You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-user@lucene.apache.org by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> on 2013/05/19 18:02:18 UTC
solr.xml or its successor in the wiki
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ConfiguringSolr
does not point to any information on solr.xml.
Given https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4791, I'm a bit
confused, and I need to set up a sharedLib directory for 4.3.0.
I would do some writing or linking if I had some raw material ...
Re: solr.xml or its successor in the wiki
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
I suppose you saw my JIRA suggesting that solr.xml should might have
the same repetoire of 'lib' elements as solrconfig.xml, instead of
just a single 'str'.
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Erick Erickson
<er...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What's supposed to happen (not guaranteeing it is completely correct,
> mind you) is that the presence of a <cores> tag defines which checks
> are performed. Errors are thrown on old-style constructs when no
> <cores> tag is present and vice-versa.
>
> Best
> Erick
>
>
> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> One point of confusion: Is the compatibility code I hit trying to
>> prohibit the 'str' form when it sees old-fangled cores? Or when the
>> current running version pre-5.0? I hope it's the former.
>>
>> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Shawn Heisey <so...@elyograg.org> wrote:
>>> On 5/19/2013 4:38 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>>> Shawn, thanks. need any more jiras on this?
>>>
>>> I don't think so, but if you grab the 4.3 branch or branch_4x and find
>>> any bugs, let us know.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Shawn
>>>
Re: solr.xml or its successor in the wiki
Posted by Erick Erickson <er...@gmail.com>.
What's supposed to happen (not guaranteeing it is completely correct,
mind you) is that the presence of a <cores> tag defines which checks
are performed. Errors are thrown on old-style constructs when no
<cores> tag is present and vice-versa.
Best
Erick
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> One point of confusion: Is the compatibility code I hit trying to
> prohibit the 'str' form when it sees old-fangled cores? Or when the
> current running version pre-5.0? I hope it's the former.
>
> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Shawn Heisey <so...@elyograg.org> wrote:
>> On 5/19/2013 4:38 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>> Shawn, thanks. need any more jiras on this?
>>
>> I don't think so, but if you grab the 4.3 branch or branch_4x and find
>> any bugs, let us know.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Shawn
>>
Re: solr.xml or its successor in the wiki
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
One point of confusion: Is the compatibility code I hit trying to
prohibit the 'str' form when it sees old-fangled cores? Or when the
current running version pre-5.0? I hope it's the former.
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Shawn Heisey <so...@elyograg.org> wrote:
> On 5/19/2013 4:38 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>> Shawn, thanks. need any more jiras on this?
>
> I don't think so, but if you grab the 4.3 branch or branch_4x and find
> any bugs, let us know.
>
> Thanks,
> Shawn
>
Re: solr.xml or its successor in the wiki
Posted by Shawn Heisey <so...@elyograg.org>.
On 5/19/2013 4:38 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Shawn, thanks. need any more jiras on this?
I don't think so, but if you grab the 4.3 branch or branch_4x and find
any bugs, let us know.
Thanks,
Shawn
Re: solr.xml or its successor in the wiki
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
Shawn, thanks. need any more jiras on this?
On May 19, 2013, at 6:37 PM, Shawn Heisey <so...@elyograg.org> wrote:
> On 5/19/2013 11:27 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>> Starting with the shipped solr.xml, I added a new-style <str> child to
>> configure a shared lib, and i was rewarded with:
>>
>> Caused by: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Should not have found
>> solr/str[@name='sharedLib'] solr.xml may be a mix of old and new style
>> formats.
>> at org.apache.solr.core.ConfigSolrXml.failIfFound(ConfigSolrXml.java:169)
>> at org.apache.solr.core.ConfigSolrXml.init(ConfigSolrXml.java:150)
>> at org.apache.solr.core.ConfigSolrXml.<init>(ConfigSolrXml.java:94)
>> at org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer.load(CoreContainer.java:387)
>> ... 42 more
>
> There are serious problems with the new solr.xml format in 4.3. Due to
> major changes in the code between 4.3 and 4.4, the problems will not be
> fixed in 4.3.1. You'll need to wait for 4.4 before attempting to use
> it. The new format will be used in the example in 4.4.
>
> I have updated the ConfiguringSolr page with some additional info, and
> reorganized it. I believe the "4.3 and beyond" page should be changed
> to "4.4 and beyond."
>
> The sharedLib attribute is broken in 4.3.0, fixed in 4.3.1 with
> SOLR-4791, which should be out very soon. A workaround is to put your
> jars in ${solr.solr.home}/lib which does not require configuration.
>
> After 4.3.1 comes out (or if you a use dev version), if you want to use
> sharedLib in the old-style solr.xml file, it will not be a str tag, it
> is an attribute on the solr tag. The sharedLib values are relative to
> solr.solr.home:
>
> <solr persistent="true" sharedLib="libextra">
> <cores adminPath="/admin/cores">
>
> Thanks,
> Shawn
>
Re: solr.xml or its successor in the wiki
Posted by Shawn Heisey <so...@elyograg.org>.
On 5/19/2013 11:27 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Starting with the shipped solr.xml, I added a new-style <str> child to
> configure a shared lib, and i was rewarded with:
>
> Caused by: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Should not have found
> solr/str[@name='sharedLib'] solr.xml may be a mix of old and new style
> formats.
> at org.apache.solr.core.ConfigSolrXml.failIfFound(ConfigSolrXml.java:169)
> at org.apache.solr.core.ConfigSolrXml.init(ConfigSolrXml.java:150)
> at org.apache.solr.core.ConfigSolrXml.<init>(ConfigSolrXml.java:94)
> at org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer.load(CoreContainer.java:387)
> ... 42 more
There are serious problems with the new solr.xml format in 4.3. Due to
major changes in the code between 4.3 and 4.4, the problems will not be
fixed in 4.3.1. You'll need to wait for 4.4 before attempting to use
it. The new format will be used in the example in 4.4.
I have updated the ConfiguringSolr page with some additional info, and
reorganized it. I believe the "4.3 and beyond" page should be changed
to "4.4 and beyond."
The sharedLib attribute is broken in 4.3.0, fixed in 4.3.1 with
SOLR-4791, which should be out very soon. A workaround is to put your
jars in ${solr.solr.home}/lib which does not require configuration.
After 4.3.1 comes out (or if you a use dev version), if you want to use
sharedLib in the old-style solr.xml file, it will not be a str tag, it
is an attribute on the solr tag. The sharedLib values are relative to
solr.solr.home:
<solr persistent="true" sharedLib="libextra">
<cores adminPath="/admin/cores">
Thanks,
Shawn
Re: solr.xml or its successor in the wiki
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
Starting with the shipped solr.xml, I added a new-style <str> child to
configure a shared lib, and i was rewarded with:
Caused by: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Should not have found
solr/str[@name='sharedLib'] solr.xml may be a mix of old and new style
formats.
at org.apache.solr.core.ConfigSolrXml.failIfFound(ConfigSolrXml.java:169)
at org.apache.solr.core.ConfigSolrXml.init(ConfigSolrXml.java:150)
at org.apache.solr.core.ConfigSolrXml.<init>(ConfigSolrXml.java:94)
at org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer.load(CoreContainer.java:387)
... 42 more
Is this a bug? I seem to now be caught on a fork between 4791 and this.
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Benson Margulies
<bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> OK, I found the successor.
>
> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Benson Margulies
> <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I found http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solr.xml%204.3%20and%20beyond, but
>> it doesn't mention the successor to sharedLib.
>>
>> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Benson Margulies
>> <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ConfiguringSolr
>>>
>>> does not point to any information on solr.xml.
>>>
>>> Given https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4791, I'm a bit
>>> confused, and I need to set up a sharedLib directory for 4.3.0.
>>>
>>> I would do some writing or linking if I had some raw material ...
Re: solr.xml or its successor in the wiki
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
OK, I found the successor.
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Benson Margulies
<bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I found http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solr.xml%204.3%20and%20beyond, but
> it doesn't mention the successor to sharedLib.
>
> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Benson Margulies
> <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ConfiguringSolr
>>
>> does not point to any information on solr.xml.
>>
>> Given https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4791, I'm a bit
>> confused, and I need to set up a sharedLib directory for 4.3.0.
>>
>> I would do some writing or linking if I had some raw material ...
Re: solr.xml or its successor in the wiki
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
I found http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solr.xml%204.3%20and%20beyond, but
it doesn't mention the successor to sharedLib.
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Benson Margulies
<bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ConfiguringSolr
>
> does not point to any information on solr.xml.
>
> Given https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4791, I'm a bit
> confused, and I need to set up a sharedLib directory for 4.3.0.
>
> I would do some writing or linking if I had some raw material ...