Re: [vote] Release geronimo-ejb_3.0_spec

[Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com>]

On Dec 31, 2006, at 7:54 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:

>
> On Dec 30, 2006, at 1:51 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>
>>
>> David is out of town but I think I can answer.... The previous  
>> release was only a milestone.  These are final 1.0 jars that have  
>> been verified using the JEE 5 signature tests.  If you want to  
>> know what has changed just run svn diff:
>
> Right, but I didn't ask a question. I stated that we ought to be  
> identifying this information in the vote (or a previous discussion  
> thread). All it takes is -- "Testing of the EJB3 spec has  
> identified signature problems in the existing 1.0-M1 release of the  
> spec. I've fixed these problems and updated the version numbers of  
> the specs that EJB3 is dependent on. I propose we release a final  
> 1.0 version of EJB3." This way all voters (and non-voters) understand.

Even if there weren't a change to the code, we still need to release  
final versions, as the M1 versions are just a Milestone on the path  
to a full final release.

> For the record -- I'm +1 for a release. Due to the finger check in  
> the original vote, I'd suggest that a new vote be called, but admit  
> that may be going a bit overboard...

I think that is overboard.

-dain