You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flex.apache.org by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> on 2016/09/08 07:33:44 UTC
Re: [Non-DoD Source] Official naming for the "standard" Flex SDK
I think falcon and falconjx can be blurred.
I thought we agreed on "FlexJS Compiler" (falcon/falconjx), "FlexJS Typedefs” (typedefs) and "FlexJS Framework" (asjs)
On Sep 8, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de> wrote:
> I see it the same way ... Flex and FlexJS is good for me. The only thing I was having problems with, was the naming of the inside parts of FlexJS: falcon, falconjx, asjs, typedefs ... here I would like some sort of consolidation, but not really for Flex/FlexJS.
>
>
> Chris
>
> ________________________________
> Von: OK <po...@olafkrueger.net>
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. September 2016 23:58:19
> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Official naming for the "standard" Flex SDK
>
> Thanks for your thoughts Marc and Alex.
>
>> I am hopeful that the "JS" in FlexJS will be enough of a differentiator.
> FlexJS is definately clear and unambiguously.
>
> Maybe I was on the wrong track and Apache Flex/Apache FlexJS is sufficient.
>
> Thanks,
> Olaf
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/Official-naming-for-the-standard-Flex-SDK-tp54897p54938.html
> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
AW: [Non-DoD Source] Official naming for the "standard" Flex SDK
Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
+1 :-) from me :-)
Chris
________________________________
Von: Josh Tynjala <jo...@gmail.com>
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. September 2016 16:40:39
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [Non-DoD Source] Official naming for the "standard" Flex SDK
You have my agreement too!
- Josh
On Sep 8, 2016 4:15 AM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, if no one has objections, we can officially agree on it now… ;-)
>
> On Sep 8, 2016, at 11:15 AM, Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Harbs,
> >
> >
> > well that's what I'm using when talking about FlexJS, but I couldn't
> remember us actually agreeing on that ;-)
> >
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > ________________________________
> > Von: Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>
> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. September 2016 09:33:44
> > An: dev@flex.apache.org
> > Betreff: Re: [Non-DoD Source] Official naming for the "standard" Flex SDK
> >
> > I think falcon and falconjx can be blurred.
> >
> > I thought we agreed on "FlexJS Compiler" (falcon/falconjx), "FlexJS
> Typedefs” (typedefs) and "FlexJS Framework" (asjs)
> >
> > On Sep 8, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I see it the same way ... Flex and FlexJS is good for me. The only
> thing I was having problems with, was the naming of the inside parts of
> FlexJS: falcon, falconjx, asjs, typedefs ... here I would like some sort of
> consolidation, but not really for Flex/FlexJS.
> >>
> >>
> >> Chris
> >>
> >> ________________________________
> >> Von: OK <po...@olafkrueger.net>
> >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. September 2016 23:58:19
> >> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> >> Betreff: Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Official naming for the "standard"
> Flex SDK
> >>
> >> Thanks for your thoughts Marc and Alex.
> >>
> >>> I am hopeful that the "JS" in FlexJS will be enough of a
> differentiator.
> >> FlexJS is definately clear and unambiguously.
> >>
> >> Maybe I was on the wrong track and Apache Flex/Apache FlexJS is
> sufficient.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Olaf
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context: http://apache-flex-
> development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/Official-naming-for-the-
> standard-Flex-SDK-tp54897p54938.html
> >> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
> >
>
>
Re: [Non-DoD Source] Official naming for the "standard" Flex SDK
Posted by Josh Tynjala <jo...@gmail.com>.
You have my agreement too!
- Josh
On Sep 8, 2016 4:15 AM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, if no one has objections, we can officially agree on it now… ;-)
>
> On Sep 8, 2016, at 11:15 AM, Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Harbs,
> >
> >
> > well that's what I'm using when talking about FlexJS, but I couldn't
> remember us actually agreeing on that ;-)
> >
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > ________________________________
> > Von: Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>
> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. September 2016 09:33:44
> > An: dev@flex.apache.org
> > Betreff: Re: [Non-DoD Source] Official naming for the "standard" Flex SDK
> >
> > I think falcon and falconjx can be blurred.
> >
> > I thought we agreed on "FlexJS Compiler" (falcon/falconjx), "FlexJS
> Typedefs” (typedefs) and "FlexJS Framework" (asjs)
> >
> > On Sep 8, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I see it the same way ... Flex and FlexJS is good for me. The only
> thing I was having problems with, was the naming of the inside parts of
> FlexJS: falcon, falconjx, asjs, typedefs ... here I would like some sort of
> consolidation, but not really for Flex/FlexJS.
> >>
> >>
> >> Chris
> >>
> >> ________________________________
> >> Von: OK <po...@olafkrueger.net>
> >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. September 2016 23:58:19
> >> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> >> Betreff: Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Official naming for the "standard"
> Flex SDK
> >>
> >> Thanks for your thoughts Marc and Alex.
> >>
> >>> I am hopeful that the "JS" in FlexJS will be enough of a
> differentiator.
> >> FlexJS is definately clear and unambiguously.
> >>
> >> Maybe I was on the wrong track and Apache Flex/Apache FlexJS is
> sufficient.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Olaf
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context: http://apache-flex-
> development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/Official-naming-for-the-
> standard-Flex-SDK-tp54897p54938.html
> >> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
> >
>
>
Re: [Non-DoD Source] Official naming for the "standard" Flex SDK
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
Well, if no one has objections, we can officially agree on it now… ;-)
On Sep 8, 2016, at 11:15 AM, Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de> wrote:
> Hi Harbs,
>
>
> well that's what I'm using when talking about FlexJS, but I couldn't remember us actually agreeing on that ;-)
>
>
> Chris
>
> ________________________________
> Von: Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. September 2016 09:33:44
> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [Non-DoD Source] Official naming for the "standard" Flex SDK
>
> I think falcon and falconjx can be blurred.
>
> I thought we agreed on "FlexJS Compiler" (falcon/falconjx), "FlexJS Typedefs” (typedefs) and "FlexJS Framework" (asjs)
>
> On Sep 8, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de> wrote:
>
>> I see it the same way ... Flex and FlexJS is good for me. The only thing I was having problems with, was the naming of the inside parts of FlexJS: falcon, falconjx, asjs, typedefs ... here I would like some sort of consolidation, but not really for Flex/FlexJS.
>>
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> ________________________________
>> Von: OK <po...@olafkrueger.net>
>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. September 2016 23:58:19
>> An: dev@flex.apache.org
>> Betreff: Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Official naming for the "standard" Flex SDK
>>
>> Thanks for your thoughts Marc and Alex.
>>
>>> I am hopeful that the "JS" in FlexJS will be enough of a differentiator.
>> FlexJS is definately clear and unambiguously.
>>
>> Maybe I was on the wrong track and Apache Flex/Apache FlexJS is sufficient.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Olaf
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/Official-naming-for-the-standard-Flex-SDK-tp54897p54938.html
>> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
AW: [Non-DoD Source] Official naming for the "standard" Flex SDK
Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
Hi Harbs,
well that's what I'm using when talking about FlexJS, but I couldn't remember us actually agreeing on that ;-)
Chris
________________________________
Von: Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. September 2016 09:33:44
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [Non-DoD Source] Official naming for the "standard" Flex SDK
I think falcon and falconjx can be blurred.
I thought we agreed on "FlexJS Compiler" (falcon/falconjx), "FlexJS Typedefs” (typedefs) and "FlexJS Framework" (asjs)
On Sep 8, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de> wrote:
> I see it the same way ... Flex and FlexJS is good for me. The only thing I was having problems with, was the naming of the inside parts of FlexJS: falcon, falconjx, asjs, typedefs ... here I would like some sort of consolidation, but not really for Flex/FlexJS.
>
>
> Chris
>
> ________________________________
> Von: OK <po...@olafkrueger.net>
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. September 2016 23:58:19
> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Official naming for the "standard" Flex SDK
>
> Thanks for your thoughts Marc and Alex.
>
>> I am hopeful that the "JS" in FlexJS will be enough of a differentiator.
> FlexJS is definately clear and unambiguously.
>
> Maybe I was on the wrong track and Apache Flex/Apache FlexJS is sufficient.
>
> Thanks,
> Olaf
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/Official-naming-for-the-standard-Flex-SDK-tp54897p54938.html
> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.