You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@druid.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/11/11 22:32:10 UTC

[GitHub] [druid] capistrant opened a new pull request #11913: Batch Indexing short circuits

capistrant opened a new pull request #11913:
URL: https://github.com/apache/druid/pull/11913


   <!-- Thanks for trying to help us make Apache Druid be the best it can be! Please fill out as much of the following information as is possible (where relevant, and remove it when irrelevant) to help make the intention and scope of this PR clear in order to ease review. -->
   
   <!-- Please read the doc for contribution (https://github.com/apache/druid/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) before making this PR. Also, once you open a PR, please _avoid using force pushes and rebasing_ since these make it difficult for reviewers to see what you've changed in response to their reviews. See [the 'If your pull request shows conflicts with master' section](https://github.com/apache/druid/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#if-your-pull-request-shows-conflicts-with-master) for more details. -->
   
   <!-- Replace XXXX with the id of the issue fixed in this PR. Remove this section if there is no corresponding issue. Don't reference the issue in the title of this pull-request. -->
   
   <!-- If you are a committer, follow the PR action item checklist for committers:
   https://github.com/apache/druid/blob/master/dev/committer-instructions.md#pr-and-issue-action-item-checklist-for-committers. -->
   
   ### Description
   
   <!-- Describe the goal of this PR, what problem are you fixing. If there is a corresponding issue (referenced above), it's not necessary to repeat the description here, however, you may choose to keep one summary sentence. -->
   
   <!-- Describe your patch: what did you change in code? How did you fix the problem? -->
   
   <!-- If there are several relatively logically separate changes in this PR, create a mini-section for each of them. For example: -->
   
   Add configurations to `index_hadoop` and `index` task type tuning configs that allow for certain ingestion jobs to short circuit early if they are determined to breach the configured thresholds that have been added by this PR. The defaults for these circuit breaker configs are turned off by default.
   
   short circuit 1: maxSegmentsIngested - short circuits the ingestion job if it is determined that the job will generate a number of segments greater than what is specified in the tuningConfig
   
   short circuit 2: maxIntervalsIngested - short circuits the ingestion job if it is determined that the job will generate a number of segment intervals greater than what is specified in the tuningConfig
   
   These short circuits only apply in certain scenarios:
     * index_hadoop
       * hashed partitioning
         * both the segments circuit breaker and intervals circuit breaker are in effect if the job has to determine partitions
       * single dim partitioning
         * only the intervals circuit breaker is in effect if the job has to determine intervals at runtime
     * index
       * dynamic partitioning
         * only the intervals circuit breaker is in effect if the job has to determine intervals at runtime
       * hashed partitioning
         * both the segments circuit breaker and intervals circuit breaker are in effect if the job has to determine partitions
   
   why not have both circuit breakers in effect for all batch job types?
     * first of all, the circuit breakers only really make sense when the intervals and/or partitions are generated at runtime because this is a spec level config and if the spec knows the partitions and/or intervals due to explicit inclusion in the spec, the thresholds are not really needed.. the spec creator just needs to  not submit that spec.
     * It was not obvious how this would be implemented for index_parallel due to the architecture of that task type
     * It is not possible for dynamic partitioning in the `index` task type, because the partitions are generated dynamically when the segments are being generated.
     * It was not obvious if it was possible to do the segments threshold for single_dim in `index_hadoop` 
   
   Why is this useful?
     * Prevented jobs of unexpected or undesired size.
       * my use case is a multi-tenant cluster where data engineers ingest their own data. we have control over the spec submit, but not what underlying data the spec points to. That is why it is helpful for us to inject these configs to prevent jobs from creating an obscene amount of segments that would hurt the quality of service for other users on the multi-tenant cluster. 
     * even in the case where the spec and data owner are the same. it may be useful for the spec owner to add these in order to guard against mistakenly creating something they did not intend to (perhaps generating far more number of segments than they wanted due to misunderstanding of underlying data being ingested)
   
   <!--
   In each section, please describe design decisions made, including:
    - Choice of algorithms
    - Behavioral aspects. What configuration values are acceptable? How are corner cases and error conditions handled, such as when there are insufficient resources?
    - Class organization and design (how the logic is split between classes, inheritance, composition, design patterns)
    - Method organization and design (how the logic is split between methods, parameters and return types)
    - Naming (class, method, API, configuration, HTTP endpoint, names of emitted metrics)
   -->
   
   
   <!-- It's good to describe an alternative design (or mention an alternative name) for every design (or naming) decision point and compare the alternatives with the designs that you've implemented (or the names you've chosen) to highlight the advantages of the chosen designs and names. -->
   
   <!-- If there was a discussion of the design of the feature implemented in this PR elsewhere (e. g. a "Proposal" issue, any other issue, or a thread in the development mailing list), link to that discussion from this PR description and explain what have changed in your final design compared to your original proposal or the consensus version in the end of the discussion. If something hasn't changed since the original discussion, you can omit a detailed discussion of those aspects of the design here, perhaps apart from brief mentioning for the sake of readability of this PR description. -->
   
   <!-- Some of the aspects mentioned above may be omitted for simple and small changes. -->
   
   <hr>
   
   ##### Key changed/added classes in this PR
    * `JobHelper`
   * `IndexTask`
   * `HashPartitionAnalysis`
   * `HadoopTuningConfig`
   * `HadoopDruidDetermineConfigurationJob`
   
   <hr>
   
   <!-- Check the items by putting "x" in the brackets for the done things. Not all of these items apply to every PR. Remove the items which are not done or not relevant to the PR. None of the items from the checklist below are strictly necessary, but it would be very helpful if you at least self-review the PR. -->
   
   This PR has:
   - [ ] been self-reviewed.
      - [ ] using the [concurrency checklist](https://github.com/apache/druid/blob/master/dev/code-review/concurrency.md) (Remove this item if the PR doesn't have any relation to concurrency.)
   - [ ] added documentation for new or modified features or behaviors.
   - [ ] added Javadocs for most classes and all non-trivial methods. Linked related entities via Javadoc links.
   - [ ] added or updated version, license, or notice information in [licenses.yaml](https://github.com/apache/druid/blob/master/dev/license.md)
   - [ ] added comments explaining the "why" and the intent of the code wherever would not be obvious for an unfamiliar reader.
   - [ ] added unit tests or modified existing tests to cover new code paths, ensuring the threshold for [code coverage](https://github.com/apache/druid/blob/master/dev/code-review/code-coverage.md) is met.
   - [ ] added integration tests.
   - [ ] been tested in a test Druid cluster.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@druid.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@druid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-help@druid.apache.org