Re: [Bug 6939] spamc[7611]: connect(AF_UNIX) to spamd failed: Connection refused

[Karsten Bräckelmann <gu...@rudersport.de>]

On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 03:14 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> > --- Comment #67 from Karsten Bräckelmann <gu...@rudersport.de> ---
> > > I added the character class to clean up the output and just display 
> > > spamc.
> >
> > Here, you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.
> >
> > > You are on dairy.
> >
> > And here *I* have no idea what you are talking about. But hey, not 
> > everyone is a native English speaker.
> 
> please continue using bugzilla as a chat forum

As you noticed, Benny, I am. Nice chat forum, though lousy threading.
But it at least gets the job done of giving Kip Warner exactly as much
rope as he needs to hang himself.

While we're at the topic:

Yes, Benny, please do continue using bugzilla as a chat forum and a
place to ask questions. You know, the mailing lists are only for mere
users, or scary devs. So where else could one ask, whether a particular
3 years old bug has been fixed...


I would really be interested in the meaning of "being on a dairy",
though. Should I feel insulted? Much?


And since we're already having a nice chat -- you quoted the bug mail
with my email address. I seem to remember a slightly heated thread on
the users list the other day, started by you kill-filing another
subscriber, who violated your signature "warning" and quoted your email
address on-list...

That warning applies only to others, not you, right?

Pick your jokes wisely. And bugzillas, for that matter. ;)


-- 
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}

Re: [Bug 6939] spamc[7611]: connect(AF_UNIX) to spamd failed: Connection refused

[Karsten Bräckelmann <gu...@rudersport.de>]

On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 05:15 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> > And since we're already having a nice chat -- you quoted the bug mail
> > with my email address. I seem to remember a slightly heated thread on
> > the users list the other day, started by you kill-filing another
> > subscriber, who violated your signature "warning" and quoted your 
> > email address on-list...
> 
> as i noted, it does not matter what spamtrap thay want to be in

Would that mean you're now in mine, if I where you?

> > That warning applies only to others, not you, right?
> 
> using @ in body content is not that matter,

Quoting your address is a matter. Your sig says so.

> but what is after @ can maybe copyrighted ?, feel free to pay if one wants

Hmm, let me see...

So even *if* someone manages to copyright the right hand part, and also
manages to successfully prevent any un-authorized mentioning -- it
basically translates to "no mail from third-parties, ever".

  This content is not available in your country, because ACME
  has not granted use of this copyrighted string.

Or visiting your website, or...


-- 
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}

Re: [Bug 6939] spamc[7611]: connect(AF_UNIX) to spamd failed: Connection refused

[Benny Pedersen <me...@junc.eu>]

Karsten Bräckelmann skrev den 2013-05-31 03:44:

> As you noticed, Benny, I am. Nice chat forum, though lousy threading.
> But it at least gets the job done of giving Kip Warner exactly as 
> much
> rope as he needs to hang himself.

+1

> While we're at the topic:
>
> Yes, Benny, please do continue using bugzilla as a chat forum and a
> place to ask questions. You know, the mailing lists are only for mere
> users, or scary devs. So where else could one ask, whether a 
> particular
> 3 years old bug has been fixed...

+2

have you seen spamassassin 3.4.0 tarball somewhere ?

and i note that running the spam / ham corpus here is not yet using a 
stable sa 3.4.0 either, will it be ready this yaer to to my new linode ? 
:)

> I would really be interested in the meaning of "being on a dairy",
> though. Should I feel insulted? Much?

for me its does not matter, just that you help me have more fun, ha :)

> And since we're already having a nice chat -- you quoted the bug mail
> with my email address. I seem to remember a slightly heated thread on
> the users list the other day, started by you kill-filing another
> subscriber, who violated your signature "warning" and quoted your 
> email
> address on-list...

as i noted, it does not matter what spamtrap thay want to be in

> That warning applies only to others, not you, right?

using @ in body content is not that matter, but what is after @ can 
maybe copyrighted ?, feel free to pay if one wants

> Pick your jokes wisely. And bugzillas, for that matter. ;)

i am not a developper yet, so it might not help to cry over me :)

-- 
senders that put my email into body content will deliver it to my own 
trashcan, so if you like to get reply, dont do it