?
Posted by Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>.
Ah, ok. I might take a look at any simple bugs in 1 after we release 2.0.
On Thursday, 20 March 2014, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> And _building and releasing_ v1 is painful IIRC.
>
> Gary
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Ralph Goers <ralph.goers@dslextreme.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ralph.goers@dslextreme.com');>
> > wrote:
>
>> Yes, there is nothing stopping you from doing that except for time. Most
>> of us would just prefer to get 2.0 to GA and don’t have time to work on
>> both.
>>
>> Ralph
>>
>>
>> On Mar 20, 2014, at 6:06 AM, Matt Sicker <boards@gmail.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','boards@gmail.com');>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Like for bug fixes. Make a new patch release perhaps. Just curious; I
>> haven't even looked at the old codebase.
>>
>> --
>> Matt Sicker <boards@gmail.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','boards@gmail.com');>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','garydgregory@gmail.com');>| ggregory@apache.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ggregory@apache.org');>
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>
--
Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>
Re: Is it ok to update log4j 1?
Posted by Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>.
And _building and releasing_ v1 is painful IIRC.
Gary
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>wrote:
> Yes, there is nothing stopping you from doing that except for time. Most
> of us would just prefer to get 2.0 to GA and don’t have time to work on
> both.
>
> Ralph
>
>
> On Mar 20, 2014, at 6:06 AM, Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Like for bug fixes. Make a new patch release perhaps. Just curious; I
> haven't even looked at the old codebase.
>
> --
> Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>
>
>
>
--
E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
Re: Is it ok to update log4j 1?
Posted by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>.
Yes, there is nothing stopping you from doing that except for time. Most of us would just prefer to get 2.0 to GA and don’t have time to work on both.
Ralph
On Mar 20, 2014, at 6:06 AM, Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Like for bug fixes. Make a new patch release perhaps. Just curious; I haven't even looked at the old codebase.
>
> --
> Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>