You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@nlpcraft.apache.org by Aaron Radzinski <ar...@datalingvo.com> on 2020/06/01 20:32:45 UTC
[CANCEL] [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft 0.6.0
NLPCraft-ers,
We need to cancel this vote as we've discovered the problem with pom.xml
for the project that affects both this and Java Client project (incorrectly
pulling in GPL dependencies). We'll fix this and re-release again.
Thank you,
--
Aaron Radzinski
On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 4:56 AM Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au> wrote:
> Forgot to mention. Only a minor thing but you probably want to delete:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nlpcraft/nlpcraft/0.5.0/
>
> In general, the dist/dev area should be empty apart from when there are
> pending votes in play.
>
> Cheers, Paul.
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 8:52 PM Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au> wrote:
>
> > I am +0 (I don't know whether you expect failures under Windows but I'm
> > happy to change to +1 if that is expected or if you believe it is
> something
> > in my environment).
> >
> > I checked:
> >
> > - "incubating" in name
> > - DISCLAIMER exists
> > - LICENSE and NOTICE look good
> > - no unexpected binary files
> > - signatures okay
> > - hashes okay
> > - rat checks are okay (I'd suggest removing
> > <numUnapprovedLicenses>1000000</numUnapprovedLicenses> and adding exclude
> > for .yaml files)
> > - mvn clean package verify passes on Linux under JDK11 (and doesn't
> > include L/GPL files when -Prelease is given)
> > - mvn verify fails under Windows JDK8 and 11 (see below)
> >
> > Windows Surefire Failure:
> >
> > [ERROR] Errors:
> >> [ERROR]
> >> NCEnricherNestedModelSpec.test:41->NCEnricherBaseSpec.runBatch:153 »
> >> TestFailed
> >> [ERROR] Tests run: 29, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 1
> >> !!! Failed 2 from 3 tests. See errors list above. !!!
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.nlpcraft.probe.mgrs.nlp.enrichers.model.NCEnricherNestedModelSpec.test(NCEnricherNestedModelSpec.scala:41)
> >
> >
> > There are errors like below throughout the console logs (possibly
> relevant
> > or perhaps a red herring):
> >
> > [INFO] Caused by: java.io.IOException: Failed to deserialize object
> >> [typeName=scala.collection.immutable.HashMap$SerializationProxy]
> >> ...
> >> [[INFO] Caused by: org.apache.ignite.IgniteCheckedException: Failed to
> >> deserialize object with given class loader:
> >> [clsLdr=sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader@5c647e05, err=Failed to
> >> deserialize object [typeName=scala.collection.mutable.HashSet]]
> >> ...
> >> [INFO] Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: Optimized stream
> >> class checksum mismatch (is same version of marshalled class present on
> all
> >> nodes?) [expected=32321, actual=26723, cls=class
> >> scala.collection.immutable.Vector]
> >> ...
> >> [INFO] Caused by: org.apache.ignite.binary.BinaryObjectException: Failed
> >> to read field
> >> [name=org$apache$nlpcraft$common$nlp$NCNlpSentenceToken$$notes]
> >> ...
> >> [INFO] Caused by: org.apache.ignite.binary.BinaryObjectException: Failed
> >> to deserialize object
> >> [typeName=org.apache.nlpcraft.common.nlp.NCNlpSentenceToken]
> >> ...
> >> [INFO] Jun-01|20:16:32|ERROR| System error processing query: class
> >> org.apache.ignite.IgniteCheckedException: Failed to deserialize object
> >>
> [typeName=org.apache.nlpcraft.server.nlp.enrichers.NCServerEnrichmentManager$Holder]
> >
> >
> > Cheers, Paul.
> >
> >
> > On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 3:49 AM Aaron Radzinski <
> aradzinski@datalingvo.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> NLPCraft-ers,
> >> This is the vote for release of NLPCraft v0.6.0. This release includes a
> >> number of bug fixes, improvements and brand new real-life example of
> >> accessing SQL databases using natural language.
> >>
> >> NOTE: we've fixed the Windows-related issue causing a last minute delay
> >> with the last 0.6.0 release attempt.
> >>
> >> Quick links:
> >> 1. Release location:
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nlpcraft/nlpcraft/
> >> 2. GitHub v0.6.0 tag:
> >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-nlpcraft/tree/v0.6.0
> >> 3. JIRA issues closed:
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NLPCRAFT/versions/12347775
> >> 4. KEYS file:
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/nlpcraft/KEYS
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NLPCRAFT/versions/12347774>
> >>
> >> The vote is formal, see voting guidelines here:
> >> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> >> +1 - to accept Apache NLPCraft 0.6.0
> >> 0 - don't care either way
> >> -1 - DO NOT accept Apache NLPCraft 0.6.0 (explain why)
> >>
> >> See notes on how to verify release here:
> >> https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html
> >>
> >> The vote will be held for 72 hours and will end on June 1, 2020 at
> >> midnight
> >> MSK.
> >>
> >> Thank you!
> >> --
> >> Aaron Radzinski
> >>
> >
>
Re: [CANCEL] [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft 0.6.0
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
+1 - sorry, missed that line!
--
With regards,
Cos
On 2020-06-02 14:31, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
> Hi Konstantin,
>
> Actually, that's what I've suggested:
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rcb20fe26dbeba39c75861cee7f48a30f472b807079f2a1ebcbd1a7a3%40%3Cdev.nlpcraft.apache.org%3E
>
> Kind Regards,
> Furkan KAMACI
>
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 9:24 AM Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Guys,
>>
>> perhaps it would makes sense to start marking release candidates (RCs) to
>> vote
>> on as it makes it easier to distinguish them apart. Having a few RCs aren't
>> that unusual as issues could be found during the review/vote process.
>> However,
>> voting repeatedly on what seems like the same version x.y.z is a bit
>> confusion ;)
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Cos
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 01:32PM, Aaron Radzinski wrote:
>>> NLPCraft-ers,
>>> We need to cancel this vote as we've discovered the problem with pom.xml
>>> for the project that affects both this and Java Client project
>> (incorrectly
>>> pulling in GPL dependencies). We'll fix this and re-release again.
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> --
>>> Aaron Radzinski
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 4:56 AM Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Forgot to mention. Only a minor thing but you probably want to delete:
>>>>
>>>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nlpcraft/nlpcraft/0.5.0/
>>>>
>>>> In general, the dist/dev area should be empty apart from when there are
>>>> pending votes in play.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers, Paul.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 8:52 PM Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I am +0 (I don't know whether you expect failures under Windows but
>> I'm
>>>>> happy to change to +1 if that is expected or if you believe it is
>>>> something
>>>>> in my environment).
>>>>>
>>>>> I checked:
>>>>>
>>>>> - "incubating" in name
>>>>> - DISCLAIMER exists
>>>>> - LICENSE and NOTICE look good
>>>>> - no unexpected binary files
>>>>> - signatures okay
>>>>> - hashes okay
>>>>> - rat checks are okay (I'd suggest removing
>>>>> <numUnapprovedLicenses>1000000</numUnapprovedLicenses> and adding
>> exclude
>>>>> for .yaml files)
>>>>> - mvn clean package verify passes on Linux under JDK11 (and doesn't
>>>>> include L/GPL files when -Prelease is given)
>>>>> - mvn verify fails under Windows JDK8 and 11 (see below)
>>>>>
>>>>> Windows Surefire Failure:
>>>>>
>>>>> [ERROR] Errors:
>>>>>> [ERROR]
>>>>>> NCEnricherNestedModelSpec.test:41->NCEnricherBaseSpec.runBatch:153 »
>>>>>> TestFailed
>>>>>> [ERROR] Tests run: 29, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 1
>>>>>> !!! Failed 2 from 3 tests. See errors list above. !!!
>>>>>> at
>>>>>>
>>>>
>> org.apache.nlpcraft.probe.mgrs.nlp.enrichers.model.NCEnricherNestedModelSpec.test(NCEnricherNestedModelSpec.scala:41)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> There are errors like below throughout the console logs (possibly
>>>> relevant
>>>>> or perhaps a red herring):
>>>>>
>>>>> [INFO] Caused by: java.io.IOException: Failed to deserialize object
>>>>>> [typeName=scala.collection.immutable.HashMap$SerializationProxy]
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> [[INFO] Caused by: org.apache.ignite.IgniteCheckedException: Failed
>> to
>>>>>> deserialize object with given class loader:
>>>>>> [clsLdr=sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader@5c647e05, err=Failed to
>>>>>> deserialize object [typeName=scala.collection.mutable.HashSet]]
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> [INFO] Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: Optimized stream
>>>>>> class checksum mismatch (is same version of marshalled class
>> present on
>>>> all
>>>>>> nodes?) [expected=32321, actual=26723, cls=class
>>>>>> scala.collection.immutable.Vector]
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> [INFO] Caused by: org.apache.ignite.binary.BinaryObjectException:
>> Failed
>>>>>> to read field
>>>>>> [name=org$apache$nlpcraft$common$nlp$NCNlpSentenceToken$$notes]
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> [INFO] Caused by: org.apache.ignite.binary.BinaryObjectException:
>> Failed
>>>>>> to deserialize object
>>>>>> [typeName=org.apache.nlpcraft.common.nlp.NCNlpSentenceToken]
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> [INFO] Jun-01|20:16:32|ERROR| System error processing query: class
>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.IgniteCheckedException: Failed to deserialize
>> object
>>>>>>
>>>>
>> [typeName=org.apache.nlpcraft.server.nlp.enrichers.NCServerEnrichmentManager$Holder]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers, Paul.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 3:49 AM Aaron Radzinski <
>>>> aradzinski@datalingvo.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> NLPCraft-ers,
>>>>>> This is the vote for release of NLPCraft v0.6.0. This release
>> includes a
>>>>>> number of bug fixes, improvements and brand new real-life example of
>>>>>> accessing SQL databases using natural language.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> NOTE: we've fixed the Windows-related issue causing a last minute
>> delay
>>>>>> with the last 0.6.0 release attempt.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Quick links:
>>>>>> 1. Release location:
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nlpcraft/nlpcraft/
>>>>>> 2. GitHub v0.6.0 tag:
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-nlpcraft/tree/v0.6.0
>>>>>> 3. JIRA issues closed:
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NLPCRAFT/versions/12347775
>>>>>> 4. KEYS file:
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/nlpcraft/KEYS
>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NLPCRAFT/versions/12347774
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The vote is formal, see voting guidelines here:
>>>>>> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>>>>>> +1 - to accept Apache NLPCraft 0.6.0
>>>>>> 0 - don't care either way
>>>>>> -1 - DO NOT accept Apache NLPCraft 0.6.0 (explain why)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> See notes on how to verify release here:
>>>>>> https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The vote will be held for 72 hours and will end on June 1, 2020 at
>>>>>> midnight
>>>>>> MSK.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you!
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Aaron Radzinski
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
Re: [CANCEL] [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft 0.6.0
Posted by Furkan KAMACI <fu...@gmail.com>.
Hi Konstantin,
Actually, that's what I've suggested:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rcb20fe26dbeba39c75861cee7f48a30f472b807079f2a1ebcbd1a7a3%40%3Cdev.nlpcraft.apache.org%3E
Kind Regards,
Furkan KAMACI
On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 9:24 AM Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> Guys,
>
> perhaps it would makes sense to start marking release candidates (RCs) to
> vote
> on as it makes it easier to distinguish them apart. Having a few RCs aren't
> that unusual as issues could be found during the review/vote process.
> However,
> voting repeatedly on what seems like the same version x.y.z is a bit
> confusion ;)
>
> What do you think?
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Cos
>
> On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 01:32PM, Aaron Radzinski wrote:
> > NLPCraft-ers,
> > We need to cancel this vote as we've discovered the problem with pom.xml
> > for the project that affects both this and Java Client project
> (incorrectly
> > pulling in GPL dependencies). We'll fix this and re-release again.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > --
> > Aaron Radzinski
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 4:56 AM Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au> wrote:
> >
> > > Forgot to mention. Only a minor thing but you probably want to delete:
> > >
> > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nlpcraft/nlpcraft/0.5.0/
> > >
> > > In general, the dist/dev area should be empty apart from when there are
> > > pending votes in play.
> > >
> > > Cheers, Paul.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 8:52 PM Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I am +0 (I don't know whether you expect failures under Windows but
> I'm
> > > > happy to change to +1 if that is expected or if you believe it is
> > > something
> > > > in my environment).
> > > >
> > > > I checked:
> > > >
> > > > - "incubating" in name
> > > > - DISCLAIMER exists
> > > > - LICENSE and NOTICE look good
> > > > - no unexpected binary files
> > > > - signatures okay
> > > > - hashes okay
> > > > - rat checks are okay (I'd suggest removing
> > > > <numUnapprovedLicenses>1000000</numUnapprovedLicenses> and adding
> exclude
> > > > for .yaml files)
> > > > - mvn clean package verify passes on Linux under JDK11 (and doesn't
> > > > include L/GPL files when -Prelease is given)
> > > > - mvn verify fails under Windows JDK8 and 11 (see below)
> > > >
> > > > Windows Surefire Failure:
> > > >
> > > > [ERROR] Errors:
> > > >> [ERROR]
> > > >> NCEnricherNestedModelSpec.test:41->NCEnricherBaseSpec.runBatch:153 »
> > > >> TestFailed
> > > >> [ERROR] Tests run: 29, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 1
> > > >> !!! Failed 2 from 3 tests. See errors list above. !!!
> > > >> at
> > > >>
> > >
> org.apache.nlpcraft.probe.mgrs.nlp.enrichers.model.NCEnricherNestedModelSpec.test(NCEnricherNestedModelSpec.scala:41)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > There are errors like below throughout the console logs (possibly
> > > relevant
> > > > or perhaps a red herring):
> > > >
> > > > [INFO] Caused by: java.io.IOException: Failed to deserialize object
> > > >> [typeName=scala.collection.immutable.HashMap$SerializationProxy]
> > > >> ...
> > > >> [[INFO] Caused by: org.apache.ignite.IgniteCheckedException: Failed
> to
> > > >> deserialize object with given class loader:
> > > >> [clsLdr=sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader@5c647e05, err=Failed to
> > > >> deserialize object [typeName=scala.collection.mutable.HashSet]]
> > > >> ...
> > > >> [INFO] Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: Optimized stream
> > > >> class checksum mismatch (is same version of marshalled class
> present on
> > > all
> > > >> nodes?) [expected=32321, actual=26723, cls=class
> > > >> scala.collection.immutable.Vector]
> > > >> ...
> > > >> [INFO] Caused by: org.apache.ignite.binary.BinaryObjectException:
> Failed
> > > >> to read field
> > > >> [name=org$apache$nlpcraft$common$nlp$NCNlpSentenceToken$$notes]
> > > >> ...
> > > >> [INFO] Caused by: org.apache.ignite.binary.BinaryObjectException:
> Failed
> > > >> to deserialize object
> > > >> [typeName=org.apache.nlpcraft.common.nlp.NCNlpSentenceToken]
> > > >> ...
> > > >> [INFO] Jun-01|20:16:32|ERROR| System error processing query: class
> > > >> org.apache.ignite.IgniteCheckedException: Failed to deserialize
> object
> > > >>
> > >
> [typeName=org.apache.nlpcraft.server.nlp.enrichers.NCServerEnrichmentManager$Holder]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Cheers, Paul.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 3:49 AM Aaron Radzinski <
> > > aradzinski@datalingvo.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> NLPCraft-ers,
> > > >> This is the vote for release of NLPCraft v0.6.0. This release
> includes a
> > > >> number of bug fixes, improvements and brand new real-life example of
> > > >> accessing SQL databases using natural language.
> > > >>
> > > >> NOTE: we've fixed the Windows-related issue causing a last minute
> delay
> > > >> with the last 0.6.0 release attempt.
> > > >>
> > > >> Quick links:
> > > >> 1. Release location:
> > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nlpcraft/nlpcraft/
> > > >> 2. GitHub v0.6.0 tag:
> > > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-nlpcraft/tree/v0.6.0
> > > >> 3. JIRA issues closed:
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NLPCRAFT/versions/12347775
> > > >> 4. KEYS file:
> > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/nlpcraft/KEYS
> > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NLPCRAFT/versions/12347774
> >
> > > >>
> > > >> The vote is formal, see voting guidelines here:
> > > >> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> > > >> +1 - to accept Apache NLPCraft 0.6.0
> > > >> 0 - don't care either way
> > > >> -1 - DO NOT accept Apache NLPCraft 0.6.0 (explain why)
> > > >>
> > > >> See notes on how to verify release here:
> > > >> https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html
> > > >>
> > > >> The vote will be held for 72 hours and will end on June 1, 2020 at
> > > >> midnight
> > > >> MSK.
> > > >>
> > > >> Thank you!
> > > >> --
> > > >> Aaron Radzinski
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
>
Re: [CANCEL] [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft 0.6.0
Posted by Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au>.
The main thing to keep in mind is that the whole team is aware of the
status during voting and afterwards (email history).
The RC approach that others have mentioned works well with that in mind.
Apache Groovy doesn't use that approach but the vote email conventions that
we use and tagging keep it clear exactly the status of any failed and
successful votes/releases.
Cheers, Paul.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 1:09 AM Nikita Ivanov <ni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Gents - for my education, could you please explain how this would work (or
> typically works in other projects)?
>
> 1. Do we release, say, 1.0.0-rc1 on PPMC, then, when voted, rename all
> artefacts to 1.0.0 and submit to IPMC?
> 2. Release 1.0.0-rc1, then, when voted, cut another release from the same
> tag naming it 1.0.0 and submit to IPMC?
> 3. Release/vote 1.0.0-rc1, then release/vote 1.0.0 right after that?
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Nikita Ivanov
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 11:24 PM Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Guys,
> >
> > perhaps it would makes sense to start marking release candidates (RCs) to
> vote
> > on as it makes it easier to distinguish them apart. Having a few RCs
> aren't
> > that unusual as issues could be found during the review/vote process.
> However,
> > voting repeatedly on what seems like the same version x.y.z is a bit
> > confusion ;)
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Cos
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 01:32PM, Aaron Radzinski wrote:
> > > NLPCraft-ers,
> > > We need to cancel this vote as we've discovered the problem with
> pom.xml
> > > for the project that affects both this and Java Client project
> (incorrectly
> > > pulling in GPL dependencies). We'll fix this and re-release again.
> > >
> > > Thank you,
> > > --
> > > Aaron Radzinski
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 4:56 AM Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Forgot to mention. Only a minor thing but you probably want to
> delete:
> > > >
> > > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nlpcraft/nlpcraft/0.5.0/
> > > >
> > > > In general, the dist/dev area should be empty apart from when there
> are
> > > > pending votes in play.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers, Paul.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 8:52 PM Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I am +0 (I don't know whether you expect failures under Windows but
> I'm
> > > > > happy to change to +1 if that is expected or if you believe it is
> > > > something
> > > > > in my environment).
> > > > >
> > > > > I checked:
> > > > >
> > > > > - "incubating" in name
> > > > > - DISCLAIMER exists
> > > > > - LICENSE and NOTICE look good
> > > > > - no unexpected binary files
> > > > > - signatures okay
> > > > > - hashes okay
> > > > > - rat checks are okay (I'd suggest removing
> > > > > <numUnapprovedLicenses>1000000</numUnapprovedLicenses> and adding
> exclude
> > > > > for .yaml files)
> > > > > - mvn clean package verify passes on Linux under JDK11 (and doesn't
> > > > > include L/GPL files when -Prelease is given)
> > > > > - mvn verify fails under Windows JDK8 and 11 (see below)
> > > > >
> > > > > Windows Surefire Failure:
> > > > >
> > > > > [ERROR] Errors:
> > > > >> [ERROR]
> > > > >> NCEnricherNestedModelSpec.test:41->NCEnricherBaseSpec.runBatch:153
> »
> > > > >> TestFailed
> > > > >> [ERROR] Tests run: 29, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 1
> > > > >> !!! Failed 2 from 3 tests. See errors list above. !!!
> > > > >> at
> > > > >>
> > > >
>
> org.apache.nlpcraft.probe.mgrs.nlp.enrichers.model.NCEnricherNestedModelSpec.test(NCEnricherNestedModelSpec.scala:41)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > There are errors like below throughout the console logs (possibly
> > > > relevant
> > > > > or perhaps a red herring):
> > > > >
> > > > > [INFO] Caused by: java.io.IOException: Failed to deserialize object
> > > > >> [typeName=scala.collection.immutable.HashMap$SerializationProxy]
> > > > >> ...
> > > > >> [[INFO] Caused by: org.apache.ignite.IgniteCheckedException:
> Failed to
> > > > >> deserialize object with given class loader:
> > > > >> [clsLdr=sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader@5c647e05, err=Failed to
> > > > >> deserialize object [typeName=scala.collection.mutable.HashSet]]
> > > > >> ...
> > > > >> [INFO] Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: Optimized
> stream
> > > > >> class checksum mismatch (is same version of marshalled class
> present on
> > > > all
> > > > >> nodes?) [expected=32321, actual=26723, cls=class
> > > > >> scala.collection.immutable.Vector]
> > > > >> ...
> > > > >> [INFO] Caused by: org.apache.ignite.binary.BinaryObjectException:
> Failed
> > > > >> to read field
> > > > >> [name=org$apache$nlpcraft$common$nlp$NCNlpSentenceToken$$notes]
> > > > >> ...
> > > > >> [INFO] Caused by: org.apache.ignite.binary.BinaryObjectException:
> Failed
> > > > >> to deserialize object
> > > > >> [typeName=org.apache.nlpcraft.common.nlp.NCNlpSentenceToken]
> > > > >> ...
> > > > >> [INFO] Jun-01|20:16:32|ERROR| System error processing query: class
> > > > >> org.apache.ignite.IgniteCheckedException: Failed to deserialize
> object
> > > > >>
> > > >
>
> [typeName=org.apache.nlpcraft.server.nlp.enrichers.NCServerEnrichmentManager$Holder]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers, Paul.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 3:49 AM Aaron Radzinski <
> > > > aradzinski@datalingvo.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> NLPCraft-ers,
> > > > >> This is the vote for release of NLPCraft v0.6.0. This release
> includes a
> > > > >> number of bug fixes, improvements and brand new real-life example
> of
> > > > >> accessing SQL databases using natural language.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> NOTE: we've fixed the Windows-related issue causing a last minute
> delay
> > > > >> with the last 0.6.0 release attempt.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Quick links:
> > > > >> 1. Release location:
> > > > >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nlpcraft/nlpcraft/
> > > > >> 2. GitHub v0.6.0 tag:
> > > > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-nlpcraft/tree/v0.6.0
> > > > >> 3. JIRA issues closed:
> > > > >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NLPCRAFT/versions/12347775
> > > > >> 4. KEYS file:
> > > > >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/nlpcraft/KEYS
> > > > >> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NLPCRAFT/versions/12347774
> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The vote is formal, see voting guidelines here:
> > > > >> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> > > > >> +1 - to accept Apache NLPCraft 0.6.0
> > > > >> 0 - don't care either way
> > > > >> -1 - DO NOT accept Apache NLPCraft 0.6.0 (explain why)
> > > > >>
> > > > >> See notes on how to verify release here:
> > > > >> https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The vote will be held for 72 hours and will end on June 1, 2020 at
> > > > >> midnight
> > > > >> MSK.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thank you!
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> Aaron Radzinski
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
>
Re: [CANCEL] [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft 0.6.0
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
You might find this helpful [1], section "10. Roll Out"
[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BIGTOP/How+to+release
--
With regards,
Cos
On 2020-06-02 22:08, Nikita Ivanov wrote:
> Gents - for my education, could you please explain how this would work (or
> typically works in other projects)?
>
> 1. Do we release, say, 1.0.0-rc1 on PPMC, then, when voted, rename all
> artefacts to 1.0.0 and submit to IPMC?
> 2. Release 1.0.0-rc1, then, when voted, cut another release from the same
> tag naming it 1.0.0 and submit to IPMC?
> 3. Release/vote 1.0.0-rc1, then release/vote 1.0.0 right after that?
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Nikita Ivanov
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 11:24 PM Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Guys,
>>
>> perhaps it would makes sense to start marking release candidates (RCs) to
> vote
>> on as it makes it easier to distinguish them apart. Having a few RCs
> aren't
>> that unusual as issues could be found during the review/vote process.
> However,
>> voting repeatedly on what seems like the same version x.y.z is a bit
>> confusion ;)
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Cos
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 01:32PM, Aaron Radzinski wrote:
>>> NLPCraft-ers,
>>> We need to cancel this vote as we've discovered the problem with pom.xml
>>> for the project that affects both this and Java Client project
> (incorrectly
>>> pulling in GPL dependencies). We'll fix this and re-release again.
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> --
>>> Aaron Radzinski
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 4:56 AM Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Forgot to mention. Only a minor thing but you probably want to delete:
>>>>
>>>>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nlpcraft/nlpcraft/0.5.0/
>>>>
>>>> In general, the dist/dev area should be empty apart from when there
> are
>>>> pending votes in play.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers, Paul.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 8:52 PM Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I am +0 (I don't know whether you expect failures under Windows but
> I'm
>>>>> happy to change to +1 if that is expected or if you believe it is
>>>> something
>>>>> in my environment).
>>>>>
>>>>> I checked:
>>>>>
>>>>> - "incubating" in name
>>>>> - DISCLAIMER exists
>>>>> - LICENSE and NOTICE look good
>>>>> - no unexpected binary files
>>>>> - signatures okay
>>>>> - hashes okay
>>>>> - rat checks are okay (I'd suggest removing
>>>>> <numUnapprovedLicenses>1000000</numUnapprovedLicenses> and adding
> exclude
>>>>> for .yaml files)
>>>>> - mvn clean package verify passes on Linux under JDK11 (and doesn't
>>>>> include L/GPL files when -Prelease is given)
>>>>> - mvn verify fails under Windows JDK8 and 11 (see below)
>>>>>
>>>>> Windows Surefire Failure:
>>>>>
>>>>> [ERROR] Errors:
>>>>>> [ERROR]
>>>>>> NCEnricherNestedModelSpec.test:41->NCEnricherBaseSpec.runBatch:153
> »
>>>>>> TestFailed
>>>>>> [ERROR] Tests run: 29, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 1
>>>>>> !!! Failed 2 from 3 tests. See errors list above. !!!
>>>>>> at
>>>>>>
>>>>
> org.apache.nlpcraft.probe.mgrs.nlp.enrichers.model.NCEnricherNestedModelSpec.test(NCEnricherNestedModelSpec.scala:41)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> There are errors like below throughout the console logs (possibly
>>>> relevant
>>>>> or perhaps a red herring):
>>>>>
>>>>> [INFO] Caused by: java.io.IOException: Failed to deserialize object
>>>>>> [typeName=scala.collection.immutable.HashMap$SerializationProxy]
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> [[INFO] Caused by: org.apache.ignite.IgniteCheckedException:
> Failed to
>>>>>> deserialize object with given class loader:
>>>>>> [clsLdr=sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader@5c647e05, err=Failed to
>>>>>> deserialize object [typeName=scala.collection.mutable.HashSet]]
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> [INFO] Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: Optimized
> stream
>>>>>> class checksum mismatch (is same version of marshalled class
> present on
>>>> all
>>>>>> nodes?) [expected=32321, actual=26723, cls=class
>>>>>> scala.collection.immutable.Vector]
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> [INFO] Caused by: org.apache.ignite.binary.BinaryObjectException:
> Failed
>>>>>> to read field
>>>>>> [name=org$apache$nlpcraft$common$nlp$NCNlpSentenceToken$$notes]
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> [INFO] Caused by: org.apache.ignite.binary.BinaryObjectException:
> Failed
>>>>>> to deserialize object
>>>>>> [typeName=org.apache.nlpcraft.common.nlp.NCNlpSentenceToken]
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> [INFO] Jun-01|20:16:32|ERROR| System error processing query: class
>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.IgniteCheckedException: Failed to deserialize
> object
>>>>>>
>>>>
> [typeName=org.apache.nlpcraft.server.nlp.enrichers.NCServerEnrichmentManager$Holder]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers, Paul.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 3:49 AM Aaron Radzinski <
>>>> aradzinski@datalingvo.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> NLPCraft-ers,
>>>>>> This is the vote for release of NLPCraft v0.6.0. This release
> includes a
>>>>>> number of bug fixes, improvements and brand new real-life example
> of
>>>>>> accessing SQL databases using natural language.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> NOTE: we've fixed the Windows-related issue causing a last minute
> delay
>>>>>> with the last 0.6.0 release attempt.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Quick links:
>>>>>> 1. Release location:
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nlpcraft/nlpcraft/
>>>>>> 2. GitHub v0.6.0 tag:
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-nlpcraft/tree/v0.6.0
>>>>>> 3. JIRA issues closed:
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NLPCRAFT/versions/12347775
>>>>>> 4. KEYS file:
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/nlpcraft/KEYS
>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NLPCRAFT/versions/12347774
>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The vote is formal, see voting guidelines here:
>>>>>> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>>>>>> +1 - to accept Apache NLPCraft 0.6.0
>>>>>> 0 - don't care either way
>>>>>> -1 - DO NOT accept Apache NLPCraft 0.6.0 (explain why)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> See notes on how to verify release here:
>>>>>> https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The vote will be held for 72 hours and will end on June 1, 2020 at
>>>>>> midnight
>>>>>> MSK.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you!
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Aaron Radzinski
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>
Re: [CANCEL] [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft 0.6.0
Posted by Nikita Ivanov <ni...@gmail.com>.
Gents - for my education, could you please explain how this would work (or
typically works in other projects)?
1. Do we release, say, 1.0.0-rc1 on PPMC, then, when voted, rename all
artefacts to 1.0.0 and submit to IPMC?
2. Release 1.0.0-rc1, then, when voted, cut another release from the same
tag naming it 1.0.0 and submit to IPMC?
3. Release/vote 1.0.0-rc1, then release/vote 1.0.0 right after that?
Thanks,
--
Nikita Ivanov
On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 11:24 PM Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Guys,
>
> perhaps it would makes sense to start marking release candidates (RCs) to
vote
> on as it makes it easier to distinguish them apart. Having a few RCs
aren't
> that unusual as issues could be found during the review/vote process.
However,
> voting repeatedly on what seems like the same version x.y.z is a bit
> confusion ;)
>
> What do you think?
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Cos
>
> On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 01:32PM, Aaron Radzinski wrote:
> > NLPCraft-ers,
> > We need to cancel this vote as we've discovered the problem with pom.xml
> > for the project that affects both this and Java Client project
(incorrectly
> > pulling in GPL dependencies). We'll fix this and re-release again.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > --
> > Aaron Radzinski
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 4:56 AM Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au> wrote:
> >
> > > Forgot to mention. Only a minor thing but you probably want to delete:
> > >
> > >
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nlpcraft/nlpcraft/0.5.0/
> > >
> > > In general, the dist/dev area should be empty apart from when there
are
> > > pending votes in play.
> > >
> > > Cheers, Paul.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 8:52 PM Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I am +0 (I don't know whether you expect failures under Windows but
I'm
> > > > happy to change to +1 if that is expected or if you believe it is
> > > something
> > > > in my environment).
> > > >
> > > > I checked:
> > > >
> > > > - "incubating" in name
> > > > - DISCLAIMER exists
> > > > - LICENSE and NOTICE look good
> > > > - no unexpected binary files
> > > > - signatures okay
> > > > - hashes okay
> > > > - rat checks are okay (I'd suggest removing
> > > > <numUnapprovedLicenses>1000000</numUnapprovedLicenses> and adding
exclude
> > > > for .yaml files)
> > > > - mvn clean package verify passes on Linux under JDK11 (and doesn't
> > > > include L/GPL files when -Prelease is given)
> > > > - mvn verify fails under Windows JDK8 and 11 (see below)
> > > >
> > > > Windows Surefire Failure:
> > > >
> > > > [ERROR] Errors:
> > > >> [ERROR]
> > > >> NCEnricherNestedModelSpec.test:41->NCEnricherBaseSpec.runBatch:153
»
> > > >> TestFailed
> > > >> [ERROR] Tests run: 29, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 1
> > > >> !!! Failed 2 from 3 tests. See errors list above. !!!
> > > >> at
> > > >>
> > >
org.apache.nlpcraft.probe.mgrs.nlp.enrichers.model.NCEnricherNestedModelSpec.test(NCEnricherNestedModelSpec.scala:41)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > There are errors like below throughout the console logs (possibly
> > > relevant
> > > > or perhaps a red herring):
> > > >
> > > > [INFO] Caused by: java.io.IOException: Failed to deserialize object
> > > >> [typeName=scala.collection.immutable.HashMap$SerializationProxy]
> > > >> ...
> > > >> [[INFO] Caused by: org.apache.ignite.IgniteCheckedException:
Failed to
> > > >> deserialize object with given class loader:
> > > >> [clsLdr=sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader@5c647e05, err=Failed to
> > > >> deserialize object [typeName=scala.collection.mutable.HashSet]]
> > > >> ...
> > > >> [INFO] Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: Optimized
stream
> > > >> class checksum mismatch (is same version of marshalled class
present on
> > > all
> > > >> nodes?) [expected=32321, actual=26723, cls=class
> > > >> scala.collection.immutable.Vector]
> > > >> ...
> > > >> [INFO] Caused by: org.apache.ignite.binary.BinaryObjectException:
Failed
> > > >> to read field
> > > >> [name=org$apache$nlpcraft$common$nlp$NCNlpSentenceToken$$notes]
> > > >> ...
> > > >> [INFO] Caused by: org.apache.ignite.binary.BinaryObjectException:
Failed
> > > >> to deserialize object
> > > >> [typeName=org.apache.nlpcraft.common.nlp.NCNlpSentenceToken]
> > > >> ...
> > > >> [INFO] Jun-01|20:16:32|ERROR| System error processing query: class
> > > >> org.apache.ignite.IgniteCheckedException: Failed to deserialize
object
> > > >>
> > >
[typeName=org.apache.nlpcraft.server.nlp.enrichers.NCServerEnrichmentManager$Holder]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Cheers, Paul.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 3:49 AM Aaron Radzinski <
> > > aradzinski@datalingvo.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> NLPCraft-ers,
> > > >> This is the vote for release of NLPCraft v0.6.0. This release
includes a
> > > >> number of bug fixes, improvements and brand new real-life example
of
> > > >> accessing SQL databases using natural language.
> > > >>
> > > >> NOTE: we've fixed the Windows-related issue causing a last minute
delay
> > > >> with the last 0.6.0 release attempt.
> > > >>
> > > >> Quick links:
> > > >> 1. Release location:
> > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nlpcraft/nlpcraft/
> > > >> 2. GitHub v0.6.0 tag:
> > > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-nlpcraft/tree/v0.6.0
> > > >> 3. JIRA issues closed:
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NLPCRAFT/versions/12347775
> > > >> 4. KEYS file:
> > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/nlpcraft/KEYS
> > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NLPCRAFT/versions/12347774
>
> > > >>
> > > >> The vote is formal, see voting guidelines here:
> > > >> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> > > >> +1 - to accept Apache NLPCraft 0.6.0
> > > >> 0 - don't care either way
> > > >> -1 - DO NOT accept Apache NLPCraft 0.6.0 (explain why)
> > > >>
> > > >> See notes on how to verify release here:
> > > >> https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html
> > > >>
> > > >> The vote will be held for 72 hours and will end on June 1, 2020 at
> > > >> midnight
> > > >> MSK.
> > > >>
> > > >> Thank you!
> > > >> --
> > > >> Aaron Radzinski
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
Re: [CANCEL] [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft 0.6.0
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
Guys,
perhaps it would makes sense to start marking release candidates (RCs) to vote
on as it makes it easier to distinguish them apart. Having a few RCs aren't
that unusual as issues could be found during the review/vote process. However,
voting repeatedly on what seems like the same version x.y.z is a bit
confusion ;)
What do you think?
--
Cheers,
Cos
On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 01:32PM, Aaron Radzinski wrote:
> NLPCraft-ers,
> We need to cancel this vote as we've discovered the problem with pom.xml
> for the project that affects both this and Java Client project (incorrectly
> pulling in GPL dependencies). We'll fix this and re-release again.
>
> Thank you,
> --
> Aaron Radzinski
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 4:56 AM Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au> wrote:
>
> > Forgot to mention. Only a minor thing but you probably want to delete:
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nlpcraft/nlpcraft/0.5.0/
> >
> > In general, the dist/dev area should be empty apart from when there are
> > pending votes in play.
> >
> > Cheers, Paul.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 8:52 PM Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au> wrote:
> >
> > > I am +0 (I don't know whether you expect failures under Windows but I'm
> > > happy to change to +1 if that is expected or if you believe it is
> > something
> > > in my environment).
> > >
> > > I checked:
> > >
> > > - "incubating" in name
> > > - DISCLAIMER exists
> > > - LICENSE and NOTICE look good
> > > - no unexpected binary files
> > > - signatures okay
> > > - hashes okay
> > > - rat checks are okay (I'd suggest removing
> > > <numUnapprovedLicenses>1000000</numUnapprovedLicenses> and adding exclude
> > > for .yaml files)
> > > - mvn clean package verify passes on Linux under JDK11 (and doesn't
> > > include L/GPL files when -Prelease is given)
> > > - mvn verify fails under Windows JDK8 and 11 (see below)
> > >
> > > Windows Surefire Failure:
> > >
> > > [ERROR] Errors:
> > >> [ERROR]
> > >> NCEnricherNestedModelSpec.test:41->NCEnricherBaseSpec.runBatch:153 »
> > >> TestFailed
> > >> [ERROR] Tests run: 29, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 1
> > >> !!! Failed 2 from 3 tests. See errors list above. !!!
> > >> at
> > >>
> > org.apache.nlpcraft.probe.mgrs.nlp.enrichers.model.NCEnricherNestedModelSpec.test(NCEnricherNestedModelSpec.scala:41)
> > >
> > >
> > > There are errors like below throughout the console logs (possibly
> > relevant
> > > or perhaps a red herring):
> > >
> > > [INFO] Caused by: java.io.IOException: Failed to deserialize object
> > >> [typeName=scala.collection.immutable.HashMap$SerializationProxy]
> > >> ...
> > >> [[INFO] Caused by: org.apache.ignite.IgniteCheckedException: Failed to
> > >> deserialize object with given class loader:
> > >> [clsLdr=sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader@5c647e05, err=Failed to
> > >> deserialize object [typeName=scala.collection.mutable.HashSet]]
> > >> ...
> > >> [INFO] Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: Optimized stream
> > >> class checksum mismatch (is same version of marshalled class present on
> > all
> > >> nodes?) [expected=32321, actual=26723, cls=class
> > >> scala.collection.immutable.Vector]
> > >> ...
> > >> [INFO] Caused by: org.apache.ignite.binary.BinaryObjectException: Failed
> > >> to read field
> > >> [name=org$apache$nlpcraft$common$nlp$NCNlpSentenceToken$$notes]
> > >> ...
> > >> [INFO] Caused by: org.apache.ignite.binary.BinaryObjectException: Failed
> > >> to deserialize object
> > >> [typeName=org.apache.nlpcraft.common.nlp.NCNlpSentenceToken]
> > >> ...
> > >> [INFO] Jun-01|20:16:32|ERROR| System error processing query: class
> > >> org.apache.ignite.IgniteCheckedException: Failed to deserialize object
> > >>
> > [typeName=org.apache.nlpcraft.server.nlp.enrichers.NCServerEnrichmentManager$Holder]
> > >
> > >
> > > Cheers, Paul.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 3:49 AM Aaron Radzinski <
> > aradzinski@datalingvo.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> NLPCraft-ers,
> > >> This is the vote for release of NLPCraft v0.6.0. This release includes a
> > >> number of bug fixes, improvements and brand new real-life example of
> > >> accessing SQL databases using natural language.
> > >>
> > >> NOTE: we've fixed the Windows-related issue causing a last minute delay
> > >> with the last 0.6.0 release attempt.
> > >>
> > >> Quick links:
> > >> 1. Release location:
> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nlpcraft/nlpcraft/
> > >> 2. GitHub v0.6.0 tag:
> > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-nlpcraft/tree/v0.6.0
> > >> 3. JIRA issues closed:
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NLPCRAFT/versions/12347775
> > >> 4. KEYS file:
> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/nlpcraft/KEYS
> > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NLPCRAFT/versions/12347774>
> > >>
> > >> The vote is formal, see voting guidelines here:
> > >> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> > >> +1 - to accept Apache NLPCraft 0.6.0
> > >> 0 - don't care either way
> > >> -1 - DO NOT accept Apache NLPCraft 0.6.0 (explain why)
> > >>
> > >> See notes on how to verify release here:
> > >> https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html
> > >>
> > >> The vote will be held for 72 hours and will end on June 1, 2020 at
> > >> midnight
> > >> MSK.
> > >>
> > >> Thank you!
> > >> --
> > >> Aaron Radzinski
> > >>
> > >
> >