You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by Christoph Goller <go...@detego-software.de> on 2004/10/18 18:35:15 UTC
Propose Bernhard as committer
I would like to propose Bernhard as Lucene committer.
He has contributed a number of valuable and high quality patches
and I am simply tired of checking and committing all his work :-)
Christoph
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: Propose Bernhard as committer
Posted by Daniel Naber <da...@t-online.de>.
On Monday 18 October 2004 18:35, Christoph Goller wrote:
> I would like to propose Bernhard as Lucene committer.
+1
--
http://www.danielnaber.de
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: Propose Bernhard as committer
Posted by Doug Cutting <cu...@apache.org>.
+1
Christoph Goller wrote:
> I would like to propose Bernhard as Lucene committer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: Propose Bernhard as committer
Posted by Erik Hatcher <er...@ehatchersolutions.com>.
+1
On Oct 18, 2004, at 12:35 PM, Christoph Goller wrote:
> I would like to propose Bernhard as Lucene committer.
>
> He has contributed a number of valuable and high quality patches
> and I am simply tired of checking and committing all his work :-)
>
> Christoph
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: Propose Bernhard as committer
Posted by Terry Steichen <te...@net-frame.com>.
+1. because he's done excellent work, and because I feel sorry for Christoph ;-)
----- Original Message -----
From: Christoph Goller
To: Lucene Developers List
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 12:35 PM
Subject: Propose Bernhard as committer
I would like to propose Bernhard as Lucene committer.
He has contributed a number of valuable and high quality patches
and I am simply tired of checking and committing all his work :-)
Christoph
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: Two formal questions
Posted by Erik Hatcher <er...@ehatchersolutions.com>.
On Oct 23, 2004, at 10:24 AM, Christoph Goller wrote:
> I have no idea. Does not seem related to queryparser since the
> resulting
> query looks like it should, doesn't it? Could you please try with the
> 1.4
> branch. Anyway, the 1.4 branch and the CVS Head should behave identical
> except for deprecated warnings and maybe fuzzyQueries.
Just so I'm testing the right thing, you mean the lucene_1_4_2_dev
branch? Or which one?
Erik
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: Two formal questions
Posted by Erik Hatcher <er...@ehatchersolutions.com>.
On Oct 23, 2004, at 10:24 AM, Christoph Goller wrote:
> Erik Hatcher schrieb:
>> What am I missing? Query.toString looks fine.
>> Something seems awry, but it could easily be me. Or it could be that
>> I'm using CVS HEAD and not the 1.4 branch? Thought I'd report it and
>> see what you thought.
>
> I have no idea. Does not seem related to queryparser since the
> resulting
> query looks like it should, doesn't it? Could you please try with the
> 1.4
> branch. Anyway, the 1.4 branch and the CVS Head should behave identical
> except for deprecated warnings and maybe fuzzyQueries.
I checked out the lucene_1_4_2_dev branch, and my tests passed fine.
I'll do some research next week into why it doesn't work with HEAD.
Erik
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: Two formal questions
Posted by Christoph Goller <go...@detego-software.de>.
Erik Hatcher schrieb:
> On Oct 21, 2004, at 1:41 PM, Christoph Goller wrote:
>
>> Furthermore concerning Lucene 1.4.3:
>> Erik, before making the new release, I would feel better if
>> you could check whether your query-parser works with the current
>> branch 1.4.3.
>
>
> The added back methods all are working fine in my tests (using CVS
> HEAD). Thanks!
>
> However, one oddity now comes about in this test case, from Lucene in
> Action:
>
> public void testGrouping() throws Exception {
> Query query = QueryParser.parse(
> "(agile OR extreme) AND methodology",
> "subject",
> analyzer);
> Hits hits = searcher.search(query);
>
> System.out.println("hits.length() = " + hits.length());
> System.out.println("query = " + query);
>
> assertHitsIncludeTitle(hits, "Extreme Programming Explained");
> assertHitsIncludeTitle(hits, "The Pragmatic Programmer");
> }
>
> Here's the output:
>
> hits.length() = 1
> query = +(subject:agile subject:extreme) +subject:methodology
>
> Process finished with exit code -1
>
> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: title 'The Pragmatic Programmer'
> not found
> at lia.common.LiaTestCase.assertHitsIncludeTitle(LiaTestCase.java:54)
> at lia.searching.QueryParserTest.testGrouping(QueryParserTest.java:57)
>
> This test previously passed. If I remove the word "extreme" from the
> query, it passes. "The Pragmatic Programmer" does not have the term
> "extreme" in its subject field.
>
> What am I missing? Query.toString looks fine.
>
> Something seems awry, but it could easily be me. Or it could be that
> I'm using CVS HEAD and not the 1.4 branch? Thought I'd report it and
> see what you thought.
I have no idea. Does not seem related to queryparser since the resulting
query looks like it should, doesn't it? Could you please try with the 1.4
branch. Anyway, the 1.4 branch and the CVS Head should behave identical
except for deprecated warnings and maybe fuzzyQueries.
Christoph
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: Two formal questions
Posted by Erik Hatcher <er...@ehatchersolutions.com>.
On Oct 21, 2004, at 1:41 PM, Christoph Goller wrote:
> Furthermore concerning Lucene 1.4.3:
> Erik, before making the new release, I would feel better if
> you could check whether your query-parser works with the current
> branch 1.4.3.
The added back methods all are working fine in my tests (using CVS
HEAD). Thanks!
However, one oddity now comes about in this test case, from Lucene in
Action:
public void testGrouping() throws Exception {
Query query = QueryParser.parse(
"(agile OR extreme) AND methodology",
"subject",
analyzer);
Hits hits = searcher.search(query);
System.out.println("hits.length() = " + hits.length());
System.out.println("query = " + query);
assertHitsIncludeTitle(hits, "Extreme Programming Explained");
assertHitsIncludeTitle(hits, "The Pragmatic Programmer");
}
Here's the output:
hits.length() = 1
query = +(subject:agile subject:extreme) +subject:methodology
Process finished with exit code -1
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: title 'The Pragmatic Programmer'
not found
at lia.common.LiaTestCase.assertHitsIncludeTitle(LiaTestCase.java:54)
at lia.searching.QueryParserTest.testGrouping(QueryParserTest.java:57)
This test previously passed. If I remove the word "extreme" from the
query, it passes. "The Pragmatic Programmer" does not have the term
"extreme" in its subject field.
What am I missing? Query.toString looks fine.
Something seems awry, but it could easily be me. Or it could be that
I'm using CVS HEAD and not the 1.4 branch? Thought I'd report it and
see what you thought.
Erik
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: Two formal questions
Posted by Daniel Naber <da...@t-online.de>.
On Thursday 21 October 2004 19:41, Christoph Goller wrote:
> I think there are enough votes for Bernhard.
> As I nominated Bernhard, what am I supposed to do now?
> I looked already through the Apache pages, but didn't find
> a HOWTO :-)
See http://jakarta.apache.org/site/roles.html
Regards
Daniel
--
http://www.danielnaber.de
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: Two formal questions
Posted by Erik Hatcher <er...@ehatchersolutions.com>.
On Oct 21, 2004, at 1:41 PM, Christoph Goller wrote:
> Furthermore concerning Lucene 1.4.3:
> Erik, before making the new release, I would feel better if
> you could check whether your query-parser works with the current
> branch 1.4.3.
I apologize for the delay. I have meant to do this since you made the
change. I will carve out some time and do that tonight if possible.
It should be easy to make a test case for this though - have a
QueryParser subclass override all the get*Query(...) methods from the
Lucene 1.4.0 API and ensure that it compiles :)
Erik
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Two formal questions
Posted by Christoph Goller <go...@detego-software.de>.
I think there are enough votes for Bernhard.
As I nominated Bernhard, what am I supposed to do now?
I looked already through the Apache pages, but didn't find
a HOWTO :-)
Furthermore concerning Lucene 1.4.3:
Erik, before making the new release, I would feel better if
you could check whether your query-parser works with the current
branch 1.4.3.
Thanks,
Christoph
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: Propose Bernhard as committer
Posted by Otis Gospodnetic <ot...@yahoo.com>.
+1
Otis
--- Christoph Goller <go...@detego-software.de> wrote:
> I would like to propose Bernhard as Lucene committer.
>
> He has contributed a number of valuable and high quality patches
> and I am simply tired of checking and committing all his work :-)
>
> Christoph
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org