2.1.0 branch with hotfix

[Thilo Goetz <tw...@gmx.de>]

Marshall, I see that you changed the POM file of uimaj-ep-configurator 
so that the resulting artifact has a new name.  Are we going to leave it 
like this?  What should happen when we build another hotfix, say in 
another component: do we change the name again, or do we leave it like 
that?  I don't really have an opinion at this point, just asking.

--Thilo

Re: 2.1.0 branch with hotfix

[Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>]

Thilo Goetz wrote:
> Marshall, I see that you changed the POM file of uimaj-ep-configurator 
> so that the resulting artifact has a new name.  Are we going to leave 
> it like this?  What should happen when we build another hotfix, say in 
> another component: do we change the name again, or do we leave it like 
> that?  I don't really have an opinion at this point, just asking.
>
> --Thilo
>
>

Just to be clear, I only built and packaged for release the one 
"project" - not the whole build.  If another hot-fix is needed in 
another component, we could perhaps build / release just that 
component.  So the fact that the ep-config project has a pom with 
hotfix-1 as part of the name would not be relevant.

I think the feeling in the incubator is that each release should be as 
clear as possible from these naming conventions as to what's in it, and 
in particular, not to put out something under the same name which is 
different.

So as long as the base names for this level is 2.1.0, I think the 
preference would be to keep the hot-fix-1 name. 

Hopefully we won't have any additional work on this level, in any case, 
unless another hot fix comes along....

-M