You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to github@beam.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2020/04/09 21:08:15 UTC

[GitHub] [beam] chamikaramj commented on a change in pull request #11122: [BEAM-9346] Improve the efficiency of TFRecordIO

chamikaramj commented on a change in pull request #11122: [BEAM-9346] Improve the efficiency of TFRecordIO
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/11122#discussion_r406478334
 
 

 ##########
 File path: sdks/java/core/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/io/WriteFiles.java
 ##########
 @@ -410,13 +412,44 @@ private GatherResults(Coder<ResultT> resultCoder) {
       } else {
         // Pass results via a side input rather than reshuffle, because we need to get an empty
         // iterable to finalize if there are no results.
-        return input
-            .getPipeline()
-            .apply(Reify.viewInGlobalWindow(input.apply(View.asList()), ListCoder.of(resultCoder)));
+        return input.apply("ToList", Combine.globally(new ToListCombineFn<>()));
 
 Review comment:
   What's the verdict here ? I suggest we revert this and introduce as an optional change since this is a potential regression for Dataflow runner.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services